This test runs to a breakpoint on thread 0. Thread 0 then starts
thread 2 and 3, which both have breakpoints in them.
In https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/41674
I think that we managed to do the first check on thread 2 before
thread 3 had started. Therefore "thread continue 3" failed.
So wait for all three to startup before we check their status.
I considered putting a timeout on the while like the wait_for... methods,
but the test itself already has a global timeout. Plus, I'd rather
not be tuning a timeout per piece of hardware this runs on.
99% of the time we will already have 3 threads when the check is done.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154705
-g is specified by passing in nullptr ExecutionContext, but in some
load-script-from-symbol-file specific code, the ExecutionContext was
asked for its Target w/o checking whether the pointer was null.
Fix that and add a test.
This test previously ran on QEMU or A64FX both of which can/do have
512 bit SVE by default.
Graviton 3 has 256 bit SVE so the first part of the test failed.
To fix this, probe the supported vector lengths before starting
the test. The first check will use the default vector length and
the rest use either 256 or 128 bit.
Therefore this test will be skipped on a machine with only 128 bit SVE.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154208
During __do_global_dtors_aux glibc sets a flag that is right
next to the global variable. This is done using a store byte.
On QEMU the watchpoints are handled with a finer granularity
than real hardware, so this wasn't a problem. On Graviton 3
(and Mountain Jade, though this test won't run there) watchpoints
look at larger chunks of memory.
This means that the final continue actually stops in __do_global_dtors_aux
instead of exiting.
We could fix this by padding the global to be away from the flag,
but that is fiddly and it is easier just to remove the watchpoint
before the final continue. We have already verified it worked by that
point.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154201
While looking at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61955
I noticed that when we send qLaunchGDBServer we check that we got a response
but not what kind of response it was.
I think this was why the bug reporter saw:
(lldb) run
error: invalid host:port specification: '[192.168.64.2]'
The missing port is because we went down a path we only should have
chosen if the operation succeeded. Since we didn't check, we went ahead
with an empty port number.
To test this I've done the following:
* Make a temporary copy of lldb-server.
* Run that as a platform.
* Remove the copy.
* Attempt to create and run a target.
This fails because the running lldb-server will try to invoke itself
and it no longer exists.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153513
This reverts commit 3254623d73.
One test has been updated to add the "-s" flag which along with
86fd957af9 should fix the tests on MacOS.
An assert on hijack listener added in that patch was removed, it seems
to be correct on MacOS but not on Linux.
This fixes#62068.
After 8d1de7b34a the following issue appeared:
```
$ ./bin/lldb /tmp/test.o
(lldb) target create "/tmp/test.o"
Current executable set to '/tmp/test.o' (aarch64).
(lldb) platform process launch -s
error: Cannot launch '': Nothing to launch
```
Previously would call target->GetRunArguments when there were no extra
arguments, so we could find out what target.run-args might be.
Once that change started relying on the first arg being the exe,
the fact that that call clears the existing argument list caused the bug.
Instead, have it set a local arg list and append that to the existing
one. Which in this case will just contain the exe name.
Since there's no existing tests for this command I've added a new file
that covers enough to check this issue.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153636
This teaches DumpRegisterInfo to generate a table from the register
flags type. It just calls a method on RegisterFlags.
As such, the extra tests are minimal and only show that the intergration
works. Exhaustive formatting tests are done with RegisterFlags itself.
Example:
```
(lldb) register info cpsr
Name: cpsr
Size: 4 bytes (32 bits)
In sets: general (index 0)
| 31 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 27-26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19-13 | 12 | 11-10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3-2 | 1 | 0 |
|----|----|----|----|-------|-----|-----|-----|-----|----|----|-------|------|-------|---|---|---|---|---|-----|-----|---|----|
| N | Z | C | V | | TCO | DIT | UAO | PAN | SS | IL | | SSBS | | D | A | I | F | | nRW | EL | | SP |
```
LLDB limits the max terminal width to 80 chars by default.
So to get that full width output you will need to change the "term-width"
setting to something higher.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152918
This adds a new command that will show all the information lldb
knows about a register.
```
(lldb) register info s0
Name: s0
Size: 4 bytes (32 bits)
Invalidates: v0, d0
Read from: v0
In sets: Floating Point Registers (index 1)
```
Currently it only allows a single register, and we get the
information from the RegisterInfo structure.
For those of us who know the architecture well, this information
is all pretty obvious. For those who don't, it's nice to have it
at a glance without leaving the debugger.
I hope to have more in depth information to show here in the future,
which will be of wider use.
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152916
Currently the expression parser prints a mostly useless generic error before printing the compiler error:
(lldb) p 1+x)
error: expression failed to parse:
error: <user expression 18>:1:3: use of undeclared identifier 'x'
1+x)
^
This is distracting and as far as I can tell only exists to work
around the fact that the first "error: " is unconditionally injected
by CommandReturnObject. The solution is not very elegant, but the
result looks much better.
