This adds ABI and CodeGen support for the v2f64 type, which is natively
supported by z13 instructions.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236522
This the first of a series of patches to add CodeGen support exploiting
the instructions of the z13 vector facility. This patch adds support
for the native integer vector types (v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64).
When the vector facility is present, we default to the new vector ABI.
This is characterized by two major differences:
- Vector types are passed/returned in vector registers
(except for unnamed arguments of a variable-argument list function).
- Vector types are at most 8-byte aligned.
The reason for the choice of 8-byte vector alignment is that the hardware
is able to efficiently load vectors at 8-byte alignment, and the ABI only
guarantees 8-byte alignment of the stack pointer, so requiring any higher
alignment for vectors would require dynamic stack re-alignment code.
However, for compatibility with old code that may use vector types, when
*not* using the vector facility, the old alignment rules (vector types
are naturally aligned) remain in use.
These alignment rules are not only implemented at the C language level
(implemented in clang), but also at the LLVM IR level. This is done
by selecting a different DataLayout string depending on whether the
vector ABI is in effect or not.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236521
This reverts commit b27413cbfd78d959c18e713bfa271fb69e6b3303 (ie r236515).
This is to get the bots green while i investigate the failures.
llvm-svn: 236517
A regmask (typically seen on a call) clobbers the set of registers it lists. The IfConverter, in UpdatePredRedefs, was handling register defs, but not regmasks.
These are slightly different to a def in that we need to add both an implicit use and def to appease the machine verifier. Otherwise, uses after the if converted call could think they are reading an undefined register.
Reviewed by Matthias Braun and Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 236515
This reverts commit r236360.
This change exposed a bug in WinEHPrepare by opting win32 code into EH
preparation. We already knew that WinEHPrepare has bugs, and is the
status quo for x64, so I don't think that's a reason to hold off on this
change. I disabled exceptions in the sanitizer tests in r236505 and an
earlier revision.
llvm-svn: 236508
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
It adds v1i128 to the appropriate register classes and checks parameter passing
and return values.
This is related to http://reviews.llvm.org/D9081, which will add instructions
that exploit the v1i128 datatype.
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9475
llvm-svn: 236503
Summary:
When using the N64 ABI, element-indices use the i64 type instead of i32.
In many cases, we can use iPTR to account for this but additional patterns
and pseudo's are also required.
This fixes most (but not quite all) failures in the test-suite when using
N64 and MSA together.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Reviewed By: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9342
llvm-svn: 236494
When deciding whether a value comes from the aggregate or inserted value of an
insertvalue instruction, we compare the indices against those of the location
we're interested in. One of the lists needs reversing because the input data is
backwards (so that modifications take place at the end of the SmallVector), but
we were reversing both before leading to incorrect results.
Should fix PR23408
llvm-svn: 236457
This pass is responsible for constructing the EH registration object
that gets linked into fs:00, which is all it does in this change. In the
future, it will also insert stores to update the EH state number.
I considered keeping this functionality in WinEHPrepare, but it's pretty
separable and X86 specific. It has conceptually very little to do with
the task of WinEHPrepare, which is currently outlining. WinEHPrepare is
also in theory useful on ARM, but this logic is pretty x86 specific.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9422
llvm-svn: 236339
Functions with jump tables need an alignment of 4 because they use the ADR
instruction, which aligns the PC to 4 bytes before adding an offset.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9424
llvm-svn: 236327
This patch fixes issues with vector constant folding not correctly handling scalar input operands if they require implicit truncation - this was tested with llvm-stress as recommended by Patrik H Hagglund.
The patch ensures that integer input scalars from a build vector are correctly truncated before folding, and that constant integer scalar results are promoted to a legal type before inclusion in the new folded build vector.
I have added another crash test case and also a test for UINT_TO_FP / SINT_TO_FP using an non-truncated scalar input, which was failing before this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9282
llvm-svn: 236308
This pass was generating 'Instruction does not dominate all uses!'
errors for programs which had loops with a condition variable that
depended on the result of a phi instruction from outside of the loop.
The pass was inserting new phi nodes outside of the loop which used values
defined inside the loop.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90056
llvm-svn: 236306
If we move an instruction from one block down to a MOVC and predicate it,
then the original instruction could be moved in to a loop. In this case,
its invalid for any kill flags to remain on there.
Fails with -verfy-machineinstrs.
rdar://problem/20752113
llvm-svn: 236290
When commuting a thumb instruction in the size reduction pass, thumb
instructions are represented as a bundle and so some operands may be marked
as internal. The internal flag has to move with the operand when commuting.
This test is sensitive to register allocation so can't specifically check that
this error was happening, but so long as it continues to pass with -verify then
hopefully its still ok.
rdar://problem/20752113
llvm-svn: 236282
The expansion for t2ABS was always setting the kill flag on the rsb instruction.
It should instead only be set on rsb if it was set on the original ABS instruction.
rdar://problem/20752113
llvm-svn: 236272
This helps reduce the frequency of stack realignment prologues in 32-bit
X86 Windows code. Before this change and the corresponding clang change,
we would take the max of the type preferred alignment and the explicit
alignment on the alloca.
If you don't override aggregate alignment in datalayout, you get a
default of 8. This dates back to 2007 / r34356, and changing it seems
prohibitively difficult at this point.
llvm-svn: 236270
Revision 220239 exposed a latent bug in method
'TargetInstrInfo::commuteInstruction'. When commuting the operands of a machine
instruction, method 'commuteInstruction' didn't correctly propagate the
'IsUndef' flag to the register operands of the new (commuted) instruction.
Before this patch, the following instruction:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg14, %vreg5<undef>; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg14,%vreg5
was wrongly converted by method 'commuteInstruction' into:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg5, %vreg14<undef>; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg5,%vreg14
The correct instruction should have been:
%vreg4<def> = VADDSDrr %vreg5<undef>, %vreg14; FR64:%vreg4,%vreg5,%vreg14
This patch fixes the problem in method 'TargetInstrInfo::commuteInstruction'.
When swapping the operands of a machine instruction, we now make sure that
'IsUndef' flags are correctly set.
Added test case 'pr23103.ll'.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9406
llvm-svn: 236258
In the test case here, the 'unreachable' BB was removed by BranchFolding because its empty.
It then rewrote the jump from 'entry' to jump to its fallthrough, which was a landing pad.
This results in 'entry' jumping to 2 different landing pads, which fails the machine verifier.
rdar://problem/20750162
llvm-svn: 236248
temporary.
Because of that:
1. The machine verifier was complaining on such code.
2. The generate code worked just because the thumb reduction size pass fixed the
opcode.
rdar://problem/20749824
llvm-svn: 236247
changes:
Don't apply on hexagon and NVPTX since they no longer claim to support UADDO/USUBO
Add location to getConstant
Drop comment about the ops being turned into expand
llvm-svn: 236240
Summary:
The majority of the checks are subtarget independent. The few that aren't
will be corrected shortly.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Reviewed By: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9340
llvm-svn: 236220
Summary:
This doesn't make much difference to MIPS32, but it will simplify a
MIPS64r6 bugfix which will follow shortly by removing unnecessary
sign-extension of parameters.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Reviewed By: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9338
llvm-svn: 236216
At the least it should be guarded by some kind of target hook.
It also introduced catastrophic compile time and code quality
regressions on some out of tree targets (test case still being
reduced/sanitized).
Sanjay agreed with reverting this patch until these issues can be
resolved.
llvm-svn: 236199
