Summary:
This causes the issue in PR26872 to go away now that we aren't creating
symbols for the string literals, but that may just be concealing a
deeper problem, so best to keep that PR open.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: Bigcheese, llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17971
llvm-svn: 262968
There was a known limitation for -r option:
relocations against local symbols were not supported.
For example rel[a].eh_frame sections contained relocations against sections
and that was not supported for -r before. Patch fixes that.
Differential review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17813
llvm-svn: 262590
This patch implements the same algorithm as LLD/COFF's ICF. I'm
not going to repeat the same description about how it works, so you
want to read the comment in ICF.cpp in this patch if you want to know
the details. This algorithm should be more powerful than the ICF
algorithm implemented in GNU gold. It can even merge mutually-recursive
functions (which is harder than one might think).
ICF is a fairly effective size optimization. Here are some examples.
LLD: 37.14 MB -> 35.80 MB (-3.6%)
Clang: 59.41 MB -> 57.80 MB (-2.7%)
The lacking feature is "safe" version of ICF. This merges all
identical sections. That is not compatible with a C/C++ language
requirement that two distinct functions must have distinct addresses.
But as long as your program do not rely on the pointer equality
(which is in many cases true), your program should work with the
feature. LLD works fine for example.
GNU gold implements so-called "safe ICF" that identifies functions
that are safe to merge by heuristics -- for example, gold thinks
that constructors are safe to merge because there is no way to
take an address of a constructor in C++. We have a different idea
which David Majnemer suggested that we add NOPs at beginning of
merged functions so that two or more pointers can have distinct
values. We can do whichever we want, but this patch does not
include neither.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17529
llvm-svn: 261912
-r, -relocatable - Generate relocatable output
Currently does not have support for files containing
relocation sections with entries that refer to local
symbols (like rel[a].eh_frame which refer to sections
and not to symbols)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14382
llvm-svn: 261838
"Discarded" section is a marker for discarded sections, and we do not
use the instance except for checking its identity. In that sense, it
is just another type of a "null" pointer for InputSectionBase. So,
it doesn't have to be a real instance of InputSectionBase class.
In this patch, we no longer instantiate Discarded section but instead
use -1 as a pointer value. This eliminates a global variable which
needed initialization at startup.
llvm-svn: 261761
This patch moves BitcodeFile instantiation into createObjectFile.
Previously, we handle bitcode files outside that function and did
not handle for --whole-archive.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17527
llvm-svn: 261663
This reduces the .rodata of scyladb from 4501932 to 4334639 bytes (1.038
times smaller).
I don't think it is critical to support tail merging, just exact
duplicates, but given the code organization it was actually a bit easier
to support both.
llvm-svn: 261327
Summary:
LLVM3.3 (and earlier) would fail to include a relocation section in
the group that the section it was relocating is in. Object files
affected by this issue have been encountered in the wild when using LLD.
This would result in a siutation like:
Section {
Index: 5
Name: .text._Z3fooIiEvv (6)
Type: SHT_PROGBITS (0x1)
Flags [ (0x206)
SHF_ALLOC (0x2)
SHF_EXECINSTR (0x4)
SHF_GROUP (0x200)
]
Address: 0x0
Offset: 0x48
Size: 5
Link: 0
Info: 0
AddressAlignment: 1
EntrySize: 0
}
Section {
Index: 6
Name: .rela.text._Z3fooIiEvv (1)
Type: SHT_RELA (0x4)
Flags [ (0x0)
]
Address: 0x0
Offset: 0x3F0
Size: 24
Link: 8
Info: 5
AddressAlignment: 8
EntrySize: 24
}
In LLD, during symbol resolution, we discard the section containing the
weak symbol, but this amounts to replacing it with
InputSection<ELFT>::Discarded.
When we later saw the corresponding relocation section, we would then
end up pusing onto InputSection<ELFT>::Discarded.RelocSections, which is
bogus.
Reviewers: ruiu, rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Bigcheese
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16898
llvm-svn: 259831
If object files are drawn from archive files, the error message should
be something like "conflict symbols in foo.a(bar.o) and baz.o" instead
of "conflict symbols in bar.o and baz.o". This patch implements that.
llvm-svn: 259475
In many situations, we don't want to exit at the first error even in the
process model. For example, it is better to report all undefined symbols
rather than reporting the first one that the linker picked up randomly.
In order to handle such errors, we don't need to wrap everything with
ErrorOr (thanks for David Blaikie for pointing this out!) Instead, we
can set a flag to record the fact that we found an error and keep it
going until it reaches a reasonable checkpoint.
This idea should be applicable to other places. For example, we can
ignore broken relocations and check for errors after visiting all relocs.
In this patch, I rename error to fatal, and introduce another version of
error which doesn't call exit. That function instead sets HasError to true.
Once HasError becomes true, it stays true, so that we know that there
was an error if it is true.
I think introducing a non-noreturn error reporting function is by itself
a good idea, and it looks to me that this also provides a gradual path
towards lld-as-a-library (or at least embed-lld-to-your-program) without
sacrificing code readability with lots of ErrorOr's.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16641
llvm-svn: 259069
MipsReginfoInputSection is basically just a container of Elf_Mips_Reginfo
struct. This patch makes that struct directly accessible from others.
llvm-svn: 256984
Unlike ObjectFile or ArchiveFile, SharedFile had two parse functions,
parseSoName() and parse(). parse must have been called after parseSoName,
but that requirement was not obvious from their names. (So it looked
like you could call parse() on a shared object file right away.)
This patch rename parseRest. It is now obvious that there's no single
parse function for the shared object file.
llvm-svn: 256898
Previously, we handle archive files with --whole-archive this way:
create instances of ArchiveFile, call getMembers to obtain memory
buffers of archive members, and create ObjectFiles for the members.
We didn't call anything except getMembers if --whole-archive was
specified.
I noticed that we didn't actually have to create ArchiveFile instaces
at all for that case. All we need is to get a list of memory buffers
for members, which can be done by a non-member function.
This patch removes getMembers member function from ArchiveFile.
Also removed unnecessary code for memory management.
llvm-svn: 256893
The R_MIPS_GPREL16 / R_MIPS_GPREL32 relocations use the following
expressions for calculations:
```
local symbol: S + A + GP0 - GP
global symbol: S + A - GP
GP - Represents the final gp value, i.e. _gp symbol
GP0 - Represents the gp value used to create the relocatable object
```
The GP0 value is taken from the .reginfo data section defined by an object
file. To implement that I keep a reference to `MipsReginfoInputSection`
in the `ObjectFile` class. This reference is used by the
`ObjectFile::getMipsGp0` method to return the GP0 value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15760
llvm-svn: 256416
There are 3 symbol types that a .bc can provide during lto: defined,
undefined, common.
Defined and undefined symbols have already been refactored. I was
working on common and noticed that absolute symbols would become an
oddity: They would be the only symbol type present in a .o but not in
a.bc.
Looking a bit more, other than the special section number they were only
used for special rules for computing values. In that way they are
similar to TLS, and we don't have a DefinedTLS.
This patch deletes it. With it we have a reasonable rule of the thumb
for having a symbol kind: It exists if it has special resolution
semantics.
llvm-svn: 256383
