The declaration of the destructor of an invalid class was not properly marked
as noexcept. As a result, the definition of the same destructor, which was
properly implicitly marked as noexcept, would not match the definition.
This would cause the definition CXXDestructorDecl to be matked as invalid
and omited from the AST.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17988
llvm-svn: 263639
Given the following test case:
typedef struct {
const char *name;
id field;
} Test9;
extern void doSomething(Test9 arg);
void test9() {
Test9 foo2 = {0, 0};
doSomething(foo2);
}
With a release compiler, we don't emit any message and silently ignore the
variable "foo2". With an assert compiler, we get an assertion failure.
The root cause —————————————
Back in r140457 we gave InitListChecker a verification-only mode, and will use
CanUseDecl instead of DiagnoseUseOfDecl for verification-only mode.
These two functions handle unavailable issues differently:
In Sema::CanUseDecl, we say the decl is invalid when the Decl is unavailable and
the current context is available.
In Sema::DiagnoseUseOfDecl, we say the decl is usable by ignoring the return
code of DiagnoseAvailabilityOfDecl
So with an assert build, we will hit an assertion in diagnoseListInit
assert(DiagnoseInitList.HadError() &&
"Inconsistent init list check result.");
The fix -------------------
If we follow what is implemented in CanUseDecl and treat Decls with
unavailable issues as invalid, the variable decl of “foo2” will be marked as
invalid. Since unavailable checking is processed in delayed diagnostics
(r197627), we will silently ignore the diagnostics when we find out that
the variable decl is invalid.
We add a flag "TreatUnavailableAsInvalid" for the verification-only mode.
For overload resolution, we want to say decls with unavailable issues are
invalid; but for everything else, we should say they are valid and
emit diagnostics. Depending on the value of the flag, CanUseDecl
can return different values for unavailable issues.
rdar://23557300
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15314
llvm-svn: 263149
Original patch by Stefan Bühler http://reviews.llvm.org/D12834
Difference between original and this one:
- fixed all comments in original code review
- added more tests, all new diagnostics now covered by tests
- moved abi_tag on re-declaration checks to Sema::mergeDeclAttributes
where they actually may work as designed
- clang-format + other stylistic changes
Mangle part will be sent for review as a separate patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17567
llvm-svn: 263015
- Prevent local variables to be declared in global AS
- Diagnose AS of local variables with an extern storage class
as if they would be in a program scope
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17345
llvm-svn: 262641
Applying the following restrictions for block types in OpenCL (v2.0 s6.12.5):
- __block storage class is disallowed
- every block declaration must be const qualified and initialized
- a block can't be used as a return type of a function
- a blocks can't be used to declare a structure or union field
- extern speficier is disallowed
Corrected image and sampler types diagnostics with struct and unions.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16928
llvm-svn: 262616
Add parsing, sema analysis and serialization/deserialization for 'declare reduction' construct.
User-defined reductions are defined as
#pragma omp declare reduction( reduction-identifier : typename-list : combiner ) [initializer ( initializer-expr )]
These custom reductions may be used in 'reduction' clauses of OpenMP constructs. The combiner specifies how partial results can be combined into a single value. The
combiner can use the special variable identifiers omp_in and omp_out that are of the type of the variables being reduced with this reduction-identifier. Each of them will
denote one of the values to be combined before executing the combiner. It is assumed that the special omp_out identifier will refer to the storage that holds the resulting
combined value after executing the combiner.
As the initializer-expr value of a user-defined reduction is not known a priori the initializer-clause can be used to specify one. Then the contents of the initializer-clause
will be used as the initializer for private copies of reduction list items where the omp_priv identifier will refer to the storage to be initialized. The special identifier
omp_orig can also appear in the initializer-clause and it will refer to the storage of the original variable to be reduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11182
llvm-svn: 262582
Functions with an explicit exception specification have their behavior
dictated by the specification. The additional /EHc behavior only comes
into play if no exception specification is given.
llvm-svn: 262198
If we import a module that has a complete array type and one that has an
incomplete array type, the declaration found by name lookup might be the one with
the incomplete type, possibly resulting in rejects-valid.
