This patch adds the following check from OpenMP 5.2.
```
If the directive has a clause, it must contain at least one enter clause
or at least one link clause.
```
Also added a warning for the deprication of `TO` clause on `DECLARE
TARGET` construct.
```
The clause-name to may be used as a synonym for the clause-name enter.
This use has been deprecated.
```
Based on the tests for to clause, the tests for enter clause are added.
This patch does not add tests where both to and enter clause are used together.
Summary of this patch
- Add semantic support for HAS_DEVICE_ADDR and IS_DEVICE_PTR clauses.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause must be a valid
device pointer for the device data environment.
- A list item may not be specified in both an IS_DEVICE_PTR clause and a
HAS_DEVICE_ADDR clauses on the directive.
- A list item that appears in an IS_DEVICE_PTR or a HAS_DEVICE_ADDR
clauses must not be specified in any data-sharing attribute clause on
the same target construct.
Re-land commit 3787fd942f
This patch adds support for storing OpenMP REQUIRES information in the
semantics symbols for programs/subprograms and modules/submodules, and
populates them during directive resolution. A pass is added to name resolution
that makes sure this information is also propagated across top-level programs,
functions and subprograms.
Storing REQUIRES information inside of semantics symbols will also allow
supporting the propagation of this information across Fortran modules. This
will come as a separate patch.
The `bool DirectiveAttributeVisitor::Pre(const parser::SpecificationPart &x)`
method is removed since it resulted in specification parts being visited twice.
This is patch 3/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157983
Changes in this commit make some gfortran tests crash the compiler. It is
likely trying to dereference undefined symbol pointers.
This reverts commit 3787fd942f.
This patch adds support for storing OpenMP REQUIRES information in the
semantics symbols for programs/subprograms and modules/submodules, and
populates them during directive resolution. A pass is added to name resolution
that makes sure this information is also propagated across top-level programs,
functions and subprograms.
Storing REQUIRES information inside of semantics symbols will also allow
supporting the propagation of this information across Fortran modules. This
will come as a separate patch.
The `bool DirectiveAttributeVisitor::Pre(const parser::SpecificationPart &x)`
method is removed since it resulted in specification parts being visited twice.
This is patch 3/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157983
This patch fixes a problem in the representation of the clause list for the
REQUIRES directive. Location information was not present, making error messages
not very descriptive.
This is patch 1/5 of a series splitting D149337 to simplify review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157710
This patch adds support for matching multiple OpenMP `if` clauses to their
specified directive in a combined construct. It also enables this clause to be
attached by name to `simd` and `teams` directives, in addition to the others
that were already supported.
This patch on its own cannot yet be tested because there is currently no
lowering to MLIR support for any combined construct containing two or more
OpenMP directives that can have an `if` clause attached.
Depends on D155981.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156313
This is an assisting patch which is implemented to address review comment to switch std::list<Name> to OmpObjectlist from https://reviews.llvm.org/D142722.
Also addressed a semantic check https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61161 OpenMP 5.2 standard states that only pointer variables (C_PTR, Cray pointers, POINTER or ALLOCATABLE items) can appear in SIMD aligned clause (section 5.11). And not to allow common block names on an ALIGNED clause.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152637
Initial support for USE_DEVICE_PTR clause on OMP TARGET DATA directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148254
This patch adds parser suppert for the device_type clause used by the Declare Target directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143671
OpenMP 5.0 adds support for the "requires" directive. This patch adds parser support for it in flang.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136867
This patch adds support for the device clause on `Target` directive.
Device clause was added in OpenMP specification version 4.5 to
create a device data environment for the extent of a region. On
target construct, the device expression be either be `ancestor`
(taking after the parent) or assign a new `device_num`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126441
OpenMP 5.0 adds a new clause `in_reduction` on OpenMP directives.
This patch adds parser support for the same.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124156
This patch adds parser nodes for each indivudual section in sections
construct. This should help with the translation to FIR. `!$omp section`
was not recognized as a construct and hence needed special handling.
`OpenMPSectionsConstruct` contains a list of `OpenMPConstruct`. Each
such `OpenMPConstruct` wraps an `OpenMPSectionConstruct`
(section, not sections). An `OpenMPSectionConstruct` is a wrapper around
a `Block`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, peixin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121680
As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48145, name resolution for omp critical construct was failing. This patch adds functionality to help that name resolution as well as implementation to catch name mismatches.
The following semantic restrictions are therefore handled here:
- If a name is specified on a critical directive, the same name must also be specified on the end critical directive
- If no name appears on the critical directive, no name can appear on the end critical directive
- If a name appears on either the start critical directive or the end critical directive
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110502
This patch adds parsing support for the nontemporal clause. Also adds a couple of test cases.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106896
The TableGen emitter for directives has two slots for flangClass information and this was mainly
to be able to keep up with the legacy openmp parser at the time. Now that all clauses are encapsulated in
AccClause or OmpClause, these two strings are not necessary anymore and were the the source of couple
of problem while working with the generic structure checker for OpenMP.
