The ordering in which functions are presented to the expression evaluator in
this test setting triggers a known bug in LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154843
D68678 added a test that ensures an Apple accelerator lookup is done
efficiently. Since these tables are not used for DWARF 5, we should decorate the
test appropriately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154268
The Objective-C runtime and the shared cache has changed slightly.
Given a class_ro_t, the baseMethods ivar is now a pointer union and may
either be a method_list_t pointer or a pointer to a relative list of
lists. The entries of this relative list of lists are indexes that refer
to a specific image in the shared cache in addition to a pointer offset
to find the accompanying method_list_t. We have to go over each of these
entries, parse it, and then if the relevant image is loaded in the
process, we add those methods to the relevant clang Decl.
In order to determine if an image is loaded, the Objective-C runtime
exposes a symbol that lets us determine if a particular image is loaded.
We maintain a data structure SharedCacheImageHeaders to keep track of
that information.
There is a known issue where if an image is loaded after we create a
Decl for a class, the Decl will not have the relevant methods from that
image (i.e. for Categories).
rdar://107957209
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153597
When formatting a variable, the max depth would potentially be ignored
if the current value object failed to print itself. Change that to
always respect the max depth, even if failure occurs.
rdar://109855463
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152409
The `target.max-children-depth` setting and `--depth` flag would be
ignored if treating pointer as arrays, fix that by always incrementing
the current depth when printing a new child.
rdar://109855463
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151950
I fixed some long-standing failures in SBTarget::FindGlobalVariables
but the fix is in the the accelerator table lookups. I fixed it in
the DWARF mappable tables but not everyone uses those, so I had to
restrict the test to systems I know did.
There were two bugs here.
eMatchTypeStartsWith searched for "symbol_name" by adding ".*" to the
end of the symbol name and treating that as a regex, which isn't
actually a regex for "starts with". The ".*" is in fact a no-op. When
we finally get to comparing the name, we compare against whatever form
of the name was in the accelerator table. But for C++ that might be
the mangled name. We should also try demangled names here, since most
users are going the see demangled not mangled names. I fixed these
two bugs and added a bunch of tests for FindGlobalVariables.
This change is in the DWARF parser code, so there may be a similar bug
in PDB, but the test for this was already skipped for Windows, so I
don't know about this.
You might theoretically need to do this Mangled comparison in
DWARFMappedHash::MemoryTable::FindByName
except when we have names we always chop them before looking them up
so I couldn't see any code paths that fail without that change. So I
didn't add that to this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151940
Following tests are now passing on LLDB AArch64 Windows buildbot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/deleting-implicit-copy-constructor/TestDeletingImplicitCopyConstructor.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-categories/TestDataFormatterCategories.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/constructors/TestCppConstructors.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/namespace/TestNamespace.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/this_class_type_mixing/TestThisClassTypeMixing.py
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/219/builds/3012
This patch removes XFAIL decorator from all of the above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151268
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
**Summary**
When filling out the LayoutInfo for a structure with the offsets
from DWARF, LLDB fills gaps in the layout by creating unnamed
bitfields and adding them to the AST. If we don't do this correctly
and our layout has overlapping fields, we will hat an assertion
in `clang::CGRecordLowering::lower()`. Specifically, if we have
a derived class with a VTable and a bitfield immediately following
the vtable pointer, we create a layout with overlapping fields.
This is an oversight in some of the previous cleanups done around this
area.
In `D76808`, we prevented LLDB from creating unnamed bitfields if there
was a gap between the last field of a base class and the start of a bitfield
in the derived class.
In `D112697`, we started accounting for the vtable pointer. The intention
there was to make sure the offset bookkeeping accounted for the
existence of a vtable pointer (but we didn't actually want to create
any AST nodes for it). Now that `last_field_info.bit_size` was being
set even for artifical fields, the previous fix `D76808` broke
specifically for cases where the bitfield was the first member of a
derived class with a vtable (this scenario wasn't tested so we didn't
notice it). I.e., we started creating redundant unnamed bitfields for
where the vtable pointer usually sits. This confused the lowering logic
in clang.
This patch adds a condition to `ShouldCreateUnnamedBitfield` which
checks whether the first field in the derived class is a vtable ptr.
