Summary:
I'm not sure that this failure should be fixed by modifying this test.
It seems strange for me that the only one type vUInt8 is printed with '0x' prefix.
This patch fixes the following error:
```
======================================================================
FAIL: test_with_dsym_and_run_command (Test-rdar-10642615.Radar10642615DataFormatterTestCase)
Test data formatter commands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/lldbtest.py", line 456, in wrapper
return func(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/rdar-10642615/Test-rdar-10642615.py", line 21, in test_with_dsym_and_run_command
self.data_formatter_commands()
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/rdar-10642615/Test-rdar-10642615.py", line 68, in data_formatter_commands
'(vBool32) valueBool32 = (0, 1, 0, 1)'])
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/lldbtest.py", line 2100, in expect
msg if msg else EXP_MSG(str, exe))
AssertionError: False is not True : '(vUInt8) valueU8 = ('\x01', '\0', '\x04', '\0', '\0', '\x01', '\0', '\x04', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0')' returns expected result
Config=x86_64-clang
======================================================================
FAIL: test_with_dwarf_and_run_command (Test-rdar-10642615.Radar10642615DataFormatterTestCase)
Test data formatter commands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/lldbtest.py", line 473, in wrapper
return func(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/rdar-10642615/Test-rdar-10642615.py", line 28, in test_with_dwarf_and_run_command
self.data_formatter_commands()
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/functionalities/data-formatter/rdar-10642615/Test-rdar-10642615.py", line 68, in data_formatter_commands
'(vBool32) valueBool32 = (0, 1, 0, 1)'])
File "/Users/IliaK/p/llvm/tools/lldb/test/lldbtest.py", line 2100, in expect
msg if msg else EXP_MSG(str, exe))
AssertionError: False is not True : '(vUInt8) valueU8 = ('\x01', '\0', '\x04', '\0', '\0', '\x01', '\0', '\x04', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0', '\0')' returns expected result
Config=x86_64-clang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
```
Reviewers: granata.enrico, zturner, clayborg
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits, zturner, granata.enrico
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8102
llvm-svn: 231490
Unlike GDB, we tackle the problem of representing vector types in different styles by having a synthetic child provider that recognizes the format you're trying to apply to the variable, and coming up with the right type and number of child values to match that format
This makes for a more compact representation and less visual noise
Fixes rdar://5429347
llvm-svn: 231449
clang-3.5+ outputs FullDebugInfo by default for Darwin/FreeBSD targets.
Other targets do not, which causes several tests to fail. This flag
enables FullDebugInfo for all targets.
Fixes the following tests:
TestCallStdStringFunction.py
TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py
TestDataFormatterStdIterator.py
TestDataFormatterStdList.py
TestDataFormatterStdString.py
TestSBValuePersist.py
TestStringPrinter.py
TestTypeCompletion.py
llvm-svn: 230831
Reverting this commit led to other failures which I did not see at
first. This turned out to be an easy problem to fix, so I added
SBVariablesOptions.cpp to the CMakeLists.txt. In the future please
try to make sure new files are added to CMake.
llvm-svn: 229516
We talked about it internally - and came to the conclusion that it's time to have an options class
This commit adds an SBVariablesOptions class and goes through all the required dance
llvm-svn: 228975
Why? Debugger::FormatPrompt() would run through the format prompt every time and parse it and emit it piece by piece. It also did formatting differently depending on which key/value pair it was parsing.
The new code improves on this with the following features:
1 - Allow format strings to be parsed into a FormatEntity::Entry which can contain multiple child FormatEntity::Entry objects. This FormatEntity::Entry is a parsed version of what was previously always done in Debugger::FormatPrompt() so it is more efficient to emit formatted strings using the new parsed FormatEntity::Entry.
2 - Allows errors in format strings to be shown immediately when setting the settings (frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format
3 - Allows auto completion by implementing a new OptionValueFormatEntity and switching frame-format, thread-format, and disassembly-format settings over to using it.
4 - The FormatEntity::Entry for each of the frame-format, thread-format, disassembly-format settings only replaces the old one if the format parses correctly
5 - Combines all consecutive string values together for efficient output. This means all "${ansi.*}" keys and all desensitized characters like "\n" "\t" "\0721" "\x23" will get combined with their previous strings
6 - ${*.script:} (like "${var.script:mymodule.my_var_function}") have all been switched over to use ${script.*:} "${script.var:mymodule.my_var_function}") to make the format easier to parse as I don't believe anyone was using these format string power user features.
