Commit Graph

24163 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Hahn
15224408f0 [VPlan] Use VPUser for VPWidenSelectRecipe operands (NFC).
VPWidenSelectRecipe already contains a VPUser, but it is not used. This
patch updates the code related to VPWidenSelectRecipe to use VPUser for
its operands.

Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin

Reviewed By: gilr

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80219
2020-05-24 13:58:08 +01:00
Matt Arsenault
cdd006eec9 SimplifyCFG: Clean up optforfuzzing implementation
This should function as any other SimplifyCFGOption rather than having
the transform check and specially consider the attribute itself.
2020-05-23 13:49:50 -04:00
Matt Arsenault
27fe841aa6 AMDGPU: Refine rcp/rsq intrinsic folding for modern FP rules
We have to assume undef could be an snan, which would need quieting so
returning qnan is safer than undef. Also consider strictfp, and don't
care if the result rounded.
2020-05-23 13:28:36 -04:00
Michal Paszkowski
335de55fa3 Revert "Added a new IRCanonicalizer pass."
This reverts commit 14d358537f.
2020-05-23 13:51:43 +02:00
Michal Paszkowski
14d358537f Added a new IRCanonicalizer pass.
Summary:
Added a new IRCanonicalizer pass which aims to transform LLVM modules into
a canonical form by reordering and renaming instructions while preserving the
same semantics. The canonicalizer makes it easier to spot semantic differences
when diffing two modules which have undergone different passes.

Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9WMijSOEUg

Reviewed by: plotfi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66029
2020-05-23 12:45:53 +02:00
Craig Topper
7392820f98 [Align] Remove operations on MaybeAlign that asserted that it had a defined value.
If the caller needs to reponsible for making sure the MaybeAlign
has a value, then we should just make the caller convert it to an Align
with operator*.

I explicitly deleted the relational comparison operators that
were being inherited from Optional. It's unclear what the meaning
of two MaybeAligns were one is defined and the other isn't
should be. So make the caller reponsible for defining the behavior.

I left the ==/!= operators from Optional. But now that exposed a
weird quirk that ==/!= between Align and MaybeAlign required the
MaybeAlign to be defined. But now we use the operator== from
Optional that takes an Optional and the Value.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80455
2020-05-22 21:54:28 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
024098ae53 [VectorCombine] set preserve alias analysis
As noted in D80236, moving the pass in the pipeline exposed this
shortcoming. Extra work to recalculate the alias results showed
up as a compile-time slowdown.
2020-05-22 16:25:16 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
6438ea45e0 [VectorCombine] position pass after SLP in the optimization pipeline rather than before
There are 2 known problem patterns shown in the test diffs here:
vector horizontal ops (an x86 specialization) and vector reductions.

SLP has greater ability to match and fold those than vector-combine,
so let SLP have first chance at that.

This is a quick fix while we continue to improve vector-combine and
possibly canonicalize to reduction intrinsics.

In the longer term, we should improve matching of these patterns
because if they were created in the "bad" forms shown here, then we
would miss optimizing them.

I'm not sure what is happening with alias analysis on the addsub test.
The old pass manager now shows an extra line for that, and we see an
improvement that comes from SLP vectorizing a store. I don't know
what's missing with the new pass manager to make that happen.
Strangely, I can't reproduce the behavior if I compile from C++ with
clang and invoke the new PM with "-fexperimental-new-pass-manager".

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80236
2020-05-22 12:22:44 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
2f7c24fe30 [InstCombine] (A + B) + B --> A + (B << 1)
This eliminates a use of 'B', so it can enable follow-on transforms
as well as improve analysis/codegen.

The PhaseOrdering test was added for D61726, and that shows
the limits of instcombine vs. real reassociation. We would
need to run some form of CSE to collapse that further.

The intermediate variable naming here is intentional because
there's a test at llvm/test/Bitcode/value-with-long-name.ll
that would break with the usual nameless value. I'm not sure
how to improve that test to be more robust.

The naming may also be helpful to debug regressions if this
change exposes weaknesses in the reassociation pass for example.
2020-05-22 11:46:59 -04:00
Anh Tuyen Tran
13bf6039c9 Title: [LV] Handle Fold-Tail of loops with vectorizarion factor equal to 1
Summary:
When handling loops whose VF is 1, fold-tail vectorization sets the
backedge taken count of the original loop with a vector of a single
element. This causes type-mismatch during instruction generartion.

The purpose of this patch is toto address the case of VF==1.

