reduce the number of comparisons.
Specifically, InstCombine can turn:
(i == 5334 || i == 5335)
into:
((i | 1) == 5335)
SimplifyCFG was already able to detect the pattern:
(i == 5334 || i == 5335)
to:
((i & -2) == 5334)
This patch supersedes D21315 and resolves PR27555
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27555).
Thanks to David and Chandler for the suggestions!
Author: Thomas Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: majnemer chandlerc halfdan cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21397
llvm-svn: 273639
Summary:
This instcombine rule folds away trunc operations that have value available from a prior load or store.
This kind of code can be generated as a result of GVN widening the load or from source code as well.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21246
llvm-svn: 273608
When simplifying a load we need to make sure that the type of the
simplified value matches the type of the instruction we're processing.
In theory, we can handle casts here as we deal with constant data, but
since it's not implemented at the moment, we at least need to bail out.
This fixes PR28262.
llvm-svn: 273562
DeadStoreElimination can currently remove a small store rendered unnecessary by
a later larger one, but could not remove a larger store rendered unnecessary by
a series of later smaller ones. This adds that capability.
It works by keeping a map, which is used as an effective interval map, for each
store later overwritten only partially, and filling in that interval map as
more such stores are discovered. No additional walking or aliasing queries are
used. In the map forms an interval covering the the entire earlier store, then
it is dead and can be removed. The map is used as an interval map by storing a
mapping between the ending offset and the beginning offset of each interval.
I discovered this problem when investigating a performance issue with code like
this on PowerPC:
#include <complex>
using namespace std;
complex<float> bar(complex<float> C);
complex<float> foo(complex<float> C) {
return bar(C)*C;
}
which produces this:
define void @_Z4testSt7complexIfE(%"struct.std::complex"* noalias nocapture sret %agg.result, i64 %c.coerce) {
entry:
%ref.tmp = alloca i64, align 8
%tmpcast = bitcast i64* %ref.tmp to %"struct.std::complex"*
%c.sroa.0.0.extract.shift = lshr i64 %c.coerce, 32
%c.sroa.0.0.extract.trunc = trunc i64 %c.sroa.0.0.extract.shift to i32
%0 = bitcast i32 %c.sroa.0.0.extract.trunc to float
%c.sroa.2.0.extract.trunc = trunc i64 %c.coerce to i32
%1 = bitcast i32 %c.sroa.2.0.extract.trunc to float
call void @_Z3barSt7complexIfE(%"struct.std::complex"* nonnull sret %tmpcast, i64 %c.coerce)
%2 = bitcast %"struct.std::complex"* %agg.result to i64*
%3 = load i64, i64* %ref.tmp, align 8
store i64 %3, i64* %2, align 4 ; <--- ***** THIS SHOULD NOT BE HERE ****
%_M_value.realp.i.i = getelementptr inbounds %"struct.std::complex", %"struct.std::complex"* %agg.result, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
%4 = lshr i64 %3, 32
%5 = trunc i64 %4 to i32
%6 = bitcast i32 %5 to float
%_M_value.imagp.i.i = getelementptr inbounds %"struct.std::complex", %"struct.std::complex"* %agg.result, i64 0, i32 0, i32 1
%7 = trunc i64 %3 to i32
%8 = bitcast i32 %7 to float
%mul_ad.i.i = fmul fast float %6, %1
%mul_bc.i.i = fmul fast float %8, %0
%mul_i.i.i = fadd fast float %mul_ad.i.i, %mul_bc.i.i
%mul_ac.i.i = fmul fast float %6, %0
%mul_bd.i.i = fmul fast float %8, %1
%mul_r.i.i = fsub fast float %mul_ac.i.i, %mul_bd.i.i
store float %mul_r.i.i, float* %_M_value.realp.i.i, align 4
store float %mul_i.i.i, float* %_M_value.imagp.i.i, align 4
ret void
}
the problem here is not just that the i64 store is unnecessary, but also that
it blocks further backend optimizations of the other uses of that i64 value in
the backend.
In the future, we might want to add a special case for handling smaller
accesses (e.g. using a bit vector) if the map mechanism turns out to be
noticeably inefficient. A sorted vector is also a possible replacement for the
map for small numbers of tracked intervals.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18586
llvm-svn: 273559
This is similar to the computeKnownBits improvement in rL268479.
There's probably more we can do for vector logic instructions, but
this should let us see non-splat constant masking ops that can
become vector selects instead of and/andn/or sequences.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21610
llvm-svn: 273459
We no longer have corresponding code in autoupgrade and the vast majority of the tests were fixed long time ago. Fix the remaining few. One of the verifier test cases is marked as XFAIL because it was passing only because the signature was incorrect.
llvm-svn: 273428
It did not handle correctly cases without GEP.
