Summary:
The Scalar class claims to follow the C type conversion rules. This is
true for the Promote function, but it is not true for the implicit
conversions done in the getter methods.
These functions had a subtle bug: when extending the type, they used the
signedness of the *target* type in order to determine whether to do
sign-extension or zero-extension. This is not how things work in C,
which uses the signedness of the *source* type. I.e., C does
(sign-)extension before it does signed->unsigned conversion, and not the
other way around.
This means that: (unsigned long)(int)-1
is equal to (unsigned long)0xffffffffffffffff
and not (unsigned long)0x00000000ffffffff
Unsurprisingly, we have accumulated code which depended on this
inconsistent behavior. It mainly manifested itself as code calling
"ULongLong/SLongLong" as a way to get the value of the Scalar object in
a primitive type that is "large enough". Previously, the ULongLong
conversion did not do sign-extension, but now it does.
This patch makes the Scalar getters consistent with the declared
semantics, and fixes the couple of call sites that were using it
incorrectly.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82772
Summary:
This replaces the current use of LLDB's own `StringConvert` with LLVM's
`to_integer` which has a less error-prone API and doesn't use special 'error
values' to designate parsing problems.
Where needed I also added missing error handling code that prints a parsing
error instead of continuing with the error value returned from `StringConvert`
(which either gave a cryptic error message or just took the error value
performed an incorrect action with it. For example, `frame recognizer delete -1`
just deleted the frame recognizer at index 0).
Reviewers: #lldb, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: labath, abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82297
Summary:
A lot of our tests do 'self.assertTrue(error.Success()'. The problem
with that is that when this fails, it produces a completely useless
error message (False is not True) and the most important piece of
information -- the actual error message -- is completely hidden.
Sometimes we mitigate that by including the error message in the "msg"
argument, but this has two additional problems:
- as the msg argument is evaluated unconditionally, one needs to be
careful to not trigger an exception when the operation was actually
successful.
- it requires more typing, which means we often don't do it
assertSuccess solves these problems by taking the entire SBError object
as an argument. If the operation was unsuccessful, it can format a
reasonable error message itself. The function still accepts a "msg"
argument, which can include any additional context, but this context now
does not need to include the error message.
To demonstrate usage, I replace a number of existing assertTrue
assertions with the new function. As this process is not easily
automatable, I have just manually updated a representative sample. In
some cases, I did not update the code to use assertSuccess, but I went
for even higher-level assertion apis (runCmd, expect_expr), as these are
even shorter, and can produce even better failure messages.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82759
These tests are flaky on the reproducer bot. I suspect it has something
to do with the module cache. Skipping the whole category while I
investigate the issue.
The reproducer don't model timeouts so tests that rely on them end up
with unexpected packets during replay. Skip them until we can handle
this scenario.
Summary:
It turns out that the order in which we provide completions for expressions is
nondeterministic. This leads to confusing user experience and also breaks the
reproducer tests (as two LLDB tests can go out of sync due to the
non-determinism in the completion lists)
The reason for the non-determinism is that the CompletionConsumer informs us
about decls in the order in which it finds declarations in the lookup store of
the DeclContexts it visits (mainly this snippet in SemaLookup.cpp):
``` lang=c++
// Enumerate all of the results in this context.
for (DeclContextLookupResult R :
Load ? Ctx->lookups()
: Ctx->noload_lookups(/*PreserveInternalState=*/false)) {
[...]
```
This storage of the lookup is sorted by pointer values (see the hash of
`DeclarationName`) and can therefore be non-deterministic. The LLDB code
completion consumer that receives these calls originally expected that the order
of declarations is defined by Clang, but it seems the API expects the client to
provide an order to the completions.
This patch fixes the issue as follows:
* We sort the completions we get from Clang alphabetically and also by the
priority value we get from Clang (with priority value sorting having precedence
over the alphabetical sorting)
* We make all the functions/variables that touch a completion before the sorting
const-qualified. The idea is that this should prevent that we never have
observable side-effect from touching these declarations in a non-deterministic
order (e.g., we don't try to complete the type by accident).
This way we behave like the other parts of Clang which also sort the results by
some deterministic value (usually the name or something computed from a name,
e.g., edit distance to a given string).
We most likely also need to fix the Clang code to make the loop I listed above
deterministic to prevent these issues in the future (tracked in rdar://63442513
). This wouldn't replace the functionality provided in this patch though as we
would still need the priority and overall alphabetical sorting.
Note: I had to increase the lldb-vscode completion limit to 100 as the tests
look for strings that aren't in the first 50 results anymore due to variable
names starting with letters like 'v' (which are now always shown much further
down in the list due to the alphabetical sorting).
