Summary:
.rela.debug_info relocations are being done via
ObjectFileELF::ApplyRelocations for aarch64. Currently, the switch case
that iterates over the relocation type is only implemented for a few
different types and `assert(false)`es over the rest.
Implement the relocation for R_AARCH64_ABS32 in ApplyRelocations
Reviewers: sas, xiaobai, peter.smith, clayborg, javed.absar, espindola
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49407
Change by Nathan Lanza <lanza@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 339068
In the lldb-bench/arithmetic benchmark, 1.7% of the total running time
is spent zero-initializing a std::vector that has already been zeroed.
llvm-svn: 339051
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
This is a fixed version of: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
The changes from D49750 are:
Don't init the m_arch in the Initialize call as a system info isn't required. This keeps the thread list, module list and other tests from failing
Added -Wextended-offsetof to Xcode project so we catch use extended usages of offsetof before submission
Fixed any extended offset of warnings
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50336
llvm-svn: 339032
Summary: `IsEmpty()` and `operator bool() == false` have equal semantics. Usage in Mangled::GetDemangledName() was incorrect. What it actually wants is a check for null-string. Split this off of D50071 and added a test to clarify usage.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50327
llvm-svn: 339014
Summary:
We already have the same check directly before, so this code can never be
reached (as seen in the test coverage).
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50317
llvm-svn: 338976
I noticed a suspicious failure:
[ RUN ] VMRange.CollectionContains
llvm/src/tools/lldb/unittests/Utility/VMRangeTest.cpp:146: Failure
Value of: VMRange::ContainsRange(collection, VMRange(0x100, 0x104))
Actual: false
Expected: true
Looking at the code, it is a very real bug:
class RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate {
public:
RangeInRangeUnaryPredicate(VMRange range) : _range(range) {} // note that _range binds to a temporary!
bool operator()(const VMRange &range) const {
return range.Contains(_range);
}
const VMRange &_range;
};
This change fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50290
llvm-svn: 338949
Summary:
This wrapper will allow us in the future to reuse LLVM methods from within the
Stream class.
Currently no test as this is intended to be an internal class that shouldn't have any
NFC. The test for this change will be the follow up patch that migrates LLDB's
LEB128 implementation to the one from LLVM.
This change also adds custom move/assignment methods to Stream, as LLVM
raw_ostream doesn't support these. As our internal stream has anyway no state,
we can just keep the same stream object around.
Reviewers: davide, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: xiaobai, labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50161
llvm-svn: 338901
This reverts commit r338734 (and subsequent fixups in r338772 and
r338746), because it breaks some minidump unit tests and introduces a
lot of compiler warnings.
llvm-svn: 338828
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
llvm-svn: 338734
Summary:
This patch allows LLDB's Stream class to count the bytes it has written to so far.
There are two major motivations for this patch:
The first one is that this will allow us to get rid of all the handwritten byte counting code
we have in LLDB so far. Examples for this are pretty much all functions in LLDB that
take a Stream to write to and return a size_t, which usually represents the bytes written.
By moving to this centralized byte counting mechanism, we hopefully can avoid some
tricky errors that happen when some code forgets to count the written bytes while
writing something to a stream.
The second motivation is that this is needed for the migration away from LLDB's `Stream`
and towards LLVM's `raw_ostream`. My current plan is to start offering a fake raw_ostream
class that just forwards to a LLDB Stream.
However, for this raw_ostream wrapper we need to fulfill the raw_ostream interface with
LLDB's Stream, which currently lacks the ability to count the bytes written so far (which
raw_ostream exposes by it's `tell()` method). By adding this functionality it is trivial to start
rolling out our raw_ostream wrapper (and then eventually completely move to raw_ostream).
Also, once this fake raw_ostream is available, we can start replacing our own code writing
to LLDB's Stream by LLVM code writing to raw_ostream. The best example for this is the
LEB128 encoding we currently ship, which can be replaced with by LLVM's version which
accepts an raw_ostream.
From the point of view of the pure source changes this test does, we essentially just renamed
the Write implementation in Stream to `WriteImpl` while the `Write` method everyone is using
to write its raw bytes is now just forwarding and counting the written bytes.
Reviewers: labath, davide
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50159
llvm-svn: 338733
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
Summary:
When I added the Stream unit test (r338488), the build bots failed due to an out-of-
bound reads when passing an empty string to the PutCStringAsRawHex8 method.
In r338491 I removed the test case to fix the bots.
