Ported DA to the new PM by splitting the former DependenceAnalysis Pass
into a DependenceInfo result type and DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass type
and adding a new PM-style DependenceAnalysis analysis pass returning the
DependenceInfo.
Patch by Philip Pfaffe, most of the review by Justin.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18834
llvm-svn: 269370
This new verifier rule lets us unambigously pick a calling convention
when creating a new declaration for
`@llvm.experimental.deoptimize.<ty>`. It is also congruent with our
lowering strategy -- since all calls to `@llvm.experimental.deoptimize`
are lowered to calls to `__llvm_deoptimize`, it is reasonable to enforce
a unique calling convention.
Some of the tests that were breaking this verifier rule have had to be
split up into different .ll files.
The inliner was violating this rule as well, and has been fixed to avoid
producing invalid IR.
llvm-svn: 269261
Summary: In sample profile, some branches may have profile missing due to profile inaccuracy. We want existing branch probability still valid after propagation.
Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19948
llvm-svn: 269137
Remove the ModuleLevelChanges argument, and the ability to create new
subprograms for cloned functions. The latter was added without review in
r203662, but it has no in-tree clients (all non-test callers pass false
for ModuleLevelChanges [1], so it isn't reachable outside of tests). It
also isn't clear that adding a duplicate subprogram to the compile unit is
always the right thing to do when cloning a function within a module. If
this functionality comes back it should be accompanied with a more concrete
use case.
Furthermore, all in-tree clients add the returned function to the module.
Since that's pretty much the only sensible thing you can do with the function,
just do that in CloneFunction.
[1] http://llvm-cs.pcc.me.uk/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp/rCloneFunction
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18628
llvm-svn: 269110
Allow vectorization when the step is a loop-invariant variable.
This is the loop example that is getting vectorized after the patch:
int int_inc;
int bar(int init, int *restrict A, int N) {
int x = init;
for (int i=0;i<N;i++){
A[i] = x;
x += int_inc;
}
return x;
}
"x" is an induction variable with *loop-invariant* step.
But it is not a primary induction. Primary induction variable with non-constant step is not handled yet.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19258
llvm-svn: 269023
Retrying r268550/r268751 which were reverted at r268577/r268765 due a memory sanitizer failure.
I have not been able to reproduce that failure, but I've taken another guess at fixing
the problem in this version of the patch and will watch for another failure.
Original commit message:
Unlike earlier similar fixes, we need to recalculate the branch weights
in this case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19674
llvm-svn: 268767
Retrying r268550 which was reverted at r268577 due a memory sanitizer failure.
I have not been able to reproduce that failure, but I've taken a guess at fixing
the problem in this version of the patch and will watch for another failure.
Original commit message:
Unlike earlier similar fixes, we need to recalculate the branch weights
in this case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19674
llvm-svn: 268751
Summary: We need to clean up CFG before assigning discriminator to minimize the impact of optimization on debug info.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, dnovillo
Subscribers: dnovillo, danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19926
llvm-svn: 268675
Summary:
Some PHIs can have expressions that are not AddRecExprs due to the presence
of sext/zext instructions. In order to prevent the Loop Vectorizer from
bailing out when encountering these PHIs, we now coerce the SCEV
expressions to AddRecExprs using SCEV predicates (when possible).
We only do this when the alternative would be to not vectorize.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet
Subscribers: mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17153
llvm-svn: 268633
MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
0x4910e47 in count /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h:159:12
0x4910e47 in countLeadingZeros<unsigned long> /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h:183
0x4910e47 in FitWeights /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:855
0x4910e47 in SimplifyCondBranchToCondBranch /mnt/b/sanitizer-buildbot2/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/build/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:2895
This reverts commit 609f4dd4bf3bc735c8c047a4d4b0a8e9e4d202e2.
llvm-svn: 268577
Unlike earlier similar fixes, we need to recalculate the branch weights
in this case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19674
llvm-svn: 268550
This patch fixes PR27615.
@llvm.dbg.value instructions no longer count towards the maximum number of
instructions to look back at in the instruction list when searching for a
store instruction. This should make the output consistent between debug and
non-debug build.
Patch by Henric Karlsson <henric.karlsson@ericsson.com>!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19912
llvm-svn: 268512
We forgot to consider the target of ifuncs when considering if a
function was alive or dead.
N.B. Also update a few auxiliary tools like bugpoint and
verify-uselistorder.
This fixes PR27593.
llvm-svn: 268468
Make it possible that TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock merges empty
basic block including lifetime intrinsics as well as phi nodes and
unconditional branch into its successor or predecessor(s).
If successor of empty block has single predecessor, all contents including
lifetime intrinsics are sinked into the successor. Otherwise, they are
hoisted into its predecessor(s) and then merged into the predecessor(s).
Patch by Josh Yoon <josh.yoon@samsung.com>!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19257
llvm-svn: 268254
This moves some logic added to EarlyCSE in rL268120 into
`llvm::isInstructionTriviallyDead`. Adds a test case for DCE to
demonstrate that passes other than EarlyCSE can now pick up on the new
information.
llvm-svn: 268126
This patch fixes two somewhat related bugs in MemorySSA's caching
walker. These bugs were found because D19695 brought up the problem
that we'd have defs cached to themselves, which is incorrect.
The bugs this fixes are:
- We would sometimes skip the nearest clobber of a MemoryAccess, because
we would query our cache for a given potential clobber before
checking if the potential clobber is the clobber we're looking for.
The cache entry for the potential clobber would point to the nearest
clobber *of the potential clobber*, so if that was a cache hit, we'd
ignore the potential clobber entirely.
- There are times (sometimes in DFS, sometimes in the getClobbering...
functions) where we would insert cache entries that say a def
clobbers itself.