**Testing**
* Added API test case
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150591
This patch add or removes XFAIL decorator from various tests which were marked
xfail for windows.
since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a couple of new failures.
Weight is in favor of new XPasses and I have removed XFail decorator from them. Also
some new tests have started failing for which we need to file separate bugs. I have
marked them xfail for now and will add the bug id after investigating the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149235
We just want to test whether the language switch works.
This is easier to control for libc++, since for bots building
the tests against libstdc++ we might not have the necessary
`<compare>` header available currently.
It was avoiding a crash at the time on macOS, apparently, and
it skipped the test on all platforms. This test passes for me
now on macOS, let's remove the skip and see how the bots go.
**Summary**
In a program such as:
```
namespace A {
namespace B {
struct Bar {};
}
}
namespace B {
struct Foo {};
}
```
...LLDB would run into issues such as:
```
(lldb) expr ::B::Foo f
error: expression failed to parse:
error: <user expression 0>:1:6: no type named 'Foo' in namespace 'A::B'
::B::Foo f
~~~~~^
```
This is because the `SymbolFileDWARF::FindNamespace` implementation
will return *any* namespace it finds if the `parent_decl_ctx` provided
is empty. In `FindExternalVisibleDecls` we use this API to find the
namespace that symbol `B` refers to. If `A::B` happened to be the one
that `SymbolFileDWARF::FindNamespace` looked at first, we would try
to find `struct Foo` in `A::B`. Hence the error.
This patch proposes a new `SymbolFileDWARF::FindNamespace` API that
will only find a match for top-level namespaces, which is what
`FindExternalVisibleDecls` is attempting anyway; it just never
accounted for multiple namespaces of the same name.
**Testing**
* Added API test-case
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147436
This patch allows users to evaluate expressions using
`expr -l c++20`. Currently DWARF keeps the CU's at
`DW_AT_language` at `DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14` even
when compiling with `-std=c++20`. So even in "C++20
programs" expression evaluation will by default be
performed in `C++11` mode for now.
Enabling `C++14` has been previously attempted at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308
There are some remaining issues around evaluating C++20
expressions. Mainly, lack of support for C++20 AST nodes in
`clang::ASTImporter`. But these can be addressed in follow-up
patches.
The name `module.modulemap` is convention.
> Clang will also search for a file named `module.map`. This behavior is deprecated and
> we plan to eventually remove it.
Reverting because Xcode requires this to be handled elsewhere.
The global variable list gets constructed using the SBAPI
This reverts commit de10c1a824.
This reverts commit 19128792e2.
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652 this implementation
doesn't quite work for subobject constructors/destructors because DWARF
can map multiple definitions of a ctor/dtor to the same specification DIE.
With the current implementation we would pick the first definition we
find and use that linkage name which means we can sometimes pick the
wrong dtor/ctor and fail to execute a valid expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
This relands the commit previously reverted in
`d2cc2c5610ffa78736aa99512bc85a85417efb0a` due to failures on Linux
when debugging split-debug-info enabled executables.
The problem was we called `SymbolFileDWARF::FindFunctions` directly
instead of `Module::FindFunctions` which resulted in a nullptr
dereference because the backing `SymbolFileDWARFDwo` didn't have
an index attached to it. The relanded version calls `Module::FindFunctions`
instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
**Summary**
This patch addresses the case where we have a `DW_AT_external`
subprogram for a constructor (and/or destructor) that doesn't carry
a `DW_AT_linkage_name` attribute. The corresponding DIE(s) that
represent the definition will have a linkage name, but if the name
contains constructs that LLDBs fallback mechanism for guessing mangled
names to resolve external symbols doesn't support (e.g., abi-tags)
then we end up failing to resolve the function call.
We address this by trying to find the linkage name before we create
the constructor/destructor decl, which will get attached using
an `AsmLabelAttr` to make symbol resolution easier.
**Testing**
* Added API test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143652
Set compiler_versions on these tests, as they fail if tested on lower compiler
versions versions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142513
In API tests, replace use of the `p` alias with the `expression` command.
To avoid conflating tests of the alias with tests of the expression command,
this patch canonicalizes to the use `expression`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141539
Otherwise we may be inserting a decl into a DeclContext that's not fully defined yet.
This simplifies/removes some clang AST node creation code. Instead, use
clang::printTemplateArgumentList().
