If a function has stack objects, and a call, we require an FP. If we
did not initially have any stack objects, and only introduced them
during PrologEpilogInserter for CSR VGPR spills, SILowerSGPRSpills
would end up spilling the FP register as if it were a normal
register. This would result in an assert in a debug build, or
redundant handling of the FP register in a release build.
Try to predict that we will have an FP later, although this is ugly.
Frame-base materialization may insert vector instructions before EXEC is initialised.
Fix this by moving lowering of llvm.amdgcn.init.exec later in backend.
Also remove SI_INIT_EXEC_LO pseudo as this is not necessary.
Reviewed By: ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94645
In RISC-V there is a single addressing mode of the form imm(reg) where
imm is a signed integer of 12-bit with a range of [-2048..2047] bytes
from reg.
The test MultiSource/UnitTests/C++11/frame_layout of the LLVM test-suite
exercises several scenarios with the stack, including function calls
where the stack will need to be realigned to to a local variable having
a large alignment of 4096 bytes.
In situations of large stacks, the RISC-V backend (in
RISCVFrameLowering) reserves an extra emergency spill slot which can be
used (if no free register is found) by the register scavenger after the
frame indexes have been eliminated. PrologEpilogInserter already takes
care of keeping the emergency spill slots as close as possible to the
stack pointer or frame pointer (depending on what the function will
use). However there is a final alignment step to honour the maximum
alignment of the stack that, when using the stack pointer to access the
emergency spill slots, has the side effect of setting them farther from
the stack pointer.
In the case of the frame_layout testcase, the net result is that we do
have an emergency spill slot but it is so far from the stack pointer
(more than 2048 bytes due to the extra alignment of a variable to 4096
bytes) that it becomes unreachable via any immediate offset.
During elimination of the frame index, many (regular) offsets of the
stack may be immediately unreachable already. Their address needs to be
computed using a register. A virtual register is created and later
RegisterScavenger should be able to find an unused (physical) register.
However if no register is available, RegisterScavenger will pick a
physical register and spill it onto an emergency stack slot, while we
compute the offset (restoring the chosen register after all this). This
assumes that the emergency stack slot is easily reachable (this is,
without requiring another register!).
This is the assumption we seem to break when we perform the extra
alignment in PrologEpilogInserter.
We can "float" the emergency spill slots by increasing (in absolute
value) their offsets from the incoming stack pointer. This way the
emergency spill slots will remain close to the stack pointer (once the
function has allocated storage for the stack, including the needed
realignment). The new size computed in PrologEpilogInserter is padding
so it should be OK to move the emergency spill slots there. Also because
we're increasing the alignment, the new location should stay aligned for
the purpose of the emergency spill slots.
Note that this change also impacts other backends as shown by the tests.
Changes are minor adjustments to the emergency stack slot offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89239
The widenScalar implementation for signed and unsigned overflowing
operations were very similar: both are checked by truncating the result
and then re-sign/zero-extending it and checking that it matches the
computed operation.
Using a truncate + zero-extend for the unsigned case instead of manually
producing the AND instruction like before leads to an extra copy
instruction during legalization, but this should be harmless.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95035
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Relands ba7dcd8542, which had memory leaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95215
During instruction selection, there is an inconsistency in choosing
the initial soffset value. With certain early passes, this value is
getting modified and that brought additional fixup during
eliminateFrameIndex to work for all cases. This whole transformation
looks trivial and can be handled better.
This patch clearly defines the initial value for soffset and keeps it
unchanged before eliminateFrameIndex. The initial value must be zero
for MUBUF with a frame index. The non-frame index MUBUF forms that
use a raw offset from SP will have the stack register for soffset.
During frame elimination, the soffset remains zero for entry functions
with zero dynamic allocas and no callsites, or else is updated to the
appropriate frame/stack register.
Also, did some code clean up and made all asserts around soffset
stricter to match.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95071
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.
amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)
These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.
This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.
This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
This test case demonstrates that the Call Frame Information generation is
totally biased towards whether exceptions are enabled or not. Currently
LLVM does not generate CFI i.e. a .debug_frame for debug purpose even
if --force-dwarf-frame-section is enabled unless exceptions are enabled.