This patch remove the flangClassValue string from DirectiveBase.td and use the string flangClass as the
placeholder for the encapsulated class.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94821
After discussion in D93105 we found that the reduction clause was not following
the common OmpClause convention. This patch makes reduction clause part of OmpClause
with a value of OmpReductionClause in a similar way than task_reduction.
The unparse function for OmpReductionClause is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis
are issued by the corresponding unparse function for parser::OmpClause::Reduction.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93482
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
Co-authored-by: Valentin Clement <clementval@gmail.com>
See OMP-5.0 2.19.5.5 task_reduction Clause.
To add a positive test case we need `taskgroup` directive which is not added hence skipping the test.
This is a dependency for `taskgroup` construct.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93105
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDistScheduleClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function for `OmpDistScheduleClause` is adapted since the keyword
and parenthesis are issued by the corresponding unparse function for
`parser::OmpClause::DistSchedule`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93644
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpNoWait` clause part of `OmpClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93643
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpProcBindClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpProcBindClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93642
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `OmpDefaultClause` clause part of `OmpClause`.
The unparse function is dropped as the unparsing is done by `WALK_NESTED_ENUM`
for `OmpDefaultClause`.
Reviewed By: clementval, kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93641
After discussion in `D93482` we found that the some of the clauses were not
following the common OmpClause convention.
The benefits of using OmpClause:
- Functionalities from structure checker are mostly aligned to work with
`llvm::omp::Clause`.
- The unparsing as well can take advantage.
- Homogeneity with OpenACC and rest of the clauses in OpenMP.
- Could even generate the parser with TableGen, when there is homogeneity.
- It becomes confusing when to use `flangClass` and `flangClassValue` inside
TableGen, if incase we generate parser using TableGen we could have only a
single `let expression`.
This patch makes `allocate` clause part of `OmpClause`.The unparse function for
`OmpAllocateClause` is adapted since the keyword and parenthesis are issued by
the corresponding unparse function for `parser::OmpClause::Allocate`.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93640
From OMP 5.0 [2.17.8]
Restriction:
If memory-order-clause is release,acquire, or acq_rel, list items must not be specified on the flush directive.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89879
Patch implements restrictions from 2.17.7 of OpenMP 5.0 standard for atomic Construct. Tests for the same are added.
One of the restriction
`OpenMP constructs may not be encountered during execution of an atomic region.`
Is mentioned in 5.0 standard to be a semantic restriction, but given the stricter nature of parser in F18 it's caught at parsing itself.
This patch is a next patch in series from D88965.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89583
This patch introduce the separate parser for the memory-order-clause from the general
OmpClauseList. This parser still creates OmpClause node and therefore can use all the feature
from TableGen and the OmpStructureChecker.
This is applied only for the Flush construct in this patch and it should be applied for
atomic as well.
This is the approach we disscussed several time during the weekly call.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91839
`OmpStructureChecker` is supposed to work only with `parser::OmpClause`
after tablegen changes for OpenMP and OpenACC were introduced.
Hence `OmpMemoryOrderClause`, `OmpAtomicMemoryOrderClause` and similar ones were failing
to catch semantic errors, inspite of having code for semantic checks.
This patch tries to change parser for `OmpMemoryOrderClause` and similar dependent ones
and use `OmpClauseList` which resides/comes from common tablegen for OpenMP/OpenACC eventually using `parser::OmpClause`.
This patch also tries to :
1. Change `OmpCriticalDirective` in `openmp-parsers.cpp` to support `OmpClauseList`.
2. Check-flang regresses when changes were introduced due to missing semantic checks in OmpCritical, patch implements them at the minimal level to pass the regression.
3. Change tablegen to support Hint clause.
4. Adds missing source locations `CharBlock Source` in each atomic construct.
5. Remove dead code realted to `memory-order-clauses` after moving to `OmpClauseList`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88965
Use the TableGen directive back-end to generate code for the clauses unparsing.
Reviewed By: sscalpone, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85851
Summary:
This patch enhances parser support for flush construct to OpenMP 5.0 by including memory-order-clause.
2.18.8 flush Construct
!$omp flush [memory-order-clause] [(list)]
where memory-order-clause is
acq_rel
release
acquire
The patch includes code changes and testcase modifications.
Reviewed By: klausler, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82177
Summary:
This patch is removing the custom enumeration for OpenMP Directives and Clauses and replace them
with the newly tablegen generated one from llvm/Frontend. This is a first patch and some will follow to share the same
infrastructure where possible. The next patch should use the clauses allowance defined in the tablegen file.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, DavidTruby, sscalpone, kiranchandramohan, ichoyjx
Reviewed By: DavidTruby, ichoyjx
Subscribers: jholewinski, cfe-commits, dblaikie, MaskRay, ymandel, ichoyjx, mgorny, yaxunl, guansong, jfb, sstefan1, aaron.ballman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #flang, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82906