Reviewer: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), fhahn (Florian Hahn), gilr (Gil Rapaport), rengolin (Renato Golin)

Reviewed By: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), fhahn (Florian Hahn)

Subscribers: Ayal (Ayal Zaks), rkruppe (Hanna Kruppe), bmahjour (Bardia Mahjour), rogfer01 (Roger Ferrer Ibanez), vkmr (Vineet Kumar), bollu (Siddharth Bhat), hiraditya (Aditya Kumar), llvm-commits (Mailing List llvm-commits)

Tag: LLVM

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79976
2020-05-22 13:30:56 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
21f7cf4057 [SLP] fix verification check for valid IR
This is a fix for PR45965 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45965 -
which was left out of D80106 because of a test failure.

SLP does its own mini-CSE after potentially creating redundant instructions,
so we need to wait for that to complete before running the verifier.
Otherwise, we will see a test failure for
test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/crash_vectorizeTree.ll (not changed here)
because a phi temporarily has identical but different incoming values for
the same incoming block.

A related, but independent, test that would have been altered here was
fixed with:
rG880df55

The test was escaping verification in SLP without this change because we
were not running verifyFunction() unless SLP actually changed the IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80401
2020-05-22 09:15:27 -04:00
Matt Arsenault
88c20fa3d2 InstCombine: Add constant folding/simplify for amdgcn.ldexp intrinsic
This really belongs in InstructionSimplify since it doesn't introduce
new instructions. Put it in instcombine to avoid increasing the number
of passes considering target intrinsics.

I also noticed that we seem to now be interpreting strictfp attributes
on call sites, so try to handle that.
2020-05-22 08:21:38 -04:00
Roman Lebedev
cd921accf9 [NFC] InstCombineNegator: use auto where type is obvious from the cast 2020-05-22 11:14:54 +03:00
Max Kazantsev
403810557b [InstCombine] Sink pure instructions down to return and unreachable blocks
If the only user of `Instr` is in a return or unreachable block, we can
sink `Instr` to the`User` safely (unless it reads/writes memory).
Return or unreachable blocks are guaranteed to execute zero
or one time, and `Instr` always dominates `User`, so they either will
be executed together (execution of `User` always implies execution
of `Instr`) or not executed at all.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80120
Reviewed By: asbirlea, jdoerfert
2020-05-22 14:33:42 +07:00
Dinar Temirbulatov
df3b95bc0a [SLP][NFC] PR45269 getVectorElementSize() is slow
The algorithm inside getVectorElementSize() is almost O(x^2) complexity and
when, for example, we compile MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/shared_sha256.c
with 1k instructions inside sha256_transform() function that resulted in almost
~800k iterations. The following change improves the algorithm with the map to
a liner complexity.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80241
2020-05-21 17:26:50 +02:00
Sam Parker
259eb619ff Revert "[CostModel] Unify Intrinsic Costs."
This reverts commit de71def3f5.

This is causing some very large changes, so I'm first going to break
this patch down and re-commit in parts.
2020-05-21 12:50:24 +01:00
Ehud Katz
111ddc57d3 [FlattenCFG] Fix MergeIfRegion in case then-path is empty
In case the then-path of an if-region is empty, then merging with the
else-path should be handled with the inverse of the condition (leading
to that path).

Fix PR37662

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78881
2020-05-21 14:06:44 +03:00
Roman Lebedev
b2df961231 [IndVarSimplify][LoopUtils] Avoid TOCTOU/ordering issues (PR45835)
Summary:
Currently, `rewriteLoopExitValues()`'s logic is roughly as following:
> Loop over each incoming value in each PHI node.
> Query whether the SCEV for that incoming value is high-cost.
> Expand the SCEV.
> Perform sanity check (`isValidRewrite()`, D51582)
> Record the info
> Afterwards, see if we can drop the loop given replacements.
> Maybe perform replacements.

The problem is that we interleave SCEV cost checking and expansion.
This is A Problem, because `isHighCostExpansion()` takes special care
to not bill for the expansions that were already expanded, and we can reuse.

While it makes sense in general - if we know that we will expand some SCEV,
all the other SCEV's costs should account for that, which might cause
some of them to become non-high-cost too, and cause chain reaction.

But that isn't what we are doing here. We expand *all* SCEV's, unconditionally.
So every next SCEV's cost will be affected by the already-performed expansions
for previous SCEV's. Even if we are not planning on keeping
some of the expansions we performed.

Worse yet, this current "bonus" depends on the exact PHI node
incoming value processing order. This is completely wrong.

