A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
Some of these were present in files which should never be read by swig
(and we also had one in the interface file, which is only read by swig).
They are probably leftovers from the time when we were running swig over
lldb headers directly.
While writing this patch, I noticed that some of the #ifdefs were
guarding public functions that were operating on lldb_private data
types. While it wasn't strictly necessary for this patch, I made these
private, as nobody should really be accessing them. This can potentially
break existing code if it happened to use these methods, though it will
only break at build time -- if someone builds against an old header, he
should still be able to link to a new lldb library, since the functions
are still there.
We could keep these public for backward compatbility, but I would argue
that if anyone was actually using these functions for anything, his code
is already broken.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60400
llvm-svn: 357984
I have occasional crashes coming from SBThread::GetExtendedBacktraceThread. The
symptom is that we got true back from HasThreadScope - so we should have a valid
live thread, but then when we go to use the thread, it is not good anymore and we
crash.
I can't spot any obvious cause for this crash, but in looking for same I noticed
that in the current code we check that the thread is valid, THEN we take the stop
locker. We really should do that in the other order, and ensure that the process
will stay stopped before we check our thread is still good. That's what this patch does.
<rdar://problem/47478205>
llvm-svn: 357963
Add a flag to control whether the ModulesDidLoad notification is
called when a module is added. If the notifications are disabled,
the caller must call ModulesDidLoad after adding all the new modules,
but postponing this notification until they're all batched up can
allow for better efficiency than notifying one-by-one.
Change the name of the ModuleList notifier functions that a subclass
can implement to start with 'Notify' to make it clear what they are.
Add a NotifyModulesRemoved.
Add header documentation for the changed/updated methods.
Added defaulted-value 'notify' argument to ModuleList Append,
AppendIfNeeded, and Remove because callers working with a local
ModuleList don't have an obvious idea of what notify means in this
context. When the ModuleList is a part of the Target class, the
notify behavior matters.
DynamicLoaderDarwin has been updated so that libraries being
added/removed are correctly batched up before notifications are
sent. Added the TestModuleLoadedNotifys.py test to run on
Darwin to test this.
<rdar://problem/48293064>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60172
llvm-svn: 357955
For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.
This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178
llvm-svn: 357639
Summary:
modify-python-lldb.py had code to insert python equality operators to
some classes. Some of those classes already had c++ equality operators,
and some didn't.
This makes the situation more consistent, by removing all equality
handilng from modify-python-lldb. Instead, I add c++ operators to
classes where they were missing, and expose them in the swig interface
files so that they are available to python too.
The only tricky case was the SBAddress class, which had an operator==
defined as a free function, which is not handled by swig. This function
cannot be removed without breaking ABI, and we cannot add an extra
operator== member, as that would make equality comparisons ambiguous.
For this class, I define a python __eq__ function by hand and have it
delegate to the operator!=, which I have defined as a member function.
This isn't fully NFC, as the semantics of some equality functions in
python changes slightly, but I believe it changes for the better (e.g.,
previously SBBreakpoint.__eq__ would consider two breakpoints with the
same ID as equal, even if they belonged to different targets; now they
are only equal if they belong to the same target).
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: jdoerfert, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59819
llvm-svn: 357463
This patch limits the scope of the python header to the implementation
of the python script interpreter plugin. ScriptInterpreterPython is now
an abstract interface that doesn't expose any Python specific types, and
is implemented by the ScriptInterpreterPythonImpl.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59976
llvm-svn: 357307
The python plugin uses wrappers generated by swig. For the symbols to be
available, we'd need to link against liblldb, which is not an option
because the symbols could conflict with the static library we are
testing. Instead we define the symbols ourselves in the unit test.
llvm-svn: 356971
Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability. The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427
llvm-svn: 356481
Tablegen doesn't support options that are both flags and take values as
an argument. I noticed this when doing the tablegen rewrite, but forgot
that that affected the reproducer --capture flag.
This patch makes --capture a flag and adds --capture-path to specify a
path for the reproducer. In reality I expect this to be mostly used for
testing, but it could be useful nonetheless.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59238
llvm-svn: 355936
Changing the type in the DUMMY macro to void* doesn't actually fix the
build error, because the argument type is deducted from the template (as
opposed to when serializing through the instrumentation framework, where
this would matter). Instead I've added a proper instance of log_append
that takes function pointers and logs their address.
llvm-svn: 355863
Callbacks in the LLDB_RECORD_DUMMY macros were causing build failures
with the Xcode project. This patch replaces the function pointers with
void pointers so they can be logged.
llvm-svn: 355842
Summary:
Our python version of the SB API has (the python equivalent of)
operator bool, but the C++ version doesn't.
