Summary: This patch adds support for the is_device_ptr clause. It expands SEMA to use the mappable expression logic that can only be tested with code generation in place and check conflicts with other data sharing related clauses using the mappable expressions infrastructure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22788
llvm-svn: 276978
Summary: This patch adds support for the use_device_ptr clause. It includes changes in SEMA that could not be tested without codegen, namely, the use of the first private logic and mappable expressions support.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, arpith-jacob, kkwli0, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22691
llvm-svn: 276977
With PCH+Module, sometimes compiler gives a hard error:
Module file ‘<some-file path>.pcm' is out of date and needs to be rebuilt
This happens when we have a pch importing a module and the module gets
overwritten by another compiler instance after we build the pch (one example is
that both compiler instances hash to the same pcm file but use different
diagnostic options). When we try to load the pch later on, the compiler notices
that the imported module is out of date (modification date, size do not match)
but it can't handle this out of date pcm (i.e it does not know how to rebuild
the pch).
This commit introduces a new command line option so for PCH + module, we can
turn on this option and if two compiler instances only differ in diagnostic
options, the latter instance will not invalidate the original pcm.
rdar://26675801
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22773
llvm-svn: 276769
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
Processing update records (and loading a module, in general) might trigger
unexpected calls to the ASTWriter (being a mutation listener). Now we have a
mechanism to suppress those calls to the ASTWriter but notify other possible
mutation listeners.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28332
Patch by Cristina Cristescu and me.
Reviewed by Richard Smith (D21800).
llvm-svn: 276473
we first touch any part of that module. Instead, defer them until the first
time that module is (transitively) imported. The initializer step for a module
then recursively initializes modules that its own headers imported.
For example, this avoids running the <iostream> global initializer in programs
that don't actually use iostreams, but do use other parts of the standard
library.
llvm-svn: 276159
Summary:
Space for storing the //constraint-expression// of the
//requires-clause// associated with a `TemplateParameterList` is
arranged by taking a bit out of the `NumParams` field for the purpose
of determining whether there is a //requires-clause// or not, and by
adding to the trailing objects tied to the `TemplateParameterList`. An
accessor is provided.
An appropriate argument is supplied to `TemplateParameterList::Create`
at the various call sites.
Serialization changes will addressed as the Concepts implementation
becomes more solid.
Drive-by fix:
This change also replaces the custom
`FixedSizeTemplateParameterListStorage` implementation with one that
follows the interface provided by `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, faisalv, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, nwilson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19322
llvm-svn: 276069
This patch adds a new AST node: ObjCAvailabilityCheckExpr, and teaches the
Parser and Sema to generate it. This node represents an availability check of
the form:
@available(macos 10.10, *);
Which will eventually compile to a runtime check of the host's OS version. This
is the first patch of the feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22171
llvm-svn: 275654
passed on the command line but never actually used. We consider a (top-level)
module to be used if any part of it is imported, either by the current
translation unit, or by any part of a top-level module that is itself used.
(Put another way, a module is used if an implicit modules build would have
loaded its .pcm file.)
llvm-svn: 275481
This patch is to implement sema and parsing for 'target parallel for simd' pragma.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22096
llvm-svn: 275365
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904
This patch is similar to the implementation of 'private' clause: it adds a list of private pointers to be used within the target data region to store the device pointers returned by the runtime.
Please refer to the following document for a full description of what the runtime witll return in this case (page 10 and 11):
https://github.com/clang-omp/OffloadingDesign
I am happy to answer any question related to the runtime interface to help reviewing this patch.
llvm-svn: 275271
On Linux, if the timestamp of a header file, included in the pch, is modified, then including the pch without regenerating it causes a fatal error, which is reasonable.
On Windows the check is ifdefed out, allowing the compilation to continue in a broken state.
The root of the broken state is that, if timestamps dont match, the preprocessor will reparse a header without discarding the pch data.
This leads to "#pragma once" header to be included twice.
The reason behind the ifdefing of the check lacks documentation, and was done 6 years ago.
This change tentatively removes the ifdefing.
First part of patch proposed at:
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20867
llvm-svn: 275261
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22007
llvm-svn: 274604
Summary: This patch is an implementation of sema and parsing for the OpenMP composite pragma 'distribute parallel for simd'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21977
llvm-svn: 274530
This patch adds a __nth_element builtin that allows fetching the n-th type of a
parameter pack with very little compile-time overhead. The patch was inspired by
r252036 and r252115 by David Majnemer, which add a similar __make_integer_seq
builtin for efficiently creating a std::integer_sequence.
Reviewed as D15421. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15421
llvm-svn: 274316
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273884
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273705
Handles the cases where old __va_list_tag is coming from a module and the new
is not, needing an update record.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27890
Patch by Cristina Cristescu, Richard Smith and me.
llvm-svn: 273159
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
When we import a module that defines a builtin identifier from prefix header and
precompile the prefix header, the macro information related to the identifier
is lost.
If we don't precompile the prefix header, the source file can still see the
macro information. The reason is that we write out the identifier in the pch
but not the macro information since the macro is not defined locally.
This is related to r251565. In that commit, if we read a builtin identifier from
a module that wasn't "interesting" to that module, we will still write it out to
a PCH that imports that module.
The fix is to write exported module macros for PCH as well.
rdar://24666630
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20383
llvm-svn: 271310
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `from` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18488
llvm-svn: 270882
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `to` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: carlo.bertolli, hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18597
llvm-svn: 270880
Summary:
This patch is to add parsing and sema support for `target update` directive. Support for the `to` and `from` clauses will be added by a different patch. This patch also adds support for other clauses that are already implemented upstream and apply to `target update`, e.g. `device` and `if`.
This patch is based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15944
llvm-svn: 270878