As an example of an issue, see @dmajor's `pr45835.ll` - if we happen to have
a PHI node with two(!) identical high-cost incoming values for the same basic blocks,
we would decide first time around that it is high-cost, expand it,
and immediately decide that it is not high-cost because we have an expansion
that we could reuse (because we expanded it right before, temporarily),
and replace the second incoming value but not the first one;
thus resulting in a broken PHI.

What we instead should do for now, is not perform any expansions
until after we've queried all the costs.

Later, in particular after `isValidRewrite()` is an assertion (D51582)
we could improve upon that, but in a more coherent fashion.

See [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45835 | PR45835 ]]

Reviewers: dmajor, reames, mkazantsev, fhahn, efriedma

Reviewed By: dmajor, mkazantsev

Subscribers: smeenai, nikic, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits, dmajor

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79787
2020-05-21 13:05:55 +03:00
Benjamin Kramer
5b0d1f04bf Fix a layering violation by not depending from Transforms/Utils on Transforms/Scalar.
NFC.
2020-05-21 09:51:58 +02:00
Sam Parker
de71def3f5 [CostModel] Unify Intrinsic Costs.
With the two getIntrinsicInstrCosts folded into one, now fold in the
scalar/code-size orientated getIntrinsicCost. This involved sinking
cost of the TTIImpl into the base implementation, as it performs no
target checks. The opcodes remaining were memcpy, cttz and ctlz which
now have special handling in the BasicTTI implementation.
getInstructionThroughput can now directly return the result of
getUserCost.

This had required a change in the AMDGPU backend for fabs and its
always 'free'. I've also changed the X86 backend to return '1' for
any intrinsic when the CostKind isn't RecipThroughput.

Though this intended to be a non-functional change, there are many
paths being combined here so I would be very surprised if this didn't
have an effect.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80012
2020-05-21 07:38:25 +01:00
Yevgeny Rouban
8138487468 [BrachProbablityInfo] Set edge probabilities at once and fix calcMetadataWeights()
Hide the method that allows setting probability for particular edge
and introduce a public method that sets probabilities for all
outgoing edges at once.
Setting individual edge probability is error prone. More over it is
difficult to check that the total probability is 1.0 because there is
no easy way to know when the user finished setting all
the probabilities.

Related bug is fixed in BranchProbabilityInfo::calcMetadataWeights().
Changing unreachable branch probabilities to raw(1) and distributing
the rest (oldProbability - raw(1)) over the reachable branches could
introduce total probability inaccuracy bigger than 1/numOfBranches.

Reviewers: yamauchi, ebrevnov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79396
2020-05-21 12:52:37 +07:00
Juneyoung Lee
d9a4a24413 Add CanonicalizeFreezeInLoops pass
Summary:
If an induction variable is frozen and used, SCEV yields imprecise result
because it doesn't say anything about frozen variables.

Due to this reason, performance degradation happened after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76483 is merged, causing
SCEV yield imprecise result and preventing LSR to optimize a loop.

The suggested solution here is to add a pass which canonicalizes frozen variables
inside a loop. To be specific, it pushes freezes out of the loop by freezing
the initial value and step values instead & dropping nsw/nuw flags from instructions used by freeze.
This solution was also mentioned at https://reviews.llvm.org/D70623 .

Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, lebedev.ri, fhahn, jdoerfert

Reviewed By: fhahn

Subscribers: nikic, mgorny, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits, sanwou01, nlopes

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77523
2020-05-21 09:29:29 +09:00
Eli Friedman
f26bdb539e Make Value::getPointerAlignment() return an Align, not a MaybeAlign.
If we don't know anything about the alignment of a pointer, Align(1) is
still correct: all pointers are at least 1-byte aligned.

