This continues the effort to reduce header footprint and improve
build speed by removing clang and other unnecessary headers
from Target.h. In one case, some headers were included solely
for the purpose of declaring a nested class in Target, which was
not needed by anybody outside the class. In this case the
definition and implementation of the nested class were isolated
in the .cpp file so the header could be removed.
llvm-svn: 231107
Summary:
This patch enables evaluation of DWARF expressions setting the CFA during stack unwinding.
This makes TestSigtrampUnwind "almost" pass on linux. I am not enabling the test yet since the
symbol name for the signal trampoline does not get resolved properly due to a different bug, but
apart from that, the backtrace is sane.
I am unsure how this change affects Mac. I think it makes the unwinder prefer the DWARF unwind
plan instead of some custom platform-dependant plan. However, it does not affect the end result
- the stack unwinding works as expected.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7792
llvm-svn: 230211
Summary:
This change refactors UnwindPlan::Row to be able to store the fact that the CFA is value is set
by evaluating a dwarf expression (DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression). This is achieved by creating a new
class CFAValue and moving all CFA setting/getting code there. Note that code using the new
CFAValue::isDWARFExpression is not yet present and will be added in a follow-up patch. Therefore,
this patch should not change the functionality in any way.
Test Plan: Ran tests on Mac and Linux. No regressions detected.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7755
llvm-svn: 230210
Summary: Coverity warns that unsigned >= 0 is always true, and k_first_gpr_powerpc happens to be 0. Quiet Coverity by changing that comparison instead to a static_assert(), in case things change in the future.
Reviewers: emaste
Reviewed By: emaste
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7576
llvm-svn: 228908
Summary:
This adds the register plumbing, as well as register reading in FreeBSD core
dumps. Further work on the POSIX/FreeBSD ProcessMonitor is required in order to
support ptrace access to these registers.
Reviewers: tfiala, emaste
Reviewed By: emaste
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7039
llvm-svn: 228278
This patch fixes TestRegisters on Linux with LLGS
Introduce GetUserRegisterCount on RegisterInfoInterface to distinguish
lldb internal registers (e.g.: DR0-DR7) during register counting.
Update GDBRemoteCommunicationServer to skip lldb internal registers on
read/write register and on discover register.
Submitted for Tamas Berghammer
llvm-svn: 226959
introduced subtle bugs in two places in
RegisterContextLLDB::GetFullUnwindPlanForFrame where
it specifically wanted to get an eh_frame unwind plan
and was using "Get CallSite UnwindPlan" as synonymous
with that. But now we have two different types of
unwind plan that can be returned in that case, and
compact unwind won't behaves as needed.
<rdar://problem/19528559>
llvm-svn: 226631
The refactor was motivated by some comments that Greg made
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6918
and also to break a dependency cascade that caused functions linking
in string->int conversion functions to pull in most of lldb
llvm-svn: 226199
it more generally available.
Add checks to UnwindAssembly_x86::AugmentUnwindPlanFromCallSite() so
that it won't try to augment an UnwindPlan that already describes
the function epilogue.
Add a test case for backtracing out of _sigtramp on Darwin systems.
This could probably be adapted to test the same thing on linux/bsd but
the function names of sigtramp and kill are probably platform
specific and I'm not sure what they should be.
llvm-svn: 225578
so that we will use the UnwindPlan's rule for providing the stack
pointer BEFORE we use the trick of using the callee's CFA address
as the stack pointer. When we're in a _sigtramp frame, the CFA of
the _sigtramp stack frame is not the same as the stack pointer value
when the async interrupt occurred -- we need to use the eh_frame
rules for retrieving the correct value.
<rdar://problem/18913548>
llvm-svn: 225427
The issue with Thumb IT (if/then) instructions is the IT instruction preceeds up to four instructions that are made conditional. If a breakpoint is placed on one of the conditional instructions, the instruction either needs to match the thumb opcode size (2 or 4 bytes) or a BKPT instruction needs to be used as these are always unconditional (even in a IT instruction). If BKPT instructions are used, then we might end up stopping on an instruction that won't get executed. So if we do stop at a BKPT instruction, we need to continue if the condition is not true.