This patch fixes this in PutCStringAsRawHex8 by always checking for the terminating
null character in the given string (instead of skipping it the first time). It also re-adds the
test case I removed.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: vsk, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50149
llvm-svn: 338637
Summary:
Previously, I thought that install-liblldb would fail because CMake had
a bug related to installing frameworks. In actuality, I misunderstood the
semantics of `add_custom_target`: the DEPENDS option refers to specific files,
not targets. Therefore `install-liblldb` should rely on the actual liblldb
getting generated rather than the target.
This means that the previous patch I committed (to stop relying on CMake's
framework support) is no longer needed and has been reverted. Using CMake's
framework support greatly simplifies the implementation.
`install-lldb-framework` (and the stripped variant) is as simple as
depending on `install-liblldb` because CMake knows that liblldb was built as a
framework and will install the whole framework for you. The stripped variant
will depend on the stripped variants of individual tools only to ensure they
actually are stripped as well.
Reviewers: labath, sas
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50038
llvm-svn: 338594
Clarify how StackFrameList works by documenting its methods. Also,
delete some dead code and insert some TODOs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50087
llvm-svn: 338590
Splitting GetOnlyConcreteFramesUpTo will make it easier to implement
support for synthetic tail call frames in backtraces. This is just a
prep change, no functionality is affected.
llvm-svn: 338588
against the OS rather than the environment. Also update other
uses of OS when we meant environment in the android local code.
NFC intended.
llvm-svn: 338460
Summary: No one is using this method, and it also doesn't really make a lot of sense to have it around.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50026
llvm-svn: 338345
Summary:
We usually don't have trailing newlines in the short help strings. This just adds
unnecessary extra lines when printing the help text of these commands.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50015
llvm-svn: 338311
This reverts r338154. This change is actually unnecessary, as the CMake
bug I referred to was actually not a bug but a misunderstanding of
CMake.
Original Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49888
llvm-svn: 338178
Summary: Stopgap patch to at least stop all the crashes I get from this code.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49949
llvm-svn: 338177
This broke a linux bot which doesn't support -std=c++17. The solution
is to add a decorator to skip these tests on machines with older compilers.
llvm-svn: 338162
This should have all the correct files now.
<rdar://problem/41471112>
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 338156
Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:
Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.
Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.
This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:
1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.
Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.
Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.
The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.
Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322
llvm-svn: 338151
Summary:
So far lldb is printing this when it finds an ambiguous command:
```
(lldb) g
Ambiguous command 'g'. Possible matches:
gdb-remote
gui
gdb-remote
gui
```
The duplicates come from the fact that we call the same query twice with the same parameters
and add it to the same list. This patch just removes the second query call to `GetCommandObject`.
As `GetCommandObject` is const and the name parameter is also not modified, this shouldn't break
anything else. I didn't merge the remaining if statement into the else as I think otherwise the
`if obj==nullptr do X else Y` pattern in there becomes hard to recognize.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49866
llvm-svn: 338043
Summary:
We always print two error messages when we hit an unknown command. As the function
`CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand` that prints the second error message unconditionally called the `CommandInterpreter::ResolveCommandImpl` before (which prints the first error message), we can just remove
that second error message.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38312
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49831
llvm-svn: 338040
Summary:
Replace the existing combination of FastDemangle and the fallback to llvm::itaniumDemangle() with LLVM's new ItaniumPartialDemangler. It slightly reduces complexity and slightly improves performance, but doesn't introduce conceptual changes. This patch is preparing for more fundamental improvements on LLDB's demangling approach.
Reviewers: friss, jingham, erik.pilkington, labath, clayborg, mgorny, davide, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, labath, clayborg, davide, lldb-commits, mgorny, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49612
llvm-svn: 337931
Summary: This class doesn't seem to be used anywhere, so we might as well remove the code.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49755
llvm-svn: 337855
Summary:
The dump function was the only part of this class which depended on
high-level functionality. This was due to the DumpDataExtractor
function, which uses info from a running target to control dump format
(although, RegisterValue doesn't really use the high-level part of
DumpDataExtractor).
This patch follows the same approach done for the DataExtractor class,
and extracts the dumping code into a separate function/file. This file
can stay in the higher level code, while the RegisterValue class and
anything that does not depend in dumping can stay go to lower layers.
The XCode project will need to be updated after this patch.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48351
llvm-svn: 337832
Summary:
LLDB_PLUGINS doesn't exist as a variable, so this line doesn't add any dependencies and is
just confusing. It seems this slipped in from the gdb-remote CMake I was using as a CMake template.
The gdb-remote CMake itself is using a local LLDB_PLUGINS variable, so that code is fine.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49695
llvm-svn: 337741
