We would check the type information from the declaration found by lookup
but we would neglect checking compatibility with the most recent
declaration. This would make it possible for us to not correctly
diagnose inconsistencies with declarations which were made in a
different scope.
llvm-svn: 225934
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
This is a different approach to r225780.
llvm-svn: 225875
conflicting attribute, warn about the conflict and pick a "winning"
attribute to preserve, instead of emitting an error. This matches the
behavior when the conflicting attributes are on different declarations.
Along the way I discovered that conflicts involving __forceinline were
reported as 'always_inline' (alternate spelling, same attribute) so
fixed that up to report the attribute as spelled in the source.
llvm-svn: 225813
In the following:
void f(int x) { extern int x; }
The second declaration of 'x' shouldn't be considered a redeclaration of
the parameter.
llvm-svn: 225780
There are two things in a C++ program that need to read the vtable pointer:
Constructors and destructors. (A few other operations -- virtual calls,
dynamic cast, rtti -- read the vtable pointer off a this pointer, but for
this they don't need the vtable symbol.) Implicit constructors and destructors
and explicit constructors already marked the vtable as used, but explicit
destructors didn't.
Note that the only thing sema's "mark a class's vtable used" does is to mark all
final overriders of the class as referenced, it does _not_ cause emission of
the vtable itself. This is done on demand by codegen, independent of sema,
since sema might emit functions that are not referenced. (The exception are
vtables that are forced via key functions -- these are forced onto codegen
by sema.)
This bug went unnoticed for years because it doesn't have observable effects
(yet -- I want to change this in PR20337, which is why I noticed this).
r213109 made it so that _calls_ to constructors don't mark the vtable used.
Currently, _calls_ to destructors still mark the vtable used. If that
wasn't the case, this program would tickle the problem:
test.h:
template <typename T>
struct B {
int* p;
virtual ~B() { delete p; }
virtual void f() {}
};
struct __attribute__((visibility("default"))) C {
C();
B<int> m;
};
test2.cc:
#include "test.h"
int main() {
C* c = new C;
delete c;
}
test3.cc:
#include "test.h"
C::C() {}
# This bin/clang++ binary doesn't MarkVTableUsed() for virtual dtor calls:
$ bin/clang++ -shared test3.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -o libtest3.dylib
$ bin/clang++ test2.cc -std=c++11 -O2 -fvisibility=hidden \
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden libtest3.dylib
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"B<int>::f()", referenced from:
vtable for B<int> in test2-af8f4f.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
What's happening here is that there's a copy of B's vtable hidden in
libtest3.dylib, because C's constructor caused an implicit instantiation of that
(and implicit constructors generate vtables).
test2.cc calls C's destructDr, which destroys the B<int> member,
which wants to overwrite the vtable back to B (think of B as the base of a class
hierarchy, and of hierarchical destruction -- maybe we shouldn't do the vtable
writing in destructors of final classes), but there's nothing in test2.cc that
marks B's vtable used. So codegen writes out the vtable, but since it wasn't
marked used, sema didn't mark all the virtual functions (in particular f())
as used.
Note that this change makes us reject programs we didn't reject before (see
the included Sema test case), but both gcc and cl also reject this code, and
clang used to reject it before r213109.
llvm-svn: 225761
We have a diagnostic describing that constexpr changed in C++14 when
compiling in C++11 mode. While doing this, it examines the previous
declaration and assumes that it is a function. However it is possible,
in the context of error recovery, for this to not be the case.
llvm-svn: 225518
We assumed that class-scope specializations would result in a
CXXMethodDecl for that class. However, globally qualified functions
will result in normal FunctionDecls.
llvm-svn: 225508
transform.
Also diagnose typos in the initializer of an invalid C++ declaration.
Both issues were hit using the same line of test code, depending on
whether the code was treated as C or C++.
Fixes PR22092.
llvm-svn: 225389
hasDeclaratorForAnonDecl, getDeclaratorForAnonDecl and
getTypedefNameForAnonDecl are expected to handle the case where
NamedDeclOrQualifier holds the wrong type or nothing at all.
llvm-svn: 224912
We expected the type of a TagDecl to be a TagType, not an
InjectedClassNameType. Introduced a helper method, Type::getAsTagDecl,
to abstract away the difference; redefine Type::getAsCXXRecordDecl to be
in terms of it.
llvm-svn: 224898
pessimistic about when to do so.
This also fixes PR21905 as the initialization argument was no longer
viewed as being type dependent due to the TypoExpr being type-cast.
llvm-svn: 224386
Bitfield RefersToEnclosingLocal of Stmt::DeclRefExprBitfields renamed to RefersToCapturedVariable to reflect latest changes introduced in commit 224323. Also renamed method Expr::refersToEnclosingLocal() to Expr::refersToCapturedVariable() and comments for constant arguments.