(Partially addresses rdar://110492710)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152590
Show line numbers to the left of diagnostic code snippets and increase
the numbers of lines shown from 1 to 16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147875
Expression evaluation for `void` valued expressions sets an error using the `kNoResult`
code. Like the `expression` command, `dwim-print` should also not print such errors.
Before:
```
(lldb) dwim-print (void)printf("hi\n")
hi
Error: 'unknown error'
```
After:
```
(lldb) dwim-print (void)printf("hi\n")
hi
```
rdar://109746544
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151351
Following tests are now passing on LLDB AArch64 Windows buildbot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/deleting-implicit-copy-constructor/TestDeletingImplicitCopyConstructor.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-categories/TestDataFormatterCategories.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/constructors/TestCppConstructors.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/namespace/TestNamespace.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/this_class_type_mixing/TestThisClassTypeMixing.py
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/219/builds/3012
This patch removes XFAIL decorator from all of the above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151268
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This patch refactors the `StructuredData::Integer` class to make it
templated, makes it private and adds 2 public specialization for both
`int64_t` & `uint64_t` with a public type aliases, respectively
`SignedInteger` & `UnsignedInteger`.
It adds new getter for signed and unsigned interger values to the
`StructuredData::Object` base class and changes the implementation of
`StructuredData::Array::GetItemAtIndexAsInteger` and
`StructuredData::Dictionary::GetValueForKeyAsInteger` to support signed
and unsigned integers.
This patch also adds 2 new `Get{Signed,Unsigned}IntegerValue` to the
`SBStructuredData` class and marks `GetIntegerValue` as deprecated.
Finally, this patch audits all the caller of `StructuredData::Integer`
or `StructuredData::GetIntegerValue` to use the proper type as well the
various tests that uses `SBStructuredData.GetIntegerValue`.
rdar://105575764
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150485
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
Fix a mutation of `CommandAlias::m_option_args_sp`, which resulted in cases where
aliases would fail to run on second, and subsequent times.
For example, an alias such as:
```
command alias p1 p 1
```
When run the second time, the following error would be reported to the user:
```
error: expression failed to parse:
error: <user expression 1>:1:1: expression is not assignable
-- 1
^ ~
```
To fix this, `CommandAlias::Desugar` now constructs options to a freshly constructed
vector, rather than by appending to the results of `GetOptionArguments`.
rdar://107770836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150078
This patch add or removes XFAIL decorator from various tests which were marked
xfail for windows.
since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a couple of new failures.
Weight is in favor of new XPasses and I have removed XFail decorator from them. Also
some new tests have started failing for which we need to file separate bugs. I have
marked them xfail for now and will add the bug id after investigating the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149235
Expression evaluation allocates memory for storing intermediate data during evaluation. For it to work properly it has to be allocated within target's available address space, for example within first 0xFFFF bytes for the 16-bit MSP430. The memory for such targets can be very tightly packed, but not all targets support GetMemoryRegionInfo API to pick an unused region, like MSP430 with MSPDebug GDB server.
These settings allow the programmer to manually pick precisely where and how much memory to allocate for expression evaluation in order not to overlap with existing data in process memory.
Reviewed By: bulbazord
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149262
llvm has a structure for maps where the key's type is a string. Using
that also means that the keys for OptionValueDictionary don't stick
around forever in ConstString's StringPool (even after they are gone).
The only thing we lose here is ordering: iterating over the map where the keys
are ConstStrings guarantees that we iterate in alphabetical order.
StringMap makes no guarantees about the ordering when you iterate over
the entire map.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149482
Have debugserver parse the watchpoint flags out of the exception
syndrome register when we get a watchpoint mach exception. Relay
those fields up to lldb in the stop reply packet, if the watchpoint
number was reported by the hardware, use the address from that as
the watchpoint address.
Change how watchpoints are reported to lldb from using the mach
exception data, to using the `reason:watchpoint` and `description:asciihex`
method that lldb-server uses, which can relay the actual trap address
as well as the address of a watched memory region responsible for
the trap, so lldb can step past it.
Have debugserver look for the nearest watchpoint that it has set
when it gets a watchpoint trap, so accesses that are reported as
starting before the watched region are associated with the correct
watchpoint to lldb. Add a test case for this specific issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147820
rdar://83996471
Fixes printing of spaces in cases where the following are true:
1. Persistent results are disabled
2. The type has a summary string
As reported by @jgorbe in D146783, two spaces were being printed before the summary
string, and no spaces were printed after.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147006
When printing a value, allow the root value's name to be elided, without omiting the
names of child values.
At the API level, this adds `SetHideRootName()`, which joins the existing
`SetHideName()` function.
This functionality is used by `dwim-print` and `expression`.
Fixes an issue identified by @jgorbe in https://reviews.llvm.org/D145609.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146783
Prior to this the only check was that we did not print
this message when reading registers that should exist.