Included in this patch is a bugfix for an issue discovered during this
cleanup: pointers with "dereferenceable" attributes/metadata were
assumed to be aligned according to the type of the pointer.  This
wasn't intentional, as far as I can tell, so Loads.cpp was fixed to
stop making this assumption. Frontends may need to be updated.  I
updated clang's handling of C++ references, and added a release note for
this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80072
2020-05-20 16:37:20 -07:00
Roman Lebedev
55430f53f3 [InstCombine] insertelement is negatible if both sources are negatible
----------------------------------------
define <2 x i4> @negate_insertelement(<2 x i4> %src, i4 %a, i32 %x, <2 x i4> %b) {
%0:
  %t0 = sub <2 x i4> { 0, 0 }, %src
  %t1 = sub i4 0, %a
  %t2 = insertelement <2 x i4> %t0, i4 %t1, i32 %x
  %t3 = sub <2 x i4> %b, %t2
  ret <2 x i4> %t3
}
=>
define <2 x i4> @negate_insertelement(<2 x i4> %src, i4 %a, i32 %x, <2 x i4> %b) {
%0:
  %t2.neg = insertelement <2 x i4> %src, i4 %a, i32 %x
  %t3 = add <2 x i4> %t2.neg, %b
  ret <2 x i4> %t3
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
2020-05-20 21:44:31 +03:00
Roman Lebedev
ebed96fdbf [InstCombine] Negator: extractelement is negatible if src is negatible
----------------------------------------
define i4 @negate_extractelement(<2 x i4> %x, i32 %y, i4 %z) {
%0:
  %t0 = sub <2 x i4> { 0, 0 }, %x
  call void @use_v2i4(<2 x i4> %t0)
  %t1 = extractelement <2 x i4> %t0, i32 %y
  %t2 = sub i4 %z, %t1
  ret i4 %t2
}
=>
define i4 @negate_extractelement(<2 x i4> %x, i32 %y, i4 %z) {
%0:
  %t0 = sub <2 x i4> { 0, 0 }, %x
  call void @use_v2i4(<2 x i4> %t0)
  %t1.neg = extractelement <2 x i4> %x, i32 %y
  %t2 = add i4 %t1.neg, %z
  ret i4 %t2
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
2020-05-20 21:44:31 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks
8a88755610 Reland [X86] Codegen for preallocated
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 for the preallocated IR constructs
and LangRef changes.

In X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(), if a call is preallocated, record
each argument's offset from the stack pointer and the total stack
adjustment. Associate the call Value with an integer index. Store the
info in X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index as the key.

This adds two new target independent ISDOpcodes and two new target
dependent Opcodes corresponding to @llvm.call.preallocated.{setup,arg}.

The setup ISelDAG node takes in a chain and outputs a chain and a
SrcValue of the preallocated call Value. It is lowered to a target
dependent node with the SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by
looking in X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to an
%esp adjustment, the exact amount determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.

The arg ISelDAG node takes in a chain, a SrcValue of the preallocated
call Value, and the arg index int constant. It produces a chain and the
pointer fo the arg. It is lowered to a target dependent node with the
SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to a
lea of the stack pointer plus an offset determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.

Force any function containing a preallocated call to use the frame
pointer.

Does not yet handle a setup without a call, or a conditional call.
Does not yet handle musttail. That requires a LangRef change first.

Tried to look at all references to inalloca and see if they apply to
preallocated. I've made preallocated versions of tests testing inalloca
whenever possible and when they make sense (e.g. not alloca related,
inalloca edge cases).

Aside from the tests added here, I checked that this codegen produces
correct code for something like

```
struct A {
        A();
        A(A&&);
        ~A();
};

void bar() {
        foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(A(), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8);
}
```

by replacing the inalloca version of the .ll file with the appropriate
preallocated code. Running the executable produces the same results as
using the current inalloca implementation.

Reverted due to unexpectedly passing tests, added REQUIRES: asserts for reland.

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77689
2020-05-20 11:25:44 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
b8cbff51d3 Revert "[X86] Codegen for preallocated"
This reverts commit 810567dc69.

Some tests are unexpectedly passing
2020-05-20 10:04:55 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
810567dc69 [X86] Codegen for preallocated
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D74651 for the preallocated IR constructs
and LangRef changes.

In X86TargetLowering::LowerCall(), if a call is preallocated, record
each argument's offset from the stack pointer and the total stack
adjustment. Associate the call Value with an integer index. Store the
info in X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index as the key.

This adds two new target independent ISDOpcodes and two new target
dependent Opcodes corresponding to @llvm.call.preallocated.{setup,arg}.

The setup ISelDAG node takes in a chain and outputs a chain and a
SrcValue of the preallocated call Value. It is lowered to a target
dependent node with the SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by
looking in X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to an
%esp adjustment, the exact amount determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.

The arg ISelDAG node takes in a chain, a SrcValue of the preallocated
call Value, and the arg index int constant. It produces a chain and the
pointer fo the arg. It is lowered to a target dependent node with the
SrcValue replaced with the integer index key by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo. In
X86TargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter() this is lowered to a
lea of the stack pointer plus an offset determined by looking in
X86MachineFunctionInfo with the integer index key.

