add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
add_llvm_library and add_llvm_executable may need to create new targets with
appropriate dependencies. As a result, it is not sufficient in some
configurations (namely LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on) to only call
add_dependencies(). Instead, the explicit TableGen dependencies must
be passed to add_llvm_library() or add_llvm_executable() using the DEPENDS
keyword.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74930
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
In the previous state, we were relying on forcing the linker to include
all libraries in the final binary and the global initializer to self-register
every piece of the system. This change help moving away from this model, and
allow users to compose pieces more freely. The current change is only "fixing"
the dialect registration and avoiding relying on "whole link" for the passes.
The translation is still relying on the global registry, and some refactoring
is needed to make this all more convenient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74461
Summary:
This patch is a step towards enabling BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on, which
builds most libraries as DLLs instead of statically linked libraries.
The main effect of this is that incremental build times are greatly
reduced, since usually only one library need be relinked in response
to isolated code changes.
The bulk of this patch is fixing incorrect usage of cmake, where library
dependencies are listed under add_dependencies rather than under
target_link_libraries or under the LINK_LIBS tag. Correct usage should be
like this:
add_dependencies(MLIRfoo MLIRfooIncGen)
target_link_libraries(MLIRfoo MLIRlib1 MLIRlib2)
A separate issue is that in cmake, dependencies between static libraries
are automatically included in dependencies. In the above example, if MLIBlib1
depends on MLIRlib2, then it is sufficient to have only MLIRlib1 in the
target_link_libraries. When compiling with shared libraries, it is necessary
to have both MLIRlib1 and MLIRlib2 specified if MLIRfoo uses symbols from both.
Reviewers: mravishankar, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, vchuravy, inouehrs, mehdi_amini, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: Joonsoo, merge_guards_bot, jholewinski, mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, csigg, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, herhut, aartbik, liufengdb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73653
Summary:
Barrier is a simple operation that takes no arguments and returns
nothing, but implies a side effect (synchronization of all threads)
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgorny, guansong, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72400
