Make minor changes to enable DFSAN and its tests on
loongarch64. And port Linux loongarch64 memory mappings
from msan.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140690
This patch adds basic memory sanitizer support for loongarch64
with 47-bit VMA, which memory layout is based on x86_64.
The LLVM part of the LoongArch memory sanitizer implementation will
be done separately, which will fix failing tests in check-msan.
These failing tests fail with the following same error: "error in
backend: unsupported architecture".
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140528
Instead of dumping all sources into RTXray object library with a weird
special case for x86, handle multiarch builds better. Build a separate
object library for each arch with its arch-specific sources, then link
in all those libraries.
This fixes the build on platforms that produce fat binaries, such as new
macOS which expects both x86_64 and aarch64 objects in the same library
since Apple Silicon is a thing.
This only enables building XRay support for Apple Silicon. It does not
actually work yet on macOS, neither on Intel nor on Apple Silicon CPUs.
Thus the tests are still disabled.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153221
CMake older than 3.20.0 is no longer supported.
This removes work-arounds for no longer supported versions.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152102
Moved setting supported architecture to parent cmake configuration files
so they can be read by both lib and test CMakeList.txt.
Fixed issue with check-asan-abi that did not filter for current host architecture
which caused x86_64 bots to run Arm64 tests.
Added x86_64 as a supported arch to the test cmake file.
rdar://110017569
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151846
I tried to build libFuzzer for RISC-V and succeeded. All the libFuzzer
targets were successfully built. I tested this on the small hello world code
with a few branches to check the instrumentation; all of them were covered by
libFuzzer on RISC-V arch. So I suppose it makes sense to enable libFuzzer
build for RISC-V.
Reviewed By: phosek, thetruestblue, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147788
Previously, an .exe suffix was only added for MSVC configurations.
In practice, an .exe suffix is added implicitly by MinGW toolchains
if the output is a suffixless file name. However this can cause lots
of subtle build system confusion, when it's not generating the file it
expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149029
If any LLVM subprojects are built separately, the LLVM build directory
LLVM_LIBRARY_DIR is added to both the build and install runpaths in
llvm_setup_rpath(), which is incorrect when installed. Separate the
build and install runpaths on ELF platforms and finally remove the
incorrect call to this function for compiler-rt, as previously attempted
in 21c008d5a5. That prior attempt was reverted in 959dbd1761, where it
was said to break the build on macOS and Windows, so I made sure to keep
those platforms the same.
Two examples of incorrect runpaths that are currently added, one from
the latest LLVM 16 toolchain for linux x86_64:
> readelf -d clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.*so | ag "File:|runpath"
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.asan.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.dyndd.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.hwasan_aliases.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.hwasan.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.memprof.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.scudo_standalone.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.tsan.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.ubsan_minimal.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
File: clang+llvm-16.0.0-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04/lib/clang/16/lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/tmp/llvm_release/final/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-16.0.0-final.obj/./lib]
Another is in the Swift toolchain, which builds lldb separately:
> readelf -d swift-5.9-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-03-24-a-ubuntu20.04/usr/{bin/lldb*,lib/liblldb.so}|ag "File:|runpath"
File: swift-5.9-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-03-24-a-ubuntu20.04/usr/bin/lldb
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/build-user/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./lib]
File: swift-5.9-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-03-24-a-ubuntu20.04/usr/bin/lldb-argdumper
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/build-user/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./lib]
File: swift-5.9-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-03-24-a-ubuntu20.04/usr/bin/lldb-server
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/build-user/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./lib]
File: swift-5.9-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2023-03-24-a-ubuntu20.04/usr/lib/liblldb.so
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/build-user/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./lib:/home/build-user/build/buildbot_linux/swift-linux-x86_64/lib/swift/linux:$ORIGIN/../lib/swift/linux]
This patch should fix this problem of absolute paths from the build host
leaking out into the toolchain's runpaths.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146918
Fixes the following on cmake version 3.24.2:
'tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt-stamps/compiler-rt-source_dirinfo.txt',
needed by 'tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt-stamps/compiler-rt-download',
missing and no known rule to make it
Maybe related to https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/release/3.24.html#modules
COMPILER_RT_DEFAULT_TARGET_ONLY is the goto workaround for building
only one of a multilib setup while still being able to autodetect the native target.
