Make the keyword `loop` optional for the end driective on combined
construct. This done to extend compatibility with other compiler that
allow this.
Reviewed By: razvanlupusoru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151856
Begin upstreaming of CUDA Fortran support in LLVM Flang.
This first patch implements parsing for CUDA Fortran syntax,
including:
- a new LanguageFeature enum value for CUDA Fortran
- driver change to enable that feature for *.cuf and *.CUF source files
- parse tree representation of CUDA Fortran syntax
- dumping and unparsing of the parse tree
- the actual parsers for CUDA Fortran syntax
- prescanning support for !@CUF and !$CUF
- basic sanity testing via unparsing and parse tree dumps
... along with any minimized changes elsewhere to make these
work, mostly no-op cases in common::visitors instances in
semantics and lowering to allow them to compile in the face
of new types in variant<> instances in the parse tree.
Because CUDA Fortran allows the kernel launch chevron syntax
("call foo<<<blocks, threads>>>()") only on CALL statements and
not on function references, the parse tree nodes for CallStmt,
FunctionReference, and their shared Call were rearranged a bit;
this caused a fair amount of one-line changes in many files.
More patches will follow that implement CUDA Fortran in the symbol
table and name resolution, and then semantic checking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150159
Presented with "IF (...)" with no following tokens in the statement,
diagnose a missing "THEN" instead of complaining about all of the
possible action statement initial tokens that could have been there
for a non-construct IF statement.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62299.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150783
When a multi-statement construct should end with a particular END statement
like "END SELECT", and that construct's END statement is missing or
unrecognizable, the error recovery productions should not misinterpret
a program unit END statement that follows and consume it as a misspelled
construct END statement. Doing so leads to cascading errors or a failed parse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136896
Extend "extension<LanguageFeature>()" to incorporate an explanatory
message better than the current generic "nonstandard usage:".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122035
The THEN keyword in the "ELSE IF (test) THEN" statement is useless
syntactically, and to omit it is a common error (at least for me!)
that has poor error recovery. This patch changes the parser to
cough up a simple "expected 'THEN'" and still recognize the rest of
the IF construct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110952
OpenACC combined construct can have an optional end directive. This patch handle this
case in the parsing/unparsing with a canonicalization step. Unlike OmpEndLoopDirective,
this doesn't need a special treatment in the pre-fir tree as there is no clause attached to
a AccEndCombinedDirective.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84481
