FuncOp is being moved out of the builtin dialect, and defining a custom
toy operation showcases various aspects of defining function-like operation
(e.g. inlining, passes, etc.).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121264
- Change syntax for FuncOp to be `func <visibility>? @name` instead of printing the
visibility in the attribute dictionary.
- Since printFunctionLikeOp() and parseFunctionLikeOp() are also used by other
operations, make the "inline visibility" an opt-in feature.
- Updated unit test to use and check the new syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90859
Summary:
This details the C++ format as well as the new declarative format. This has been one of the major missing pieces from the toy tutorial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74938
This chapter adds a partial lowering of toy operations, all but PrintOp, to a combination of the Affine and Std dialects. This chapter focuses on introducing the conversion framework, the benefits of partial lowering, and how easily dialects may co-exist in the IR.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 275150649
The current syntax separates the name and value with ':', but ':' is already overloaded by several other things(e.g. trailing types). This makes the syntax difficult to parse in some situtations:
Old:
"foo: 10 : i32"
New:
"foo = 10 : i32"
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255097928
This is the standard syntax for types on operations, and is also already used by IntegerAttr and FloatAttr.
Example:
dense<5> : tensor<i32>
dense<[3]> : tensor<1xi32>
PiperOrigin-RevId: 255069157
