This moves the definition of a `pair` constructor for `<tuple>` to
`<__utility/pair.h>` and uses the forward declaration of `pair` in
`<tuple>` instead of including the definition.
The exposition-only type trait `pair-like` includes `ranges::subrange`,
but in every single case excludes `ranges::subrange` from the list. This
patch introduces two new traits `__tuple_like_no_subrange` and
`__pair_like_no_subrange`, which exclude `ranges::subrange` from the
possible matches. `__pair_like` is no longer required, and thus removed.
`__tuple_like` is implemented as `__tuple_like_no_subrange` or a
`ranges::subrange` specialization.
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
This is in preparation for clang-formatting the whole code base. These
annotations are required either to avoid clang-format bugs or because
the manually formatted code is significantly more readable than the
clang-formatted alternative. All in all, it seems like very few
annotations are required, which means that clang-format is doing a very
good job in most cases.
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
Locale objects use atomic reference counting, which may be very
expensive in parallel applications. The classic locale is used by
default by all streams and can be very contended. But it's never
destroyed, so the reference counting is also completely pointless on the
classic locale. Currently ~70% of time in the parallel stringstream
benchmarks is spent in locale ctor/dtor. And the execution radically
slows down with more threads.
Avoid reference counting on the classic locale. With this change
parallel benchmarks start to scale with threads.
This is a re-application of f8afc53d64 (aka PR #72112) which was
reverted in 4e0c48b907 because it broke the sanitizer builds due
to an initialization order fiasco. This issue has now been fixed by
ensuring that the locale is constinit'ed.
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anymore, so we might as well
remove them to clean up the code a bit.
This is an implementation detail for `move_only_function` (and potentially other type-erasing classes).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: Mordante, ldionne, EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140259
This makes exception handling a lot simpler, since we don't have to convert any exceptions this way. Is also properly handles all the user-thrown exceptions.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: arichardson, mstorsjo, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154238
The helper function `__pair_like_explicit_wknd` is only SFINAE-ed with
`tuple_size<remove_cvref_t<_PairLike>>::value == 2`, but its function
body assumes `std::get` being valid.
Fixes#65620
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157753
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style. It also has the nice side-effect of reducing the size of names of these symbols, since the depedent return type is shorter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157736
The headers that include_next compiler and OS headers need to be in different top level modules in order to avoid module cycles. e.g. libc++'s stdlib.h will #include_next stdlib.h from the compiler and then the C library. Either of those are likely to include stddef.h, which will come back up to the libc++ module map and create a module cycle. Putting stdlib.h and stddef.h (and the rest of the C standard library headers) in top level modules resolves this by letting the order go cxx_stdlib_h -> os_stdlib_h -> cxx_stddef_h -> os_stddef_h.
All of those headers' dependencies then need to be moved into top level modules themselves to avoid module cycles between the new top level level cstd modules. This starts to get complicated, as the libc++ C headers, by standard, have to include many of the C++ headers, which include the private detail headers, which are intertwined. e.g. some `__algorithm` headers include `__memory` headers and vice versa.
Make top level modules for all of the libc++ headers to easily guarantee that the modules aren't cyclic.
Add enough module exports to fix `check-cxx` and `run-buildbot generic-modules`.
`__stop_token/intrusive_shared_ptr.h` uses `__atomic/atomic.h` but has no include path to it. Add that include.
`math.h` absorbs `bits/atomic_wide_counter.h` on some platforms that don't have modules, work around that by including `math.h` in `__threading_support`.
<mutex> doesn't actually require threads, there are a few pieces like once_flag that work without threads. Remove the requirement from its module.
AIX is no longer able to support modular builds.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144322
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
This checks whether a pointer is within a range, even during constant evaluation. This allows running optimized code paths during constant evaluation, instead of falling back to the general-purpose implementation all the time. This is also a central place for comparing unrelated pointers, which is technically UB.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143327
This adds an extension to std::pair in C++03 mode where we provide an
assignment operator from a pair<U, V>. Previously, any code trying to
trigger such an assignment operator would have tried using the
`operator=(pair const&)` copy assignment operator, which would then
have tried creating a `pair const&` by using the unconstrained
pair<U, V> constructor.
After this patch, pair will instead go through operator= directly if
its member types are assignable. If they are not assignable, the extension
operator= is disabled with SFINAE and the pair(pair<U, V>) constructor
will be used. Since that constructor is unconstrained, that will either
work or give a hard error.
This should be pretty transparent to users, but this is technically a
behavior change in C++03. Indeed, if a type has both a valid cross-type
assignment operator *and* a valid cross-type constructor, the library
will now prefer the cross-type assignment instead of going through the
cross-type constructor and then using the copy-constructor. Since this
is the mandated behavior in C++11, however, one could argue that any user
broken by that needs to change their code.
The motivation for this change is to allow simplifying the definition
of std::map's value_type, which requires handling assignment to a pair
of references properly. This patch will allow removing complexity from
https://llvm.org/D121485 instead of adding complexity in that patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150119
This patch makes std::pair's constructors and assignment operators
closer to conforming in C++23. The only missing bit I am aware of
now is `reference_constructs_from_temporary_v` checks, which we
don't have the tools for yet.
This patch also refactors a long-standing non-standard extension where
we'd provide constructors for tuple-like types in all standard modes. The
criteria for being a tuple-like type are different from pair-like types
as introduced recently in the standard, leading to a lot of complexity
when trying to implement recent papers that touch the pair constructors.
After this patch, the pre-C++23 extension is provided in a self-contained
block so that we can easily deprecate and eventually remove the extension
in future releases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143914
This patch makes global tag variables like std::allocator_arg
conform to C++17 by defining them as inline constexpr variables.
This is possible without creating an ODR violation now that we don't
define strong definitions of those variables in the shared library
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145589
This patch removes the symbols defined in the library for std::allocator_arg,
std::defer_lock, std::try_to_lock, std::adopt_lock, and std::piecewise_construct.
Those were defined in the library because we provided them in C++03 as an
extension, and in C++03 it was impossible to define them as `constexpr`
variables, like in the spec.
This is technically an ABI break since we are removing symbols from the
library. However, in practice, only programs compiled in C++03 mode who
take the address of those objects (or pass them as a reference) will have
an undefined ref to those symbols. In practice, this is expected to be
rare. First, those are C++11 features that we happen to provide in C++03,
and only the C++03 definition can potentially lead to code referencing
the dylib definition. So any code that is using these objects but compiling
in C++11 mode (as they should) is not at risk. Second, all uses of these
types in the library is done by passing those types by value to a function
that can get inlined. Since they are empty types, the compiler won't
generate an undefined reference if passed by value, since there's nothing
to pass anyway.
Long story short, the risk for code actually containing an undefined
reference to one of these types is rather small (but non-zero). I also
couldn't find any app on the App Store that referenced these symbols,
which supports my impression that this won't be an issue in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145587
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
As explained in the release note, libc++ used to provide various
global variables as an extension in C++03 mode. Unfortunately, that
made our definition non-conforming in all standard modes. This was
never a big problem until recently, since we are trying to support
C++20 Modules in libc++, and that requires cleaning up the definition
of these variables.
This change is the first in a series of changes to achieve our end goal.
This patch removes the ability for users to rely on the (incorrect)
definition of those global variables inside the shared library. The
plan is to then remove those definitions from the shared library
(which is an ABI break but I don't think it will have impact), and
finally to make our definition of those variables conforming in all
standard modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145422