Reviewed By: scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94801
If a function doesn't contain loops and does not call non-willreturn
functions, then it is willreturn. Loops are detected by checking
for backedges in the function. We don't attempt to handle finite
loops at this point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94633
This pass is required to get correct codegen for image instructions with
the tfe or lwe bits set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95132
Allow parsing generated mir with custom pseudo source value tokens.
Also rename pseudo source values to have more meaningful names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94768
Add DemandedElts support inside the TRUNCATE analysis.
REAPPLIED - this was reverted by @hans at rGa51226057fc3 due to an issue with vector shift amount types, which was fixed in rG935bacd3a724 and an additional test case added at rG0ca81b90d19d
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56387
In case of indirect calls or address taken functions,
skip propagating any attributes to them. We just
propagate features to such functions.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94585
It caused "Vector shift amounts must be in the same as their first arg"
asserts in Chromium builds. See the code review for repro instructions.
> Add DemandedElts support inside the TRUNCATE analysis.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56387
This reverts commit cad4275d69.
If constants are hidden behind G_ANYEXT we can treat them same way as G_SEXT.
For that purpose we extend getConstantVRegValWithLookThrough with option
to handle G_ANYEXT same way as G_SEXT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92219
Use the KnownBits icmp comparisons to determine when a ISD::UMIN/UMAX op is unnecessary should either op be known to be ULT/ULE or UGT/UGE than the other.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94532
Add pseudo instruction to allow early termination of pixel shader
anywhere based on the value of SCC. The intention is to use this
when a mask of live lanes is updated, e.g. live lanes in WQM pass.
This facilitates early termination of shaders even when EXEC is
incomplete, e.g. in non-uniform control flow.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88777
Previously, instructions which could be
expressed as VOP3 in addition to another
encoding had a _e64 suffix on the tablegen
record name, while those
only available as VOP3 did not. With this
patch, all VOP3s will have the _e64 suffix.
The assembly does not change, only the mir.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94341
Change-Id: Ia8ec8890d47f8f94bbbdac43745b4e9dd2b03423
This seems to only have overridden cold handling, which we probably
shouldn't do. As far as I can tell the wrapper library functions are
still inlined as appropriate.
If SETO/SETUO aren't legal, they'll be expanded and we'll end up
with 3 comparisons.
SETONE is equivalent to (SETOGT || SETOLT)
so if one of those operations is supported use that expansion. We
don't need both since we can commute the operands to make the other.
SETUEQ can be implemented with !(SETOGT || SETOLT) or (SETULE && SETUGE).
I've only implemented the first because it didn't look like most of the
affected targets had legal SETULE/SETUGE.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, tlively, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94450
In ST mode, flat scratch instructions have neither an sgpr nor a vgpr
for the address. This lead to an assertion when inserting hard clauses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94406
Memory operands store a base alignment that does not factor in
the effect of the offset on the alignment.
Previously the printing code only printed the base alignment if
it was different than the size. If there is an offset, the reader
would need to figure out the effective alignment themselves. This
has confused me before and someone else was recently confused on
IRC.
This patch prints the possibly offset adjusted alignment if it is
different than the size. And prints the base alignment if it is
different than the alignment. The MIR parser has been updated to
read basealign in addition to align.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94344
This patch finishes addressing unused prefixes under CodeGen: 2
remaining tests fixed, and then undo-ing the lit.local.cfg changes under
various subdirs and moving the policy under CodeGen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94430
We are checking the unsafe-fp-math for sqrt but not for fpow, which behaves inconsistent.
As the direction is to remove this global option, we need to remove the unsafe-fp-math
check for sqrt and update the test with afn fast-math flags.
Reviewed By: Spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93891
Treat a non-atomic volatile load and store as a relaxed atomic at
system scope for the address spaces accessed. This will ensure all
relevant caches will be bypassed.
A volatile atomic is not changed and still only bypasses caches upto
the level specified by the SyncScope operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94214
There are various hacks working around limitations in
handleAssignments, and the logical split between different parts isn't
correct. Start separating the type legalization to satisfy going
through the DAG infrastructure from the code required to split into
register types. The type splitting should be moved to generic code.
