Some applications have alignment directives for members inside types.
This allows those to be present, but generally getting ignored [with a warning]
later on in the processing. This is just to allow the compilation to complete.
Fortran allows the INTRINSIC attribute to be specified with a distinct
attribute statement, and also as part of the attribute list of a
type-declaration-stmt. This is an odd case (especially as the declared
type is mandated to be ignored if it doesn't match the type of the
intrinsic function) that can lead to odd error messages and crashes,
since the rest of name resolution expects that intrinsics with explicit
declarations will have been declared with INTRINSIC attribute
statements. Resolve by handling an "inline" INTRINSIC attribute as a
special case while processing a type-declaration-stmt, so that
real, intrinsic :: acos, asin, atan
is processed exactly as if it had been
intrinsic acos, asin, atan; real acos, asin, atan
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/86382.
f18's module files are Fortran with a leading header comment containing
the module file format version and a hash of the following contents.
This hash is currently used only to protect module files against
corruption and truncation.
Extend the use of these hashes to catch or avoid some error cases. When
one module file depends upon another, note its hash in additional module
file header comments. This allows the compiler to detect when the module
dependency is on a module file that has been updated. Further, it allows
the compiler to find the right module file dependency when the same
module file name appears in multiple directories on the module search
path.
The order in which module files are written, when multiple modules
appear in a source file, is such that every dependency is written before
the module(s) that depend upon it, so that their hashes are known.
A warning is emitted when a module file is not the first hit on the
module file search path.
Further work is needed to add a compiler option that emits (larger)
stand-alone module files that incorporate copies of their dependencies
rather than relying on search paths. This will be desirable for
application libraries that want to ship only "top-level" module files
without needing to include their dependencies.
Another future work item would be to admit multiple modules in the same
compilation with the same name if they have distinct hashes.
Four "issues" on GitHub report possible performance problems, likely
detected by static analysis. None of them would ever make a measureable
difference in compilation time, but I'm resolving them to clean up the
open issues list.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79703, .../79705,
.../79706, & .../79707.
I implemented legacy "token pasting" via line continuation for
call prefix&
&MACRO&
&suffix(1)
in a recent patch; this patch addresses the related cases
call prefix&
&MACRO&
&(1)
and
call &
&MACRO&
&suffix(1)
Fixes the latest https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/79590.
Ensure that #include FOO undergoes macro replacement. But, as is the
case with C/C++, continue to not perform macro replacement in a #include
directive with <angled brackets>.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78927 contains a case of
fixed-form source in which a Hollerith literal is mistakenly tokenized,
leading to grief later due to apparently unbalanced parentheses.
The source looks like "REAL*8 R8HEAP(SCRSIZE)" and the Hollerith literal
is misrecognized as such because it follows "8R". In order to properly
tokenize Hollerith literals in old comma-free FORMAT statements like "1
FORMAT(3I5HFLANG)", the tokenizer in the prescanner treats a letter
after an integer token ("3I") as a special case. The fix is to do this
only when the characters involved are nested in parentheses and
Hollerith is a possibility.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78927.
Some Fortran codes use line continuation as a form of token pasting; see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78797. This works in
compilers that run a C-like preprocessor and then apply line
continuation to its output; f18 implements line continuation during
tokenization and preprocessing, but can still handle this case.
In the rare case when an identifier is split across two or more
continuation lines, this patch allows its parts to be distinct
preprocessing tokens for the purpose of macro replacemnt. They (or their
replacement texts) can be effectively rejoined later as a single
identifier when the cooked character stream is tokenized in parsing.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78797.
Support \uNNNN and \uNNNNNNNN escape sequences for CHARACTER(KIND=2) and
CHARACTER(KIND=4) literal constants for better GNU Fortran
compatibility.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/achar_6.F90 and
.../widechar_1.f90.