Now, the name lookup prefers decls with a complete array types. Also,
diagnose cases when the redecl chain has array bound, different from the merge
candidate.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 262189
Use "strict" instead of "nopartial". Also make strictly not-introduced
share the same diagnostics as Obsolete and Unavailable.
rdar://23791325
llvm-svn: 261512
option. Previously these options could both be used to specify that you were
compiling the implementation file of a module, with a different set of minor
bugs in each case.
This change removes -fmodule-implementation-of, and instead tracks a flag to
determine whether we're currently building a module. -fmodule-name now behaves
the same way that -fmodule-implementation-of previously did.
llvm-svn: 261372
An optional nopartial can be placed after the platform name.
int bar() __attribute__((availability(macosx,nopartial,introduced=10.12))
When deploying back to a platform version prior to when the declaration was
introduced, with 'nopartial', Clang emits an error specifying that the function
is not introduced yet; without 'nopartial', the behavior stays the same: the
declaration is `weakly linked`.
A member is added to the end of AttributeList to save the location of the
'nopartial' keyword. A bool member is added to AvailabilityAttr.
The diagnostics for 'nopartial' not-yet-introduced is handled in the same way as
we handle unavailable cases.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor and Jordan Rose.
rdar://23791325
llvm-svn: 261163
thousands of modules, each of which declares the same namespace, linearly
scanning the redecl chain looking for a visible declaration (once for each leaf
module, for each use) performs very poorly. Namespace visibility can only
decrease when we leave a module during a module build step, and we never care
*which* visible declaration of a namespace we find, so we can cache this very
effectively.
This results in a 35x speedup on one of our internal build steps (2m -> 3.5s),
but is hard to unit test because it requires a very large number of modules.
Ideas for a test appreciated! No functionality change intended other than the
speedup.
llvm-svn: 261161
diagnosing when 'concept' is specified on a function or template
specialization.
Since a concept can only be applied to a function or variable template,
the concept bit is stored in TemplateDecl as a PointerIntPair.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13357
llvm-svn: 260074
When building a PCH with modules enabled this import would assert in the
ASTWriter and (if assertions were disabled) sometimes crash the compiler
that loaded the resulting PCH when trying to lookup the submodule ID.
rdar://problem/24137448
llvm-svn: 259859
C++14 generic lambdas. It conflicts with the C++14 return type deduction
mechanism, and results in us failing to actually deduce the lambda's return
type in some cases.
llvm-svn: 259609
In general CUDA does not allow dynamic initialization of
global device-side variables. One exception is that CUDA allows
records with empty constructors as described in section E2.2.1 of
CUDA 7.5 Programming guide.
This patch applies initializer checks for all device-side variables.
Empty constructors are accepted, but no code is generated for them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15305
llvm-svn: 259592
Fix the issue discovered by fuzzing (PR23057, comment 18) by handling nullptr in Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeDecl
and correct delayed typos in for-range expression before calling Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeStmt. Also fixes PR26288.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16630
llvm-svn: 259532
Diagnose if the return type of a function concept or declaration type of a
variable concept is not bool.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16163
llvm-svn: 259159
For
void f() {
union { int i; };
}
clang used to omit the RecordDecl from the anonymous union from the AST.
That's because the code creating it only called PushOnScopeChains(), which adds
it to the current DeclContext, which here is the function's DeclContext. But
RecursiveASTVisitor doesn't descent into all decls in a FunctionDecl.
Instead, for DeclContexts that contain statements, return the RecordDecl so
that it can be included in the DeclStmt containing the VarDecl for the union.
Interesting bits from the AST before this change:
|-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | `-VarDecl 0x589cd60 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
After this change:
-FunctionDecl
| `-CompoundStmt
| |-DeclStmt
| | |-CXXRecordDecl 0x4612e48 <col:3, col:18> col:3 union definition
| | | |-FieldDecl 0x4612f70 <col:11, col:15> col:15 referenced i 'int'
| | `-VarDecl 0x4613010 <col:3> col:3 implicit used 'union (anonymous at test.cc:3:3)' callinit
This is now closer to how anonymous struct and unions are represented as
members of structs. It also enabled deleting some one-off code in the
template instantiation code.
