After the format change from D69471, there can be more than one section
in an object that contains coverage function records. Look up each of
these sections and concatenate all the records together.
This re-enables the instrprof-merging.cpp test, which previously was
failing on OSes which use comdats.
Thanks to Jeremy Morse, who very kindly provided object files from the
bot I broke to help me debug.
An execution count goes missing for a constructor, this needs
investigation:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64be-linux/builds/45132/
```
/home/buildbots/ppc64be-clang-test/clang-ppc64be/llvm/compiler-rt/test/profile/instrprof-merging.cpp:28:16:
error: V1: expected string not found in input
A() {} // V1: [[@LINE]]{{ *}}|{{ *}}1
<stdin>:28:32: note: possible intended match here
28| | A() {} // V1: [[@LINE]]{{ *}}|{{ *}}1
```
Summary:
The llvm-cov tool needs to be able to find coverage names in the
executable, so the .lprfn and .lcovmap sections cannot be merged into
.rdata.
Also, the linker merges .lprfn$M into .lprfn, so llvm-cov needs to
handle that when looking up sections. It has to support running on both
relocatable object files and linked PE files.
Lastly, when loading .lprfn from a PE file, llvm-cov needs to skip the
leading zero byte added by the profile runtime.
Reviewers: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58661
llvm-svn: 354840
Summary:
Before this change, check-profile would run, but all tests would be
marked unsupported on Windows. This is the new status of 'check-profile'
after this change:
Testing Time: 6.66s
Expected Passes : 29
Expected Failures : 5
Unsupported Tests : 39
I moved many tests that exercise posix-y features like dlopen and DSOs
into the Posix subdirectory, and ran the tests on Linux to validate my
changes.
These are the remaining tests that I handled on a case by case basis:
- instrprof-path.c
Passes, Fixed some path portability issues
- instrprof-gcov-exceptions.test
Passes, the FileCheck actually succeeds on Windows, so I RUNX'd it
- instrprof-icall-promo.test
XFAILed, probably due to C++ ABI differences in vtables
- instrprof-merge-match.test
- instrprof-merge.c
- instrprof-merging.cpp
XFAILed, These seem like real bugs that need fixing
- instrprof-version-mismatch.c
XFAILed, Overriding the weak version symbol doesn't work
- instrprof-without-libc.c
UNSUPPORTED, test needs an executable symbol table, Windows has none
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, void
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57853
llvm-svn: 353435
Frontends emit 'unused' coverage mapping records for functions which are
provably unused in a TU. These unused records contain a single counter
with CounterKind::Zero. However, a function may be unused in one TU and
used in another. When this happens, prefer the records with a full set
of counters instead of arbitrarily picking the first loaded record.
There is no impact on the single-TU case. In the multiple-TU case, this
resolves issues causing a function to appear unused when it's not.
Testing: check-{llvm,clang,compiler-rt}
rdar://42981322
llvm-svn: 339194
