Summary:
- Adds getters for the line, column, and scope of a DILocation
- Adds getters for the name, size in bits, offset in bits, alignment in bits, line, and flags of a DIType
Reviewers: whitequark, harlanhaskins, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46627
llvm-svn: 332014
Reviewed by: dblaikie, JDevlieghere, espindola
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44560
Summary:
The .debug_line parser previously reported errors by printing to stderr and
return false. This is not particularly helpful for clients of the library code,
as it prevents them from handling the errors in a manner based on the calling
context. This change switches to using llvm::Error and callbacks to indicate
what problems were detected during parsing, and has updated clients to handle
the errors in a location-specific manner. In general, this means that they
continue to do the same thing to external users. Below, I have outlined what
the known behaviour changes are, relating to this change.
There are two levels of "errors" in the new error mechanism, to broadly
distinguish between different fail states of the parser, since not every
failure will prevent parsing of the unit, or of subsequent unit. Malformed
table errors that prevent reading the remainder of the table (reported by
returning them) and other minor issues representing problems with parsing that
do not prevent attempting to continue reading the table (reported by calling a
specified callback funciton). The only example of this currently is when the
last sequence of a unit is unterminated. However, I think it would be good to
change the handling of unrecognised opcodes to report as minor issues as well,
rather than just printing to the stream if --verbose is used (this would be a
subsequent change however).
I have substantially extended the DwarfGenerator to be able to handle
custom-crafted .debug_line sections, allowing for comprehensive unit-testing
of the parser code. For now, I am just adding unit tests to cover the basic
error reporting, and positive cases, and do not currently intend to test every
part of the parser, although the framework should be sufficient to do so at a
later point.
Known behaviour changes:
- The dump function in DWARFContext now does not attempt to read subsequent
tables when searching for a specific offset, if the unit length field of a
table before the specified offset is a reserved value.
- getOrParseLineTable now returns a useful Error if an invalid offset is
encountered, rather than simply a nullptr.
- The parse functions no longer use `WithColor::warning` directly to report
errors, allowing LLD to call its own warning function.
- The existing parse error messages have been updated to not specifically
include "warning" in their message, allowing consumers to determine what
severity the problem is.
- If the line table version field appears to have a value less than 2, an
informative error is returned, instead of just false.
- If the line table unit length field uses a reserved value, an informative
error is returned, instead of just false.
- Dumping of .debug_line.dwo sections is now implemented the same as regular
.debug_line sections.
- Verbose dumping of .debug_line[.dwo] sections now prints the prologue, if
there is a prologue error, just like non-verbose dumping.
As a helper for the generator code, I have re-added emitInt64 to the
AsmPrinter code. This previously existed, but was removed way back in r100296,
presumably because it was dead at the time.
This change also requires a change to LLD, which will be committed separately.
llvm-svn: 331971
The new verifier check has found an error in the
debug-names-name-collisions.ll test on the PS4 bot:
error: Name Index @ 0x0: Entry @ 0xdc: mismatched Name of DIE @ 0x23: index - _ZN3foo3fooE; debug_info - foo.
Reverting while I investigate whether this is a bug in the verifier or
the generator.
This reverts commit r331868.
llvm-svn: 331869
Summary:
This patch implements a check which makes sure all entries required by
the DWARF v5 specification are present in the Name Index. The algorithm
tries to follow the wording of Section 6.1.1.1 of the spec as closely as
possible.
The main deviation from it is that instead of a whitelist-based approach
in the spec "The name index must contain an entry for each debugging
information entry that defines a named subprogram, label, variable,
type, or namespace" I chose a blacklist-based one, where I consider
everything to be "in" and then remove the entries that don't make sense.
I did this because it has more potential for catching interesting cases
and the above is a bit vague (it uses plain words like "variable" and
"subprogram", but the rest of the section speaks about specific TAGs).
This approach has raised some interesting questions, the main one being
whether enumerator values should be indexed. The consensus seems to be
that they should, although it does not follow from section 6.1.1.1.
For the time being I made the verifier ignore these, as LLVM does not do
this yet, and I wanted to get a clean run when verifying generated debug
info.
Another interesting case was the DW_TAG_imported_declaration. It was not
immediately clear to me whether this should go in or not, but currently
it is not indexed, and (unlike the enumerators) in does not seem to cause
problems for LLDB, so I've also ignored it.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46583
llvm-svn: 331868
The operator == used for exporting a function with a different
name in the DLL compared to the name in the import library
(which is useful for adding linker level aliases for function
in the import library) is a feature distinct and different from
the operator = used for exporting a function with a different
name (both in import library and DLL) than in the implementation
producing the DLL.
When creating an import library using dlltool, from a def file that
contains forwards (Func = OtherDll.Func), this shouldn't affect the
produced import library, which should still behave just as if it
was a normal exported function.
This clears a lot of confusion and subtle misunderstandings, and
avoids a parameter that was used to avoid creating weak aliases
when invoked from lld. (This parameter was added previously due to
the existing conflation of the two features.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46245
llvm-svn: 331859
Reverting this to see if the clang-cmake-aarch64-global-isel and
clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bots are failing because of this commit.