There's a bit of common code between the fixes for the bugs, so they
aren't split out into multiple commits.
This patch also adds a few unit tests, and refactors existing tests a
bit to reduce the duplication of setup code.
llvm-svn: 268087
Summary:
Historically, we had a switch in the Makefiles for turning on "expensive
checks". This has never been ported to the cmake build, but the
(dead-ish) code is still around.
This will also make it easier to turn it on in buildbots.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: jyknight, mzolotukhin, RKSimon, gberry, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19723
llvm-svn: 268050
When inlining a call site with llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata, this
metadata needs to be propagated to all cloned memory-accessing instructions.
Otherwise, inlining parts of the loop body will invalidate the annotation.
With this functionality, we now vectorize the following as expected:
void Body(int *res, int *c, int *d, int *p, int i) {
res[i] = (p[i] == 0) ? res[i] : res[i] + d[i];
}
void Test(int *res, int *c, int *d, int *p, int n) {
int i;
#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)
for (i = 0; i < 1600; i++) {
Body(res, c, d, p, i);
}
}
llvm-svn: 267949
There's no existing test for this path, and I don't know how to expose
it in a regression test, but I'm assuming there's some reason this
path exists.
llvm-svn: 267813
Now the pass is just a tiny wrapper around the util. This lets us reuse
the logic elsewhere (done here for BuildLibCalls) instead of duplicating
it.
The next step is to have something like getOrInsertLibFunc that also
sets the attributes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19470
llvm-svn: 267759
I tried to be as close as possible to the strongest check that
existed before; cleaning these up properly is left for future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19469
llvm-svn: 267758
Summary:
Refine the workaround from r266877 that attempts to prevent
renaming of locals in inline assembly, so that in addition to looking
for a llvm.used local value, that there is at least one inline assembly
call in the module. Otherwise, debug functions added to the llvm.used
can block importing/exporting unnecessarily.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19573
llvm-svn: 267717
Summary:
cloneLoopWithPreheader() does not update LoopInfo for sub-loop of
the original loop being cloned. Add assert to ensure no sub-loops for loop being cloned.
Reviewers: anemet, ashutosh.nema, hfinkel
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15922
llvm-svn: 267671
Summary:
It is incorrect to compare TripCount (which is BECount + 1)
with extraiters (or Count) to check if we should enter unrolled
loop or not, because TripCount can potentially overflow
(when BECount is max unsigned integer).
While comparing BECount with (Count - 1) is overflow safe and
therefore correct.
Reviewer: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19256
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 267662
The destination buffer that sprintf uses is restrict qualified, we do
not need to worry about derived pointers referenced via format
specifiers.
This reverts commit r267580.
llvm-svn: 267605
sprintf doesn't read or copy the terminating null byte from it's string
operands. sprintf will append it's own after processing all of the
format specifiers.
This fixes PR27526.
llvm-svn: 267580
When SimplifyCFG merges identical instructions from both sides of a diamond, it
can preserve !llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access (as it does with most of the other
metadata). There's no real data or control dependency change in this case.
llvm-svn: 267515
The original commit was reverted because of a buildbot problem with LazyCallGraph::SCC handling (not related to the OptBisect handling).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267231
E.g. for:
!1 = {"llvm.distribute", i32 1}
it now returns the MDOperand for 1.
I will use this in LoopDistribution to check the value of the metadata.
Note that the change is backward-compatible with its current use in
LoopVersioningLICM. An Optional implicitly converts to a bool depending
whether it contains a value or not.
llvm-svn: 267190
Summary:
CachingMemorySSAWalker::invalidateInfo was using IsCall to determine
which cache map needed to be cleared of entries referring to the invalidated
MemoryAccess, but there could also be entries referring to it in the
other cache map (value entries, not key entries). This change just
clears both tables to be conservatively correct.
Also add a verifyRemoved() function, called when expensive
checks (i.e. XDEBUG) are enabled to verify that the invalidated
MemoryAccess object is not referenced in any of the caches.
Reviewers: dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19388
llvm-svn: 267157
Re-layer the functions in the new (i.e., newly correct) post-order
traversals in ValueEnumerator (r266947) and ValueMapper (r266949).
Instead of adding a node to the worklist in a helper function and
returning a flag to say what happened, return the node itself. This
makes the code way cleaner: the worklist is local to the main function,
there is no flag for an early loop exit (since we can cleanly bury the
loop), and it's perfectly clear when pointers into the worklist might be
invalidated.
I'm fixing both algorithms in the same commit to avoid repeating the
commit message; if you take the time to understand one the other should
be easy. The diff itself isn't entirely obvious since the traversals
have some noise (i.e., things to do), but here's the high-level change:
auto helper = [&WL](T *Op) { auto helper = [](T **&I, T **E) {
=> while (I != E) {
if (shouldVisit(Op)) { T *Op = *I++;
WL.push(Op, Op->begin()); if (shouldVisit(Op)) {
return true; return Op;
} }
return false; return nullptr;
}; };
=>
WL.push(S, S->begin()); WL.push(S, S->begin());
while (!empty()) { while (!empty()) {
auto *N = WL.top().N; auto *N = WL.top().N;
auto *&I = WL.top().I; auto *&I = WL.top().I;
bool DidChange = false;
while (I != N->end())
if (helper(*I++)) { => if (T *Op = helper(I, N->end()) {
DidChange = true; WL.push(Op, Op->begin());
break; continue;
} }
if (DidChange)
continue;
POT.push(WL.pop()); => POT.push(WL.pop());
} }
Thanks to Mehdi for helping me find a better way to layer this.
llvm-svn: 267099
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
llvm-svn: 267022