Reviewed By: Michael137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142413
The provided test case was crashing because of confusion attempting to find types for `ns::Foo` under -gsimple-template-names. (This looks broken normally because it's attempting to find `ns::Foo` rather than `ns::Foo<T>`)
Looking up types can't give false positives, as opposed to looking up functions as mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D137098.
Reviewed By: Michael137
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140240
The original code always set the m_live_address of children of the ValueObjects that
use ValueObjectConstResultImpl backends to the parent m_live_address + child_byte_offset.
That is correct for structure types, but wrong for pointer types, since m_live_address
for a pointer type is the address of the storage for the pointer, not of the pointee.
Also added a test which was failing before this patch.
Without checking template parameters, we would sometimes lookup the
wrong type definition for a type declaration because different
instantiations of the same template class had the same debug info name.
The added GetForwardDeclarationDIETemplateParams() shouldn't need a
cache because we'll cache the results of the declaration -> definition
lookup anyway. (DWARFASTParserClang::ParseStructureLikeDIE()
is_forward_declaration branch)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138834
D127284 introduced a new language option which is not benign from modules
perspective. Before this patch lldb would set up the compiler invocation and
later enable incremental processing. Post-D127284 this does not work because
the option causes a module hash mismatch for implicit modules.
In addition, D127284 enables parsing statements on the global scope if
incremental processing is on and thus `syntax_error_for_lldb_to_find` was
rightfully not recognized as a declaration and is considered a statement
which produces a slightly different diagnostic.
Thanks to Michael Buch for the help in understanding this issue. This patch
should appease the lldb bots.
More discussion available at: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127284
DWARFExpression::Evaluate will convert DW_OP_addr addresses in
a DWARF expression into load addresses on the expression stack
when there is a StackFrame in the ExecutionContext, this from
a change in 2018 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362. At the
time this was handling a case that came up in swift programs,
and is no longer necessary. I generalized this conversion to
a load address when a Target is available in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D137682 to make a test case possible;
this change broke a use case that Ted reported.
This change removes my test case, and removes this conversion
of a DW_OP_addr into a load address in some instances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139226
After D134378, we started seeing crashes with incomplete types (in the
context of shared libraries).
When trying to print a `std::vector<int> &` with only debug info for a
declaration, we now try to use the formatter after D134378. With an
incomplete type, this somehow goes into infinite recursion with the
frames
```
lldb_private::ValueObject::Dereference
lldb_private::ValueObjectSynthetic::CreateSynthFilter
lldb_private::ValueObjectSynthetic::ValueObjectSynthetic
lldb_private::ValueObject::CalculateSyntheticValue
lldb_private::ValueObject::HasSyntheticValue
```
This has to do with `FrontEndWantsDereference` that some STL formatters
set, causing recursion between the formatter (which tries to dereference),
and dereferencing (which wants to know if there's a formatter to avoid dereferencing).
The reason this only started appearing after D134378 was because
previously with incomplete types, for names with `<`, lldb would attempt
to parse template parameter DIEs, which were empty, then create an empty
`ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` which overrode the name used to lookup
a formatter in `FormattersMatchData()` to not include template
parameters (e.g. `std::vector<> &`). After D134378 we don't create a
`ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl` when there are no template parameters
and the name to lookup a formatter is the original name (e.g.
`std::vector<int> &`).
The code to try harder with incomplete child compiler types was added in
D79554 for ObjC purposes.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137983
Followup to D134378.
With PrintingPolicy::SuppressScope, we'd also not print the scope in template params. The intention was only to skip the scope for the class because we expect template params to be fully qualified when comparing them for simple template names.
Instead, use `NamedDecl::getNameForDiagnostic` if we're dealing with a tag, which is what we actually use when emitting debug info in clang. That already has an option to suppress the scope on the base name.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137583
When we cannot allocate memory in the inferior process, the IR
interpreter's IRMemoryMap::FindSpace will create an lldb local
buffer and assign it an address range in the inferior address
space. When the interpreter sees an address in that range, it
will read/write from the local buffer instead of the target. If
this magic address overlaps with actual data in the target, the
target cannot be accessed through expressions.
Instead of using a high memory address that is validly addressable,
this patch uses an address that cannot be accessed on 64-bit systems
that don't actually use all 64 bits of the virtual address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137682
rdar://96248287
