* This is a reattempted commit due to a previous builtbot failure
- Now using a env var to determine whether to run the test, as
someone might have built liblldbIntelFeatures.so without intelPT
support, which would make this test fail.
Summary:
Depends on D76872.
There was no test for the Intel PT support on LLDB, so I'm creating one, which
will help making progress on solid grounds.
The test is skipped if the Intel PT plugin library is not built.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, kusmour, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77107
This patch was reverted because it introduced a failure in
TestHelloWorld.py. The reason for that was running "ls" shell command
failed as it was evaluated in an environment with an empty path. This
has now been fixed with D77123, which ensures that all shell commands
inherit the host environment, so this patch should be safe to recommit.
The original commit message was:
A defensive check in ProcessLauncherWindows meant that we would never
attempt to launch a process with a completely empty environment -- the
host environment would be used instead. Instead, I make the function add
an extra null wchar_t at the end of an empty environment. The
documentation on this is a bit fuzzy, but it seems to be what is needed
to make windows accept these kinds of environments.
Reviewers: amccarth, friss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76835
Summary:
Depends on D76872.
There was no test for the Intel PT support on LLDB, so I'm creating one, which
will help making progress on solid grounds.
The test is skipped if the Intel PT plugin library is not built.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, kusmour, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77107
Summary:
Depends on D76872.
There was no test for the Intel PT support on LLDB, so I'm creating one, which
will help making progress on solid grounds.
The test is skipped if the Intel PT plugin library is not built.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, kusmour, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77107
Summary:
Several lldb-vscode users have noticed that when a source map rule is invalid (because a folder doesn't exist anymore), the rest of the source maps from their configurations are not applied.
This happens because lldb-vscode executes a single "settings set target.source-map" command with all the source maps and LLDB processes them one by one until one fails.
Instead of doing this, we can process in LLDB all the source map rules and apply the valid ones instead of failing fast.
Reviewers: clayborg, labath, kusmour, aadsm
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77186
Summary:
On most hosts we were running shell commands with an empty environment.
The only exception was windows, which was inheriting the host enviroment
mostly by accident.
Running the commands in an empty environment does not sound like a
sensible default, so this patch changes Host::RunShellCommand to inherit
the host environment. This impacts both commands run via
SBPlatform::Run (in case of host platforms), as well as the "platform
shell" CLI command.
Reviewers: jingham, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77123
Summary:
If we don't have a current frame then we can still run many expressions
as long as we have an active target. With this patch `expect_expr` directly
calls the target's EvaluateExpression function when there is no current frame.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77197
This reverts commit because of test failures in TestHelloWorld.
It seems that this test (specifically running "ls" as a platform shell
command) depended on the implicit passing of the host environment.
The fix should be fairly simple (inherit the environment explicitly),
but it may take me a while to figure where exactly to do that. Revert
while I am figuring that out.
Summary:
A defensive check in ProcessLauncherWindows meant that we would never
attempt to launch a process with a completely empty environment -- the
host environment would be used instead. Instead, I make the function add
an extra null wchar_t at the end of an empty environment. The
documentation on this is a bit fuzzy, but it seems to be what is needed
to make windows accept these kinds of environments.
Reviewers: amccarth, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76835
Summary:
D73024 seems to have fixed one set crash, but it introduced another.
Namely, if a class contains a covariant method returning itself, the
logic in MaybeCompleteReturnType could cause us to attempt a recursive
import, which would result in an assertion failure in
clang::DeclContext::removeDecl.
For some reason, this only manifested itself if the class contained at
least two member variables, and the class itself was imported as a
result of a recursive covariant import.
This patch fixes the crash by not attempting to import classes which are
already completed in MaybeCompleteReturnType. However, it's not clear to
me if this is the right fix, or if this should be handled automatically
by functions lower in the stack.
Reviewers: teemperor, shafik
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76840
Commit 83c81c0a46 enabled Fix-Its for top-level
expressions which change the error message of this test here as Clang comes
up with a strange Fix-It for this expression. This patch just changes the
test to declare a void variable so that Clang doesn't see a way to
recover with a Fix-It and change the error message.
Summary:
Currently top-level expressions won't automatically get Fix-Its applied. The reason
for that is that we only set the `m_fixed_text` member if we have a wrapping
source code (I.e. `m_source_code` is not zero and is wrapping some expressions).
