The hardware loop pass should try to generate a hardware loop
instruction when the original loop has a critical edge.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9678
llvm-svn: 237258
Summary:
This change adds two new parameters to the statepoint intrinsic, `i64 id`
and `i32 num_patch_bytes`. `id` gets propagated to the ID field
in the generated StackMap section. If the `num_patch_bytes` is
non-zero then the statepoint is lowered to `num_patch_bytes` bytes of
nops instead of a call (the spill and reload code remains unchanged).
A non-zero `num_patch_bytes` is useful in situations where a language
runtime requires complete control over how a call is lowered.
This change brings statepoints one step closer to patchpoints. With
some additional work (that is not part of this patch) it should be
possible to get rid of `TargetOpcode::STATEPOINT` altogether.
PlaceSafepoints generates `statepoint` wrappers with `id` set to
`0xABCDEF00` (the old default value for the ID reported in the stackmap)
and `num_patch_bytes` set to `0`. This can be made more sophisticated
later.
Reviewers: reames, pgavlin, swaroop.sridhar, AndyAyers
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9546
llvm-svn: 237214
Summary:
This rule was always in the old SysV i386 ABI docs and the new ones that
H.J. Lu has put together, but we never noticed:
EAX scratch register; also used to return integer and pointer values
from functions; also stores the address of a returned struct or union
Fixes PR23491.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9715
llvm-svn: 237175
On Mips, frame pointer points to the same side of the frame as the stack
pointer. This function is used to decide where to put register scavenging
spill slot. So far, it was put on the wrong side of the frame, and thus it
was too far away from $fp when frame was larger than 2^15 bytes.
Patch by Vladimir Radosavljevic.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8895
llvm-svn: 237153
Spilling can insert instructions almost anywhere, and this can mess
up control flow lowering in a multitude of ways, due to instruction
reordering. Let's sort this out the easy way: never spill registers
involved with control flow, i.e. saved EXEC masks.
Unfortunately, this does not work at all with optimizations disabled,
as the register allocator ignores spill weights. This should be
addressed in a future commit.
The test was reduced from the "stacks" shader of [1]. Some issues
trigger the machine verifier while another one is checked manually.
[1] http://madebyevan.com/webgl-path-tracing/
v2: only insert pass with optimizations enabled, merge test runs.
Patch by: Grigori Goronzy
llvm-svn: 237152
The other changes in the LowerShift() are not functional,
just to make the code more convenient.
So, the functional changes for SKX only.
llvm-svn: 237129
AEABI defines aligned variants of memcpy etc. that can be faster than
the default version due to not having to do alignment checks. When
emitting target code for these functions make use of these aligned
variants if possible. Also convert memset to memclr if possible.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8060
llvm-svn: 237127
According to the documentation in StackMap section for the safepoint we should have:
"The first Location in each pair describes the base pointer for the object. The second is the derived pointer actually being relocated."
But before this change we emitted them in reverse order - derived pointer first, base pointer second.
llvm-svn: 237126
Summary: Allow calls with non legal integer types based on i8 and i16 to be processed by mips fast-isel.
Based on a patch by Reed Kotler.
Test Plan:
"Make check" test forthcoming.
Test-suite passes at O0/O2 and with mips32 r1/r2
Reviewers: rkotler, dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rfuhler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6770
llvm-svn: 237121
Summary:
Try to compute addresses when the offset from a memory location is a constant
expression.
Based on a patch by Reed Kotler.
Test Plan:
Passes test-suite for -O0/O2 and mips 32 r1/r2
Reviewers: rkotler, dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rfuhler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6767
llvm-svn: 237117
The X86-specific DAGCombine for stores should not assume vector types are always simple.
This fixes PR23476.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9659
llvm-svn: 237097
to use the information in the module rather than TargetOptions.
We've had and clang has used the use-soft-float attribute for some
time now so have the backends set a subtarget feature based on
a particular function now that subtargets are created based on
functions and function attributes.