Fixes rdar://63200995
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgrang, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80292
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
This patch introduces the `(-h|--host)` option to the `platform shell`
command. It allows the user to run shell commands from the host platform
(always available) without putting lldb in the background.
Since the default behaviour of `platform shell` is to run the command of
the selected platform, having such a choice can be quite handy when
debugging remote targets, for instances.
This patch also introduces a `shell` alias, to improve the command
discoverability and make it more convenient to use for the user.
rdar://62856024
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79659
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Skip tests or parts thereof that aren't expected to work when run from a
reproducer. Also improve the doc comments in configuration.py to prevent
mistakes in the future.
Summary:
The test machinery translates each continuous block of "//%" comments
into a single breakpoint. If there's no code between the blocks the
breakpoints will end up at the same location in the program. When the
process stops at a breakpoint lldb correctly reports all breakpoint IDs,
but the test machinery only looks at the first one. This results in a
very dangerous situation as it means some checks can be silently
stopped.
This patch fixes that by making the test machinery iterate through all
breakpoints at a given location and execute all commands.
Reviewers: vsk, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79563
Because LLDB isn't the one spawning the subprocess, the PID is different
during replay. Exclude it form the substring check during replay.
Depends on D79646 to pass with reproducer replay.
This skips some tests that pass with active replay (which doesn't check
the output) but fail with passive replay. Valid reasons for this
include:
- Checking the output of the process (which doesn't run during replay),
- Checking files that cannot be captured in the VFS (non-existing or
unreadable files or files that are removed during test),
Unfortunately there's no good way to mark a test as supported for active
replay but unsupported for passive replay because the number and order
of API calls needs to be identical during capture and replay. I don't
think this is a huge loss however.
Summary:
Sometimes users think that setting a function regex for all function that contain the word 'needle' in their
name looks like this: `*needle*`. However, LLDB only searches the function name and doesn't fully match
it against the regex, so the leading and trailing '*' operators don't do anything and actually just cause the
regex engine to reject the regular expression with "repetition-operator operand invalid".
This patch makes this a bit more obvious to the user by printing a warning that a leading '*' before this
regular expression here doesn't have any purpose (and will cause an error). This doesn't attempt to detect
a case where there is only a trailing '*' as that would involve parsing the regex and it seems the most
common way to end up in this situation is by doing `rbreak *needle*`.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78809
This patch fixes the test failure happening on Windows introduced by
`015117411e11458f9816ba4359246132164a4297`.
Since the failure message comes from the OS, the test needs to support both
UNIX and Windows messages.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
When trying to read a core file that is not owned by the user running lldb
and that doesn't have read permission on the file, lldb shows a misleading
error message:
```
Unable to find process plug-in for core file
```
This is due to the fact that currently, lldb doesn't check the file
ownership. And when trying to to open and read a core file, the syscall
fails, which prevents a process to be created.
Since lldb already have a portable `open` syscall interface, lets take
advantage of that and delegate the error handling to the syscall
itself. This way, no matter if the file exists or if the user has proper
ownership, lldb will always try to open the file, and behave accordingly
to the error code returned.
rdar://42630030
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78712
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
Currently the breakpoint command is prompting the user to file a bug report if the provided regex is invalid:
```
(lldb) rbreak *foo
error: Function name regular expression could not be compiled: "Inconvertible error value. An error has occurred that could not be converted to a known std::error_code. Please file a bug. repetition-operator operand invalid"
```
The reason is simply that we are using the wrong StringError constructor (the one with the error code as the first parameter
is also printing the string version of the error code, and the inconvertible error code is just an invalid place holder code with
that description). Switching the StringError constructor parameters will only print the error message we get from the regex
engine when we convert the error into a string.
I checked the rest of the code base and I couldn't find the same issue anywhere else.
Fixes rdar://62233561
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78808
In ImportContext(…) we may call into CompleteDecl(…) which if FromRecrord is not
defined will start the definition of a ToRecord but from what I can tell at least
one of the paths though here don't ensure we complete the definition.
For a RecordDecl this can be problematic since this means we won’t import base
classes and we won’t have any of the methods or types we inherit from these bases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78000
Add the skipIfReproducer decorator to the remaining tests that fail to
replay because the GDB remote packets diverge during replay. This is
*not* expected and should be fixed, but figuring out exactly what caused
the divergence has proven pretty difficult to track down.
I've marked these tests as skipped for now so we can get clean results
and detect new regressions. I have no evidence to believe that these
failures have the same root cause, so I've not assigned them a PR.
