This patch adds a configuration of the libc++ test suite that enables
optimizations when building the tests. It also adds a new CI
configuration to exercise this on a regular basis. This is added in the
context of [1], which requires building with optimizations in order to
hit the bug.
[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68552
Picolibc is a C Standard Library that is commonly used in embedded
environments. This patch adds initial support for this configuration
along with pre-commit CI. As of this patch, the test suite only builds
the tests and nothing is run. A follow-up patch will make the test suite
actually run the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154246
Several experimental headers around std::pmr have been slated for
removal for a while now. This patch actually performs the removal and
cleanups from the code base.
I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
Testing all the SIMD widths exhaustively is nice in theory, however in
practice it leads to extremely slow tests. Given that
1. our testing resources are finite and actually pretty costly
2. we have thousands of other tests we also need to run
3. the value of executing these SIMD tests for absolutely all supported
SIMD widths is fairly small compared to cherry-picking a few relevant
widths
I think it makes a lot of sense to reduce the exhaustiveness of these
tests. I'm getting a ~4x speedup for the worst offender
(reference_assignment.pass.cpp) after this patch.
I'd also like to make this a reminder to anyone seeing this PR that
tests impact everyone's productivity. Slow unit tests contribute to
making the CI slower as a whole, and that has a direct impact on
everyone's ability to iterate quickly during PRs. Even though we have a
pretty robust CI setup in place, we should remember that it doesn't come
for free and should strive to keep our tests at a good bang for the buck
ratio.
According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anymore, so we might as well
remove them to clean up the code a bit.
[libcxx] <experimental/simd> Added internal storage type for class simd/simd_mask
[libcxx] <experimental/simd> Added all constructors of class simd/simd_mask and related tests
[libcxx] <experimental/simd> Added basic simd reference implementation, subscript operators of class simd/simd_mask and related tests
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144364
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: #libc, kwk, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150763
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.
This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.
This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.
The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intptr_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146643
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?int(_[a-z]+)?[0-9]{1,2}_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145880
The module std does not provide c-types in the global namespace. This
means all these types need to be fully qualified. This is a first step
to convert them by using sed.
Since this is an automated conversion other types like uint64_t are kept
as is.
Note that tests in the directory libcxx/test/std/depr/depr.c.headers
should not be converted automatically. This requires manual attention,
there some test require testing uint32_t in the global namespace. These
test should fail when using the std module, and pass when using the
std.compat module.
A similar issue occurs with atomic, atomic_uint32_t is specified as
using atomic_uint32_t = atomic<uint32_t>; // freestanding
So here too we need to keep the name in the global namespace in the
tests.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145520
We've been shipping <coroutine> since LLVM 14, so LLVM 17 won't ship
the <experimental/coroutine> header per our policy for removing TSes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108697
There are no tests for the aliases because clang doesn't diagnose deprecated template aliases currently.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127678
This commit deprecates <experimental/memory_resource> since we now ship the non-experimental
version of it. Per the libc++ policy [1], we are deprecating the experimental feature in
upcoming LLVM 16 and will remove it entirely in LLVM 18.
[1]: https://libcxx.llvm.org/DesignDocs/ExperimentalFeatures.html#id4
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136245
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This caused build failures when building Clang and libc++ together on Mac:
fatal error: 'experimental/memory_resource' file not found
See the code review for details. Reverting until the problem and how to
solve it is better understood.
(Updates to some test files were not reverted, since they seemed
unrelated and were later updated by 340b48b267b96.)
> This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
> by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
> users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
> also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
> in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
> build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
> use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
>
> Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
> existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
> that would merely break users that might be relying on such
> content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
> should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
> of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
> counterpart.
>
> Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
> _LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
> that do not implement -funstable yet.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This reverts commit bb939931a1.
This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
that would merely break users that might be relying on such
content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
counterpart.
Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
that do not implement -funstable yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
