The `parse.pass.cpp` tests doen't need to call
`test_format_context_create` to create a `basic_format_context`, so they
shouldn't include `test_format_context.h`.
The `to_address` mechanism works around the iterator debugging
mechanisms of MSVC STL. Related to
[LWG3989](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3989).
Discovered when implementing `formatter<tuple>` in MSVC STL. With the
inclusion removed, `std/utilities/format/format.tuple/parse.pass.cpp`
when using enhanced MSVC STL (and `/utf-8` option for MSVC).
This patch removes assumptions that std::array's iterators are raw
pointers in the source code and in our test suite. While this is true
right now, this doesn't have to be true and ion the future we might want
to enable bounded iterators in std::array, which would require this
change.
This is a pre-requisite for landing #74482
This change requires quite a number of changes in the tests; this is not
code I expect people to use in the wild. So I don't expect breakage for
users.
Implements:
- P2905R2 Runtime format strings, as a Defect Report
This paper was voted in as a DR, so it's retroactively enabled back to
C++20; the C++ version that introduced std::format.
Implements:
- P2909R4 Fix formatting of code units as integers (Dude, where’s my
``char``?)
I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
Some tests in our test suite are unbelievably slow on GCC due to the
use of the always_inline attribute. See [1] for more details.
This patch introduces the GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME lit feature to
disable tests that are plagued by that issue. At the same time, it
moves several existing tests from ad-hoc `UNSUPPORTED: gcc-12` markup
to the new GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME feature, and marks the slowest tests
reported by the CI as `UNSUPPORTED: GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME`.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-stop-supporting-extern-instantiations-with-gcc/71277/1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152736
The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI
breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150802
This is based on the last open review comment in D144331 and is applied
to all occurrences.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147885
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.
This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.
This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.
The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intptr_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146643
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).
However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating
point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target
requirements.
This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and
updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail
on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple
of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when
it isn't fundamental to the test.
Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying
TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)
These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars,
however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a
floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point
std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could
be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time.
In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could
do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars
because we know the format string at compile-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
We pretty consistently don't define those cause they are not needed,
and it removes the potential pitfall to think that these tests are
being run. This doesn't touch .compile.fail.cpp tests since those
should be replaced by .verify.cpp tests anyway, and there would be
a lot to fix up.
As a fly-by, I also fixed a bit of formatting, removed a few unused
includes and made some very minor, clearly NFC refactorings such as
in allocator.traits/allocator.traits.members/allocate.verify.cpp where
the old test basically made no sense the way it was written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146236
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?int(_[a-z]+)?[0-9]{1,2}_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145880
Using some builds the modular build fails due to missing exports
and includes. This fixes the build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143203
LWG-3539 was already implemented but not marked as done.
LWG-3567 is implemented in this commit.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112368
This partly reverts D133535 and enables CTAD for more parts in format.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135292
This concept is introduced in P2286, but was implemented in libc++
before. This implementation was used in the library internally. This
implementation lacked the resolution of LWG3636. The original formatter
had a non-const member function that wasn't trivial to make a const
member. The recent parser improvements made this member a const member
in preparation of LWG3636.
Note LWG3636 isn't voted in. Its status is Ready. P2286's concept has
been written as-if LWG3636 is accepted and refers to that LWG issue.
Updates some tests make format a const member function and removes a
tests that's mainly a duplicate of the formattable concept test.
Implements
- LWG3636 formatter<T>::format should be const-qualified
Implements parts of
- P2286R8 Formatting Ranges
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134110
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
Replaces std::__format_context_create with the public wrapper
test_format_context_create.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133781
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Spies: philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130905
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
With to_chars supporting 128-bit it's possible to support the full
128-bit range in format. This only removes the previous restrictions
and updates the tests to validate proper support.
Depends on D128929.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129007
The compilers clang-11, clang-12, and apple-clang-12 are no longer
supported, so remove their annotations in the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127588
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
This optimizes the __format_arg_store type to allow a more efficient
storage of the basic_format_args.
It stores the data in two arrays:
- A struct with the tag of the exposition only variant's type and the
offset of the element in the data array. Since this array only depends
on the type information it's calculated at compile time and can be
shared by different instances of this class.
- The arguments converted to the types used in the exposition only
variant of basic_format_arg. This means the packed data can be
directly copied to an element of this variant.
The new code uses rvalue reference arguments in preparation for P2418.
The handle class also has some changes to prepare for P2418. The real
changed for P2418 will be done separately, but these parts make it
easier to implement that paper.
Some parts of existing test code are removed since they were no longer
valid after the changes, but new tests have been added.
Implements parts of:
- P2418 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
Completes:
- LWG3473 Normative encouragement in non-normative note
Depends on D121138
Reviewed By: #libc, vitaut, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121514
This formatter isn't in the list of required formatters in
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
Since remove_cvref_t<const charT[N]> is charT[N] the formatter is
required by
[format.functions]/25
Preconditions: formatter<remove_cvref_t<Ti>, charT> meets the
BasicFormatter requirements ([formatter.requirements]) for each Ti in
Args.
Depends on D120921
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121138
The GCC failures were partly fixed in D124103.
The format functions tests are fixed on GCC but they require a huge
amount of RAM (>10 GB). This fails with parallel testing in the CI. It
can be solved by splitting the test, but GCC-12 will be released shortly
and might fix the memory usage in these tests. Therefore these tests
remain disabled.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124335
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
Before it only accepted one output iterator type. Now it accepts all
output iterator types as required by BasicFormatter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120916
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