The following loop wasn't vectorized:
for (int i=0; i<len; i++)
*to++ = *from++;
I use getPtrStride() to find Stride for memory access and return 0 is the Stride is not 1 or -1.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20789
llvm-svn: 273257
The BSWAP of vector types is quite efficiently implemented using vector shuffles on SSE/AVX targets, we should reflect the typical cost of this to encourage vectorization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21521
llvm-svn: 273217
By moving this transform to InstSimplify from InstCombine, we sidestep the problem/question
raised by PR27869:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27869
...where InstCombine turns an icmp+zext into a shift causing us to miss the fold.
Credit to David Majnemer for a draft patch of the changes to InstructionSimplify.cpp.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21512
llvm-svn: 273200
Summary: Inliner needs ACT when calling InlineFunction. Instead of nullptr, we need to pass it in from SampleProfileLoader
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, vsk, danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21205
llvm-svn: 273199
This reverts commit r273160, reapplying r273132.
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions cannot be called on a
parentless Instruction.
llvm-svn: 273162
This reverts commit r273132.
Breaks multiple test under /llvm/test:Transforms (e.g.
llvm/test:Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll.test) under asan.
llvm-svn: 273160
After a store has been eliminated, when making sure that the
instruction iterator points to a valid instruction, dbg intrinsics are
now ignored as a new instruction.
Patch by Henric Karlsson.
Reviewed by Daniel Berlin.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21076
llvm-svn: 273141
Removing dead instructions requires remembering which operands have
already been removed. RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions has
this logic, don't partially reimplement it in LoopIdiomRecognize.
This fixes PR28196.
llvm-svn: 273132
Change the underlying offset and comparisons to use int64_t instead of
uint64_t.
Patch by River Riddle!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21499
llvm-svn: 273105
The way we elide max expressions when computing trip counts is incorrect
-- it breaks cases like this:
```
static int wrapping_add(int a, int b) {
return (int)((unsigned)a + (unsigned)b);
}
void test() {
volatile int end_buf = 2147483548; // INT_MIN - 100
int end = end_buf;
unsigned counter = 0;
for (int start = wrapping_add(end, 200); start < end; start++)
counter++;
print(counter);
}
```
Note: the `NoWrap` variable that was being tested has little to do with
the values flowing into the max expression; it is a property of the
induction variable.
test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/nsw-tripcount.ll was added to solely test
functionality I'm reverting in this change, so I've deleted the test
fully.
llvm-svn: 273079
This is a functional change for LLE and LDist. The other clients (LV,
LVerLICM) already had this explicitly enabled.
The temporary boolean parameter to LAA is removed that allowed turning
off speculation of symbolic strides. This makes LAA's caching interface
LAA::getInfo only take the loop as the parameter. This makes the
interface more friendly to the new Pass Manager.
The flag -enable-mem-access-versioning is moved from LV to a LAA which
now allows turning off speculation globally.
llvm-svn: 273064
This is indeed a much cleaner approach (thanks to Daniel Berlin
for pointing out), and also David/Sean for review.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21454
llvm-svn: 273032
Many CPUs only have the ability to do a 4-byte cmpxchg (or ll/sc), not 1
or 2-byte. For those, you need to mask and shift the 1 or 2 byte values
appropriately to use the 4-byte instruction.
This change adds support for cmpxchg-based instruction sets (only SPARC,
in LLVM). The support can be extended for LL/SC-based PPC and MIPS in
the future, supplanting the ISel expansions those architectures
currently use.
