__precision_ is declared as an int32_t which on some hexagon platforms
is defined as a long.
This change fixes errors like the ones below:
In file included from
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/llvm-project/libcxx/test/libcxx/diagnostics/format.nodiscard_extensions.compile.pass.cpp:19:
In file included from
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/format:202:
In file included from
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/format_functions.h:29:
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_floating_point.h:700:17:
error: no matching function for call to 'max'
700 | int __p = std::max(1, (__specs.__has_precision() ?
__specs.__precision_ : 6));
| ^~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_floating_point.h:771:25:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::__formatter::__format_floating_point<float, char,
std::format_context>' requested here
771 | return __formatter::__format_floating_point(__value, __ctx,
__parser_.__get_parsed_std_specifications(__ctx));
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/format_functions.h:284:42:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::__formatter_floating_point<char>::format<float,
std::format_context>' requested here
284 | __ctx.advance_to(__formatter.format(__arg, __ctx));
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/format_functions.h:429:15:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::__vformat_to<std::back_insert_iterator<std::string>, char,
std::back_insert_iterator<std::__format::__output_buffer<char>>>'
requested here
429 | return std::__vformat_to(std::move(__out_it), __fmt, __args);
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__format/format_functions.h:462:8:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::vformat_to<std::back_insert_iterator<std::string>>' requested here
462 | std::vformat_to(std::back_inserter(__res), __fmt, __args);
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/llvm-project/libcxx/test/libcxx/diagnostics/format.nodiscard_extensions.compile.pass.cpp:29:8:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::vformat<void>' requested here
29 | std::vformat("", std::make_format_args());
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__algorithm/max.h:35:1:
note: candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting types for
parameter '_Tp' ('int' vs. 'int32_t' (aka 'long'))
35 | max(_LIBCPP_LIFETIMEBOUND const _Tp& __a, _LIBCPP_LIFETIMEBOUND
const _Tp& __b) {
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__algorithm/max.h:43:1:
note: candidate template ignored: could not match
'initializer_list<_Tp>' against 'int'
43 | max(initializer_list<_Tp> __t, _Compare __comp) {
| ^
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__algorithm/max.h:48:86:
note: candidate function template not viable: requires single argument
'__t', but 2 arguments were provided
48 | _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp max(initializer_list<_Tp> __t) {
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/local/mnt/workspace/hex/obj_runtimes_hex88_qurt_v75_ON_ON_shared/include/c++/v1/__algorithm/max.h:29:1:
note: candidate function template not viable: requires 3 arguments, but
2 were provided
29 | max(_LIBCPP_LIFETIMEBOUND const _Tp& __a, _LIBCPP_LIFETIMEBOUND
const _Tp& __b, _Compare __comp) {
| ^
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This uses the macro on record types and inline constexpr variables. The
tagged declarations are very likely to change in future versions of
libc++:
- __fields are internal types used to control the formatter's parse
functions which fields to expect. Newer formatters may add new fields.
For example the filesystem::path formatter accepted in the recent Tokyo
meeting added a new 'g' flag, which differs from the 'g' type.
- The Unicode tables. The number of entries in these table likely differ
between Unicode versions. The tables contain only a part of all Unicode
properties. Typically they are stored in a 32-bit entry where some bits
contain the properties and other bits the size of the range. Changes in
the Unicode or C++ algorithms may require more properties to be
available in C++. This may affect the number of bits available in the
range. If needed, other declarations get the macro. This is mainly a
first time to review this approach.
This was originally https://reviews.llvm.org/D143494 where a new macro
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_TYPE was defined. Testing revealed the existing
macro _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI could be used. The "parts" of the macro that
do not affect records are not harmful. Based on this information the
existing macro was used and additional documentation was written.
An immediate colon signifeis that the range-format-spec contains only
range-underlying-spec.
This patch allows this code to compile and run:
```c++
std::println("{::<<9?}", std::span<const char>{"Hello", sizeof "Hello"});
```
Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.
This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.
rdar://105510916
We recently noticed that the unwrap_iter.h file was pushing macros, but
it was pushing them again instead of popping them at the end of the
file. This led to libc++ basically swallowing any custom definition of
these macros in user code:
#define min HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// min is not HELLO anymore, it's not defined
While investigating this issue, I noticed that our push/pop pragmas were
actually entirely wrong too. Indeed, instead of pushing macros like
`move`, we'd push `move(int, int)` in the pragma, which is not a valid
macro name. As a result, we would not actually push macros like `move`
-- instead we'd simply undefine them. This led to the following code not
working:
#define move HELLO
#include <algorithm>
// move is not HELLO anymore
Fixing the pragma push/pop incantations led to a cascade of issues
because we use identifiers like `move` in a large number of places, and
all of these headers would now need to do the push/pop dance.
