This commit enables forming vector extloads for ARM.
It only does so for legal types, and when we can't fold the extension
in a wide/long form of the user instruction.
Enabling it for larger types isn't as good an idea on ARM as it is on
X86, because:
- we pretend that extloads are legal, but end up generating vld+vmov
- we have instructions like vld {dN, dM}, which can't be generated
when we "manually expand" extloads to vld+vmov.
For legal types, the combine doesn't fire that often: in the
integration tests only in a big endian testcase, where it removes a
pointless AND.
Related to rdar://19723053
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7423
llvm-svn: 231396
Summary:
In PNaCl, most atomic instructions have their own @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function, each one, with a few exceptions, represents a consistent behaviour across all NaCl-supported targets. Unfortunately, the atomic RMW operations nand, [u]min, and [u]max aren't directly represented by any such @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function. This patch refines shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR in TargetLowering so that a future `Le32TargetLowering` class can selectively inform the caller how the target desires the atomic RMW instruction to be expanded (ie via load-linked/store-conditional for ARM/AArch64, via cmpxchg for X86/others?, or not at all for Mips) if at all.
This does not represent a behavioural change and as such no tests were added.
Patch by: Richard Diamond.
Reviewers: jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7713
llvm-svn: 231250
a lookup, pass that in rather than use a naked call to getSubtargetImpl.
This involved passing down and around either a TargetMachine or
TargetRegisterInfo. Update all callers/definitions around the targets
and SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 230699
This required plumbing a TargetRegisterInfo through computeRegisterProperties
and into findRepresentativeClass which uses it for register class
iteration. This required passing a subtarget into a few target specific
initializations of TargetLowering.
llvm-svn: 230583
The logic is almost there already, with our special homogeneous aggregate
handling. Tweaking it like this allows front-ends to emit AAPCS compliant code
without ever having to count registers or add discarded padding arguments.
Only arrays of i32 and i64 are needed to model AAPCS rules, but I decided to
apply the logic to all integer arrays for more consistency.
llvm-svn: 230348
It was previously using the subtarget to get values for the global
offset without actually checking each function as it was generating
code. Go ahead and solidify the current behavior and make the
existing FIXMEs more prominent.
As a note the ARM backend previously had a thumb1 and non-thumb1
set of defaults. Only the former was tested so I've changed the
behavior to only use that for now.
llvm-svn: 230245
Everyone except R600 was manually passing the length of a static array
at each callsite, calculated in a variety of interesting ways. Far
easier to let ArrayRef handle that.
There should be no functional change, but out of tree targets may have
to tweak their calls as with these examples.
llvm-svn: 230118
This re-applies r223862, r224198, r224203, and r224754, which were
reverted in r228129 because they exposed Clang misalignment problems
when self-hosting.
The combine caused the crashes because we turned ISD::LOAD/STORE nodes
to ARMISD::VLD1/VST1_UPD nodes. When selecting addressing modes, we
were very lax for the former, and only emitted the alignment operand
(as in "[r1:128]") when it was larger than the standard alignment of
the memory type.
However, for ARMISD nodes, we just used the MMO alignment, no matter
what. In our case, we turned ISD nodes to ARMISD nodes, and this
caused the alignment operands to start being emitted.
And that's how we exposed alignment problems that were ignored before
(but I believe would have been caught with SCTRL.A==1?).
To fix this, we can just mirror the hack done for ISD nodes: only
take into account the MMO alignment when the access is overaligned.
Original commit message:
We used to only combine intrinsics, and turn them into VLD1_UPD/VST1_UPD
when the base pointer is incremented after the load/store.
We can do the same thing for generic load/stores.
Note that we can only combine the first load/store+adds pair in
a sequence (as might be generated for a v16f32 load for instance),
because other combines turn the base pointer addition chain (each
computing the address of the next load, from the address of the last
load) into independent additions (common base pointer + this load's
offset).
rdar://19717869, rdar://14062261.
llvm-svn: 229932
In preparation for a future patch:
- rename isLoad to isLoadOp: the former is confusing, and can be taken
to refer to the fact that the node is an ISD::LOAD. (it isn't, yet.)
- change formatting here and there.
- add some comments.
