In presence of symbols with AssocEntityDetails in an expression,
`Traverse`, `AnyTraverse`, `AllTraverse`, and `SetTraverse`
automatically visit the selector expression or variable.
This is most often the desired behavior but can be surprising, and was
not correct for FindImpureCall and HasVectorSubscript.
Add a default template option to flag the behavior to someone willing to
use the Traverse helper for a new utility, and set this template to
false for FindImpureCall and HasVectorSubscript.
…istinguishing characteristic
We note whether a procedure's interface is explicit or implicit as an
attribute of its characteristics, so that other semantics can be checked
appropriately, but this internal attribute should not be used as a
distinguishing characteristic in itself.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81876.
Recognize Cray pointees as such when they are declared as assumed size
arrays, and don't emit a bogus error message about implied shape arrays.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77330.
The checking of calls to the intrinsic subroutine MOVE_ALLOC is not
insisting that its first two arguments be whole allocatable variables or
components. Fix, move the code into check-calls.cpp (a better home for
such things), and clean up the tests.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/77230.
Add `notify-type` to `iso_fortran_env` module. Add `notify-wait-stmt` to
the parser and add checks for constraints on the statement, `C1177` and
`C1178`, from the Fortran 2023 standard. Add three semantics tests for
`notify-wait-stmt`.
The compiler requires that a Cray pointee have a SEQUENCE type, but a
recent bug report points out that a BIND(C) type should also be
accepted.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76529.
…arrays
When comparing dummy array extents, cope with references to symbols
better (including references to other dummy arguments), and emit
warnings in dubious cases that are not equivalent but not provably
incompatible.
Construct entities that are associations from selectors in ASSOCIATE,
CHANGE TEAMS, and SELECT TYPE constructs do not have the ALLOCATABLE or
POINTER attributes, even when associating with allocatables or pointers;
associations from selectors in SELECT RANK constructs do have those
attributes.
The POINTER= and TARGET= arguments to the intrinsic function
ASSOCIATED() can be the results of references to functions that return
object pointers or procedure pointers. NULL() was working well but not
program-defined pointer-valued functions. Correct the validation of
ASSOCIATED() and extend the infrastructure used to detect and
characterize procedures and pointers.
Expression processing applies some straightforward rewriting of mixed
complex/real and complex/integer operations to avoid having to promote
the real/integer operand to complex and then perform a complex
operation; for example, (a,b)+x becomes (a+x,b) rather than (a,b)+(x,0).
But this can blow up the expression representation when the complex
operand cannot be duplicated cheaply. So apply this technique only to
complex operands that are appropriate to duplicate.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/65142.
A RANK(*) case in a SELECT RANK construct selects the case of an
assumed-rank dummy argument whose effective actual argument is an
assumed-size array. In this case, the attributes of the selector are
those of a rank-1 assumed-size array, and the selector cannot be
allocatable or a pointer.
Ensure that the representation of a SELECT RANK construct's per-case
AssocEntityDetails can distinguish RANK(n), RANK(*), and RANK DEFAULT,
and clean up various code sites and tests where the distinctions matter.
Implements compatibility checking for initializers in procedure pointer
declarations. This work exposed some inconsistency in how ELEMENTAL
interfaces were handled and checked, from both unrestricted intrinsic
functions and others, and some refinements needed for function result
compatbility checking; these have also been ironed out. Some new
warnings are now emitted, and this affected a dozen or so tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159026
Unlike other executable constructs with associating selectors, the
selector of a SELECT RANK construct can have the ALLOCATABLE or POINTER
attribute, and will work as an allocatable or object pointer within
each rank case, so long as there is no RANK(*) case.
