Flang also supports non-scalar logical dummy argument with a different
KIND from C_BOOL to a bind(c) routine as well as a component in a
bind(c) derived type. Update the document.
```
subroutine sub(arg)
logical(4) :: arg(4)
end
```
```
type dt
logical(4) :: comp
end type
end
```
…nt arguments
Arguments to the intrinsic functions MAX and MIN after the first two are
optional. When these actual arguments might not be present at run time,
emit a compilation time error if they require data conversion (a
non-standard but nearly universal language extension); such a conversion
would crash if the argument was absent.
Other compilers either disallow data conversions entirely on MAX/MIN or
crash at run time if a converted argument is absent.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/87046.
Allocatable components of structure constructors were not deallocated.
Deallocate them without calling final subroutines.
This was already properly done for array constructors.
The specific intrinsic function INDEX should work as a PROCEDURE
interface in the declaration of a procedure pointer or dummy procedure,
and it should be compatible with a user-defined interface.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82397.
The standard states that data objects involved in an asynchronous data
transfer statement gain the ASYNCHRONOUS attribute implicitly in the
surrounding subprogram or BLOCK scope. This attribute affects the checks
in call semantics, as an ASYNCHRONOUS actual object associated with an
ASYNCHRONOUS dummy argument must not require data copies in or out.
(Most compilers don't implement implied ASYNCHRONOUS attributes
correctly; XLF gets these right, and GNU is close.)
When a generic procedure interface, either declared or the result of
merging two use-associated generics, has two specific procedures
that are not distinguishable according to the rules in F'2023
subclause 15.4.3.4.5, emit a portability warning rather than a
hard error message. The rules in that subclause are not adequate
to detect pairs of specific procedures that admit an ambiguous
reference, as demonstrated by a case that arose in pFUnit. Further,
these distinguishability checks, even if sufficient to the task
of detecting pairs of specifics capable of ambiguous references,
should only apply to pairs where *every* reference would have to
be ambiguous -- and this can and is validated at every reference
anyway. Last, only XLF enforces these incomplete and needless
distinguishability rules -- every other compiler seems to just
check that each procedure reference resolves to exactly one
specific procedure.
If the standard were to complete lose subclause 15.4.3.4.5 and
its related note (C.11.6) -- which admits that the rules are
incomplete! -- and simply require that each generic procedure
reference resolve unambiguously to exactly one specific, nobody
would miss them. This patch changes this compiler to give them
lip service when requested, but they are now otherwise ignored.
Added support for COSD and SIND. This is quick fix. ATAND, TAND, COSD
and SIND needs to be revisited to make it a runtime call. This patch has
code changes and test cases.
Using the VALUE attribute for assumed-length CHARACTER dummy arguments
became standard in F'2008 but still lacks widespread implementation;
emit a portability warning when they are enabled.
Resolves llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/value_5.f90.
The Fortran standard defines real MOD and MODULO with expressions like
MOD(a,p) = a - AINT(a/p)*p. Unfortunately, these definitions have poor
accuracy when a is much larger in magnitude than p, and every Fortran
compiler uses better algorithms instead.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/mod_large_1.f90.
There are some very odd (even for Fortran) rules in F'2023 subclause
19.4 (paras 6 & 8) pertaining to the index variables of FORALL and DO
CONCURRENT constructs/statements, and they are not currently implemented
correctly.
Although these index variables are construct entities, they have
restrictions in the standard that would essentially allow them to also
be variables in their enclosing scopes. If their names are present in
the enclosing scope, and the construct does not have an explicit type
specification for its indices, then the names in the enclosing scope
must either be scalar variables or COMMON blocks, and their type must be
integer.
Reimplement these restrictions largely with portability warnings rather
than hard errors. Retain the semantic interpretation that the type of an
untyped index variable be taken from the type of a variable of the same
name in the enclosing scope, if it exists, although that bit of the
standard could be interpreted otherwise.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76978.
Detect NaN elements in data and handle them like gfortran does (at
runtime); namely, NaN can be returned if all the data are NaNs, but any
non-NaN value is preferable. Ensure that folding returns the same
results as runtime computation.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/maxloc_2.f90 (and
probably others).
…field
When a comma appears in a fixed-width input field for integer editing,
many compilers accept it without error and interpret the comma as
terminating the field early.