- const-ify bools.
llvm-svn: 229929
This adds a safe interface to the machine independent InputArg struct
for accessing the index of the original (IR-level) argument. When a
non-native return type is lowered, we generate the hidden
machine-level sret argument on-the-fly. Before this fix, we were
representing this argument as OrigArgIndex == 0, which is an outright
lie. In particular this crashed in the AArch64 backend where we
actually try to access the type of the original argument.
Now we use a sentinel value for machine arguments that have no
original argument index. AArch64, ARM, Mips, and PPC now check for this
case before accessing the original argument.
Fixes <rdar://19792160> Null pointer assertion in AArch64TargetLowering
llvm-svn: 229413
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
llvm-svn: 229220
While various DAG combines try to guarantee that a vector SETCC
operation will have the same output size as input, there's nothing
intrinsic to either creation or LegalizeTypes that actually guarantees
it, so the function needs to be ready to handle a mismatch.
Fortunately this is easy enough, just extend or truncate the naturally
compared result.
I couldn't reproduce the failure in other backends that I know have
SIMD, so it's probably only an issue for these two due to shared
heritage.
Should fix PR21645.
llvm-svn: 228518
This reverts patches 223862, 224198, 224203, and 224754, which were all
related to the vector load/store combining and were reverted/reaplied
a few times due to the same alignment problems we're seeing now.
Further tests, mainly self-hosting Clang, will be needed to reapply this
patch in the future.
llvm-svn: 228129
type (in addition to the memory type).
The *LoadExt* legalization handling used to only have one type, the
memory type. This forced users to assume that as long as the extload
for the memory type was declared legal, and the result type was legal,
the whole extload was legal.
However, this isn't always the case. For instance, on X86, with AVX,
this is legal:
v4i32 load, zext from v4i8
but this isn't:
v4i64 load, zext from v4i8
Whereas v4i64 is (arguably) legal, even without AVX2.
Note that the same thing was done a while ago for truncstores (r46140),
but I assume no one needed it yet for extloads, so here we go.
Calls to getLoadExtAction were changed to add the value type, found
manually in the surrounding code.
Calls to setLoadExtAction were mechanically changed, by wrapping the
call in a loop, to match previous behavior. The loop iterates over
the MVT subrange corresponding to the memory type (FP vectors, etc...).
I also pulled neighboring setTruncStoreActions into some of the loops;
those shouldn't make a difference, as the additional types are illegal.
(e.g., i128->i1 truncstores on PPC.)
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6532
llvm-svn: 225421
Weak externals are resolved statically, so we can actually generate the tail
call on PE/COFF targets without breaking the requirements. It is questionable
whether we want to propagate the current behaviour for MachO as the requirements
are part of the ARM ELF specifications, and it seems that prior to the SVN
r215890, we would have tail'ed the call. For now, be conservative and only
permit it on PE/COFF where the call will always be fully resolved.
llvm-svn: 225119
r223862/r224203 tried to also combine base-updating load/stores.
There was a mistake there: the alignment was added as is as an operand to
the ARMISD::VLD/VST node. However, the VLD/VST selection logic doesn't care
about less-than-standard alignment attributes.
For example, no matter the alignment of a v2i64 load (say 1), SelectVLD picks
VLD1q64 (because of the memory type). But VLD1q64 ("vld1.64 {dXX, dYY}") is
8-aligned, per ARMARMv7a 3.2.1.
For the 1-aligned load, what we really want is VLD1q8.
This commit introduces bitcasts if necessary, and changes the vld/vst type to
one whose standard alignment matches the original load/store alignment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6759
llvm-svn: 224754
Add in definedness checks for shift operators, null checks when
pointers are assumed by the code to be non-null, and explicit
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 224255
r223862 tried to also combine base-updating load/stores.
r224198 reverted it, as "it created a regression on the test-suite
on test MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram by scrambling the order
in which the words are shown."
Reapply, with a fix to ignore non-normal load/stores.
Truncstores are handled elsewhere (you can actually write a pattern for
those, whereas for postinc loads you can't, since they return two values),
but it should be possible to also combine extloads base updates, by checking
that the memory (rather than result) type is of the same size as the addend.
Original commit message:
We used to only combine intrinsics, and turn them into VLD1_UPD/VST1_UPD
when the base pointer is incremented after the load/store.