Summary:
...and replace it with m_last_file_spec instead.
When Source Cache is enabled, the value stored in m_last_file_sp is
already in the Source Cache, and caching it again in SourceManager
brings no extra benefit. All we need is to "remember" the last used
file, and FileSpec can serve the same purpose.
When Source Cache is disabled, the user explicitly requested no caching
of source files, and therefore, m_last_file_sp should NOT be used.
Bug: llvm.org/PR45310
Depends on D76805.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76806
Since D77214 there is a testsuite regression for TestFixIts.py
on Fedora 31 x86_64.
File "/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/fixits/TestFixIts.py", line 148, in test_with_target
self.assertEquals(value.GetError().GetCString(), "error: No value")
AssertionError: 'error: error: Multiple internal symbols found for \'d\'\nid = {0x00000d2a}, ran [truncated]... != 'error: No value'
That is because Fedora glibc incl. libm.so contains also ELF debug
symbols and there exists a 'd' symbol:
(gdb) p d
$1 = {i = {0, 1076887552}, d = 16}
(gdb) p &d
$2 = (const number *) 0x7ffff78e8bc0 <d>
(gdb) info sym 0x7ffff78e8bc0
d in section .rodata of /lib64/libm.so.6
$ nm /lib64/libm.so.6 |grep ' d$'
00000000000bfbc0 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
glibc-build$ for i in `find -name "*.o"`;do nm 2>/dev/null $i|grep ' d$' && echo $i;done
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan-fma4.o
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan-avx.o
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan.o
The final function call to `test_X` is failing on aarch64-linux with SIGILL.
Function calls to previous expressions seem to just not work on aarch64-linux
but I don't see another way to test the multiple-run Fix-Its.
This patch refactors the test that the skipIf for aarch64 Linux only covers
the part of the test that was added D77214.
I fixed the bug that the "log timer" has no tab command.
Original code has the only CommandObjectLogTimer class, but it is not
sufficient. Thus I divided the content of CommandObjectLog class into
CommandObjectLogEnable class, CommandObjectLogDisable class,
CommandObjectLogDump class, CommandObjectLogReset class,
CommandObjectLogIncrement class.
Reviewed by: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76906
Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.
This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).
The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: shafik, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
Summary:
LLDB currently applies Fix-Its if they are attached to a Clang diagnostic that has the
severity "error". Fix-Its connected to warnings and other severities are supposed to
be ignored as LLDB doesn't seem to trust Clang Fix-Its in these situations.
However, LLDB also ignores all Fix-Its coming from "note:" diagnostics. These diagnostics
are usually emitted alongside other diagnostics (both warnings and errors), either to keep
a single diagnostic message shorter or because the Fix-It is in a different source line. As they
are technically their own (non-error) diagnostics, we currently are ignoring all Fix-Its associated with them.
For example, this is a possible Clang diagnostic with a Fix-It that is currently ignored:
```
error: <user expression 1>:2:10: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
ToStr(0, {,})
^
<user expression 1>:1:9: macro 'ToStr' defined here
#define ToStr(x) #x
^
<user expression 1>:2:1: cannot use initializer list at the beginning of a macro argument
ToStr(0, {,})
^ ~~~~
```
We also don't store "note:" diagnostics at all, as LLDB's abstraction around the whole diagnostic
concept doesn't have such a concept. The text of "note:" diagnostics is instead
appended to the last non-note diagnostic (which is causing that there is no "note:" text in the
diagnostic above, as all the "note:" diagnostics have been appended to the first "error: ..." text).
This patch fixes the ignored Fix-Its in note-diagnostics by appending them to the last non-note
diagnostic, similar to the way we handle the text in these diagnostics.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77055
This patch was reverted because it introduced a failure in
TestHelloWorld.py. The reason for that was running "ls" shell command
failed as it was evaluated in an environment with an empty path. This
has now been fixed with D77123, which ensures that all shell commands
inherit the host environment, so this patch should be safe to recommit.
The original commit message was:
A defensive check in ProcessLauncherWindows meant that we would never
attempt to launch a process with a completely empty environment -- the
host environment would be used instead. Instead, I make the function add
an extra null wchar_t at the end of an empty environment. The
documentation on this is a bit fuzzy, but it seems to be what is needed
to make windows accept these kinds of environments.
Reviewers: amccarth, friss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76835
Summary:
If we don't have a current frame then we can still run many expressions
as long as we have an active target. With this patch `expect_expr` directly
calls the target's EvaluateExpression function when there is no current frame.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77197
