Per discussion with Anna a /long/ time ago, it was way too easy to misuse
BlockCall: because it inherited from AnyFunctionCall (through SimpleCall),
getDecl() was constrained to return a FunctionDecl, and you had to call
getBlockDecl() instead. This goes against the whole point of CallEvent
(to abstract over different ways to invoke bodies of code).
Now, BlockCall just inherits directly from CallEvent. There's a bit of
duplication in getting things out of the origin expression (which is still
known to be a CallExpr), but nothing significant.
llvm-svn: 199321
In an expression like "new (a, b) Foo(x, y)", two things happen:
- Memory is allocated by calling a function named 'operator new'.
- The memory is initialized using the constructor for 'Foo'.
Currently the analyzer only models the second event, though it has special
cases for both the default and placement forms of operator new. This patch
is the first step towards properly modeling both events: it changes the CFG
so that the above expression now generates the following elements.
1. a
2. b
3. (CFGNewAllocator)
4. x
5. y
6. Foo::Foo
The analyzer currently ignores the CFGNewAllocator element, but the next
step is to treat that as a call like any other.
The CFGNewAllocator element is not added to the CFG for analysis-based
warnings, since none of them take advantage of it yet.
llvm-svn: 199123
...by synthesizing their body to be "return self->_prop;", with an extra
nudge to RetainCountChecker to still treat the value as +0 if we have no
other information.
This doesn't handle weak properties, but that's mostly correct anyway,
since they can go to nil at any time. This also doesn't apply to properties
whose implementations we can't see, since they may not be backed by an
ivar at all. And finally, this doesn't handle properties of C++ class type,
because we can't invoke the copy constructor. (Sema has actually done this
work already, but the AST it synthesizes is one the analyzer doesn't quite
handle -- it has an rvalue DeclRefExpr.)
Modeling setters is likely to be more difficult (since it requires
handling strong/copy), but not impossible.
<rdar://problem/11956898>
llvm-svn: 198953
...rather somewhere in the destructor when we try to access something and
realize the object has already been deleted. This is necessary because
the destructor is processed before the 'delete' itself.
Patch by Karthik Bhat!
llvm-svn: 198779
...even though the argument is declared "const void *", because this is
just a way to pass pointers around as objects. (Though NSData is often
a better one.)
PR18262
llvm-svn: 198710
RetainCountChecker has to track returned object values to know if they are
retained or not. Under ARC, even methods that return +1 are tracked by the
system and should be treated as +0. However, this effect behaves exactly
like NotOwned(ObjC), i.e. a generic Objective-C method that actually returns
+0, so we don't need a special case for it.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 198709
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
This has the dual effect of (1) enabling more dead-stripping in release builds
and (2) ensuring that debug helper functions aren't stripped away in debug
builds, as they're intended to be called from the debugger.
Note that the attribute is applied to definitions rather than declarations in
headers going forward because it's now conditional on NDEBUG:
/// \brief Mark debug helper function definitions like dump() that should not be
/// stripped from debug builds.
Requires corresponding macro added in LLVM r198456.
llvm-svn: 198489
This checker has not been updated to work with interprocedural analysis,
and actually contains both logical correctness issues but also
memory bugs. We can resuscitate it from version control once there
is focused interest in making it a real viable checker again.
llvm-svn: 198476
Summary:
This allows for a better alternative to the FrontendAction hack used in
clang-tidy in order to get static analyzer's ASTConsumer.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2505
llvm-svn: 198426
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
We have assertions for this, but a few edge cases had snuck through where
we were still unconditionally using 'int'.
<rdar://problem/15703011>
llvm-svn: 197733
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
With the introduction of explicit address space casts into LLVM, there's
a need to provide a new cast kind the front-end can create for C/OpenCL/CUDA
and code to produce address space casts from those kinds when appropriate.
Patch by Michele Scandale!
llvm-svn: 197036
Warn if both result expressions of a ternary operator (? :) are the same.
Because only one of them will be executed, this warning will fire even if
the expressions have side effects.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm and Per Viberg!
llvm-svn: 196937
This reverts commit r189090.
The original patch introduced regressions (see the added live-variables.* tests). The patch depends on the correctness of live variable analyses, which are not computed correctly. I've opened PR18159 to track the proper resolution to this problem.
The patch was a stepping block to r189746. This is why part of the patch reverts temporary destructor tests that started crashing. The temporary destructors feature is disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 196593
look at the attribute spelling instead. The 'ownership_*' attributes should
probably be split into separate *Attr classes, but that's more than I wanted to
do here.
llvm-svn: 195805
New rules of invalidation/escape of the source buffer of memcpy: the source buffer contents is invalidated and escape while the source buffer region itself is neither invalidated, nor escape.
In the current modeling of memcpy the information about allocation state of regions, accessible through the source buffer, is not copied to the destination buffer and we can not track the allocation state of those regions anymore. So we invalidate/escape the source buffer indirect regions in anticipation of their being invalidated for real later. This eliminates false-positive leaks reported by the unix.Malloc and alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks checkers for the cases like
char *f() {
void *x = malloc(47);
char *a;
memcpy(&a, &x, sizeof a);
return a;
}
llvm-svn: 194953
This is similar to r194004: because we can't reason about the data structure
invariants of std::basic_string, the analyzer decides it's possible for an
allocator to be used to deallocate the string's inline storage. Just ignore
this by walking up the stack, skipping past methods in classes with
"allocator" in the name, and seeing if we reach std::basic_string that way.
PR17866
llvm-svn: 194764
This has no effect on user-visible output, but can be used by post-processing
tools that work with the generated HTML, rather than using CmpRuns.py's
interface to work with plists.
Patch by György Orbán!
llvm-svn: 194763
I've added the missing ImutProfileInfo [sic] specialization for bool,
so this patch on r194235 is no longer needed.
This reverts r194244 / 2baea2887dfcf023c8e3560e5d4713c42eed7b6b.
llvm-svn: 194265
In ADT/ImmutableSet, ImutProfileInfo<bool> cannot be matched to ImutProfileInteger.
I didn't have idea it'd the right way if PROFILE_INTEGER_INFO(bool) could be added there.
llvm-svn: 194244
This syntactic checker looks for expressions on both sides of comparison
operators that are structurally the same. As a special case, the
floating-point idiom "x != x" for "isnan(x)" is left alone.
Currently this only checks comparison operators, but in the future we could
extend this to include logical operators or chained if-conditionals.
Checker by Per Viberg!
llvm-svn: 194236
An Objective-C for-in loop will have zero iterations if the collection is
empty. Previously, we could only detect this case if the program asked for
the collection's -count /before/ the for-in loop. Now, the analyzer
distinguishes for-in loops that had zero iterations from those with at
least one, and can use this information to constrain the result of calling
-count after the loop.
In order to make this actually useful, teach the checker that methods on
NSArray, NSDictionary, and the other immutable collection classes don't
change the count.
<rdar://problem/14992886>
llvm-svn: 194235
The path note that says "Loop body executed 0 times" has been changed to
"Loop body skipped when range is empty" for C++11 for-range loops, and to
"Loop body skipped when collection is empty" for Objective-C for-in loops.
Part of <rdar://problem/14992886>
llvm-svn: 194234
We could certainly be more precise in many of our diagnostics, but before we
were printing "Assuming x is && y", which is just ridiculous.
<rdar://problem/15167979>
llvm-svn: 193455