When using the BKPT isntructions are easy in that you don't need to detect the size of the breakpoint that needs to be used when setting a breakpoint even in a thumb IT instruction. The bad part is you will now always stop at the opcode location and let LLDB determine if it should auto-continue. If the BKPT instruction is used, the BKPT that is used for ARM code should be something that also triggers the BKPT instruction in Thumb in case you set a breakpoint in the middle of code and the code is actually Thumb code. A value of 0xE120BE70 will work since the lower 16 bits being 0xBE70 happens to be a Thumb BKPT instruction.
The alternative is to use trap or illegal instructions that the kernel will translate into breakpoint hits. On Mac this was 0xE7FFDEFE for ARM and 0xDEFE for Thumb. The darwin kernel currently doesn't recognize any 32 bit Thumb instruction as a instruction that will get turned into a breakpoint exception (EXC_BREAKPOINT), so we had to use the BKPT instruction on Mac. The linux kernel recognizes a 16 and a 32 bit instruction as valid thumb breakpoint opcodes. The benefit of using 16 or 32 bit instructions is you don't stop on opcodes in a IT block when the condition doesn't match.
To further complicate things, single stepping on ARM is often implemented by modifying the BCR/BVR registers and setting the processor to stop when the PC is not equal to the current value. This means single stepping is another way the ARM target can stop on instructions that won't get executed.
This patch does the following:
1 - Fix the internal debugserver for Apple to use the BKPT instruction for ARM and Thumb
2 - Fix LLDB to catch when we stop in the middle of a Thumb IT instruction and continue if we stop at an instruction that won't execute
3 - Fixes this in a way that will work for any target on any platform as long as it is ARM/Thumb
4 - Adds a patch for ignoring conditions that don't match when in ARM mode (see below)
This patch also provides the code that implements the same thing for ARM instructions, though it is disabled for now. The ARM patch will check the condition of the instruction in ARM mode and continue if the condition isn't true (and therefore the instruction would not be executed). Again, this is not enable, but the code for it has been added.
<rdar://problem/19145455>
llvm-svn: 223851
a register value that is live in the stack frame 0 register context.
Fixes a problem where retrieving a register value on stack frame #n
would involved O(n!) stack frame checks. This could be very slow on
a deep stack when retrieving register values that had not been
modified/saved by any of the stack frames. Not common, but annoying
when it was hit.
<rdar://problem/19010211>
llvm-svn: 223843
section for x86_64 and i386 targets on Darwin systems. Currently only the
compact unwind encoding for normal frame-using functions is supported but it
will be easy handle frameless functions when I have a bit more free time to
test it. The LSDA and personality routines for functions are also retrieved
correctly for functions from the compact unwind section.
This new code is very fresh -- it passes the lldb testsuite and I've done
by-hand inspection of many functions and am getting correct behavior for all
of them. There may need to be some bug fixing over the next couple weeks as
I exercise and test it further. But I think it's fine right now so I'm
committing it.
<rdar://problem/13220837>
llvm-svn: 223625
UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame to try the fallback unwind plan on
that same stack frame before it tries the fallback unwind plan
on the "next" or callee frame.
In RegisterContextLLDB::TryFallbackUnwindPlan, when we're
trying the fallback unwind plan to see if it is valid, make
sure we change all of the object ivars that might be used in
the process of fetching the CFA & caller's saved pc value
and restore those if we decide not to use the fallback
unwindplan.
<rdar://problem/19035079>
llvm-svn: 222601
LLDB supports many different register numbering schemes, and these
are typically prefixed with an indicator that lets the user know
what numbering scheme is used. The gcc numbering scheme is
prefixed with gcc, and there are similar ones for dwarf, gdb,
and gcc_dwarf.
LLDB also contains its own internal numbering scheme, but the enum
for LLDB's numbering scheme was prefixed differently. This patch
changes the names of these enums to use the same naming scheme for
the enum values as the rest of the register kinds by removing gpr_
and fpu_ prefixes, and instead using lldb_ prefixes for all enum
values.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6351
Reviewed by: Greg Clayton
llvm-svn: 222495
Running a diff against lldb-x86-register-enums.h and the file
modified in this patch, the two enums were completely identical.