This is because our python operators are added by modify-python-lldb.py,
which performs postprocessing on the swig-generated interface files.
In this patch, I add the "operator bool" to all SB classes which have an
IsValid method (which is the same logic used by modify-python-lldb.py).
This way, we make the two interfaces more constent, and it allows us to
rely on swig's automatic syntesis of python __nonzero__ methods instead
of doing manual fixups.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg, jfb, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792
llvm-svn: 355824
Add a macro that doesn't actually record anything but still toggles the
API boundary. Removing just the register macros for lldb::thread_t
wasn't sufficient on NetBSD because the serialization logic needed the
underlying type to be complete.
This macro should be used by functions that are currently unsupported,
as they might trip the API boundary logic. This should be easy using the
lldb-instr tool.
llvm-svn: 355709
The current record macros already log the function being called. This
patch extends the macros to also log their input arguments and removes
explicit logging from the SB API.
This might degrade the amount of information in some cases (because of
smarter casts or efforts to log return values). However I think this is
outweighed by the increased coverage and consistency. Furthermore, using
the reproducer infrastructure, diagnosing bugs in the API layer should
become much easier compared to relying on log messages.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59101
llvm-svn: 355649
As discussed on the mailing list, default serialization for thread ids
is not correct, even if they're represented as basic types. I'm
purposely leaving the corresponding record macros in place so that we
don't break the API boundary detection.
llvm-svn: 355610
Summary:
If LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON is set, some functions are unavailable but
SBReproducer assumes they are. Let's conditionally register those functions
since they are conditionally declared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59056
llvm-svn: 355575
/BIGOBJ is used to bypass certain COFF file format
limitations and is used with, unsurprisingly, very big
object files. This file has grown large enough that it
needs this flag in order to compile successfully.
llvm-svn: 355559
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
On Windows, lldb::thread_t is just a void*, so the we will try to
allocate an object of type void when deserializing. Undef this for now
until we support void* arguments.
llvm-svn: 355519
Now that the LLDB instrumentation macros are in place, we should use
that to test reproducer replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58565
llvm-svn: 355470
This patch adds the SBReproducer macros needed to capture and reply the
corresponding calls. This patch was generated by running the lldb-instr
tool on the API source files.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475
llvm-svn: 355459
When running the test suite with the instrumentation macros, I noticed
two lldb-mi tests regressed. The issue was the copy constructor of
SBLineEntry. Without the macros the returned value would be elided, but
with the macros the copy constructor was called. The latter using ::IsValid
to determine whether the underlying opaque pointer should be set. This
is likely a remnant of when ::IsValid would only check the validity of the
smart pointer. In SBLineEntry however, it actually forwards to
LineEntry::IsValid().
So what happened here was that because of the macros the copy
constructor was called. The opaque pointer was valid but the LineEntry
didn't consider itself valid. So the copied-to object ended up default
initialized.
This patch replaces all checks for IsValid in copy (assignment)
constructors with checks for the opaque pointer itself.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58946
llvm-svn: 355458
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
This patch adds the necessary logic to capture and replay commands
entered into the command interpreter. A DataRecorder shadows the input
and writes its data to a know file. During replay this file is used as
the command interpreter's input.
It's possible to the command interpreter more than once, with a
different input source. We support this scenario by using multiple
buffers. The synchronization for this takes place at the SB layer, where
we create a new recorder every time the debugger input is changed.
During replay we use the corresponding buffer as input.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58564
llvm-svn: 355249
Summary:
The clang headers are useful when dealing with clang modules. There is also a
way to get to the clang headers from the SB API so it would be nice if they were
also available when we just build lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58793
llvm-svn: 355149
As per the discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190218/048007.html
This commit implements option (3):
> Go back to initializing the reproducer before the rest of the debugger.
> The method wouldn't be instrumented and guarantee no other SB methods are
> called or SB objects are constructed. The initialization then becomes part
> of the replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58410
llvm-svn: 354631
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The code in LLDB assumes that CompilerType and friends use the size 0
as a sentinel value to signal an error. This works for C++, where no
zero-sized type exists, but in many other programming languages
(including I believe C) types of size zero are possible and even
common. This is a particular pain point in swift-lldb, where extra
code exists to double-check that a type is *really* of size zero and
not an error at various locations.
To remedy this situation, this patch starts by converting
CompilerType::getBitSize() and getByteSize() to return an optional
result. To avoid wasting space, I hand-rolled my own optional data
type assuming that no type is larger than what fits into 63
bits. Follow-up patches would make similar changes to the ValueObject
hierarchy.
rdar://problem/47178964
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56688
llvm-svn: 351214