We can do the same thing for generic load/stores.
Note that we can only combine the first load/store+adds pair in
a sequence (as might be generated for a v16f32 load for instance),
because other combines turn the base pointer addition chain (each
computing the address of the next load, from the address of the last
load) into independent additions (common base pointer + this load's
offset).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6585
llvm-svn: 224203
This reverts commit r223862, as it created a regression on the test-suite
on test MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram by scrambling the order
in which the words are shown. We'll investigate the issue and re-apply
when safe.
llvm-svn: 224198
We used to only combine intrinsics, and turn them into VLD1_UPD/VST1_UPD
when the base pointer is incremented after the load/store.
We can do the same thing for generic load/stores.
Note that we can only combine the first load/store+adds pair in
a sequence (as might be generated for a v16f32 load for instance),
because other combines turn the base pointer addition chain (each
computing the address of the next load, from the address of the last
load) into independent additions (common base pointer + this load's
offset).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6585
llvm-svn: 223862
Move the combiner-state check into another function, add a few
small comments, and use a more general type in a cast<>.
In preparation for a future patch.
llvm-svn: 223834
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
llvm-svn: 222334
register class tGPRRegClass if the target is thumb1.
This commit fixes a crash that occurs during register allocation which was
triggered when a virtual register defined by an inline-asm instruction had to
be spilled.
rdar://problem/18740489
llvm-svn: 221178
This patch adds an optimization in CodeGenPrepare to move an extractelement
right before a store when the target can combine them.
The optimization may promote any scalar operations to vector operations in the
way to make that possible.
** Context **
Some targets use different register files for both vector and scalar operations.
This means that transitioning from one domain to another may incur copy from one
register file to another. These copies are not coalescable and may be expensive.
For example, according to the scheduling model, on cortex-A8 a vector to GPR
move is 20 cycles.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(<2 x i32>* %addr1, i32* %dest) {
%in1 = load <2 x i32>* %addr1, align 8
%extract = extractelement <2 x i32> %in1, i32 1
%out = or i32 %extract, 1
store i32 %out, i32* %dest, align 4
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on armv7:
vldr d16, [r0] @vector load
vmov.32 r0, d16[1] @ cross-register-file copy: 20 cycles
orr r0, r0, #1 @ scalar bitwise or
str r0, [r1] @ scalar store
bx lr
Whereas we could generate much faster code:
vldr d16, [r0] @ vector load
vorr.i32 d16, #0x1 @ vector bitwise or
vst1.32 {d16[1]}, [r1:32] @ vector extract + store
bx lr
Half of the computation made in the vector is useless, but this allows to get
rid of the expensive cross-register-file copy.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid this cross-register-copy penalty, we promote the scalar operations to
vector operations. The penalty will be removed if we manage to promote the whole
chain of computation in the vector domain.
Currently, we do that only when the chain of computation ends by a store and the
target is able to combine an extract with a store.
Stores are the most likely candidates, because other instructions produce values
that would need to be promoted and so, extracted as some point[1]. Moreover,
this is customary that targets feature stores that perform a vector extract (see
AArch64 and X86 for instance).
The proposed implementation relies on the TargetTransformInfo to decide whether
or not it is beneficial to promote a chain of computation in the vector domain.
Unfortunately, this interface is rather inaccurate for this level of details and
although this optimization may be beneficial for X86 and AArch64, the inaccuracy
will lead to the optimization being too aggressive.
Basically in TargetTransformInfo, everything that is legal has a cost of 1,
whereas, even if a vector type is legal, usually a vector operation is slightly
more expensive than its scalar counterpart. That will lead to too many
promotions that may not be counter balanced by the saving of the
cross-register-file copy. For instance, on AArch64 this penalty is just 4
cycles.
For now, the optimization is just enabled for ARM prior than v8, since those
processors have a larger penalty on cross-register-file copies, and the scope is
limited to basic blocks. Because of these two factors, we limit the effects of
the inaccuracy. Indeed, I did not want to build up a fancy cost model with block
frequency and everything on top of that.