For the one middle end soft float check go ahead and create
an overloadable TargetLowering::useSoftFloat function that
just checks the TargetSubtargetInfo in all cases.
Also remove the command line option that hard codes whether or
not soft-float is set by using the attribute for all of the
target specific test cases - for the generic just go ahead and
add the attribute in the one case that showed up.
llvm-svn: 237079
Summary:
r235215 adds support for f16 to be considered as a load/store type and
promote f16 operations to f32.
This patch has miscellaneous fixes for the X86 backend so all f16
operations are handled:
1. Set loadextaction for f16 vectors to expand.
2. Handle FP_EXTEND in a switch statement when handling v2f32
3. Do not fold (FP_TO_SINT (load f16)) into FP_TO_INT*_IN_MEM or
(store (SINT_TO_FP )) to a FILD.
Tests included.
Reviewers: ab, srhines, delena
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9092
llvm-svn: 237004
The bug showed up as a compile-time assertion failure:
Assertion `NumBits >= MIN_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too small"' failed
when building msan tests on x86-64.
Prior to r236850, this bug was masked due to a bogus alignment check,
which also accidentally rejected non-byte-sized accesses. Afterwards,
an invalid ElementSizeBytes == 0 got further into the function, and
triggered the assertion failure.
It would probably be a good idea to allow it to handle merging stores
of unusual widths as well, but for now, to un-break it, I'm just
making the minimal fix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9626
llvm-svn: 236927
When emitting something like 'add x, 1000' if we remat the 1000 then we should be able to
mark the vreg containing 1000 as killed. Given that we go bottom up in fast-isel, a later
use of 1000 will be higher up in the BB and won't kill it, or be impacted by the lower kill.
However, rematerialised constant expressions aren't generated bottom up. The local value save area
grows downwards. This means that if you remat 2 constant expressions which both use 1000 then the
first will kill it, then the second, which is *lower* in the BB will read a killed register.
This is the case in the attached test where the 2 GEPs both need to generate 'add x, 6680' for the constant offset.
Note that this commit only makes kill flag generation conservative. There's nothing else obviously wrong with
the local value save area growing downwards, and in fact it needs to for handling arbitrarily complex constant expressions.
However, it would be nice if there was a solution which would let us generate more accurate kill flags, or just kill flags completely.
llvm-svn: 236922
The code that builds the dependence graph assumes that two PseudoSourceValues
don't alias. In a tail calling function two FixedStackObjects might refer to the
same location. Worse 'immutable' fixed stack objects like function arguments are
not immutable and will be clobbered.
Change this so that a load from a FixedStackObject is not invariant in a tail
calling function and don't return a PseudoSourceValue for an instruction in tail
calling functions when building the dependence graph so that we handle function
arguments conservatively.
Fix for PR23459.
rdar://20740035
llvm-svn: 236916
When selecting an extract instruction, we don't actually generate code but instead work out which register we are reading, and rewrite uses of the extract def to the source register. This is done via updateValueMap,.
However, its possible that the source register we are rewriting *to* to also have uses. If those uses are after a kill of the value we are rewriting *from* then we have uses after a kill and the verifier fails.
This code checks for the case where the to register is also used, and if so it clears all kill on the from register. This is conservative, but better that always clearing kills on the from register.
llvm-svn: 236897
Refactored parts of the hardware loop pass to generate
more. Also, added more tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9568
llvm-svn: 236896
A trunc from i32 to i1 on x86_64 generates an instruction such as
%vreg19<def> = COPY %vreg9:sub_8bit<kill>; GR8:%vreg19 GR32:%vreg9
However, the copy here should only have the kill flag on the 32-bit path, not the 64-bit one.
Otherwise, we are killing the source of the truncate which could be used later in the program.
llvm-svn: 236890
This changes the shape of the statepoint intrinsic from:
@llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(anyptr target, i32 # call args, i32 unused, ...call args, i32 # deopt args, ...deopt args, ...gc args)
to:
@llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(anyptr target, i32 # call args, i32 flags, ...call args, i32 # transition args, ...transition args, i32 # deopt args, ...deopt args, ...gc args)
This extension offers the backend the opportunity to insert (somewhat) arbitrary code to manage the transition from GC-aware code to code that is not GC-aware and back.
