This patch renames the `OpenMPIRBuilderConfig` flags to reduce confusion over
their meaning. `IsTargetCodegen` becomes `IsGPU`, whereas `IsEmbedded` becomes
`IsTargetDevice`. The `-fopenmp-is-device` compiler option is also renamed to
`-fopenmp-is-target-device` and the `omp.is_device` MLIR attribute is renamed
to `omp.is_target_device`. Getters and setters of all these renamed properties
are also updated accordingly. Many unit tests have been updated to use the new
names, but an alias for the `-fopenmp-is-device` option is created so that
external programs do not stop working after the name change.
`IsGPU` is set when the target triple is AMDGCN or NVIDIA PTX, and it is only
valid if `IsTargetDevice` is specified as well. `IsTargetDevice` is set by the
`-fopenmp-is-target-device` compiler frontend option, which is only added to
the OpenMP device invocation for offloading-enabled programs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154591
Debug info emission for extern variables in C++ was previously disabled
when the functionality was added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D71818 and
originally in https://reviews.llvm.org/D70696, because there was no use
case. We are enabling it now, as we start to deploy BPF programs
compiled from C++, leveraging C++ features like templates to reduce code
complexity. This patch is required so that we can still use kconfig in
such BPF programs compiled from C++.
Reviewed By: rnk, dblaikie, MaskRay, yonghong-song
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153898
In preparation for removing the `#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"`
from the header to source file of `llvm/Support/Error.h`, first add in
all the missing includes that were previously included transitively
through this header.
Add -fcheck-new and -fno-check-new, from GCC, which make the compiler
not assume pointers returned from operator new are non-null.
Fixes#16931.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125272
When implicitly defining a function in C, we would try to find an
appropriate declaration context for the function to be declared within.
However, we did not account for GNU statement expressions, which
masquerade as a compound statement and can be used in other contexts
such as within structure member declarations.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/48579
When the diagnosed function/variable is a template specialization, the source range covers the specialization arguments.
e.g.
```
warning: unused function 'func<int>' [-Wunused-function]
template <> int func<int> () {}
^~~~~~~~~
```
This comes in line with the printed text in the warning message. In the above case, `func<int>`
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152707
Now that we print >1 line of code snippet, we printed another line of
code for now reason, because the source range we created for the fixit
expanded to the next line, if the next token was there. Don't do that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152525
This commit implements support for WebAssembly table types and
respective builtins. Table tables are WebAssembly objects to store
reference types. They have a large amount of semantic restrictions
including, but not limited to, only being allowed to be declared
at the top-level as static arrays of zero-length. Not being arguments
or result of functions, not being stored ot memory, etc.
This commit introduces the __attribute__((wasm_table)) to attach to
arrays of WebAssembly reference types. And the following builtins to
manage tables:
* ref __builtin_wasm_table_get(table, idx)
* void __builtin_wasm_table_set(table, idx, ref)
* uint __builtin_wasm_table_size(table)
* uint __builtin_wasm_table_grow(table, ref, uint)
* void __builtin_wasm_table_fill(table, idx, ref, uint)
* void __builtin_wasm_table_copy(table, table, uint, uint, uint)
This commit also enables reference-types feature at bleeding-edge.
This is joint work with Alex Bradbury (@asb).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139010
The C++ standard allows abstract parameters in deleted functions
and in function declarations
> The type of a parameter or the return type for a function definition
> shall not be a (possibly cv-qualified) class type that is
> incomplete or abstract within the function body
> unless the function is deleted.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63012
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152096
Clang currently emits an error when a friend of a local class
tries to access it's private data members. This patch fixes the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152195
A variable declared with __attribute__((cleanup)) cannot be unused, as
its address is passed to the clean up function. Do not emit
-Wunused-variable for variables declared with the cleanup attribute,
which matches GCC's behavior: https://godbolt.org/z/dz5YfTsan
Reviewed By: erichkeane, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152180
This patch adds the Parse and Sema support for RegularKeyword attributes,
following on from a previous patch that added Attr.td support.
The patch is quite large. However, nothing outside the tests is
specific to the first RegularKeyword attribute (__arm_streaming).
The patch should therefore be a one-off, up-front cost. Other
attributes just need an entry in Attr.td and the usual Sema support.
The approach taken in the patch is that the keywords can be used with
any language version. If standard attributes were added in language
version Y, the keyword rules for version X<Y are the same as they were
for version Y (to the extent possible). Any extensions beyond Y are
handled in the same way for both keywords and attributes. This ensures
that existing C++11 successors like C++17 are not treated differently
from versions that have yet to be defined.
Some notes on the implementation:
* The patch emits errors rather than warnings for diagnostics that
relate to keywords.
* Where possible, the patch drops “attribute” from diagnostics
relating to keywords.
* One exception to the previous point is that warnings about C++
extensions do still mention attributes. The use there seemed OK
since the diagnostics are noting a change in the production rules.
* If a diagnostic string needs to be different for keywords and
attributes, the patch standardizes on passing the attribute/
name/token followed by 0 for attributes and 1 for keywords.
* Although the patch updates warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type_str,
warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type, and warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type,
only the error forms of these strings are used for keywords.
* I couldn't trigger the warnings in checkUnusedDeclAttributes,
even for existing attributes. An assert on the warnings caused
no failures in the testsuite. I think in practice all standard
attributes would be diagnosed before this.
* The patch drops a call to standardAttributesAllowed in
ParseFunctionDeclarator. This is because MaybeParseCXX11Attributes
checks the same thing itself, where appropriate.