Getting this right exposed a correctness risk with the popular
predicate IsAllocatableOrPointer() -- it will be true for procedure
pointers as well as object pointers, and in many contexts, a procedure
pointer should not be acceptable. So this patch adds the new predicate
IsAllocatableOrObjectPointer(), and updates some call sites of the original
function to use the new one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159043
This patch lowers allocatables and pointers named in "private" OpenMP clause.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148570
In the CoarrayChecker, add checks for the constraints C1177 and
C1178 for event-wait-stmt. Add event-post-stmt to the check
for the constraints for sync-stat-list. Add a check for the
constraint C1176 on event-variable.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137204
In the CoarrayChecker, add checks for the constraints C1177 and
C1178 for event-wait-stmt. Add event-post-stmt to the check
for the constraints for sync-stat-list. Add a check for the
constraint C1176 on event-variable.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137204
Make __builtin_c_loc() into an intrinsic function and verify the
special semantic requirements on its actual arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149988
Implement semantics for the IGNORE_TKR directive as it is interpreted
by the PGI / NVFORTRAN compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148643
Many semantic checks for constraints related to PURE subprograms
can be implemented in terms of Semantics' "definable.h" utilities,
slightly expanded. Replace some particular PURE constraint
checks with calls to WhyNotDefinable(), except for cases that
had better specific error messages, and start checking some
missing constraints with DEALLOCATE statements and local
variable declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147389
When a parameterized derived type has FINAL subroutines, only
those FINAL subroutines whose dummy argument's type matches the
type parameter values of a particular instantiation are relevant
to that instantiation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145741
A more precise reading of the standard for associate entities, like "x"
in ASSOCIATE(x => selector), shows that the utility predicates used for
determining their status as variables should treat them as variables
(not necessarily definable), whatever the selector is. Currently
the cases where the selector is an expression or a designator with a
vector subscript are not properly considered to be variables.
(See Fortran 2018, 11.1.3.3 paragraph 5.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143835
In some circumstances, such as in compile-time array shape analysis,
clients of the utility function ResolveAssociations() don't really
want it to drill all of the way down to an assumed-rank dummy argument.
Add a variation, ResolveAssociationsExceptSelectRank(), that
will return a specific rank case's AssocEntity symbol instead.
This fixes a crash in subscript validation checking that stemmed from
deducing an incorrect number of lower and upper bound expressions
from a specific rank case association entity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143778
The standard's specification for the ASSOCIATED() intrinsic function
describes its optional second argument (TARGET=) as being required
to be a valid target for a pointer assignment statement in which the
first argument (POINTER=) was the left-hand side. Some Fortran compilers
apparently interpret this text as a requirement that the POINTER= argument
actually be a valid left-hand side to a pointer assignment statement,
and emit an error if it is not so. This particularly affects the
use of an explicit NULL pointer as the first argument.
Such usage is well-defined, benign, useful, and supported by at least
two other compilers, so we should continue to accept it. This patch
adds a portability warning and some documentation.
In order to implement the portability warning in the best way, the
special checks on calls to the ASSOCIATED() intrinsic function have
been moved from intrinsic processing to Semantics/check-calls.cpp,
whence they have access to semantics' toolchest. Special checks for
other intrinsic functions might also migrate in the future in order
to keep them all in one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142768
The ProcInterface structure is used only by ProcEntityDetails; it represents
what a program might have put in parentheses in a procedure-declaration-stmt,
either the name of a procedure interface or a declaration-type-spec.
If a procedure entity has an implicit interface, the function result
type (if any) can be kept in EntityDetails::type_, which already exists
and is currently redundant for ProcEntityDetails symbols.
All that is really needed is a nullable Symbol pointer in ProcEntityDetails
to point to the procedure's explicit interface, when it has one.
Also, catch the case where a procedure has an explicit interface
and a program attempts to also give it a type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140134
The semantics of many transformational intrinsic functions, especially
reductions like SUM(), are determined by the static presence or absence
of a DIM= argument. In the case of an actual DIM= argument that is
syntactically present but could be dynamically absent at execution time
(due to being OPTIONAL, POINTER, or ALLOCATABLE), f18 should emit some
kind of diagnostic message.
Other compilers either ignore this possibility or treat it as a hard
error; neither really seems correct, so let's do something more nuanced.
For cases where the dynamic absence of a value for DIM doesn't pose
as much of a risk because it lowering is going to assume that it's
equal to 1 anyway, emit only a portability warning.
For other cases where the generated code or runtime support library
will need the value of DIM= during execution, emit a warning that
the use of an OPTIONAL/POINTER/ALLOCATABLE variable or component
here is dicey and should be reconsidered.
While here, also catch bad constant DIM= values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139155
Check most of the requiremens of constraint C1577 for statement functions.
The restrictions that prevent recursion are hard errors; the others seem
to be benign legacies and are caught as portability warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139136
When a scope declares the name and perhaps some characteristics of
an external subprogram using any of the many means that Fortran supplies
for doing such a thing, and that external subprogram's definition is
available, check the local declaration against the external definition.
In particular, if the global definition's interface cannot be called
by means of an implicit interface, ensure that references are via an
explicit and compatible interface.