[1] We can imagine targets that can combine an extractelement with other
instructions than just stores. If we want to go into that direction, the current
interfaces must be augmented and, moreover, I think this becomes a global isel
problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5921
<rdar://problem/14170854>
llvm-svn: 220978
Currently, the ARM backend will select the VMAXNM and VMINNM for these C
expressions:
(a < b) ? a : b
(a > b) ? a : b
but not these expressions:
(a > b) ? b : a
(a < b) ? b : a
This patch allows all of these expressions to be matched.
llvm-svn: 220671
This updates check for double precision zero floating point constant to allow
use of instruction with immediate value rather than temporary register.
Currently "a == 0.0", where "a" is of "double" type generates:
vmov.i32 d16, #0x0
vcmpe.f64 d0, d16
With this change it becomes:
vcmpe.f64 d0, #0
Patch by Sergey Dmitrouk.
llvm-svn: 220486
The previous code had a few problems, motivating the choices here.
1. It could create instructions clobbering CPSR, but the incoming MachineInstr
didn't reflect this. A potential source of corruption. This is why the patch
has a new PseudoInst for before lowering.
2. Similarly, there was some code to handle the incoming instruction not being
ARMCC::AL, but this would have caused massive problems if it was actually
invoked when a complex offset needing more than one instruction was requested.
3. It wasn't designed to handle unaligned pointers (or offsets). These should
probably be minimised anyway, but the code needs to deal with them properly
regardless.
4. It had some rather dubious ad-hoc code to avoid calling
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate, a function which should be designed to do precisely
this job.
We seem to cover the common cases correctly now, and hopefully can enhance
emitThumbRegPlusImmediate to handle any extra optimisations we need to add in
future.
llvm-svn: 220236
Currently, we only codegen the VRINT[APMXZR] and VCVT[BT] instructions
when targeting ARMv8, but they are actually present on any target with
FP-ARMv8. Note that FP-ARMv8 is called FPv5 when is is part of an
M-profile core, but they have the same instructions so we model them
both as FPARMv8 in the ARM backend.
llvm-svn: 218763
Summary:
The goal is to eventually remove all the code related to getInsertFencesForAtomic
in SelectionDAGBuilder as it is wrong (designed for ARM, not really portable, works
mostly by accident because the backends are overly conservative), and repeats the
same logic that goes in emitLeading/TrailingFence.
In this patch, I make AtomicExpandPass insert the fences as it knows better
where to put them. Because this requires getting the fences and not just
passing an IRBuilder around, I had to change the return type of
emitLeading/TrailingFence.
This code only triggers on ARM for now. Because it is earlier in the pipeline
than SelectionDAGBuilder, it triggers and lowers atomic accesses to atomic so
SelectionDAGBuilder does not add barriers anymore on ARM.
If this patch is accepted I plan to implement emitLeading/TrailingFence for all
backends that setInsertFencesForAtomic(true), which will allow both making them
less conservative and simplifying SelectionDAGBuilder once they are all using
this interface.
This should not cause any functionnal change so the existing tests are used
and not modified.
Test Plan: make check-all, benefits from existing tests of atomics on ARM
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5179
llvm-svn: 218329
The fix is slightly different then x86 (see r216117) because the number of values
attached to a return can vary even for a single returned value (e.g., f64 yields
two returned values).
<rdar://problem/18352998>
llvm-svn: 218076
Summary:
This patch was originally in D5304 (I could not find a way to reopen that revision).
It was accepted, commited and broke the build bots because the overloading of
the constructor of ArrayRef for braced initializer lists is not supported by all
toolchains. I then reverted it, and propose this fixed version that uses a plain
C array instead in makeDMB (that array is then converted implicitly to an
ArrayRef, but that is not behind an ifdef). Could someone confirm me whether
initialization lists for plain C arrays are supported by every toolchain used
to build llvm ? Otherwise I can just initialize the array in the old way:
args[0] = ...; .. ; args[5] = ...;
Below is the description of the original patch:
```
I had only tested this code for ARMv7 and ARMv8. This patch adds several
fallback paths if the processor does not support dmb ish:
- dmb sy if a cortex-M with support for dmb
- mcr p15, #0, r0, c7, c10, #5 for ARMv6 (special instruction equivalent to a DMB)
These fallback paths were chosen based on the code for fence seq_cst.
Thanks to luqmana for having noticed this bug.
```
Test Plan: Added more cases to atomic-load-store.ll + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover, luqmana
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5386
llvm-svn: 218066