* The new tests are based on c2x-attributes.c and
cxx0x-attributes.cpp. The C++ test also incorporates a version of
cxx11-base-spec-attributes.cpp. The FIXMEs are carried across from
the originals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148702
On AArch64 for function multiversioning target_version/target_clones
attributes should be used. The patch fixes the defect allowing target
attribute to cause multiversioning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150867
It was rejected in C, and in a strange way accepted in C++. However, the
support was never properly tested and fully implemented, so just reject
it in C++ mode as well.
This change also fixes crash on attempt to initialize union with flexible
array member. Due to missing check on union, there was a null expression
added to init list that caused crash later.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61746
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147626
This patch adds static functions for constructing most
AttributeCommonInfo::Forms. Direct construction is only retained where
all fields (currently the syntax and spelling) are specified explicitly.
This is a wash on its own. The purpose is to allow extra fields
to be added to Form without disrupting all callers. In particular,
it allows extra information to be stored about keywords without
affecting non-keyword uses.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148104
When constructing an attribute, the syntactic form was specified
using two arguments: an attribute-independent syntax type and an
attribute-specific spelling index. This patch replaces them with
a single argument.
In most cases, that's done using a new Form class that combines the
syntax and spelling into a single object. This has the minor benefit
of removing a couple of constructors. But the main purpose is to allow
additional information to be stored as well, beyond just the syntax and
spelling enums.
In the case of the attribute-specific Create and CreateImplicit
functions, the patch instead uses the attribute-specific spelling
enum. This helps to ensure that the syntax and spelling are
consistent with each other and with the Attr.td definition.
If a Create or CreateImplicit caller specified a syntax and
a spelling, the patch drops the syntax argument and keeps the
spelling. If the caller instead specified only a syntax
(so that the spelling was SpellingNotCalculated), the patch
simply drops the syntax argument.
There were two cases of the latter: TargetVersion and Weak.
TargetVersionAttrs were created with GNU syntax, which matches
their definition in Attr.td, but which is also the default.
WeakAttrs were created with Pragma syntax, which does not match
their definition in Attr.td. Dropping the argument switches
them to AS_GNU too (to match [GCC<"weak">]).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148102
The purpose of this patch and follow-on patches is to ensure that
AttributeCommonInfos always have a syntax that is appropriate for
their kind (i.e. that it matches one of the entries in Attr.td).
The attribute-specific Create and CreateImplicit methods had four
overloads, based on their tail arguments:
(1) no extra arguments
(2) an AttributeCommonInfo
(3) a SourceRange
(4) a SourceRange, a syntax, and (where necessary) a spelling
When (4) had a spelling argument, it defaulted to
SpellingNotCalculated.
One disadvantage of this was that (1) and (3) zero-initialized
the syntax field of the AttributeCommonInfo, which corresponds
to AS_GNU. But AS_GNU isn't always listed as a possibility
in Attr.td.
This patch therefore removes (1) and (3) and instead provides
the same functionality using default arguments on (4) (a bit
like the existing default argument for the spelling).
The default syntax is taken from the attribute's first valid
spelling.
Doing that raises the question: what should happen for attributes
like AlignNatural and CUDAInvalidTarget that are only ever created
implicitly, and so have no source-code manifestation at all?
The patch adds a new AS_Implicit "syntax" for that case.
The patch also removes the syntax argument for these attributes,
since the syntax must always be AS_Implicit.
For similar reasons, the patch removes the syntax argument if
there is exactly one valid spelling.
Doing this means that AttributeCommonInfo no longer needs the
single-argument constructors. It is always given a syntax instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148101
Due to not resetting that, clang still thinks that it is in immediate
function context even if it already entered non-consteval function.
This caused consteval functions reaching codegen in some cases.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61142
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147531
If the HLSL entry function had a shader attribute that conflicted
with the pipeline stage specified in the target triple, Clang
would emit:
error: (null) attribute parameters do not match the previous declaration
conflicting attribute is here
(where the second line doesn't reference an attribute).
This was because the code constructed a dummy attribute that had
only a source location, but no kind or syntax.
Noticed while doing some changes to the attribute handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147657
The current implementation 6da3d66f03
got a few things wrong, particularly that a template, or definition
or member in a templated entity is required to be allowed to have a
trailing requires clause.
This patch corrects this, as reproted by #61748Fixes: #61748
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147070
We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).
This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.
Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).
This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.
Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
This is the funcref counterpart to 890146b. We introduce a new attribute
that marks a function pointer as a funcref. It also implements builtin
__builtin_wasm_ref_null_func(), that returns a null funcref value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128440
VarTemplateSpecializationDecl does not store a template param list,
so the "template<>" needs to be stored in the ExtInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142692
Structs that contain global or local pointers can be passed as kernel
arguments starting OpenCL v2.0 with the introduction of shared virtual memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143849
This patch introduces a new type __externref_t that denotes a WebAssembly opaque
reference type. It also implements builtin __builtin_wasm_ref_null_extern(),
that returns a null value of __externref_t. This lays the ground work
for further builtins and reference types.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122215
If a struct/enum type used in a record doesn't have a forward decl /
def, an implicit one is injected into the struct. This stops clang from
randomizing the structure in some situations---i.e. when the struct
contains only function pointers. So we accept forward decls so they
don't prevent randomization.
Fixes 60349
Reviewed By: MaskRay, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143300