Further, extend call site checking so that when a local declaration
exists for a known global symbol and the arguments are valid for that
local declaration, the arguments are checked against the global's
interface, just are is already done when no local declaration exists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139042
There are some exceptional cases where the compiler permits association of
procedure pointers or dummy arguments with slightly incompatible procedure
targets, but they should not override any incompatibilty of function
result types.
(Includes a second fix to resolve the original motivating test failure, in
which a COMPLEX intrinsic function was getting its result kind divided by
two due to an implicit C++ conversion of the kind to a "*kind" parse tree
node, and those legacy "COMPLEX*size" type designators' values are twice
the type kind value.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136964
An ASSOCIATE or SELECT TYPE statement's selector whose "right-hand side" is the result
of a reference to a function that returns a pointer must be usable as a valid target
(but not as a pointer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135211
Currently, lowering is promoting main program array and character
variables that are not saved into static memory.
This causes issues with equivalence initial value images because
semantics is relying on IsSaved to build the initial value of variables
in static memory. It seems more robust to have IsSaved be the place
deciding if a variable needs to be in static memory (except for common
block members).
Move the logic to decide if a main program variable must be in static
memory into evaluate::IsSaved and add two options to semantics to
replace the llvm options that were used in lowering:
- SaveMainProgram (off by default): save all main program variables.
- SaveBigMainProgramVariables (on by default): save all main program
variables that are bigger than 32 bytes.
The first options is required to run a few old programs that expect all
main program variables to be in bss (and therefore zero initialized).
The second option is added to allow performance testing: placing big
arrays in static memory seems a sane default to avoid blowing up the
stack with old programs that define big local arrays in the main
program, but since it is easier to prove that an alloca does not
escape/is not modified by calls, keeping big arrays on the stack could
yield improvements.
The logic of SaveBigMainProgramVariables is slightly changed compared to what
it was doing in lowering. The old code was placing all arrays and all
explicit length characters in static memory.
The new code is placing everything bigger than 32 bytes in static
memory. This has the advantages of being a simpler logic, and covering
the cases of scalar derived type with big array components or many
components. Small strings and arrays are now left on the stack (after
all, a character(1) can fit in register).
Note: I think it could have been nicer to add a single "integer" option
to set a threshold to place main program variables in static memory so
that this can be fine tuned by the drivers (SaveMainProgram would be
implemented by setting it to zero). But the language feature options are
not meant to carry integer options. Extending it for this seems an
overkill precedent, and placing it in SemanticsContext is weird (it is
a too low level option to be a bare member of SemanticsContext in my
opinion). So I just rolled my own dices and picked 32 for the sake of
simplicity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134735
NULL intrinsic with a MOLD argument can be used in a type constructor.
This patch handles this use case with a specific lowering that create
an unallocated box with the MOLD type.
Reviewed By: PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134554
When a component reference to a named constant of derived type should
fold down to NULL() without a MOLD=, do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134395
As Fortran 2018 18.3.2, C_PTR is interoperable with any C object pointer
type. C_FUNPTR is interoperable with any C function pointer type. As
18.3.6, a C pointer can correspond to a Fortran dummy argument of type
C_PTR with the VALUE attribute.
The interface for type(C_PTR)/type(C_FUNPTR) argument with value
attribute is different from the the usual derived type. For type(C_PTR)
or type(C_FUNPTR), the component is the address, and the interface is
a pointer even with VALUE attribute. For a usual derived type such as
the drived type with the component of integer 64, the interface is a i64
value when it has VALUE attribute on aarch64 linux.
To lower the type(C_PTR)/type(C_FUNPTR) argument with value attribute,
get the value of the component of the type(C_PTR)/type(C_FUNPTR), which
is the address, and then convert it to the pointer and pass it.
Reviewed By: Jean Perier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131583
A NULL() pointer is a valid actual argument for a procedure pointer dummy
argument whose intent is INTENT(IN); it should also be acceptable for a
procedure pointer dummy argument with unspecified intent.