Deleting one of them to reduce code noise.
llvm-svn: 222478
where it is retrieving the Return Address register contents
on a target where that's a thing. If we fail to get a valid
RA, we force a switch to the fallback unwind plan. This patch
adds a sanity check for that fallback unwind plan -- it must
get a valid CFA for this frame in addition to being able to
retrieve the caller's PC -- and it correctly marks the unwind
rules as failing if the fallback unwind plan fails.
<rdar://problem/19010211>
llvm-svn: 222301
RegisterContextLLDB. I have core files of half a dozen tricky
unwind situations on x86/arm and they're all working pretty much
correctly at this point, but we'll need to keep an eye out for
unwinder regressions for a little while; it's tricky to get these
heuristics completely correct in all unwind situations.
<rdar://problem/18937193>
llvm-svn: 221866
After r221575 TestCallStopAndContinue and TestCallThatRestarts started
crashing on FreeBSD with a null temporary_module_sp in
RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame().
llvm-svn: 221805
The addition of RegisterNumber introduced a bug where if the PC is stored in a
return address register, such as on ARM and PowerPC, this register number is
retrieved and used, but never checked in the row if it's saved. Correct this by
setting the variable that's used to the new register number.
Patch by Jason Molenda.
llvm-svn: 221790
Summary:
Taking advantage of the new 'CFAIsRegisterDereferenced' CFA register type, add
full stack unwind support to the PowerPC/PowerPC64 ABI. Also, add a new
register set for powerpc32-on-64, so the register sizes are correct. This also
requires modifying the ProcessMonitor to add support for non-uintptr_t-sized
register values.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, emaste
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6183
llvm-svn: 221789
Summary:
PowerPC handles the stack chain with the current stack pointer being a pointer
to the backchain (CFA). LLDB currently has no way of handling this, so this
adds a "CFA is dereferenced from a register" type.
Discussed with Jason Molenda, who also provided the initial patch for this.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6182
llvm-svn: 221788
it in RegisterContext.cpp.
There's a lot of bookkeeping code in RegisterContextLLDB where it has
to convert between different register numbering schemes and it makes
some methods like SavedLocationForRegister very hard to read or
maintain. Abstract all of the details about different register numbering
systems for a given register into this new class to make it easier
to understand what the method is doing.
Also add register name printing to all of the logging -- that's easy to
get now that I've got an object to represent the register numbers.
There were some gnarly corner cases of this method that I believe
I've translated correctly - initial testing looks good but it's
possible I missed a corner case, especially with architectures which
uses a link-register aka return address register like arm32/arm64.
Basic behavior is correct but there are a lot of corner casese that are
handled in this method ...
llvm-svn: 221577
If a noreturn function was the last function in a section,
we wouldn't correctly back up the saved-pc value into the
correct section leading to us showing the wrong function in
the backtrace.
Also add a backtrace test with an attempt to elicit this
particular layout. It happens to work out with clang -Os
but other compilers may not quite get the same layout I'm
getting at that opt setting. We'll still be exercising the
basic noreturn handling in the unwinder even if we don't get
one function at the very end of a section.
<rdar://problem/16051613>
llvm-svn: 221575
let's let lldb try the arch default unwind every time but not destructively --
it doesn't permanently replace the main unwind method for that function from
now on.
This fix is for <rdar://problem/18683658>.
I tested it against Ryan Brown's go program test case and also a
collection of core files of tricky unwind scenarios
<rdar://problem/15664282> <rdar://problem/15835846>
<rdar://problem/15982682> <rdar://problem/16099440>
<rdar://problem/17364005> <rdar://problem/18556719>
that I've fixed over the last 6-9 months.
llvm-svn: 221238
is "invalid" -- it is past the end of the stack trace. Add a new
method IsCompletedStackWalk() so we can tell if an invalid stack
frame is from a complete backtrace or if it might be worth re-trying
the last unwind with a different method.
This fixes the unwinder problems Ryan Brown was having with go
programs. The unwinder can (under the right circumstances) still
destructively replace unwind plans permanently - I'll work on
that in a different patch.