No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 224329
This attribute serves as a hint to improve warnings about the ranges of
enumerators used as flag types. It currently has no working C++ implementation
due to different semantics for enums in C++. For more explanation, see the docs
and testcases.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 222906
Clang r181627 moved a check for block-scope variables into this code for
handling thread storage class specifiers, but in the process, it broke the
logic for checking if the target supports TLS. Fix this with some simple
restructuring of the code. rdar://problem/18796883
llvm-svn: 222512
The bug is that ExprCleanupObjects isn't always empty
in a fresh evaluation context. New evaluation contexts just
track the current depth of the stack.
The assertion will misfire whenever we finish processing
a function body inside an expression that contained an earlier
block literal with non-trivial captures. That's actually
a lot less likely than you'd think, though, because it has
to be a real function declaration, not just another block.
Mixed block/lambda code would work, as would a template
instantiation or a local class definition.
The code works correctly if the assertion is disabled.
rdar://16356628
llvm-svn: 222194
Now we don't warn on this code:
void __stdcall f(void);
void __stdcall f();
My previous commit regressed this functionality because I didn't update
the relevant test case which used a definition.
llvm-svn: 221188
We already have a warning on the call sites of code like this:
void f() { }
void g() { f(1, 2, 3); }
t.c:2:21: warning: too many arguments in call to 'f'
We can limit ourselves to diagnosing unprototyped forward declarations
of f to cut down on noise.
llvm-svn: 221184
It turns out that MinGW never dllimports of exports inline functions.
This means that code compiled with Clang would fail to link with
MinGW-compiled libraries since we might try to import functions that
are not imported.
To fix this, make Clang never dllimport inline functions when targeting
MinGW.
llvm-svn: 221154
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
Clang supports __restrict__ as a function qualifier, but
DeclaratorChunk::FunctionTypeInfo lacked a field to track the qualifier's
source location (as we do with volatile, etc.). This was the subject of a FIXME
in GetFullTypeForDeclarator (in SemaType.cpp). This should also prove useful as
we add more warnings regarding questionable uses of the restrict qualifier.
There is no significant functional change (except for an improved source range
associated with the err_invalid_qualified_function_type diagnostic fixit
generated by GetFullTypeForDeclarator).
llvm-svn: 220215
A second instance of attributed types escaped the previous change, identified
thanks to Richard Smith! When deducing the void case, we would also assume that
the type would not be attributed. Furthermore, properly handle multiple
attributes being applied to a single TypeLoc.
Properly handle this case and future-proof a bit by ignoring parenthesis
further. The test cases do use the additional parenthesis to ensure that this
case remains properly handled.
Addresses post-commit review comments from Richard Smith to SVN r219851.
llvm-svn: 219974
They cannot be written to, so marking them const makes sense and may improve
optimisation.
As a side-effect, SectionInfos has to be moved from Sema to ASTContext.
It also fixes this problem, that occurs when compiling ATL:
warning LNK4254: section 'ATL' (C0000040) merged into '.rdata' (40000040) with different attributes
The ATL headers are putting variables in a special section that's marked
read-only. However, Clang currently can't model that read-onlyness in the IR.
But, by making the variables const, the section does become read-only, and
the linker warning is avoided.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5812
llvm-svn: 219960
Windows TLS relies on indexing through a tls_index in order to get at
the DLL's thread local variables. However, this index is not exported
along with the variable: it is assumed that all accesses to thread local
variables are inside the same module which created the variable in the
first place.
While there are several implementation techniques we could adopt to fix
this (notably, the Itanium ABI gets this for free), it is not worth the
heroics.
Instead, let's just ban this combination. We could revisit this in the
future if we need to.
This fixes PR21111.
llvm-svn: 219049
We build a NestedNameSpecifier that records the CXXRecordDecl in which
__super appeared. Name lookup is performed in all base classes of the
recorded CXXRecordDecl. Use of __super is allowed only inside class and
member function scope.
llvm-svn: 218484
A record which contains a flexible array member is itself a flexible
array member. A struct which contains such a record should also
consider itself to be a flexible array member.
llvm-svn: 218378
lists. Since the fields are inititalized one at a time, using a field with
lower index to initialize a higher indexed field should not be warned on.
llvm-svn: 218339
Summary:
This fixes PR20023. In order to implement this scoping rule, we piggy
back on the existing LabelDecl machinery, by creating LabelDecl's that
will carry the "internal" name of the inline assembly label, which we
will rewrite the asm label to.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4589
llvm-svn: 218230
According to lore, we used to verifier-fail on:
void __thiscall f();
int main() { f(1); }
So that's fixed now. System headers use prototype-less __stdcall functions,
so make that a warning that's DefaultError -- then it fires on regular code
but is suppressed in system headers.
Since it's used in system headers, we have codegen tests for this; massage
them slightly so that they still compile.
llvm-svn: 218166
Previously, we would not mark structs containing anonymous structs as
invalid. Later, horrific things would occur when trying to determine
the size of the parent record.
Instead, require the struct to be a complete type when used as an
anonymous struct. Mark both the anonymous field for the struct and the
parent context as invalid (this is similar to what we do when a struct
contains a field with an incomplete type.)
This fixes PR11847.
llvm-svn: 218006
Summary: This fixes PR20883.
Test Plan: The patch includes an automated test.
Reviewers: hansw
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5256
llvm-svn: 217413
