Summary: This patch originated from D46562 and is a proper subset, with some issues addressed for fsub.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, wristow, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47910
llvm-svn: 334306
While trying to propagate AND masks back to loads, we currently allow
one non-load node to be included as a leaf in chain. This fix now
limits that node to produce only a single data value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47878
llvm-svn: 334268
Summary: This change uses fmf subflags to guard fma optimizations as well as unsafe. These changes originated from D46483 and have been simplified via getNode.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, hfinkel, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nemanjai, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47388
llvm-svn: 334242
This avoids regressions in a future AMDGPU change
to make v4i16/v4f16 legal. For these types, build_vector
is implemented as bitcasted operations on v2i32. This
combine was creating v4i16s out of what would have been
already been a v2i32 build_vector, creating a mess
of nodes that never get cleaned up.
I'm not sure this is the right condition to check.
I initially tried just checking for the legality of the
new build_vector. This works for my case, but breaks dozens
of x86 tests. A Mips test seems to show some improvement
or at least a neutral change. I don't want to think
about how long it would take to analyze the set of
different x86 vector operations impacted.
Test included in future commit.
llvm-svn: 334218
Summary:
This change uses fmf subflags to guard optimizations as well as unsafe. These changes originated from D46483.
It contains only context for fsqrt.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hfinkel, wdng, andrew.w.kaylor, wristow, efriedma, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47749
llvm-svn: 334113
Summary: This include variant for add, uaddo and addcarry. usubo and subcarry require the carry to be flipped to preserve semantic, but we chose to do the transform anyway in that case as to push the transform down the carry chain.
Reviewers: efriedma, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46505
llvm-svn: 333943
Summary: It has been deprecated in favor of SETCCCARRY for a year now and isn't used by any in tree backend.
Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, dblaikie, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47685
llvm-svn: 333939
Summary:
As pointed out in D46528, we errneously transform cases like `xor X, -1`,
even though we use said function.
It's because the `-1` is actually a bitcast there.
So i think we can just look through it in the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47156
llvm-svn: 332905
Summary:
This **appears** to be the last missing piece for the masked merge pattern handling in the backend.
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andps`+`andnps` / `bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`), and we need to make sure that they are generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46528
llvm-svn: 332904
SimplifyDemandedBits can remove bits from the masks for the shift amounts we need to see to detect rotates.
This patch uses zeroes from computeKnownBits to fill in some of these mask bits to make the match work.
As currently written this calls computeKnownBits even when the mask hasn't been simplified because it made the code simpler. If we're worried about compile time performance we can improve this.
I know we're talking about making a rotate intrinsic, but hopefully we can go ahead and do this change and just make sure the rotate intrinsic also handles it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47116
llvm-svn: 332895
As part of merging stores we check that fusing the nodes does not
cause a cycle due to one candidate store being indirectly dependent on
another store (this may happen via chained memory copies). This is
done by searching if a store is a predecessor to another store's
value.
Prune the search at the candidate search's root node which is a
predecessor to all candidate stores. This reduces the
size of the subgraph searched in large basic blocks.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46955
llvm-svn: 332490
search. NFCI.
Migrate single-use and non-volatility, non-indexed requirements on
stores of immediate store values to candidate collection pass from
later stage.
llvm-svn: 332392
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
ExtendSetCCUses updates SETCC nodes which use a load (OriginalLoad) to
reflect a simplification to the load (ExtLoad).
Based on my reading, ExtendSetCCUses may create new nodes to extend a
constant attached to a SETCC. It also creates fresh SETCC nodes which
refer to any updated operands.
ISTM that the location applied to the new constant and SETCC nodes
should be the same as the location of the ExtLoad.
This was suggested by Adrian in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46216
llvm-svn: 332119
This teaches tryToFoldExtOfLoad to set the right location on a
newly-created extload. With that in place, the logic for performing a
certain ([s|z]ext (load ...)) combine becomes identical for sexts and
zexts, and we can get rid of one copy of the logic.
The test case churn is due to dependencies on IROrders inherited from
the wrong SDLoc.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46158
llvm-svn: 332118
Part of the logic for combining (zext (load ...)) and (sext (load ...))
is duplicated. This creates problems because bugs in one version have to
be fixed again in the other version.
To address this, as a first step, I've extracted the duplicate logic
into a helper. I'll fix the debug location bug in the helper and
eliminate the copy of its logic in a followup.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46157
llvm-svn: 332117
Summary:
The combine in rebuildSetCC may be combined to another
node leaving our references stale. Keep a handle on
it to avoid stale references.
Fixes PR36602.
Reviewers: dbabokin, RKSimon, eli.friedman, davide
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, JesperAntonsson, qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46404
llvm-svn: 331985
Previously if !LegalOperations we would blindly call getBitcast and hope that getNode would constant fold it. But if the conversion is between a vector and a scalar, getNode has no simplification.
This means we would just get back the original N. We would then return that N which would make the caller of visitBITCAST think that we used CombineTo and did our own worklist management. This prevents target specific optimizations from being called for vector/scalar bitcasts until after legal operations.
llvm-svn: 331896
The previous value of 8192 resulted in severe compile time hits in
some pathological cases.
rdar://39781410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46581
llvm-svn: 331888
Summary:
Split off from D46031.
The previous patch, D46493, completely disabled unfolding in case of immediates.
But we can do better:
{F6120274} {F6120277}
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/xJS
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46494
llvm-svn: 331685
Summary:
Split off from D46031.
In masked merge case, this degrades IPC by decreasing instruction count.