This patch just always sets `m_fixed_text` to get this working.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77042
In ObjectFileMachO we construct the symbol table from multiple
sources -- primarily the binary's nlist records, but when the nlist
symbols have been stripped, we would augment those with function
start address from the LC_FUNCTION_STARTS or eh_frame. This patch
adds another source of symbols - the exported symbols that the
dynamic linker, dyld, uses at runtime from its trie structure. This
provides us names and addresses for these functions/data.
This patch removes the code from ParseSymtab that would reject an
empty symbol table / nlist source. It adds a new symbols_added
set which tracks the address of every symbol we've added to the
symtab. We add symbols in most-information-ful order, and before
adding a symbol from less-informational-ful source (e.g.
LC_FUNCTION_STARTS with no function name), we check if that symbol
has already been added.
On targets with thumb code generation, instead of using the 0th bit
in these addresses in FunctionStarts (or now the trie entries), we
use the data field of FunctionStarts (formerly used to track if the
func_start should be added) and a flag for the trie entries to
encode this, and only store the actual addresses in the symbols_seen
and these vectors.
<rdar://problem/50791451>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76758
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.
This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.
This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
Summary:
The DAP specifies the following for the SetBreakpoints request:
The breakpoints returned are in the same order as the elements of the 'breakpoints' arguments
This was not followed, as lldb-vscode was returning the breakpoints in a different order, because they were first stored into a map, and then traversed. Of course, maps normally don't preserve ordering.
See this log I captured:
-->
{"command":"setBreakpoints",
"arguments":{
"source":{
"name":"main.cpp",
"path":"/Users/wallace/fbsource/xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"
},
"lines":[6,10,11],
"breakpoints":[{"line":6},{"line":10},{"line":11}],
"sourceModified":false
},
"type":"request",
"seq":3
}
<--
{"body":{
"breakpoints":[
{"id":1, "line":11,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":2,"line":6,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true},
{"id":3,"line":10,"source":{"name":"main.cpp","path":"xplat/sand/test-projects/buck-cpp/main.cpp"},"verified":true}]},
"command":"setBreakpoints",
"request_seq":3,
"seq":0,
"success":true,
"type":"response"
}
As you can see, the order was not respected. This was causing the IDE not to be able to disable/enable breakpoints by clicking on them in the breakpoint view in the lower corner of the Debug tab.
This diff fixes the ordering problem. The traversal + querying was done very fast in O(nlogn) time. I'm keeping the same complexity.
I also updated a couple of tests to account for the ordering.
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, kusmour, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76891
Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed
on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cause was that lldb looked
up the line location for an artificial frame by subtracting 1 from the
frame's address. For artificial frames, the subtraction must not happen
because the address is already exact.
---
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
This reverts commit 6905394d15. The
changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly because lldb is
subtracting an offset from the DW_AT_call_pc address used for the
artificial frame:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/7171/steps/test/logs/stdio
/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/main.cpp:6:17: error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-NEXT: frame #1: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`func3() at main.cpp:14:3 [opt] [artificial]
^
<stdin>:3:2: note: scanning from here
frame #1: 0x0000000000401127 a.out`func3() at main.cpp:13:4 [opt] [artificial]
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
Summary:
Detection of C strings does not work well for pointers. If the value object holding a (char*) pointer does not have an address (e.g., if it is a temp), the value is not considered a C string and its formatting is left to DumpDataExtractor rather than the special handling in ValueObject::DumpPrintableRepresentation. This leads to inconsistent outputs, e.g., in escaping non-ASCII characters. See the test for an example; the second test expectation is not met (without this patch). With this patch, the C string detection only insists that the pointer value is valid. The patch makes the code consistent with how the pointer is obtained in ValueObject::ReadPointedString.
Reviewers: teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76650
There an option: EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetResultIsInternal to indicate
whether the result number should be returned to the pool or not. It
got broken when the PersistentExpressionState was refactored.
This fixes the issue and provides a test of the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76532
This adds a formatter for libc++ std::unique_ptr.
I also refactored GetValueOfCompressedPair(...) out of LibCxxList.cpp since I need the same functionality and it made sense to share it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76476
The newly introduced tests for unsetting environment variables
is failing on Windows. Skip the test there to allow investigation.
