The patch adds support for R_MIPS_PC16, R_MIPS_PC19_S2, R_MIPS_PC21_S2,
R_MIPS_PC26_S2, R_MIPS_PCHI16, R_MIPS_PCLO16 relocations handling.
llvm-svn: 256172
This relocation is similar to R_*_RELATIVE except that the value used in this relocation is the program address returned by the function, which takes no arguments, at the address of
the result of the corresponding R_*_RELATIVE relocation as specified in the processor-specific ABI. The purpose of this relocation to avoid name lookup for locally defined STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols at load-time.
More info can be found in ifunc.txt from https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/documents.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15235
llvm-svn: 256144
R_386_GOTOFF is calculated as S + A - GOT, where:
S - Represents the value of the symbol whose index resides in the relocation entry.
A - Represents the addend used to compute the value of the relocatable field.
GOT - Represents the address of the global offset table.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15383
llvm-svn: 256143
@indntpoff is similar to @gotntpoff, but for use in position dependent code. While @gotntpoff resolves to GOT slot address relative to the
start of the GOT in the movl or addl instructions, @indntpoff resolves to the
absolute GOT slot address. ("ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage", Ulrich Drepper).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15494
llvm-svn: 255884
The `R_MIPS_JALR` is a relocation generated by gcc and gas. This
relocation points to the `jalr` instruction which might be optimized and
converted to the `b` instruction under some conditions.
Now we just ignore this relocation and keep instructions unchanged.
llvm-svn: 255453
R_X86_64_SIZE64/R_X86_64_SIZE32 relocations were introduced in 0.98v of "System V Application Binary Interface x86-64" (http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf).
Calculation for them is Z + A, where:
Z - Represents the size of the symbol whose index resides in the relocation entry.
A - Represents the addend used to compute the value of the relocatable field.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15335
llvm-svn: 255332
If R_386_PLT32 relocation is applied against symbol that can not be preempted then it can be resolved statically.
Patch implements it for x86 target.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15376
llvm-svn: 255233
Implement the TLS relocation optimization for 32-bit x86 that is described in
"ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" by Ulrich Drepper, chapter 5,
"IA-32 Linker Optimizations". Specifically, this patch implements these
optimizations: LD->LE, GD->IE, GD->LD, and IE->LE.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15292
llvm-svn: 255103
All relocations, which cannot be handled by the dynamic linker,
cause a linking error "rebuild with -fPIC".
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15193
llvm-svn: 254840
"Ulrich Drepper, ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage" (5.5 x86-x64 linker optimizations, http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf) shows how GD can be optimized to IE.
This patch implements the optimization.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15000
llvm-svn: 254713
Main aim of the patch to introduce basic support for TLS access models for x86 target.
Models using @tlsgd, @tlsldm and @gotntpoff are implemented.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15060
llvm-svn: 254500
Some MIPS relocations including `R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16` use combined
addends. Such addend is calculated using addends of both paired relocations.
Each `R_MIPS_HI16` relocation is paired with the next `R_MIPS_LO16`
relocation. ABI requires to compute such combined addend in case of REL
relocation record format only.
For details see p. 4-17 at
ftp://www.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/doc/ABI/mipsabi.pdf
This patch implements lookup of the next paired relocation suing new
`InputSectionBase::findPairedRelocLocation` method. The primary
disadvantage of this approach is that we put MIPS specific logic into
the common code. The next disadvantage is that we lookup `R_MIPS_LO16`
for each `R_MIPS_HI16` relocation, while in fact multiple `R_MIPS_HI16`
might be paired with the single `R_MIPS_LO16`. From the other side
this way allows us to keep `MipsTargetInfo` class stateless and implement
later relocation handling in parallel.
This patch does not support `R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16` relocations against
`_gp_disp` symbol. In that case the relocations use a special formula for
the calculation. That will be implemented later.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15112
llvm-svn: 254461
ABI specifies the allowed range for these relocations as 2^(n-1) <= X < 2^n.
The patch fixes checks and introduces precise tests for these relocations.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14957
llvm-svn: 254146
Implements @tlsld (LD to LE) and @tlsgd (GD to LE) optimizations.
Patch does not implement the GD->IE case for @tlsgd.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14870
llvm-svn: 254101
Patch implements lazy relocations for x86.
One of features of x86 is that executable files and shared object files have separate procedure linkage tables. So patch implements both cases.
Detailed information about instructions used can be found in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19620-01/805-3050/chapter6-1235/index.html (search: x86: Procedure Linkage Table).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14955
llvm-svn: 254098
R_MIPS_CALL16 relocation provides the same result as R_MIPS_GOT16
relocation but does not need to check the result on overflow.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14916
llvm-svn: 254092
This patch implements next relocations:
R_386_TLS_LE - Negative offset relative to static TLS (GNU version).
R_386_TLS_LE_32 - Offset relative to static TLS block.
These ones are created when using next code sequences:
* @tpoff - The operator must be used to compute an immediate value. The linker will report
an error if the referenced variable is not defined or it is not code for the executable
itself. No GOT entry is created in this case.
* @ntpoff Calculate the negative offset of the variable it is added to relative to the static TLS block.
The operator must be used to compute an immediate value. The linker will report
an error if the referenced variable is not defined or it is not code for the executable
itself. No GOT entry is created in this case.
Information was found in Ulrich Drepper, ELF Handling For Thread-Local Storage, http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf, (6.2, p76)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14930
llvm-svn: 254090
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19683-01/817-3677/chapter6-26/index.html says:
R_386_GOTPC
Resembles R_386_PC32, except that it uses the address of the global offset table in its calculation. The symbol referenced in this relocation normally is _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_, which also instructs the link-editor to create the global offset table.
Currently _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ has value == zero. And we use GOT address to calculate the relocation. This patch does not changes that. It just removes the method which is used only for x86. So it is close to non functional change.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14993
llvm-svn: 254088
R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF is not always requires GOT entries. Some relocations can be converted to local ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14713
llvm-svn: 253966
With these relocations, it is now possible to build a simple "hello world"
program for AArch64 Debian.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14917
llvm-svn: 253957
The content of reserved entries of the .got.plt section is target specific.
In particular, on x86_64 the zero entry holds the address of the .dynamic section,
but on AArch64 the same info is stored in the zero entry of the .got section.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14703
llvm-svn: 253239
leaq symbol@tlsld(%rip), %rdi
call __tls_get_addr@plt
symbol@tlsld (R_X86_64_TLSLD) instructs the linker to generate a tls_index entry (two GOT slots) in the GOT for the entire module (shared object or executable) with an offset of 0. The symbol for this GOT entry doesn't matter (as long as it's either local to the module or null), and gold doesn't put a symbol in the dynamic R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 relocation for the GOT entry.
All other platforms defined in http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/tls.pdf except for Itanium use a similar model where global and local dynamic GOT entries take up 2 contiguous GOT slots, so we can handle this in a unified manner if we don't care about Itanium.
While scanning relocations we need to identify local dynamic relocations and generate a single tls_index entry in the GOT for the module and store the address of it somewhere so we can later statically resolve the offset for R_X86_64_TLSLD relocations. We also need to generate a R_X86_64_DTPMOD64 relocation in the RelaDyn relocation section.
This implementation is a bit hacky. It side steps the issue of GotSection and RelocationSection only handling SymbolBody entries by relying on a specific relocation type. The alternative to this seemed to be completely rewriting how GotSection and RelocationSection work, or using a different hacky signaling method.
llvm-svn: 252682