Finally, it fixes a crash with ASTMatchers, see the included test case
(this fixes http://crbug.com/580749).
llvm-svn: 259079
Member pointers in the MS ABI are tricky for a variety of reasons.
The size of a member pointer is indeterminate until the program reaches
a point where the representation is required to be known. However,
*pointers* to member pointers may exist without knowing the pointee
type's representation. In these cases, we synthesize an opaque LLVM
type for the pointee type.
However, we can be in a situation where the underlying member pointer's
representation became known mid-way through the program. To account for
this, we attempted to manicure CodeGen's type-cache so that we can
replace the opaque member pointer type with the real deal while leaving
the pointer types unperturbed. This, unfortunately, is a problematic
approach to take as we will violate CodeGen's invariants.
These violations are mostly harmless but let's do the right thing
instead: invalidate the type-cache if a member pointer's LLVM
representation changes.
This fixes PR26313.
llvm-svn: 258839
Summary:
Turns out the variadic function checking added in r258643 was too strict
for some existing users; give them an escape valve. When
-fcuda-allow-variadic-functions is passed, the front-end makes no
attempt to disallow C-style variadic functions. Calls to va_arg are
still not allowed.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jhen, echristo, bkramer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16559
llvm-svn: 258822
__GetExceptionInfo triggered Sema::LazilyCreateBuiltin which tries to
create a non-templated function decl. This is unnecessary and
ill-advised, there is no need for us to create a declaration for such a
builtin.
This fixes PR26298.
llvm-svn: 258762
redeclares an existing tag but are creating a new declaration anyway (because
it has attributes or changes the visibility of the name), don't warn that it
won't be visible outside the current scope. That's not true.
Also narrow down the set of cases where we create these extra declarations when
building modules; previously, all tag declarations but the first in a module
header would get this treatment if -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility. (This
isn't a functional change, but we try to avoid creating these extra
declarations whenever we can.)
llvm-svn: 257403
Summary:
Support for OpenCL 2.0 pipe type.
This is a bug-fix version for bader's patch reviews.llvm.org/D14441
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, Anastasia, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15603
llvm-svn: 257254
tag (because the previous declaration was found in a different module), inject
the tag into the appropriate scope (that is, the enclosing scope if we're in a
function prototype scope in C++).
llvm-svn: 257251
underlying decls. Preserve the found declaration throughout, and only map to
the underlying declaration when we want to check whether it's the right kind.
This allows us to provide the right source location for the found declaration,
and prepares for the possibility of underlying decls with a different name
from the found decl.
llvm-svn: 256575
have a nested name specifier. Strictly speaking, forward declarations of class
template partial specializations are not permitted at all, but that seems like
an obvious wording defect, and if we allow them without a nested name specifier
we should also allow them with a nested name specifier.
llvm-svn: 255383
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
We will still allow it in system headers, in macros from system headers, when
combined with an 'asm' label, and under the flag -Wno-register.
llvm-svn: 254097
Currently, when there is a global register variable in a program that
is bound to an invalid register, clang/llvm prints an error message that
is not very user-friendly.
This commit improves the diagnostic and moves the check that used to be
in the backend to Sema. In addition, it makes changes to error out if
the size of the register doesn't match the declared variable size.
e.g., volatile register int B asm ("rbp");
rdar://problem/23084219
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13834
llvm-svn: 253405
other than the top level, we issue an error. This breaks a fair amount of C++
code wrapping C libraries, where the C library is #included within a namespace
/ extern "C" combination, because the C library (probably) includes C++
standard library headers which may be within modules.
Without modules, this setup is harmless if (and *only* if) the corresponding
standard library module was already included outside the namespace, so
downgrade the error to a default-error extension in that case, so that it can
be selectively disabled for such misbehaving libraries.
llvm-svn: 253398