Also make it possible to discern null object pointers from null procedure
pointers, so that an attempt to use one in place of the other in a context
where the distinction matters will still elicit an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132687
Type-bound procedure bindings that specify intrinsic procedures as their
interfaces should not acquire the ELEMENTAL attribute from the purposes
of compatibility checking between inherited bindings and their overrides
in extended derived types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131104
The predicate "CanBeCalledViaImplicitInterface()" was returning false for
restricted specific intrinsic functions (e.g., SIN) because their procedure
characteristics have the elemental attribute; this leads to a bogus semantic
error when one attempts to use them as proc-targets in procedure pointer
assignment statements when the left-hand side of the assignment is a procedure
pointer with an implicit interface. However, these restricted specific intrinsic
functions have always been allowed as special cases for such usage -- it is
as if they are elemental when it is necessary for them to be so, but not
when it's a problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130386
Some procedure pointers and EXTERNAL procedures have neither
explicit interfaces nor result types; these procedures are obviously
not known to be functions, but they could be, so semantics must not
assume that they are necessarily subroutines. Refine the procedure
pointer / dummy procedure compatibility check to handle these more
ambiguous cases and not elicit inappropriate error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129674
Replace most tests of the explicit Attr::ELEMENTAL symbol flag with
a new predicate IsElementalProcedure() that works correctly for alternate
ENTRY points and does the right thing for procedure interfaces that
reference elemental intrinsic functions like SIN() whose elemental
nature does not propagate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129022
Instead of manually checking for procedure-like details in Symbol,
defer it to IsProcedure function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127967
When a Hollerith (or short character) literal is presented as an actual
argument that corresponds to a dummy argument for which a BOZ literal
would be acceptable, treat the Hollerith as if it had been a BOZ
literal in the same way -- and with the same code -- as f18 already
does for the similar extension in DATA statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126144
Forward references to ENTRY names to pass them as actual procedure arguments
don't work in all cases, exposing some basic ordering problems in
name resolution for these symbols. Refactor; create all the
necessary procedure symbols, and either function result or host association
symbols (for subroutines), at the time that the subprogrma scope is
created, so that the names exist in the scope as text "before"
the ENTRY is processed in name resolution. Some processing
remains in PostEntryStmt() so that we can check that an ENTRY with
an explicit distinct RESULT doesn't also have declarations for the
ENTRY name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126142
Complex component references (z%RE, z%IM) of complex named constants
should be evaluated at compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125341
As is already supported for dummy procedures, we need to also accept
declarations of procedure pointers that consist of a POINTER attribute
statement followed by an INTERFACE block. (The case of an INTERFACE
block followed by a POINTER statement already works.)
While cleaning this case up, adjust the utility predicate IsProcedurePointer()
to recognize it (namely a SubprogramDetails symbol with Attr::POINTER)
and delete IsProcName(). Extend tests, and add better comments to
symbol.h to document the two ways in which procedure pointers are
represented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125139
Adds flang/include/flang/Common/log2-visit.h, which defines
a Fortran::common::visit() template function that is a drop-in
replacement for std::visit(). Modifies most use sites in
the front-end and runtime to use common::visit().
The C++ standard mandates that std::visit() have O(1) execution
time, which forces implementations to build dispatch tables.
This new common::visit() is O(log2 N) in the number of alternatives
in a variant<>, but that N tends to be small and so this change
produces a fairly significant improvement in compiler build
memory requirements, a 5-10% improvement in compiler build time,
and a small improvement in compiler execution time.
Building with -DFLANG_USE_STD_VISIT causes common::visit()
to be an alias for std::visit().
Calls to common::visit() with multiple variant arguments
are referred to std::visit(), pending further work.
This change is enabled only for GCC builds with GCC >= 9;
an earlier attempt (D122441) ran into bugs in some versions of
clang and was reverted rather than simply disabled; and it is
not well tested with MSVC. In non-GCC and older GCC builds,
common::visit() is simply an alias for std::visit().
Previously, some semantic checks that are checking if an entity is an
allocatable were relying on the expression being a designator whose
last symbol has the allocatable attribute.
This is wrong since this was considering substrings and array sections of
allocatables as being allocatable. This is wrong (see NOTE 2 in
Fortran 2018 section 9.5.3.1).
Add evaluate::IsAllocatableDesignator to correctly test this.
Also add some semantic tests for ALLOCATED to test the newly added helper.
Note that ifort and nag are rejecting coindexed-named-object in
ALLOCATED (`allocated(coarray_scalar_alloc[2])`).
I think it is wrong given allocated argument is intent(in) as per
16.2.1 point 3.
So 15.5.2.6 point 4 regarding allocatable dummy is not violated (If the actual
argument is a coindexed object, the dummy argument shall have the INTENT (IN)
attribute.) and I think this is valid. gfortran accepts it.
The need for this helper was exposed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D122779.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122899
Co-authored-by: Peixin-Qiao <qiaopeixin@huawei.com>