We know it wasn't r331819.
llvm-svn: 331846
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
In order to convert LLVM IR to MachineInstr, we need a new TargetOpcode,
DBG_LABEL, to ‘lower’ intrinsic llvm.dbg.label. The patch
creates this new TargetOpcode and convert intrinsic llvm.dbg.label to
MachineInstr through SelectionDAG.
In SelectionDAG, debug information is stored in SDDbgInfo. We create a
new data member of SDDbgInfo for labels and use the new data member,
SDDbgLabel, to create DBG_LABEL MachineInstr.
The new DBG_LABEL MachineInstr uses label metadata from LLVM IR as its
parameter. So, the backend could get metadata information of labels from
DBG_LABEL MachineInstr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45341
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331842
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
Refactoring LegalizerHelper::widenScalar member function reducing its
size by approximately a factor of 2 and (hopefuly) making it more
straightforward and regular by introducing widenScalarSrc and
widenScalarDst helper methods.
The new widenScalar* methods mutate the instructions in place instead
of recreating them from scratch and removing the originals. The
compile time implications of this were measured on sqlite3
amalgamation, targeting AArch64 in -O0:
LegalizerHelper::widenScalar: > 25% faster
Legalizer::runOnMachineFunction: ~ 4.0 - 4.5% faster
Also adding MachineOperand::setCImm and refactoring out
MachineIRBuilder::recordInsertion methods to make the change possible.
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, bogner, javed.absar, t.p.northover, ab, dsanders, arsenm
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: wdng, rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46414
llvm-svn: 331819
Summary:
Don't skip functions with the same name but from different files.
That change makes it possible to generate code coverage reports from
different binaries compiled from different sources even if there are functions
with non-unique names. Without that change, code coverage for such functions is
missing except of the first function processed.
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46478
llvm-svn: 331801
This is an NFC pre-commit for the following "Checking that generic
instrs have LLTs on all vregs" commit.
This overloads MachineOperand::print to make it possible to print LLTs
with standalone machine operands.
This also overloads MachineVerifier::print(...MachineOperand...) with
an optional LLT using the newly introduced MachineOperand::print
variant; no actual calls added.
This also refactors MachineVerifier::visitMachineInstrBefore in the
parts dealing with all generic instructions (checking Selected
property, LLTs, and phys regs).
llvm-svn: 331693
Summary:
Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)).
This had a few drawbacks:
* G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if
registers didn't naturally hold those sizes.
* All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the
extend went missing (e.g. by optimization).
* At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we
improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement
would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were
permitted.
* The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern
rewriting to translate patterns into this style.
This patch changes the representation to:
* (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x)
* (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits()
which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their
native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from
SelectionDAG patterns.
Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends
and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending
load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses
smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an
any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something
else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for
for this will follow.
The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory
access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the
extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes
now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from
select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains
loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore.
Depends on D45540
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rtereshin
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541
llvm-svn: 331601
Summary: Adding support for Fast flags in the SDNode to leverage fast math sub flag usage.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, jbhateja, hfinkel, escha, qcolombet, echristo, wristow, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rampitec, nhaehnle, tstellar, FarhanaAleen, nemanjai, javed.absar, jbhateja, hfinkel, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710
llvm-svn: 331547
Summary:
constrainOperandRegClass() currently fails if it tries to constrain the
register class of an operand that is defeined with an unallocatable register
class. This patch resolves this by adding a target callback to compute
register constriants in this case.
This is required by the AMDGPU because many of its instructions have source opreands
defined with the unallocatable register classe VS_32 which is a union of two allocatable
register classes VGPR_32 and SReg_32.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, tpr, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45991
llvm-svn: 331485
Summary:
Machine Instruction flags for fast math support and MIR print support
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45781
llvm-svn: 331417
This code previously existed only in MCMachOStreamer but is
useful for WebAssembly too. See: D46335
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46297
llvm-svn: 331412
Summary:
Prior to this change, LLVM would in some cases emit *massive* writeout
functions with many 10s of 1000s of function calls in straight-line
code. This is a very wasteful way to represent what are fundamentally
loops and creates a number of scalability issues. Among other things,
register allocating these calls is extremely expensive. While D46127 makes this
less severe, we'll still run into scaling issues with this eventually. If not
in the compile time, just from the code size.
Now the pass builds up global data structures modeling the inputs to
these functions, and simply loops over the data structures calling the
relevant functions with those values. This ensures that the code size is
a fixed and only data size grows with larger amounts of coverage data.
A trivial change to IRBuilder is included to make it easier to build
the constants that make up the global data.
Reviewers: wmi, echristo
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46357
llvm-svn: 331407
The main goal is to share getMatchTable between the Instruction
Selector and the Testgen.
The commit also contains some NFC only loosely related to refactoring
out the getMatchTable, but strongly related to the initial Testgen
patch (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D43962)
Reviewers: dsanders, aemerson
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46096
llvm-svn: 331395
Summary:
Some of our internal testing detected a major compile time regression which I've
tracked down to:
r278938 - Revert "Reassociate: Reprocess RedoInsts after each inst".