When a CharBlock starts with an expanded macro but does not end in this
macro expansion, GetProvenanceRange fails to return a ProvenanceRange
which may cause error message to be emitted without location or lowering
to emit code without source location (which is problematic if this code
contains calls to procedures defined in the same file since LLVM will
later crash with the error:
"inlinable function call in a function with a DISubprogram location must
have a debug location"
Fix this situation by returning the ProvenanceRange starting at the
replaced macro reference.
This reverts commit cc53ec82ea.
This commit hasn't accomplished anything. The original issue was that
`DumpTree`, when called from lowering, caused linker errors due to some
directive-naming functions being absent. Adding FrontendOpenMP to the
parser library didn't fix that problem, and according to the notes in
PR #77483, calling `DumpTree` from lowering isn't really supported.
Add `notify-type` to `iso_fortran_env` module. Add `notify-wait-stmt` to
the parser and add checks for constraints on the statement, `C1177` and
`C1178`, from the Fortran 2023 standard. Add three semantics tests for
`notify-wait-stmt`.
The prescanner allows multiple spaces within a compiler directive, but
not between the directive's sentinel (e.g., !DIR$) and the directive's
first token.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76537.
When parsing a deeply-nested expression like
A1(A2(A3(A4(A5(A6(...A99(i)...))))))
the parser can get into an exponential state due to the need to consider
the possibility that each "An(...)" might be the beginning of a
reference to a procedure component ("An(...)%PROC(...)") so that
alternative has to be attempted first before proceeding to try parsing
"An(...)" as a function reference or as an array element designator. The
parser for a structure component, which is used by the procedure
designator parser, was not protected with the usual failure memoization
technique, leading to exponentially bad behavior parsing a deeply-nested
expression. Fix by exploiting the instrumented() parser combinator so
that failed structure component parsers aren't repeated.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/76477.
This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
For a character literal that is split over more than one source line
with free form line continuation using '&'
at the end of one line but missing the standard-required '&' on the
continuation line, also handle the case of spaces at the beginning of
the continuation line.
For example,
PRINT *, 'don'&
't poke the bear'
now prints "don't poke the bear", like nearly all other Fortran
compilers do.
This is not strictly standard conforming behavior, and the compiler
emits a portability warning with -pedantic.
Fixes llvm-test-suite/Fortran/gfortran/regression/continuation_1.f90,
.../continuation_12.f90, and .../continuation_13.f90.
When a reference to a function-like macro begins during the rescanning
of the expansion of another macro but is not completed by the end of
that expansion, it is necessary to abort that rescanning of that
expansion and try again when more tokens can be acquired. (See the new
unclosed-FLM.F90 test case.) All other Fortran preprocessors to which I
have access can handle this situation.
This patch adds the following check from OpenMP 5.2.
```
If the directive has a clause, it must contain at least one enter clause
or at least one link clause.
```
Also added a warning for the deprication of `TO` clause on `DECLARE
TARGET` construct.
```
The clause-name to may be used as a synonym for the clause-name enter.
This use has been deprecated.
```
Based on the tests for to clause, the tests for enter clause are added.
This patch does not add tests where both to and enter clause are used together.
Before emitting a warning message, code should check that the usage in
question should be diagnosed by calling ShouldWarn(). A fair number of
sites in the code do not, and can emit portability warnings
unconditionally, which can confuse a user that hasn't asked for them
(-pedantic) and isn't terribly concerned about portability *to* other
compilers.
Add calls to ShouldWarn() or IsEnabled() around messages that need them,
and add -pedantic to tests that now require it to test their portability
messages, and add more expected message lines to those tests when
-pedantic causes other diagnostics to fire.
During function-like macro expansion in a standard C/C++ preprocessor,
the macro being expanded is disabled from recursive macro expansion. The
implementation in this compiler's preprocessor, however, was too broad;
the macro expansion needs to be disabled for the "rescanning" phase
only, not for actual argument expansion.
(Also corrects an obsolete comment elsewhere that was noticed during
reduction of an original test case.)