{F6108777}
The next patch should be able to recover and improve this.
This also affects the transform @spatel have added in D27489 / rL289738,
and the test coverage for X86 was missing.
But after i have added it, and looked at the changes in MCA, i'm somewhat confused.
{F6093591} {F6093592} {F6093593}
I'd say this regression is an improvement, since `IPC` increased in that case?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46493
llvm-svn: 331684
Summary:
Split off form D46031.
It seems we don't want to transform the pattern if the `xor`'s are actually `not`'s.
In vector case, this breaks `andnpd` / `vandnps` patterns.
That being said, we may want to re-visit this `not` handling, maybe in D46073.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46492
llvm-svn: 331595
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
Summary: Adding support for Fast flags in the SDNode to leverage fast math sub flag usage.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, jbhateja, hfinkel, escha, qcolombet, echristo, wristow, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rampitec, nhaehnle, tstellar, FarhanaAleen, nemanjai, javed.absar, jbhateja, hfinkel, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710
llvm-svn: 331547
The logic for this combine is almost identical to the logic for a
(sext (sextload x)) combine.
This commit factors out the logic so it can be shared by both combines,
and corrects the SDLoc assigned in the zext version of the combine.
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the udiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
llvm-svn: 331303
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the sdiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46222
llvm-svn: 331302
In DAGCombiner, we try to simplify this pattern:
([s|z]ext (load ...))
Conceptually, a new extload which is created while splitting the load
should have the same debug location as the load.
Making this change affects the IROrder of the new load, causing some
test case churn.
In practice, the new location is never different from the location of
the [s|z]ext, at least not during check-llvm or a stage2 build.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46156
llvm-svn: 331301
Setting the right SDLoc on a newly-created zextload fixes a line table
bug which resulted in non-linear stepping behavior.
Several backend tests contained CHECK lines which relied on the IROrder
inherited from the wrong SDLoc. This patch breaks that dependence where
feasbile and regenerates test cases where not.
In some cases, changing a node's IROrder may alter register allocation
and spill behavior. This can affect performance. I have chosen not to
prevent this by applying a "known good" IROrder to SDLocs, as this may
hide a more general bug in the scheduler, or cause regressions on other
test inputs.
rdar://33755881, Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995
llvm-svn: 331300
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Summary:
D42479 (rL329525) enabled SDIV combine for pow2 non-splat vector
dividers. But when there is a 1 in a vector, the instruction sequence to
be generated involves shifting a value by the number of its bit widths,
which is undefined
(c64f4dbfe3/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (L6000-L6006)).
Especially, in architectures that do not support vector instructions,
each of element in a vector will be computed separately using scalar
operations, and then the resulting value will be undef for '1' values
in a vector.
(All 1's vector is fine; only vectors mixed with 1 and others will be
affected.)
Reviewers: RKSimon, jgravelle-google
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46161
llvm-svn: 331092
As noted, the attribute name is subject to change once we have
the clang side implemented, but it's clear that we need some
kind of attribute-based predication here based on the discussion
for:
rL330437
llvm-svn: 330951
As discussed in the post-review comments for rL330437,
we need to guard this fold to allow existing code to
keep working with the undefined behavior that they've
come to rely on.
That would mean duplicating more code than we already
have, so let's fix that first.
llvm-svn: 330947
We were previously prefering ZEXTLOAD over EXTLOAD if it is legal. This triggers during X86's promotion of i16->i32. Not sure about other targets.
Using ZEXTLOAD can prevent folding it to SEXTLOAD later if we were to promote a sign extended operand like we would need for SRA. However, X86 doesn't currently promote i16 SRA. I was looking into doing that which is how I found this issue.
This is also blocking our ability to fold 4 byte aligned EXTLOADs with "loadi32". This is what caused most of the test changes here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45585#inline-402825
llvm-svn: 330781
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
So we need to make sure that they are still generated.
If the mask is constant, we do nothing. InstCombine should have unfolded it.
Else, i use `hasAndNot()` TLI hook.
For now, only handle scalars.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bO6
----
I *really* don't like the code i wrote in `DAGCombiner::unfoldMaskedMerge()`.
It is super fragile. Is there something like IR Pattern Matchers for this?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, courbet, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, rengolin, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45733
llvm-svn: 330646
This was originally committed at rL328921 and reverted at rL329920 to
investigate failures in Chrome. This time I've added to the ReleaseNotes
to warn users of the potential of exposing UB and let me repeat that
here for more exposure:
Optimization of floating-point casts is improved. This may cause surprising
results for code that is relying on undefined behavior. Code sanitizers can
be used to detect affected patterns such as this:
int main() {
float x = 4294967296.0f;
x = (float)((int)x);
printf("junk in the ftrunc: %f\n", x);
return 0;
}
$ clang -O1 ftrunc.c -fsanitize=undefined ; ./a.out
ftrunc.c:5:15: runtime error: 4.29497e+09 is outside the range of
representable values of type 'int'
junk in the ftrunc: 0.000000
Original commit message:
fptosi / fptoui round towards zero, and that's the same behavior as ISD::FTRUNC,
so replace a pair of casts with the equivalent node. We don't have to account for
special cases (NaN, INF) because out-of-range casts are undefined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44909
llvm-svn: 330437
This is a transform that I limited in instcombine in rL329821 because it was
creating more instructions in IR when the cast has multiple uses.
But if the cast is free, then we can do the transform regardless of other
uses because it improves the potential throughput of the calculation by
removing a dependency on the fneg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45598
llvm-svn: 330098