It appears that processing long chains of reassociatable instructions causes
non-linear (potentially exponential) growth in the number of times an
instruction is revisited. For example, the included test revisits instructions
220 times in a 20-instruction test.
It appears that r278938 reversed the order instructions were visited and that
this is preventing scheduled revisits from being cancelled as a result of
visiting the instructions naturally during normal processing. However, simply
reversing the order also harmed the generated code. Upon closer inspection, it
was discovered that revisits occurred in the opposite order to the first pass
(Thanks to escha for spotting that).
This patch makes the revisit order consistent with the first pass which allows
more revisits to be cancelled. This does appear to have a small impact on the
generated code in few cases but it significantly reduces compile-time.
After this patch, our internal test that was most affected by the regression
dropped from ~2 million revisits to ~4k resulting in Reassociate having 0.46%
of the runtime it had before (99.54% improvement).
Here's the summaries reported by lnt for the LLVM test-suite with --benchmarking-only:
| metric | geomean before patch | geomean after patch | delta |
| ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- |
| compile time | 0.1956 | 0.1261 | -35.54% |
| execution time | 0.3240 | 0.3237 | - |
| code size | 7365.4459 | 7365.6079 | - |
The results have a few wins and losses on compile-time, mostly in the +/- 2.5% range. There was one outlier though:
| Performance Regressions - compile_time | Δ | Previous | Current |
| MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/CrystalMk/CrystalMk | 9.82% | 2.0473 | 2.2483 |
Reviewers: javed.absar, dberlin
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45734
llvm-svn: 331381
It turned out that readonly argmemonly is not enough.
store 42, %p
%b = barrier(%p)
store 43, %b
the first store is dead, but because barrier was marked as
reading argument memory, it was considered alive. With
inaccessiblememonly it doesn't read the argument, but
it also can't be CSEd.
based on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32006
llvm-svn: 331338
According to MSDN, Visual Studio 2015 included support for
std::is_final. Additionally, a bug in the Visual Studio compiler results
in the incorrect definition of __cplusplus. Due to the conditions in the
else case not holding either, we end up with no definition of
LLVM_IS_FINAL when building with MSVC. This has not yet been a problem
with LLVM/clang, however, the uses of LLVM_IS_FINAL is more prevalent in
swift, which uses the ADT library and causes issues when building lldb
with Visual Studio.
Workaround the issue by always assuming that the definition of
std::is_final is available with Visual Studio. Since we currently
require VS 2015+ for building LLVM, this condition should always hold
for the users in LLVM/clang (and for swift).
llvm-svn: 331282
This is a follow-up to r331272.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331275
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
I replaced all uses of LLVM_ON_WIN32 with _WIN32 in r331127 (llvm),
r331069 (clang), r329697 (lldb), r329696 (lld), r329696 (clang-tools-extra).
If your out-of-tree program used LLVM_ON_WIN32, just use _WIN32 instead, which
is set at exactly the same time to exactly the same value.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46264
llvm-svn: 331224
Teach AsmParser to check with Assembler for when evaluating constant
expressions. This improves the handing of preprocessor expressions
that must be resolved at parse time. This idiom can be found as
assembling-time assertion checks in source-level assemblers. Note that
this relies on the MCStreamer to keep sufficient tabs on Section /
Fragment information which the MCAsmStreamer does not. As a result the
textual output may fail where the equivalent object generation would
pass. This can most easily be resolved by folding the MCAsmStreamer
and MCObjectStreamer together which is planned for in a separate
patch.
Currently, this feature is only enabled for assembly input, keeping IR
compilation consistent between assembly and object generation.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, probinson, espindola, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: eraman, peter.smith, arichardson, jyknight, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45164
llvm-svn: 331218
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Summary:
When building the selection DAG at ISel all PHI nodes are
selected and lowered to Machine Instruction PHI nodes before
we start to create any SDNodes. So there are no SDNodes for
values produced by the PHI nodes.
In the past when selecting a dbg.value intrinsic that uses
the value produced by a PHI node we have been handling such
dbg.value intrinsics as "dangling debug info". I.e. we have
not created a SDDbgValue node directly, because there is
no existing SDNode for the PHI result, instead we deferred
the creationg of a SDDbgValue until we found the first use
of the PHI result.
The old solution had a couple of flaws. The position of the
selected DBG_VALUE instruction would end up quite late in a
basic block, and for example not directly after the PHI node
as in the LLVM IR input. And in case there were no use at all
in the basic block the dbg.value could be dropped completely.
This patch introduces a new VREG kind of SDDbgValue nodes.
It is similar to a SDNODE kind of node, but it refers directly
to a virtual register and not a SDNode. When we do selection
for a dbg.value that is using the result of a PHI node we
can do a lookup of the virtual register directly (as it already
is determined for the PHI node) and create a SDDbgValue node
immediately instead of delaying the selection until we find a
use.
This should fix a problem with losing debug info at ISel
as seen in PR37234 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37234).
It does not resolve PR37234 completely, because the debug info
is dropped later on in the BranchFolder (see D46184).
Reviewers: #debug-info, aprantl
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Subscribers: rnk, gbedwell, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46129
llvm-svn: 331182
