We should set them to expand for now since there are no patterns
dealing with them. Actually, there are no instructions either so I
doubt they'll ever be acceptable.
llvm-svn: 199265
APInt only knows how to compare values with the same BitWidth and asserts
in all other cases.
With this fix, function PerformORCombine does not use the APInt equality
operator if the APInt values returned by 'isConstantSplat' differ in BitWidth.
In that case they are different and no comparison is needed.
llvm-svn: 199119
This patch covered 2 more scenarios:
1. Two operands of shuffle_vector are the same, like
%shuffle.i = shufflevector <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6, i32 8, i32 10, i32 12, i32 14>
2. One of operands is undef, like
%shuffle.i = shufflevector <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6, i32 8, i32 10, i32 12, i32 14>
After this patch, perm instructions will have chance to be emitted instead of lots of INS.
llvm-svn: 199069
There is a wrong assumption that the vector element type and the
type of each ConstantSDNode in the build_vector were the same.
However, when promoting the integer operand of a legally typed
build_vector, the operand type and the vector element type do not
need to be the same
(See method 'DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_BUILD_VECTOR' in
LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp).
in AArch64 backend, the following dag sequence:
C0: i1 = Constant<0>
C1: i1 = Constant<-1>
V: v8i1 = BUILD_VECTOR C1, C1, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0
is type-legalized into:
NewC0: i32 = Constant<0>
NewC1: i32 = Constant<1>
V: v8i8 = BUILD_VECTOR NewC1, NewC1, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0
Forcing a getZeroExtend to VTBits to ensure that the new constant
is correctly.
llvm-svn: 198582
For AArch64 backend, if DAGCombiner see "sext(setcc)", it will
combine them together to a single setcc with extended value type.
Then if it see "zext(setcc)", it assumes setcc is Vxi1, and try to
create "(and (vsetcc), (1, 1, ...)". While setcc isn't Vxi1,
DAGcombiner will create wrong node and get wrong code emitted.
llvm-svn: 198190
DAG.getVectorShuffle() doesn't always return a vector_shuffle node.
If mask is the exact sequence of it's operand(For example, operand_0
is v8i8, and the mask is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7), it will directly
return that operand. So a check is added here.
llvm-svn: 197967
This failure caused by improper condition when lowering shuffle_vector
to scalar_to_vector. After this patch NEON_VDUP with v1i64 will not
be generated.
llvm-svn: 197966
Check for single use of fmul node in fused multiply patterns
to allow generation of fused multiply add/sub instructions.
Otherwise fmul operation ends up being repeated more than
once which does not help peformance on targets with
only one MAC unit, as for example cortex-a53.
llvm-svn: 197929
The correct pattern matching should be:
- fnmadd is (-Ra) + (-Rn)*Rm which should be matched as:
fma (fneg node:$Rn), node:$Rm, (fneg node:$Ra) and as
(f32 (fsub (f32 (fneg FPR32:$Ra)), (f32 (fmul FPR32:$Rn, FPR32:$Rm))))
- fnmsub is (-Ra) + Rn*Rm which should be matched as
fma node:$Rn, node:$Rm, (fneg node:$Ra) and as
(f32 (fsub (f32 (fmul FPR32:$Rn, FPR32:$Rm)), FPR32:$Ra))))
llvm-svn: 197928
Currently we have such types as legal vector types. The DAG combiner may generate some DAG nodes having such types but we don't have patterns to match them.
E.g. a load i32 and a bitcast i32 to v1i32 will be combined into a load v1i32:
bitcast (load i32) to v1i32 -> load v1i32.
So this patch fixes such problems for load/dup instructions.
If v1i8/v1i16/v1i32 are not legal any more, the code in this patch can be deleted. So I also add some FIXME.
llvm-svn: 197361
- Copy patterns with float/double types are enough.
- Fix typos in test case names that were using v1fx.
- There is no ACLE intrinsic that uses v1f32 type. And there is no conflict of
neon and non-neon ovelapped operations with this type, so there is no need to
support operations with this type.
- Remove v1f32 from FPR32 register and disallow v1f32 as a legal type for
operations.
Patch by Ana Pazos!
llvm-svn: 197159
The assertion was checking that the virtual register VReg used to represent the
physical register PReg uses the same register class as the one passed to
MachineFunction::addLiveIn.
This is over-constraining because it is sufficient to check that the register
class of VReg (VRegRC) is a subclass of the register class of PReg (PRegRC) and
that VRegRC contains PReg.
Indeed, if VReg gets constrained because of some operation constraints
between two calls of MachineFunction::addLiveIn, the original assertion
cannot match.
This fixes <rdar://problem/15633429>.
llvm-svn: 197097
point reciprocal exponent, and floating-point reciprocal square root estimate
LLVM AArch64 intrinsics to use f32/f64 types, rather than their vector
equivalents.
llvm-svn: 197066
Patch by Jiangning Liu.
With some test case changes:
- intrinsic test added to the existing /test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-aba-abd.ll.
- New test cases to cover movi 1D scenario without using the intrinsic in
test/CodeGen/AArch64/neon-mov.ll.
llvm-svn: 196806
