Summary:
Calls sometimes need to be convergent. This is already handled at the
LLVM IR level, but it also needs to be handled at the MI level.
Ideally we'd propagate convergence from instructions, down through the
selection DAG, and into MIs. But this is Hard, and would affect
optimizations in the SDNs -- right now only SDNs with two operands have
any flags at all.
Instead, here's a much simpler hack: Add new opcodes for NVPTX for
convergent calls, and generate these when lowering convergent LLVM
calls.
Reviewers: jholewinski
Subscribers: jholewinski, chandlerc, joker.eph, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17423
llvm-svn: 262373
Summary:
This adds the beginning of an update API to preserve MemorySSA. In particular,
this patch adds a way to remove memory SSA accesses when instructions are
deleted.
It also adds relevant unit testing infrastructure for MemorySSA's API.
(There is an actual user of this API, i will make that diff dependent on this one. In practice, a ton of opt passes remove memory instructions, so it's hopefully an obviously useful API :P)
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17157
llvm-svn: 262362
This adds support to convert ProfileSummary object to Metadata and create a
ProfileSummary object from metadata. This would allow attaching profile summary
information to Module allowing optimization passes to use it.
llvm-svn: 262360
Summary:
This patch impleemnts DS_PERMUTE/DS_BPERMUTE instruction definitions and intrinsics,
which are new since VI.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17614
llvm-svn: 262356
In the code below on 32-bit targets, x would previously get forwarded to g()
without sign-extension to 32 bits as required by the parameter attribute.
void g(signed short);
void f(unsigned short x) {
g(x);
}
llvm-svn: 262352
Function lto_module_create_in_local_context() would previously
rely on the default LLVMContext being created for it by
LTOModule::makeLTOModule(). This context exits the program on
error and is not arranged to update sLastStringError in
tools/lto/lto.cpp.
Function lto_module_create_in_local_context() now creates an
LLVMContext by itself, sets it up correctly to its needs and then
passes it to LTOModule::createInLocalContext() which takes
ownership of the context and keeps it present for the lifetime of
the returned LTOModule.
Function LTOModule::makeLTOModule() is modified to take a
reference to LLVMContext (instead of a pointer) and no longer
creates a default context when nullptr is passed to it. Method
LTOModule::createInContext() that takes a pointer to LLVMContext
is removed because it allows to pass a nullptr to it. Instead
LTOModule::createFromBuffer() (that takes a reference to
LLVMContext) should be used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17715
llvm-svn: 262330
Summary:
Rename the section embeds bitcode from ".llvmbc,.llvmbc" to "__LLVM,__bitcode".
The new name matches MachO section naming convention.
Reviewers: rafael, pcc
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17388
llvm-svn: 262245
in the PassBuilder.
These are really just stubs for now, but they give a nice API surface
that Clang or other tools can start learning about and enabling for
experimentation.
I've also wired up parsing various synthetic module pass names to
generate these set pipelines. This allows the pipelines to be combined
with other passes and have their order controlled, with clear separation
between the *kind* of canned pipeline, and the *level* of optimization
to be used within that canned pipeline.
The most interesting part of this patch is almost certainly the spec for
the different optimization levels. I don't think we can ever have hard
and fast rules that would make it easy to determine whether a particular
optimization makes sense at a particular level -- it will always be in
large part a judgement call. But hopefully this will outline the
expected rationale that should be used, and the direction that the
pipelines should be taken. Much of this was based on a long llvm-dev
discussion I started years ago to try and crystalize the intent behind
these pipelines, and now, at long long last I'm returning to the task of
actually writing it down somewhere that we can cite and try to be
consistent with.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12826
llvm-svn: 262196
Change MachineInstr API to prefer MachineInstr& over MachineInstr*
whenever the parameter is expected to be non-null. Slowly inching
toward being able to fix PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262149
In all but one case, change the DFAPacketizer API to take MachineInstr&
instead of MachineInstr*. In DFAPacketizer::endPacket(), take
MachineBasicBlock::iterator. Besides cleaning up the API, this is in
search of PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262142
Update APIs in MachineInstrBundle.h to take and return MachineInstr&
instead of MachineInstr* when the instruction cannot be null. Besides
being a nice cleanup, this is tacking toward a fix for PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262141
manager proxies and use those rather than repeating their definition
four times.
There are real differences between the two directions: outer AMs are
const and don't need to have invalidation tracked. But every proxy in
a particular direction is identical except for the analysis manager type
and the IR unit they proxy into. This makes them prime candidates for
nice templates.
I've started introducing explicit template instantiation declarations
and definitions as well because we really shouldn't be emitting all this
everywhere. I'm going to go back and add the same for the other
templates like this in a follow-up patch.
I've left the analysis manager as an opaque type rather than using two
IR units and requiring it to be an AnalysisManager template
specialization. I think its important that users retain the ability to
provide their own custom analysis management layer and provided it has
the appropriate API everything should Just Work.
llvm-svn: 262127
This matches the behavior of the HSAIL clock instruction.
s_realmemtime is used if the subtarget supports it, and falls
back to s_memtime if not.
Also introduces new intrinsics for each of s_memtime / s_memrealtime.
llvm-svn: 262119
Avoid another implicit conversion from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr*, this time in MachineInstrBuilder.h (this is in pursuit of
PR26753).
llvm-svn: 262118
Take MachineInstr by reference instead of by pointer in SlotIndexes and
the SlotIndex wrappers in LiveIntervals. The MachineInstrs here are
never null, so this cleans up the API a bit. It also incidentally
removes a few implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr* (see PR26753).
At a couple of call sites it was convenient to convert to a range-based
for loop over MachineBasicBlock::instr_begin/instr_end, so I added
MachineBasicBlock::instrs.
llvm-svn: 262115
This should save a pointer of padding from all MSVC Value subclasses.
Recall that MSVC will not pack the following bitfields together:
unsigned Bits : 29;
unsigned Flag1 : 1;
unsigned Flag2 : 1;
unsigned Flag3 : 1;
Add a static_assert because LLVM developers always trip over this
behavior. This regressed in June.
llvm-svn: 262045
This patch updates cmake build scripts to build on Haiku. It adds Haiku x86_64 to config.guess.
Please consider reviewing.
Pathc by Jérôme Duval.
llvm-svn: 262038
analyses in the new pass manager.
These just handle really basic stuff: turning a type name into a string
statically that is nice to print in logs, and getting a static unique ID
for each analysis.
Sadly, the format of passes in anonymous namespaces makes using their
names in tests really annoying so I've customized the names of the no-op
passes to keep tests sane to read.
This is the first of a few simplifying refactorings for the new pass
manager that should reduce boilerplate and confusion.
llvm-svn: 262004
Summary: Check that we're using SCEV for the same loop we're simulating. Otherwise, we might try to use the iteration number of the current loop in SCEV expressions for inner/outer loops IVs, which is clearly incorrect.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17632
llvm-svn: 261958