Force any function containing a preallocated call to use the frame
pointer.

Does not yet handle a setup without a call, or a conditional call.
Does not yet handle musttail. That requires a LangRef change first.

Tried to look at all references to inalloca and see if they apply to
preallocated. I've made preallocated versions of tests testing inalloca
whenever possible and when they make sense (e.g. not alloca related,
inalloca edge cases).

Aside from the tests added here, I checked that this codegen produces
correct code for something like

```
struct A {
        A();
        A(A&&);
        ~A();
};

void bar() {
        foo(foo(foo(foo(foo(A(), 4), 5), 6), 7), 8);
}
```

by replacing the inalloca version of the .ll file with the appropriate
preallocated code. Running the executable produces the same results as
using the current inalloca implementation.

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77689
2020-05-20 09:20:38 -07:00
Sam Parker
8cc911fa5b [NFCI][CostModel] Refactor getIntrinsicInstrCost
Combine the two API calls into one by introducing a structure to hold
the relevant data. This has the added benefit of moving the boiler
plate code for arguments and flags, into the constructors. This is
intended to be a non-functional change, but the complicated web of
logic involved here makes it very hard to guarantee.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79941
2020-05-20 11:59:08 +01:00
Florian Hahn
bcbd26bfe6 [SCEV] Move ScalarEvolutionExpander.cpp to Transforms/Utils (NFC).
SCEVExpander modifies the underlying function so it is more suitable in
Transforms/Utils, rather than Analysis. This allows using other
transform utils in SCEVExpander.

This patch was originally committed as b8a3c34eee, but broke the
modules build, as LoopAccessAnalysis was using the Expander.

The code-gen part of LAA was moved to lib/Transforms recently, so this
patch can be landed again.

Reviewers: sanjoy.google, efriedma, reames

Reviewed By: sanjoy.google

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71537
2020-05-20 10:53:40 +01:00
Benjamin Kramer
350dadaa8a Give helpers internal linkage. NFC. 2020-05-19 22:16:37 +02:00
Nikita Popov
5fae613a4f [LVI] Don't require DominatorTree in LVI (NFC)
After D76797 the dominator tree is no longer used in LVI, so we
can remove it as a pass dependency, and also get rid of the
dominator tree enabling/disabling logic in JumpThreading.

Apart from cleaning up the code, this also clarifies LVI
cache consistency, in that the LVI cache can no longer
depend on whether the DT was or wasn't enabled due to
pending DT updates at any given time.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76985
2020-05-19 20:21:46 +02:00
Florian Hahn
7cefd1b4cd [LV] Remove duplicated return stmt (NFC). 2020-05-19 17:20:50 +01:00
Jay Foad
9bc989a48d [InstCombine] Remove hasNoInfs check for pow(C,y) -> exp2(log2(C)*y)
We already check hasNoNaNs and that x is finite and strictly positive.
That only leaves the following special cases (taken from the Linux man
page for pow):

If x is +1, the result is 1.0 (even if y is a NaN).
If the absolute value of x is less than 1, and y is negative infinity, the result is positive infinity.
If the absolute value of x is greater than 1, and y is negative infinity, the result is +0.
If the absolute value of x is less than 1, and y is positive infinity, the result is +0.
If the absolute value of x is greater than 1, and y is positive infinity, the result is positive infinity.

The first case is handled elsewhere, and this transformation preserves
all the others, so there is no need to limit it to hasNoInfs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79409
2020-05-19 17:06:05 +01:00
Florian Hahn
cff9399f6b [VPlan] Fix comment for User in VPWidenSelectRecipe (NFC).
The comment was referring the arguments of the call, but the recipe
widens a select.
2020-05-19 15:31:39 +01:00
Florian Hahn
f828d75b46 [VPlan] Add & use VPValue operands for VPReplicateRecipe (NFC).
This patch adds VPValue version of the instruction operands to
VPReplicateRecipe and uses them during code-generation.

Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin

Reviewed By: gilr

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80114
2020-05-19 15:12:17 +01:00
Florian Hahn
66ad107452 [VPlan] Remove unique_ptr from VPBranchOnRecipeMask (NFC).
We can remove a dynamic memory allocation, by checking the number of
operands: no operands = all true, 1 operand = mask.

Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, rengolin

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80110
2020-05-19 15:01:37 +01:00
Sameer Sahasrabuddhe
6c84884366 [LoopSimplify] don't separate nested loops with convergent calls
Summary:
When a loop has multiple backedges, loop simplification attempts to
separate them out into nested loops. This results in incorrect control
flow in the presence of some functions like a GPU barrier. This change
skips the transformation when such "convergent" function calls are
present in the loop body.