It seems like setting inherit-env to false was never tested
before. Could it be that the Windows process launcher doesn't
honor this setting?
Summary:
The interactions between the environment settings (`target.env-vars`,
`target.inherit-env`) and the inferior life-cycle are non-obvious
today. For example, if `target.inherit-env` is set, the `target.env-vars`
setting will be augmented with the contents of the host environment
the first time the launch environment is queried (usually at
launch). After that point, toggling `target.inherit-env` will have no
effect as there's no tracking of what comes from the host and what is
a user setting.
This patch computes the environment every time it is queried rather
than updating the contents of the `target.env-vars` property. This
means that toggling the `target.inherit-env` property later will now
have the intended effect.
This patch also adds a `target.unset-env-vars` settings that one can
use to remove variables from the launch environment. Using this, you
can inherit all but a few of the host environment.
The way the launch environment is constructed is:
1/ if `target.inherit-env` is set, then read the host environment
into the launch environment.
2/ Remove for the environment the variables listed in
`target.unset-env`.
3/ Augment the launch environment with the contents of
`target.env-vars`. This overrides any common values with the host
environment.
The one functional difference here that could be seen as a regression
is that `target.env-vars` will not contain the inferior environment
after launch. The patch implements a better alternative in the
`target show-launch-environment` command which will return the
environment computed through the above rules.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76470
Summary:
When no arguments or environment is provided to SBTarget::LaunchSimple,
make it use the values surrently set in the target properties. You can
get the current behavior back by passing an empty array instead.
It seems like using the target defaults is a much more intuitive
behavior for those APIs. It's unllikely that anyone passed NULL/None to
this API after having set properties in order to explicitely ignore them.
One direct application of this change is within the testsuite. We have
plenty of tests calling LaunchSimple and passing None as environment.
If you passed --inferior-env to dotest.py to, for example, set
(DY)LD_LIBRARY_PATH, it wouldn't be taken into account.
Reviewers: jingham, labath, #libc_abi!
Subscribers: libcxx-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76045
Summary:
The TargetProperties constructor invokes a series of callbacks to
prime the properties from the default ones. The one callback in
charge of updating the inferior environment was commented out
because it crashed.
The reason for the crash is that TargetProperties is a parent class
of Target and the callbacks were invoked using a Target that was
not fully initialized. This patch moves the initial callback
invocations to a separate function that can be called at the end
the Target constructor, thus preventing the crash.
One existing test had to be modified, because the initialization of
the environment properties now take place at the time the target is
created, not at the first use of the environment (usually launch
time).
The added test checks that the LaunchInfo object returned by
the target has been primed with the values from the settings.
Reviewers: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76009
Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated after each expression evaluation (assuming statistics are enabled).
From what I understand the idea is that this could be used to define how well LLDB's
expression evaluator is working.
Currently all expressions are considered successful unless the user passes an explicit
positive element counting to the expression command (with the `-Z` flag) and then passes
an expression that successfully evaluates to a type that doesn't support element counting.
Expressions that fail to parse, execute or any other outcome are considered successful
at the moment which means we nearly always have a 100% expression evaluation
success rate.
This patch makes that expressions that fail to parse or execute to count as failed
expressions.
We can't know whether the expression failed because of an user error
of because LLDB couldn't correctly parse/compile it, but I would argue that this is
still an improvement. Assuming that the percentage of valid user expressions stays
mostly constant over time (which seems like a reasonable assumption), then this
way we can still see if we are doing relatively better/worse from release to release.
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76280
Summary: Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636, I'm introducing a basic version of Environment in the API. More functionalities can be added as needed.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits, diazhector98
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76111
Summary:
If no custom launching is used, lldb-vscode launches a program with an empty environment by default. In some scenarios, the user might want to simply use the same environment as the IDE to have a set of working environment variables (e.g. PATH wouldn't be empty). In fact, most DAPs in VSCode have this behavior by default. In other cases the user definitely needs to set their custom environment, which is already supported. To make the first case easier for the user (e.g. not having to copy the PATH to the launch.json every time they want to debug simple programs that rely on PATH), a new option is now offered. inheritEnvironment will launch the program copying its own environment, and it's just a boolean flag.
{F11347695}
Reviewers: clayborg, aadsm, diazhector98, kusmour
Subscribers: labath, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74636