At present, the prescanner emits an error if a source line or compiler
directive, after macro replacement or not, contains a token with a
non-Fortran character. In the particular case of the '!' character, the
code that checks for bad character will accept the '!' if it appears
after a ';', since the '!' might begin a compiler directive.
This current implementation fails when a compiler directive appears
after some other character that might (by means of further source
processing not visible to the prescanner) be replaced with a ';' or
newline.
Extend the bad character check for '!' to actually check for a compiler
directive sentinel instead.
…fter macro expansion
When compiler directives (!$omp) and/or their continuations (!$omp &)
are produced by macro expansion, handle those continuations. Also allow
a continuation marker (&) to appear in a macro actual argument.
Some compilers allow the `$acc routine(<name>)` to be placed at the
program unit level. To be compatible, this patch enables the use of acc
routine at this level. These acc routine directives must have a name.
The OpenACC standard mentions directive format for fixed form source
files. The following sentinels are accepted:
```
!$acc directive-name [clause-list]
c$acc directive-name [clause-list]
*$acc directive-name [clause-list]
```
Update the parser to accepts these. A new option is added to `bbc` so
the change can be tested.
Fortran requires that a DO construct with a construct name end with an
END DO statement bearing the same name. This is true even if the DO
construct begins with a label DO statement; e.g., "constrName: do 10
j=1,10" must end with "10 end do constrName".
The compiler presently basically ignores construct names that appear on
label DO statements, because only non-label DO statements can be parsed
as DO constructs. This causes us to miss some errors, and (worse) breaks
the usage of the construct name on CYCLE and EXIT statements.
To fix this, this patch changes the parse tree and parser so that a DO
construct name on a putative label DO statement causes it to be parsed
as a "non-label" DO statement... with a label. Only true old-style
labeled DO statements without construct names are now parsed as such.
I did not change the class name NonLabelDoStmt -- it's widely used
across the front-end, and is the name of a production in the standard's
grammar. But now it basically means DoConstructDoStmt.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67283.
Summary of this patch
- Add semantic support for HAS_DEVICE_ADDR and IS_DEVICE_PTR clauses.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause must be a valid
device pointer for the device data environment.
- A list item may not be specified in both an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause and a
HAS_DEVICE_ADDR clauses on the directive.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR or a HAS_DEVICE_ADDR
clauses must not be specified in any data-sharing attribute clause on
the same target construct.
When the old extension of D debug lines in fixed form source is enabled,
recognize continuation lines that begin with a D.
(No test is added, since the community's driver doesn't support the GNU
Fortran option -fd-lines-as-code.)
This patch adds support for labeled do loop after combined directive. It
relaxes the initial parser and canonicalize labeled do loop into the
OpenACCCombinedConstruct.
Re-land commit 3787fd942f
This patch adds support for storing OpenMP REQUIRES information in the
semantics symbols for programs/subprograms and modules/submodules, and
populates them during directive resolution. A pass is added to name resolution
that makes sure this information is also propagated across top-level programs,
functions and subprograms.
Storing REQUIRES information inside of semantics symbols will also allow
supporting the propagation of this information across Fortran modules. This
will come as a separate patch.
The `bool DirectiveAttributeVisitor::Pre(const parser::SpecificationPart &x)`
method is removed since it resulted in specification parts being visited twice.
This is patch 3/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157983
Changes in this commit make some gfortran tests crash the compiler. It is
likely trying to dereference undefined symbol pointers.
This reverts commit 3787fd942f.
This patch adds support for storing OpenMP REQUIRES information in the
semantics symbols for programs/subprograms and modules/submodules, and
populates them during directive resolution. A pass is added to name resolution
that makes sure this information is also propagated across top-level programs,
functions and subprograms.
Storing REQUIRES information inside of semantics symbols will also allow
supporting the propagation of this information across Fortran modules. This
will come as a separate patch.
The `bool DirectiveAttributeVisitor::Pre(const parser::SpecificationPart &x)`
method is removed since it resulted in specification parts being visited twice.
This is patch 3/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157983