For example only building 64 bit libraries on Intel instead of 32 and 64 bit.
Which may fail without 32 bit compatibility libs installed.
As reported in https://discourse.llvm.org/t/configuring-compiler-rt-to-use-default-target-only-does-not-work/62727
this build config hasn't worked in a while.
It relies on a variable usually set during cross compliation,
though my testing shows you can set it in other scenarios too.
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_LANG_COMPILER_TARGET.html
So the options you need to provide are:
-DCOMPILER_RT_DEFAULT_TARGET_ONLY=ON -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER_TARGET="aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"
And we should error if CMAKE_C_COMPILER_TARGET isn't set.
Reviewed By: glaubitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147598
-Werror is redundant because CMake not only checks the
exit status, but also parses the output of try_compile.
-Wformat-security is a special case, because specifying it
without -Wformat causes gcc to emit a warning in a format
not recognized by CMake, which makes the check pass.
Enable Scudo on RISCV64 on both clang side and compiler-rt side.
Reviewers: cryptoad, eugenis, vitalybuka, luismarques, hiraditya
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137397
clang-cl doesn't support -dumpmachine directly, so we need to
preface it with /clang: in order to get this probing function
to work.
This is needed in order to run cmake directly on the runtimes
directory.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143557
The orginal single folder layout produced libraries in the form:
lib/linux/<libname>-<archname>.a
That archname for Arm depended on whether you had hard or soft float.
This is sometimes shown as "arm" (soft) vs. "armhf" (hard).
If this is set in a triple we do it in the final portion, the ABI.
"gnueabi" for soft float, "gnueabihf" for hard float.
Meaning that the expected triple is:
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Not this:
armhf-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
For the per target layout I have decided to rely on the ABI portion
of the triple instead of the arch name used for the old layout
(doing that would produce the invalid triple above).
This means that building with triple:
armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Will result in libraries in:
lib/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/
And clang will now know to look for "arm" instead of "armv8l".
Meaning that we can share libraries between an armv8 and armv7 build
as we did with the previous layout. In addition to handling spelling
differences e.g. "armv8l" with an "l" on some Linux distros.
compiler-rt will autodetect that the "armhf" and/or "arm" architecture
can be built. We then replace the given triple's architecture with that.
Then if the triple's float ABI doesn't match, we change that. That new
triple is then used as the folder name.
If you select to build only the given triple, with COMPILER_RT_DEFAULT_TARGET_ONLY,
compiler-rt will not autodetect the architecture and for that I assume you
know what you're doing. In that case the library path will use the unomdified triple.
From what I can tell, this is how most large builds e.g Android and
Arm's Embedded Toolchain for llvm do things. I assume that big endian "armeb"
builds would end up doing this too.
Bare metal builds will not be using per target runtime dirs so they
remain as they were.
Depends on D139536
Reviewed By: MaskRay, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140011
Reviewed by: vitalybuka, kito-cheng
These changes will allow to use HWASAN with RISCV64 architecture.
The majority of existing tests are passing with a few exceptions(see below).
The tests were running on QEMU, since currently there're no hardware with support
for J-extension.
For this feature to work the system must support PR_{SET,GET}_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
syscall. For now this is only available for a patched Linux kernel and QEMU with
enabled experimental J-extension.
Results of running HWASAN lit tests for RISC-V:
```
Unsupported : 6
Passed : 79
Expectedly Failed: 2
```
Tests are marked as expected to fail or unsupported either because of:
- android platform not being supported
- no support for legacy hwasan v1 mode
- test config explicitly uses aarch64 option
```
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/abort-message-android.cpp
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/cfi.cpp
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/lto.c
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/print-memory-usage-android.c
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/register-dump-read.c
UNSUPPORTED: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/try-catch.cpp
XFAIL: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/stack-oob.c
XFAIL: HWAddressSanitizer-riscv64 :: TestCases/exported-tagged-global.c
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131345
This patch enabled tsan for loongarch64 with 47-bit VMA layout. All
tests are passing.
Also adds assembly routines to enable setjmp/longjmp for loongarch64
on linux.