Tests added for the IR transform and SPARCv9.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21029
llvm-svn: 273025
The motivating example for this transform is similar to D20774 where bitcasts interfere
with a single cmp/select sequence, but in this case we have 2 uses of each bitcast to
produce min and max ops:
define void @minmax_bc_store(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b, <4 x float>* %ptr1, <4 x float>* %ptr2) {
%cmp = fcmp olt <4 x float> %a, %b
%bc1 = bitcast <4 x float> %a to <4 x i32>
%bc2 = bitcast <4 x float> %b to <4 x i32>
%sel1 = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x i32> %bc1, <4 x i32> %bc2
%sel2 = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x i32> %bc2, <4 x i32> %bc1
%bc3 = bitcast <4 x float>* %ptr1 to <4 x i32>*
store <4 x i32> %sel1, <4 x i32>* %bc3
%bc4 = bitcast <4 x float>* %ptr2 to <4 x i32>*
store <4 x i32> %sel2, <4 x i32>* %bc4
ret void
}
With this patch, we move the selects up to use the input args which allows getting rid of
all of the bitcasts:
define void @minmax_bc_store(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b, <4 x float>* %ptr1, <4 x float>* %ptr2) {
%cmp = fcmp olt <4 x float> %a, %b
%sel1.v = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b
%sel2.v = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x float> %b, <4 x float> %a
store <4 x float> %sel1.v, <4 x float>* %ptr1, align 16
store <4 x float> %sel2.v, <4 x float>* %ptr2, align 16
ret void
}
The asm for x86 SSE then improves from:
movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
cmpltps %xmm1, %xmm2
movaps %xmm2, %xmm3
andnps %xmm1, %xmm3
movaps %xmm2, %xmm4
andnps %xmm0, %xmm4
andps %xmm2, %xmm0
orps %xmm3, %xmm0
andps %xmm1, %xmm2
orps %xmm4, %xmm2
movaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
movaps %xmm2, (%rsi)
To:
movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
minps %xmm1, %xmm2
maxps %xmm0, %xmm1
movaps %xmm2, (%rdi)
movaps %xmm1, (%rsi)
The TODO comments show that we're limiting this transform only to vectors and only to bitcasts
because we need to improve other transforms or risk creating worse codegen.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21190
llvm-svn: 273011
This is a fix for PR27844.
When replacing uses of unsafe allocas, emit the new location
immediately after each use. Without this, the pointer stays live from
the function entry to the last use, while it's usually cheaper to
recalculate.
llvm-svn: 272969
When moving unsafe allocas to the unsafe stack, dbg.declare intrinsics are
updated to refer to the new location.
This change does the same to dbg.value intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 272968
Redundant invariant loads can be CSE'ed with very little extra effort
over what early-cse already tracks, so it looks reasonable to make
early-cse handle this case.
llvm-svn: 272954
This test checks that the string 'bar' (no quotes) doesn't exist in the
output after running opt. But opt embeds the absolute path to the
filename, and on my machine, the filename contains the string 'jlebar',
causing the test to fail.
This patch changes the test to look for the string '"bar"' instead.
llvm-svn: 272941
Daniel Berlin expressed some real concerns about the port and proposed
and alternative approach. I'll revert this for now while working on a
new patch, which I hope to put up for review shortly. Sorry for the churn.
llvm-svn: 272925
This is currently only performed in the Vectorizer. I will change this
as symbolic stride collection is moved to LAA.
This test will track when the actual functional change occurs.
llvm-svn: 272918
We should update results of the BranchProbabilityInfo after removing block in JumpThreading. Otherwise
we will get dangling pointer inside BranchProbabilityInfo cache.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20957
llvm-svn: 272891
Added checks to make sure the Scalarizer::transferMetadata() don't
remove valid debug locations from instructions. This is important as
the verifier pass require that e.g. inlinable callsites have a valid
debug location.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27938
Patch by Karl-Johan Karlsson
Reviewers: dblaikie
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20807
llvm-svn: 272884
(i == 5334 || i == 5335)
to:
((i & -2) == 5334)
This transformation has some incorrect side conditions. Specifically, the
transformation is only applied when the right-hand side constant (5334 in
the example) is a power of two not equal and not equal to the negated mask.
These side conditions were added in r258904 to fix PR26323. The correct side
condition is that: ((Constant & Mask) == Constant)[(5334 & -2) == 5334].
It's a little bit hard to see why these transformations are correct and what
the side conditions ought to be. Here is a CVC3 program to verify them for
64-bit values:
ONE : BITVECTOR(64) = BVZEROEXTEND(0bin1, 63);
x : BITVECTOR(64);
y : BITVECTOR(64);
z : BITVECTOR(64);
mask : BITVECTOR(64) = BVSHL(ONE, z);
QUERY( (y & ~mask = y) =>
((x & ~mask = y) <=> (x = y OR x = (y | mask)))
);
Please note that each pattern must be a dual implication (<--> or iff). One
directional implication can create spurious matches. If the implication is
only one-way, an unsatisfiable condition on the left side can imply a
satisfiable condition on the right side. Dual implication ensures that
satisfiable conditions are transformed to other satisfiable conditions and
unsatisfiable conditions are transformed to other unsatisfiable conditions.
Here is a concrete example of a unsatisfiable condition on the left
implying a satisfiable condition on the right:
mask = (1 << z)
(x & ~mask) == y --> (x == y || x == (y | mask))
Substituting y = 3, z = 0 yields:
(x & -2) == 3 --> (x == 3 || x == 2)
The version of this code before r258904 had no side-conditions and
incorrectly justified itself in comments through one-directional
implication.
Thanks to Chandler for the suggestion!
Author: Thomas Jablin (tjablin)
Reviewers: chandlerc majnemer hfinkel cycheng
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21417
llvm-svn: 272873