Reviewed By: nhaehnle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80078
2020-05-19 09:22:39 +05:30
Eli Friedman
27b4e6931d [NFC] Replace MaybeAlign with Align in TargetTransformInfo. 2020-05-18 19:25:49 -07:00
Ayal Zaks
682e739638 [LV] Fix FoldTail under user VF and UF
LV considers an internally computed MaxVF to decide if a constant trip-count is
a multiple of any subsequently chosen VF, and conclude that no scalar remainder
iterations (tail) will be left for Fold Tail to handle. If an external VF is
provided via -force-vector-width, it must be considered instead of the internal
MaxVF.
If an external UF is provided via -force-vector-interleave, it too must be
considered in addition to MaxVF or user VF.

Fixes PR45679.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80085
2020-05-19 01:32:25 +03:00
Craig Topper
c9f63297e2 Fix several places that were calling verifyFunction or verifyModule without checking the return value.
verifyFunction/verifyModule don't assert or error internally. They
also don't print anything if you don't pass a raw_ostream to them.
So the caller needs to check the result and ideally pass a stream
to get the messages. Otherwise they're just really expensive no-ops.

I've filed PR45965 for another instance in SLPVectorizer
that causes a lit test failure.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80106
2020-05-18 13:28:46 -07:00
Nikita Popov
47a0e9f49b [Sanitizers] Use getParamByValType() (NFC)
Instead of fetching the pointer element type.
2020-05-18 22:06:18 +02:00
Volkan Keles
63081dc6f6 LoadStoreVectorizer: Match nested adds to prove vectorization is safe
If both OpA and OpB is an add with NSW/NUW and with the same LHS operand,
we can guarantee that the transformation is safe if we can prove that OpA
won't overflow when IdxDiff added to the RHS of OpA.

Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79817
2020-05-18 12:13:01 -07:00
Nikita Popov
736db2f710 [Loads] Require Align in isSafeToLoadUnconditionally() (NFC)
Now that load/store have required alignment, accept Align here.
This also avoids uses of getPointerElementType(), which is
incompatible with opaque pointers.
2020-05-18 20:50:35 +02:00
Mircea Trofin
691980ebb4 [llvm][NFC] Fixed non-compliant style in InlineAdvisor.h
Changed OnPass{Entry|Exit} -> onPass{Entry|Exit}

Also fixed a small typo in a comment.
2020-05-18 10:26:45 -07:00
Vedant Kumar
623b254244 [Local] Do not ignore zexts in salvageDebugInfo, PR45923
Summary:
When salvaging a dead zext instruction, append a convert operation to
the DIExpressions of the debug uses of the instruction, to prevent the
salvaged value from being sign-extended.

I confirmed that lldb prints out the correct unsigned result for "f" in
the example from PR45923 with this changed applied.

rdar://63246143

Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, chrisjackson, davide

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80034
2020-05-18 09:52:02 -07:00
Max Kazantsev
e47c101e35 [InstCombine][NFC] Simplify check in sinking
We just need to check that the only predecessor of user parent is
BB, we don't need to iterate through BB's successors for it.
2020-05-18 18:10:40 +07:00
Craig Topper
5f65faef2c ValueMapper does not preserve inline assembly dialect when remapping the type
Bug report: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45291

Patch by Tomasz Miąsko

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80066
2020-05-17 14:57:50 -07:00
Nikita Popov
52e98f620c [Alignment] Remove unnecessary getValueOrABITypeAlignment calls (NFC)
Now that load/store alignment is required, we no longer need most
of them. Also switch the getLoadStoreAlignment() helper to return
Align instead of MaybeAlign.
2020-05-17 22:19:15 +02:00
Roman Lebedev
fde8eb00e1 [InstCombine] visitMaskedMerge(): when unfolding, sanitize undef constants (PR45955)
We can't leave undef vector element constants as-is,
it is a miscompile, so we need to sanitize them.

We have two vectors (C and ~C):
* We can't replace undef with 0 in both of them
* We can't replace undef with 0 in only one of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in both of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in only one(!) of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in one and 0 in another one of them.

Therefore, it seems best to go with the last option, since otherwise
we'd loose knowledge that C and ~C have no common bits set,
which seems more important than preserving partial undef knowledge.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45955
2020-05-17 22:53:03 +03:00