<rdar://problem/18683658>
llvm-svn: 221229
Summary:
SIGPROF is used for profiling processes (with google-perftools for
instance), which results in the inferior receiving a SIGPROF from the
kernel every few milliseconds. Instead of stopping the debugging session
and notifying the user of this, we should just pass the signal and keep
running.
This follows the behavior we have in UnixSignals.cpp.
Test Plan: Run LLDB on linux with a binary using google-perftools, see that execution gets interrupted all the time because we receive SIGPROF. Apply the patch, everything works fine.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5953
llvm-svn: 221011
Summary:
This adds preliminary support for PowerPC/PowerPC64, for FreeBSD. There are
some issues still:
* Breakpoints don't work well on powerpc64.
* Shared libraries don't yet get loaded for a 32-bit process on powerpc64 host.
* Backtraces don't work. This is due to PowerPC ABI using a backchain pointer
in memory, instead of a dedicated frame pointer register for the backchain.
* Breakpoints on functions without debug info may not work correctly for 32-bit
powerpc.
Reviewers: emaste, tfiala, jingham, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5988
llvm-svn: 220944
function because of a '1u' making it a 32-bit value
when it really needed to be a 64-bit value. Trivial to fix
once I figured out what was going on.
clang static analzyer fixit.
llvm-svn: 220022
in GetFullUnwindPlanForFrame() - the code was mostly checking
that we had an active Process and ABI but not always.
clang static analyzer fixit.
llvm-svn: 219772
the backtrace, try falling back to the architecture default
unwind plan and see if we can backtrace a little further.
<rdar://problem/18556719>
llvm-svn: 219247
the user level. It adds the ability to invent new stepping modes implemented by python classes,
and to view the current thread plan stack and to some extent alter it.
I haven't gotten to documentation or tests yet. But this should not cause any behavior changes
if you don't use it, so its safe to check it in now and work on it incrementally.
llvm-svn: 218642
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D5495 for more details.
These are changes that are part of an effort to support building llgs, within the AOSP source tree, using the Android.mk
build system, when using the llvm/clang/lldb git repos from AOSP replaced with the experimental ones currently in
github.com/tfiala/aosp-{llvm,clang,lldb,compiler-rt}.
llvm-svn: 218568
detct unwind loops but there was a code path through there (using
architecture default unwind plans) that didn't do the check, and
could end up with an infinite loop unwind. Move that code into a
separate method and call it from both places where it is needed.
Also remove the use of ABI::FunctionCallsChangeCFA in that check.
I thought about it a lot and none of the architecutres that we're
supporting today can have a looping CFA.
Since the unwinder isn't using ABI::FunctionCallsChangeCFA() and
ABI::StackUsesFrames(), and the unwinder was the only reason
those methods exists, I removed them from the ABI and all its
plugins.
<rdar://problem/17364005>
llvm-svn: 216992
Yet another step toward ARM64 support. With this commit, lldb-gdbserver started on ARM64 target can be accessed by lldb running on desktop PC and it can process simple commands (like 'continue'). Still ARM64 support lacks NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64.* code which waits to be implemented.
Based on similar files for Linux x86_64 and Darwin ARM64. Due to common code extraction from Darwin related files, lldb should be tested for any unexpected regression on Darwin ARM64 machines too.
See the following for more details:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4580http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140825/012670.html
Change by Paul Osmialowski.
llvm-svn: 216737
We decided to use assmbly profiler instead of eh_frame for frame 0 because for compiler generated code, eh_frame is usually synchronous(a.k.a. only valid at call site); and we have no way to tell if it's asynchronous or not.
But for x86 & x86_64 compiler generated code:
1. clang & GCC describes all prologue instructions in eh_frame;
2. mid-function stack pointer altering instructions can be easily detected.
So we can grab eh_frame, and use assembly profiler to augment it into asynchronous unwind table.
This change also benefits hand-written assembly; eh_frame for hand-written assembly is often asynchronous,so we have a much better chance to successfully unwind through them.
Change by Tong Shen.
llvm-svn: 216406
i386 eh_frame register numbering, encoding a darwin-specific
bug in the register numbering. Update the definitions to be
the correct values, Darwin can use the register numbers from
debugserver. Patch from Tong Shen.
llvm-svn: 215488