7 - All key values pairs are defined in simple C arrays of entries so it is much easier to add new entries.
These changes pave the way for subsequent modifications where we can modify formats to do more (like control the width of value strings can do more and add more functionality more easily like string formatting to control the width, printf formats and more).
llvm-svn: 228207
Without this overload, attempts to edit the value of a variable with synthetic children enabled would change the value inside the synthetic ValueObject, but not propagate the changes to the underlying storage, hence resulting in no write for any meaningful purpose
Comes with a test case, and fixes rdar://19586311
llvm-svn: 227120
The reason why one mechanism is so much faster than the other (as in, ~10 seconds vs. ~1 minute) is quite baffling to me at the moment, but these are not process handling tests, so do what's faster
llvm-svn: 226730
clang does not yet support MS-ABI record layout for externally-sourced
ASTs. As a result, attempting to format something that requires data
layout results in undefined behavior in clang, in this case an assert.
http://llvm.org/pr21800 tracks fixing this on the clang side.
llvm-svn: 223868
The following lldb unit tests fail check-lldb on ubuntu:
TestDataFormatterStdMap.py
TestDataFormatterStdVBool.py
TestDataFormatterStdVector.py
TestDataFormatterSynthVal.py
TestEvents.py
TestInitializerList.py
TestMemoryHistory.py
TestReportData.py
TestValueVarUpdate.py
These unit test failures are for non-core functionality. The intent is to
reduce the check-lldb FAILS to core functionality FAILS and then circle
back later and fix these FAILS at a later date.
llvm-svn: 222608
The recent StringPrinter changes made this behavior the default, and the setting defaults to yes
If you want to change this behavior and see non-printables unescaped (e.g. "a\tb" as "a b"), set it to false
Fixes rdar://12969594
llvm-svn: 221399
This works similarly to the {thread/frame/process/target.script:...} feature - you write a summary string, part of which is
${var.script:someFuncName}
someFuncName is expected to be declared as
def someFuncName(SBValue,otherArgument) - essentially the same as a summary function
Since . -> [] are the only allowed separators, and % is used for custom formatting, .script: would not be a legitimate symbol anyway, which makes this non-ambiguous
llvm-svn: 220821
The way to do this is to write a synthetic child provider for your type, and have it vend the (optional) get_value function.
If get_value is defined, and it returns a valid SBValue, that SBValue's value (as in lldb_private::Value) will be used as the synthetic ValueObject's Value
The rationale for doing things this way is twofold:
- there are many possible ways to define a "value" (SBData, a Python number, ...) but SBValue seems general enough as a thing that stores a "value", so we just trade values that way and that keeps our currency trivial
- we could introduce a new level of layering (ValueObjectSyntheticValue), a new kind of formatter (synthetic value producer), but that would complicate the model (can I have a dynamic with no synthetic children but synthetic value? synthetic value with synthetic children but no dynamic?), and I really couldn't see much benefit to be reaped from this added complexity in the matrix
On the other hand, just defining a synthetic child provider with a get_value but returning no actual children is easy enough that it's not a significant road-block to adoption of this feature
Comes with a test case
llvm-svn: 219330
The test used to trigger an assertion failure "Cannot get layout of
forward declarations!", but it no longer fails when built with
Clang 3.4.1 (system compiler) or 3.5 from SVN on FreeBSD.
llvm.org/pr17231
llvm-svn: 218196
The test produces lines that start with "<word>: " which confuses the
buildbot log parser. Disable the test until either the test is fixed
or the buildbot can deal with the undesired output.
llvm.org/pr20545
llvm-svn: 214900
Currently, the test runner makes the assumption that it will run
commands through /bin/sh. This is obviously not true on Windows,
so this patch abstracts this logic out somewhat. Instead of
having the caller build the command string himself, the caller
will now pass in argument list of the form [[a, b], [c, d], ...]
which will get converted into a string of the form a b; c d or
a b && c d, depending on the platform.
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4590
llvm-svn: 213669
Our build is still getting this test to fail with the presence of const in
'(Foo &const) y = 0x' and '(Foo &&const) z = 0x'. This change simply changes
the match substrings to ignore the portion after the final '&' and before the
closing ')'. This should cover the presence (or absence) of the const qualifier.
llvm-svn: 206762
The additional "const" breaks the FreeBSD buildbot, and does not appear
to be due to a LLVM or Clang change. Revert the change while
investigating further.
This reverts revision 206619.
llvm-svn: 206751