This patch fixes all these issues. First, it adds a check that we don't
swallow important names like min, max, move or refresh as explained
above. This is done by augmenting the existing
system_reserved_names.gen.py test to also check that the macros are what
we expect after including each header.
Second, it fixes the push/pop pragmas to work properly and adds missing
pragmas to all the files I could detect a failure in via the newly added
test.
rdar://121365472
This reverts commit 7d9b5aa65b since
std/utilities/format/format.arguments/format.arg/visit.return_type.pass.cpp
is failing on Windows when building with Clang-cl.
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
This patch removes assumptions that std::array's iterators are raw
pointers in the source code and in our test suite. While this is true
right now, this doesn't have to be true and ion the future we might want
to enable bounded iterators in std::array, which would require this
change.
This is a pre-requisite for landing #74482
This change requires quite a number of changes in the tests; this is not
code I expect people to use in the wild. So I don't expect breakage for
users.
Implements:
- P2905R2 Runtime format strings, as a Defect Report
This is in preparation for clang-formatting the whole code base. These
annotations are required either to avoid clang-format bugs or because
the manually formatted code is significantly more readable than the
clang-formatted alternative. All in all, it seems like very few
annotations are required, which means that clang-format is doing a very
good job in most cases.
This paper was voted in as a DR, so it's retroactively enabled back to
C++20; the C++ version that introduced std::format.
Implements:
- P2909R4 Fix formatting of code units as integers (Dude, where’s my
``char``?)
This avoids having to add `_LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS`, since that is handled through `type_visibility` and GCC always makes the visibility of enums default. It also fixes and missing `_LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI` on classes when using Clang.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153658
Some places in the format library were identified to benefit from
basic_string's from_range constructor. At that time that constructor was
not implemented. It's implemented now so adjust the code to use this new
constructor.
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156022
Improves both the compile-time and run-time errors.
At compile-time it does a bit more work to get more specific errors.
This could be done at run-time too, but that has a performance penalty.
Since it's expected most use-cases use format* instead of vformat* the
compile-time errors are more common.
For example when using
std::format_to("{:-c}", 42);
Before compile output would contain
std::__throw_format_error("The format-spec should consume the input or end with a '}'");
Now it contains
std::__throw_format_error("The format specifier does not allow the sign option");
Given a better indication the sign option is not allowed. Note the
output is still not user-friendly; C++ doesn't have good facilities to
generate nice messages from the library.
In general all messages have been reviewed and improved, using a more
consistent style and using less terms used in the standard. For example
format-spec -> format specifier
arg-id -> argument index
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152624
After parsing a std-format-spec it's validated, depending on the type used some
format options are not allowed. This improves the error messages in the
exceptions thrown upon failure.
Depends on D155364
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155366
Then a std-format-spec option is invalid for a type the compile-time
validation will detect its usage and issue a diagnostic. Before it
validated after parsing the entire std-format-spec, which meant the
diagnostic was less precise. It would be possible to do this validation
run-time but that has a performance overhead. When using the format
family of functions, this would be unneeded overhead; the validation was
done at run-time. For the vformat family it would give better
diagnostics.
To avoid paying what you don't use, it has been decided to aim for the
better performance. It's more likely users will use the format family of
functions.
Depends on D155264
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155364
Both the tuple formatter and range formatter parse a bracket. Instead of
implementing this twice do it in the generic parser. This is preparation
to improve the diagnostics in the format library.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155264
Drive-by fix to make sure the __retarget_buffer works correctly whan
using a hint of 1. This was discovered in one of the new tests.
Drive-by fixes __retarget_buffer when initialized with size 1.
Implements parts of
- P2093R14 Formatted output
- P2539R4 Should the output of std::print to a terminal be
synchronized with the underlying stream?
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150044
The post-condition on the functions is that the buffer is not full.
This post-conditon is used as pre-condition of the push_back function.
When a copy, fill, of transform function exactly fit in the buffer this
post-condition was validated.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155397
<__format/format_functions.h> was using <string>, we need to bring the include back that was removed in D154122.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155116
This should reduce the size of the transitive includes for the vector header.
Note the header still quite large so the difference may be small.
Depends on D154122
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154286
I did a manual review after the post-review comments in D149543
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154122
The feature is applied as DR instead of a normal paper. MSVC STL and
libstdc++ will do the same.
Implements
- P2510R3 Formatting pointers
Depends on D153192
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153195