Support \uNNNN and \uNNNNNNNN escape sequences for CHARACTER(KIND=2) and
CHARACTER(KIND=4) literal constants for better GNU Fortran
compatibility.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/achar_6.F90 and
.../widechar_1.f90.
Fortran 2023 subclause 13.7.2.3.8 discusses input rounding only in the
context of decimal-to-binary conversion. There is no mention of rounding
for hexadecimal floating-point input conversion. At least one Fortran
compiler seems to have interpreted this silence as implying no rounding.
(Note that this is not the same thing as rounding to zero (RZ), which
would return +/-HUGE() for overflow.)
Nearly every Fortran compiler supports the extension of NAMELIST input
into a storage sequence identified by its initial scalar array element.
For example,
&GROUP A(1) = 1. 2. 3. /
should be processed as if the input had been
&GROUP A(1:) = 1. 2. 3. /
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/namelist_24.f90.
The compiler doesn't USE-associate names of intrinsic procedures from
modules (in the absence of ONLY:), so that the associating scope doesn't
get populated with names of intrinsics that were used only in
declarations (e.g., SELECTED_REAL_KIND). A recent bug report (below)
shows that we should modify that policy in the case of names that appear
in explicit INTRINSIC attribute statements. The behaviors of other
Fortran compilers are not consistent and the requirements of the
standard are not clear; this fix follows the precedent set by gfortran
and nvfortran.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/72084.
Fortran free form line continuation with '&' works with this compiler
even across the end of an included source file, as it does with most
other Fortran compilers. This extension should be documented.
A NULL() pointer without MOLD= cannot be allowed to be associated with
an assumed-rank dummy argument, as its rank is not well-defined and
neither the RANK() intrinsic function or the SELECT RANK construct will
work in the callee.
As an extension, accept the redundant use of the CONTIGUOUS attribute
when applied to scalars and to simply contiguous objects, with a
portability warning.
As is already supported as a common extension for intrinsic functions
like DIM, allow distinct kinds of integer actual arguments to the
MIL-STD bit intrinsic functions IAND, IEOR, and IOR, with the kind of
the result being the largest of the kinds of the operands. (Though one
could make a case that IAND should return the smallest kind of its
operands, that's not what other compilers do.)
Fortran allows forward references to type names, which can lead to
ambiguity when coupled with host association, as in:
module m
type ambiguous; integer n; end type
contains
subroutine s
type(ambiguous), pointer :: variable
type t
type(ambiguous), pointer :: component
end type
type ambiguous; real x; end type
end
end
Some other compilers resolve to a host association, some resolve to a
forward reference. This compiler will now emit an error.
Follow up up of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67693
- Zero initialize uninitialized components of saved derived type entity
with a default initial value.
- Zero initialize uninitialized storage of common blocks with a member
with an initial value.
- Zero initialized uninitialized saved equivalence
This removes all the cases where fir.global are created with an initial
value that results in an undef in LLVM for part of the global, leading
in surprising LLVM optimizations at -O2 for Fortran folks that expects
there saved variables to be zero initialized if there is no explicit or
default initial value.
This is not standard but is vastly expected by existing code.
This was implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D149877 for simple
scalars, but MLIR lacked a generic way to deal with aggregate types
(arrays and derived type).
Support was recently added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65508. Leverage it to zero
initialize all types.
…mmy argument
Several compilers accept a null pointer (with or without a MOLD=) as an
actual argument for association with an INTENT(IN) allocatable dummy
argument. At runtime, the allocatable dummy argument appears to be in
the unallocated state. This seems useful, unambiguous, unlikely to
invalidate conforming code, and works with Intel, NAG, & XLF, so it
should be supported with an optional portability warning in this
compiler as well.
The Fortran standards require (F'2023 C745) that a derived type with the
SEQUENCE attribute have at least one component. No Fortran compiler
actually enforces this constraint. Accept this usage with a warning.
At least one other Fortran compiler supports the use of unrestricted intrinsic
functions as specific procedures in generic interfaces, and the usage seems
to be both useful and unambiguous. Support it with a portability warning.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/pr95500.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157333
A quotation mark can appear in a Fortran character literal by doubling
it; for example, PRINT *, "'""'" prints '"'. When those doubled
quotation marks are split by a free form line continuation, the
continuation line should have an ampersand before the second quotation
mark. But most compilers, including this one, allow the second
quotation mark to appear as the first character on the continuation
line, too.