In order to support the injection of transition code, this extension wraps the STATEPOINT ISD node generated by the usual lowering lowering with two additional nodes: GC_TRANSITION_START and GC_TRANSITION_END. The transition arguments that were passed passed to the intrinsic (if any) are lowered and provided as operands to these nodes and may be used by the backend during code generation.
Eventually, the lowering of the GC_TRANSITION_{START,END} nodes should be informed by the GC strategy in use for the function containing the intrinsic call; for now, these nodes are instead replaced with no-ops.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9501
llvm-svn: 236888
The test here was sinking the AND here to a lower BB:
%vreg7<def> = ANDWri %vreg8, 0; GPR32common:%vreg7,%vreg8
TBNZW %vreg8<kill>, 0, <BB#1>; GPR32common:%vreg8
which meant that vreg8 was read after it was killed.
This commit changes the code from clearing kill flags on the AND to clearing flags on all registers used by the AND.
llvm-svn: 236886
Improved the AnalyzeBranch, InsertBranch, and RemoveBranch
functions in order to handle more of our branch instructions.
This requires changes to analyzeCompare and PredicateInstructions.
Specifically, we've added support for new value compare jumps,
improved handling of endloop, added more compare instructions,
and improved support for predicate instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9559
llvm-svn: 236876
The function 'getTargetShuffleMask' already knows how to deal with PSHUFB nodes
where the mask node is a load from constant pool, and the constant pool node
is wrapped by a X86ISD::Wrapper node. This patch extends that logic by teaching
it how to also look through X86ISD::WrapperRIP.
This helps function combineX86ShufflesRecusively to combine more shuffle
sequences containing PSHUFB nodes if we are in RIPRel PIC mode.
Before this change, llc (with -relocation-model=pic -march=x86-64) was unable
to decode a pshufb where the mask was loaded from a constant pool. For example,
the no-op shuffle from test 'x86-fold-pshufb.ll' was not folded into its
operand, so instead of generating a single 'movaps' the backend always
generated a sub-optimal 'movdqa + pshufb' sequence.
Added test x86-fold-pshufb.ll.
llvm-svn: 236863
1) check whether the alignment of the memory is sufficient for the
*merged* store or load to be efficient.
Not doing so can result in some ridiculously poor code generation, if
merging creates a vector operation which must be aligned but isn't.
2) DON'T check that the alignment of each load/store is equal. If
you're merging 2 4-byte stores, the first *might* have 8-byte
alignment, but the second certainly will have 4-byte alignment. We do
want to allow those to be merged.
llvm-svn: 236850
Summary:
In microMIPS, labels need to know whether they are on code or data. This is
indicated with STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS and can be inferred by being followed
by instructions. For empty basic blocks, we can ensure this by emitting the
.insn directive after the label.
Also, this fixes some failures in our out-of-tree microMIPS buildbots, for the
exception handling regression tests under: SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9530
llvm-svn: 236815
If we duplicate an instruction then we must also clear kill flags on any uses we rewrite.
Otherwise we might be killing a register which was used in other BBs.
For example, here the entry BB ended up with these instructions, the ADD having been tail duplicated.
%vreg24<def> = t2ADDri %vreg10<kill>, 1, pred:14, pred:%noreg, opt:%noreg; GPRnopc:%vreg24 rGPR:%vreg10
%vreg22<def> = COPY %vreg10; GPR:%vreg22 rGPR:%vreg10
The copy here is inserted after the add and so needs vreg10 to be live.
llvm-svn: 236782
We were accidentally folding a sign/zero extend in to address arithmetic in a different BB when the extend wasn't available there.
Cross BB fast-isel isn't safe, so restrict this to only when the extend is in the same BB as the use.
llvm-svn: 236764