Reviewed By: dvyukov, SixWeining, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138489
Fixes warnings (or errors, if someone injects -Werror in their build system,
which happens in fact with some folks vendoring LLVM too) with Clang 16:
```
+/var/tmp/portage.notmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-15.0.4/work/llvm_build-abi_x86_64.amd64/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.c:3:9: warning: a function declaration without a prototype
is deprecated in all versions of C [-Wstrict-prototypes]
-/var/tmp/portage.notmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-14.0.4/work/llvm_build-abi_x86_64.amd64/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.c:3:9: error: a function declaration without a prototype is
deprecated in all versions of C [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
int main() {return 0;}
^
void
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137503
Replace the use of the deprecated `llvm-config` tool with LLVM's CMake
files for detecting LLVM in standalone builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137024
Initial builtins for LoongArch.
Add loongarch64 to ALL_CRT_SUPPORTED_ARCH list.
Support fe_getround and fe_raise_inexact in builtins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136338
Replace the use of the deprecated `llvm-config` tool with LLVM's CMake
files for detecting LLVM in standalone builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137024
The current version pass -mips64r2 or -mips32r2 options,
which make it failed to build on r6 platform.
In this patch: we detect whether we are MIPSr6 by
_MIPS_ARCH_MIPS32R6/_MIPS_ARCH_MIPS64R6
The out and install path is set to the default triple instead of
hardcoded one, since the clang ask for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135735
Enable -Wsizeof-array-div and -Wsizeof-pointer-divcompiler.
Also, replace -Wmemset-transposed-args with -Wsuspicious-memaccess. The
latter automatically enables the former and a few other warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133783
As described in Issue #54196
<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54196>, the ideas of `clang`
and `compiler-rt` where runtime libs are located with
`-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES` can differ. This is the `compiler-rt` side of the
patch I've used to get them in sync for the `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and
`sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu` release builds.
Tested on `amd64-pc-solaris2.11` and `sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133406
that can lead to security vulnerabilities
Also, fix a few places that were causing -Wshadow and
-Wformat-nonliteral warnings to be emitted.
This reapplies the patch that was reverted in caaafe4ae2 because it
broke Fuchsia builders.
I reverted the changes I made to InstrProfData.inc and instead renamed
the variables in InstrProfilingWriter.c. Also fixed a bug in function
add_security_warnings that was causing it to pass -Wformat-nonliteral
when the compiler doesn't support it.
that can lead to security vulnerabilities
Also, fix a few places that were causing -Wshadow and
-Wformat-nonliteral warnings to be emitted.
This reapplies the patch that was reverted in 0d66dc57e8 because it
broke a few bots.
I made changes so that cmake checks whether some of the flags are
supported by the compiler that is used before adding them to the list.
Also, I moved function add_security_warnings to CompilerRTUtils.cmake so
that it is defined before it's used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131714
that can lead to security vulnerabilities
Also, fix a few places that were causing -Wshadow and
-Wformat-nonliteral warnings to be emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131714
We held off on this before as `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` conflicted with it.
Now we return this.
`LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` is kept as a deprecated way to set
`CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`. The other `*_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` are just removed
entirely.
I imagine this is too potentially-breaking to make LLVM 15. That's fine.
I have a more minimal version of this in the disto (NixOS) patches for
LLVM 15 (like previous versions). This more expansive version I will
test harder after the release is cut.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne, ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130586
Initial platform support for COFF/x86_64.
Completed features:
* Statically linked orc runtime.
* Full linking/initialization of static/dynamic vc runtimes and microsoft stl libraries.
* SEH exception handling.
* Full static initializers support
* dlfns
* JIT side symbol lookup/dispatch
Things to note:
* It uses vc runtime libraries found in vc toolchain installations.
* Bootstrapping state is separated because when statically linking orc runtime it needs microsoft stl functions to initialize the orc runtime, but static initializers need to be ran in order to fully initialize stl libraries.
* Process symbols can't be used blidnly on msvc platform; otherwise duplicate definition error gets generated. If process symbols are used, it's destined to get out-of-reach error at some point.
* Atexit currently not handled -- will be handled in the follow-up patches.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130479