So this works:
print *, "'"&
"'"
but it really should be written as:
print *, "'"&
&"'"
Emit a portability warning and document that we support this near-universal
extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155973
This implements the tand intrinsic by performing a multiplication
by pi/180 to the argument before calling tan inline.
This is a commonly provided extension that is used by OpenRadioss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154614
Fix some problems with INCLUDE line recognition pointed out by some
recently-added tests to the LLVM test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155497
It is not standard conforming under IMPLICIT NONE(TYPE) for a name to
appear in a DATA statement prior to its explicit type declaration,
but it is benign, supported in other compilers, and attested in real
applications. Support it with an optional portability warning.
Fixes GitHub LLVM bug https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63783.
OPEN statements can be used to change some, but not all, attributes
of units that have already been opened. The I/O runtime library
wasn't allowing ENCODING= to be changed. Every other Fortran compiler
permits this usage, and it's safe and useful, so allow it.
(Otherwise there's no good way to ensure that the preconnected
unit 6 is in UTF-8 mode.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154379
We intentionally process NAMELIST groups in a scope after having
resolved all of the names in that scope. This means that a name
whose first appearance in a scope is in the NAMELIST group resolves
to a local object, if any, rather than to any host associated object.
The standard is unclear on this point, and there is no clear
precedent in other compilers.
This patch doesn't implement this choice -- that was done long ago --
but just documents the behavior in Extensions.md.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154375
Apply the default PUBLIC/PRIVATE accessibility of a module to its symbols
a second time after it is known that all symbols, including implicitly typed
names from NAMELIST groups and specification expressions in module subprograms,
have been created in its scope.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62598.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150307
Instead of filling uninitialized global variables with "undef",
initialize them with 0. Only for Integer, Float or Logical type
variables. Complex, user defined data structures, arrays, etc
are not supported at this point.
This patch fixes the main problem of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62432
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149877
The extents, if any, of the HARVEST= actual argument must be known
at execution time for the call to be implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147391
When the same name is pulled into a scope more than once via
USE and IMPORT, emit an error if its resolutions are ambiguous,
or (as an extension like some other compilers) emit a portability
warning when the names all resolve to the same symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147388
Add an entry to the Extensions document describing how we
don't care about conflicts between module names and non-global
items. (This is a case where it would be a nontrivial amount
of work to catch an "error" that is only a standard conformance
issue, not anything that would prevent a program from working.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147387
Flang was missing value normalization for logical<->integer conversions
which is required by Flang specification. The shrinking logical<->logical
conversions were also incorrectly truncating the input.
This change performs value normalization for all logical<->integer
conversions and logical<->logical conversions between different kinds.
Note that value normalization is not strictly required for
logical(kind=k1)->logical(kind=k2) conversions when k1 < k2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147019
Presently, semantics doesn't check for discrepancies between known
constant corresponding LEN type parameters between the declared type
of an allocatable/pointer and either the type-spec or the SOURCE=/MOLD=
on an ALLOCATE statement.
This allows discrepancies between character lengths to go unchecked.
Some compilers accept mismatched character lengths on SOURCE=/MOLD=
and the allocate object, and that's useful and unambiguous feature
that already works in f18 via truncation or padding. A portability
warning should issue, however.
But for mismatched character lengths between an allocate object and
an explicit type-spec, and for any mismatch between derived type
LEN type parameters, an error is appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146583
Constraint C1406 in Fortran 2018 prohibits the USE of the same module
name as both an intrinsic module and a non-intrinsic module in a scope.
The current check misinterprets the constraint as applying only to
explicitly INTRINSIC or NON_INTRINSIC module natures.
Change the check to also apply to non-explicit module natures, and
also downgrade it to a portability warning, since there is no ambiguity
and I suspect that we need to accept this usage when building f18's
own intrinsic modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146576
Some Fortran compilers allow kinds of LOGICAL other than C_BOOL
for the types of dummy arguments to interoperable (BIND(C))
procedures. As any kind of LOGICAL can be converted to any
other without loss of information, this seems to be a useful
unambiguous extension that is attested in real codes; accept it
for scalars with a portability warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145968
Declaration checking in semantics was only examining symbols with
explicit BIND(C) attributes; extend it to also check dummy arguments
to such procedures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145746