I thought there was an indentation bug here so I wrote a test
for it. There is not, but we could do with the coverage anyway.
Reviewed By: rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145940
Change `dwim-print` to now disable persistent results by default, unless requested by
the user with the `--persistent-result` flag.
Ex:
```
(lldb) dwim-print 1 + 1
(int) 2
(lldb) dwim-print --persistent-result on -- 1 + 1
(int) $0 = 2
```
Users who wish to enable persistent results can make and use an alias that includes
`--persistent-result on`.
Updates: To recommit this, both TestPersistentResult.py and TestPAlias.py needed to be
updated, as well as the changes in D146230.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145609
Add an Objective-C++ specific test for direct ivar access. This adds to the existing C++ and ObjC tests, and tests against regression for future refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146320
I didn't refactor the test that's failing on arm64 correctly so it
failed everywhere.
Looks like the step test passes on other aarch64 systems as well as
Darwin. Turn off the xfail and see how far that gets.
We need to step the watchpoint instruction in these cases, but the
when we queued the ThreadPlanStepOverWatchpoint to do this, we didn't
make it a Controlling plan. So if you are stepping, this plan returns as
though it were a utility plan, and the stepping plan keeps going.
This only partially fixes the problem on Darwin; there's another bug
with reporting a watchpoint when we're instruction single stepping over
an instruction that triggers a watchpoint. The kernel reports the
"single step completed" but not the watchpoint hit. So this commit
also refactors the test into a part that works (at least on Darwin) and
a part that still fails.
We may have to adjust the test result expectations for other systems after
this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146337
When setting a variable watchpoint, the watchpoint stores the variable
name in the watchpoint spec. For expression variables we should store
the expression in the watchpoint spec. This patch adds that
functionality.
rdar://106096860
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146262
Change `dwim-print` to now disable persistent results by default, unless requested by
the user with the `--persistent-result` flag.
Ex:
```
(lldb) dwim-print 1 + 1
(int) 2
(lldb) dwim-print --persistent-result on -- 1 + 1
(int) $0 = 2
```
Users who wish to enable persistent results can make and use an alias that includes
`--persistent-result on`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145609
This was failing with versions of clang that didn't support the
dsymutil (D143458) and llvm (D143397) changes that are needed for this test.
Remove unused parameters that we tried passing for the `dwarf` variant, which
is an NFC change. LLDB doesn't yet support `-gdwarf-5` debugging yet so
passing it to the `Makefile` would actually cause the test to fail.
The `v` (`frame variable`) command can directly access ivars/fields of `this` or `self`.
Such as `v field`, instead of `v this->field`. This change relaxes the criteria for
finding `this`/`self` variables.
There are cases where a `this`/`self` variable does exist, but up to now the `v` command
has not made use of it. The user would have to explicitly run `v this->field` or
`self->_ivar` to access ivars. This change allows such cases to also work (without
explicitly dereferencing `this`/`self`).
A very common example in Objective-C (and Swift) is weakly capturing `self`:
```
__weak Type *weakSelf = self;
void (^block)(void) = ^{
Type *self = weakSelf; // Re-establish strong reference.
// `v _ivar` should work just as well as `v self->_ivar`.
};
```
In this case, `self` exists but `v` would not have used it. With this change, the fact
that a variable named `self` exists is enough for it to be used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145276
Add basic tests for `frame variable`'s ability to direct access fields of `this` and
ivars of `self`.
This splits the tests, preventing ObjC tests from running on Linux.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145348
Add basic tests for `frame variable`'s ability to direct access fields of `this` and
ivars of `self`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145348
The latter only checks built-in commands. I also added some docs to
make the distinction clear and a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144929
In order to run a {break,watch}point command, lldb can resolve to the
script interpreter to run an arbitrary piece of code or call into a
user-provided function. To do so, we will generate a wrapping function,
where we first copy lldb's internal dictionary keys into the
interpreter's global dictionary, copied inline the user code before
resetting the global dictionary to its previous state.
However, {break,watch}point commands can optionally return a value that
would tell lldb whether we should stop or not. This feature was
only implemented for breakpoint commands and since we inlined the user
code directly into the wrapping function, introducing an early return,
that caused lldb to let the interpreter global dictionary tinted with the
internal dictionary keys.
This patch fixes that issue while also adding the stopping behaviour to
watchpoint commands.
To do so, this patch refactors the {break,watch}point command creation
method, to let the lldb wrapper function generator know if the user code is
a function call or a arbitrary expression.
Then the wrapper generator, if the user input was a function call, the
wrapper function will call the user function and save the return value into
a variable. If the user input was an arbitrary expression, the wrapper will
inline it into a nested function, call the nested function and save the
return value into the same variable. After resetting the interpreter global
dictionary to its previous state, the generated wrapper function will return
the varible containing the return value.
rdar://105461140
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144688
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
