Summary: Fix missing return after checking that m_backend is not a pointer or reference type.
Reviewers: clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20875
llvm-svn: 271453
T x;
U y;
doing
x = *((T*)y)
is undefined behavior, even if sizeof(T) == sizeof(U), due to pointer aliasing rules
Fix up a couple of places in LLDB that were doing this, and transform them into a defined and safe memcpy() operation
Also, add a test case to ensure we didn't regress by doing this w.r.t. tagged pointer NSDate instances
llvm-svn: 270793
The function only avaibleble when python is enabled. Guard the new call
in the Java plugin with LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON until we can change
AddCXXSynthetic to be available in all case to get the build bots green
again.
llvm-svn: 268626
Also added a data formatter that presents them as structs if you use frame
variable to look at their contents. Now the blocks testcase works.
<rdar://problem/15984431>
llvm-svn: 268307
This patch fixes a bunch of issues that show up on big-endian systems:
- The gnu_libstdcpp.py script doesn't follow the way libstdc++ encodes
bit vectors: it should identify the enclosing *word* and then access
the appropriate bit within that word. Instead, the script simply
operates on bytes. This gives the same result on little-endian
systems, but not on big-endian.
- lldb_private::formatters::WCharSummaryProvider always assumes wchar_t
is UTF16, even though it could also be UTF8 or UTF32. This is mostly
not an issue on little-endian systems, but immediately fails on BE.
Fixed by checking the size of wchar_t like WCharStringSummaryProvider
already does.
- ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex uses uint32_t to access
the virtual base offset stored in the vtable, even though the size
of this field matches the target pointer size according to the C++
ABI. Again, this is mostly not visible on LE, but fails on BE.
- Process::ReadStringFromMemory uses strncmp to search for a terminator
consisting of multiple zero bytes. This doesn't work since strncmp
will stop already at the first zero byte. Use memcmp instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18983
llvm-svn: 266313
(lldb) b ~Foo
(lldb) b Foo::~Foo
(lldb) b Bar::Foo::~Foo
Improved out C++ breakpoint locations tests as well to cover this issue.
<rdar://problem/25577252>
llvm-svn: 266139
This can cause differences in which bit patterns end up meaning YES or NO. In general, however, 0 == NO and 1 == YES.
To keep it simple, LLDB will now show "YES" and "NO" only for 1 and 0 respectively, and format other values as the plain numeric value instead.
Fixes rdar://24809994
llvm-svn: 263604
The purpose of these plugins is to make LLDB capable of debugging java
code JIT-ed by the android runtime.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17616
llvm-svn: 262015
On libc++ std::atomic is a fairly simple data type (layout wise, at least), wrapping actual contents in a member variable named "__a_"
All the formatters are doing is "peel away" this intermediate layer and exposing user data as direct children or values of the std::atomic root variable
Fixes rdar://24329405
llvm-svn: 260752
However, they also contain fallback logic that - in cases where LLDB can't recognize the specific subclass - actually does run code in order to inspect those objects.
The argument for this logic was that these data types are critical enough that the risk of getting it wrong is outweighed by the advantage of always providing accurate child information.
Practical experience however shows that "po" - a code running data-inspection command - is quite frequently used, and not considered burdensome by users.
As such, this makes the code-running fallback in the data formatters a risk that carries very little actual reward. Also, unlike the time this code was originally written, we now have accurate class information for Objective-C, and thus we are less likely to improperly identify classes.
This commit removes support for the code-running fallback, and aligns the data formatters for NSArray, NSDictionary and NSSet to the general no-code-running behavior of other data formatters.
While it is possible for us to add support for some subclasses that are now no longer covered by static inspection alone, this is beyond the scope of this commit.
llvm-svn: 260664
Summary:
This change is relevant for inferiors compiled with GCC. GCC does not
emit complete debug info for std::basic_string<...>, and consequently, Clang
(the LLDB compiler) does not generate correct mangled names for certain
functions.
This change removes the hard-coded alternate names in
ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp.
Before the hard-coded names were put in ItaniumABILanguageRuntime.cpp, one could
not evaluate std::string methods (ex. std::string::length). After putting in
the hard-coded names, one could evaluate them. However, it did not still
enable one to call methods on, say for example, std::vector<string>.
This change makes that possible.
There is some amount of incompleteness in this change. Consider the
following example:
std::string hello("hello"), world("world");
std::map<std::string, std::string> m;
m[hello] = world;
One can still not evaluate the expression "m[hello]" in LLDB. Will
address this issue in another pass.
Reviewers: jingham, vharron, evgeny777, spyffe, dawn
Subscribers: clayborg, dawn, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12809
llvm-svn: 257113
This brings the timings down for 1500 elements from 166 to 2 seconds on my machine - if I can math correctly, that is a 98% improvement
llvm-svn: 254781
If memory turns out to be a problem, which I don't think it will in practice because all these ValueObjects, we'd be keeping alive anyway, I can always resort to caching the farthest-most iterator only
This gains us an order of magnitude in my benchmark, cutting the time to traverse a 1500-elements list from 22 seconds down to 2
llvm-svn: 254762
This latter determination may or may not be possible on a per-language basis; and neither is mandatory to implement for any language
Use this knowledge in the ValueObjectPrinter to generalize the notion of IsObjCNil() and the respective printout
llvm-svn: 252663
StackFrame * (StackFrame is an ExecutionContextScope.) That allows you to call an
expression on a particular Thread, but not using the context of any particular frame.
That in turn is useful for injecting utility functions that don't actually depend on
locals/self/etc of the current frame.
I also had to include StackFrame.h in a couple of places so the compiler knew
how to downcast StackFrame to ExecutionContextScope.
<rdar://problem/22852953>
llvm-svn: 251564
* Remove an unneccessary re-computaion on arch spec from the ELF file
* Use a local cache to optimize name based section lookups in symtab
parsing
* Optimize C++ method basename validation with replacing a regex with
hand written code
These modifications reduce the time required to parse the symtab from
large applications by ~25% (tested with LLDB as inferior)
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14088
llvm-svn: 251402
Summary:
Loop detection code is being called before every element access. Although it tries to cache some
of the data by remembering the loop-free initial segment, every time it needs to increase this
segment, it will start from scratch. For the typical usage pattern, where one accesses the
elements in order, the loop detection will need to be run after every access, resulting in
quadratic behavior. This behavior is noticable even for the default 255 element limit.
In this commit, I rewrite the algorithm to be truly incremental -- it maintains the state of its
loop-detection runners between calls, and reuses them when it needs to check another segment.
This way, each part of the list is scanned only once, resulting in linear behavior.
Also note that I have changed the operator== of ListEntry to do the comparison based on the
value() function (instead of relying on ValueObjectSP equality). In my experiments, I kept
getting different ValueObjectSPs when going through the same element twice.
Reviewers: granata.enrico
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sivachandra
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13902
llvm-svn: 250890
Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present them in syntatically different ways, such that LLDB can now have language-based awareness of which of the syntax variations it has to present to the user when formatting those values
This is goodness for new languages and interoperability, but is NFC for existing languages. As such, existing tests cover this
llvm-svn: 249587
