This fixes support for merging profiles which broke as a consequence
of e50a38840d. The issue was missing
adjustment in merge logic to account for the binary IDs which are
now included in the raw profile just after header.
In addition, this change also:
* Includes the version in module signature that's used for merging
to avoid accidental attempts to merge incompatible profiles.
* Moves the binary IDs size field after version field in the header
as was suggested in the review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107143
This fixes support for merging profiles which broke as a consequence
of e50a38840d. The issue was missing
adjustment in merge logic to account for the binary IDs which are
now included in the raw profile just after header.
In addition, this change also:
* Includes the version in module signature that's used for merging
to avoid accidental attempts to merge incompatible profiles.
* Moves the binary IDs size field after version field in the header
as was suggested in the review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107143
This fixes support for merging profiles which broke as a consequence
of e50a38840d. The issue was missing
adjustment in merge logic to account for the binary IDs which are
now included in the raw profile just after header.
In addition, this change also:
* Includes the version in module signature that's used for merging
to avoid accidental attempts to merge incompatible profiles.
* Moves the binary IDs size field after version field in the header
as was suggested in the review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107143
The __llvm_prf_names section uses SHF_GNU_RETAIN. However, GNU ld before 2015-10
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19161) neither supports it nor
retains __llvm_prf_names according to __start___llvm_prf_names. So --gc-sections
does not work on such old GNU ld.
This is not a problem for gold and sufficiently new lld.
This mostly follows LLVM's InstrProfReader.cpp error handling.
Previously, attempting to merge corrupted profile data would result in
crashes. See https://crbug.com/1216811#c4.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104050
We're having flaky failures on this test on the sanitizer slow
buildbot. Not per-run flaky, but it'll be green for a while, then red
for a while. I suspect that changes in codegen are causing the
LLVM_VP_MAX_NUM_VALS_PER_SITE=150 to be above and below the limit
sporadically. The limit on my machine using lld and a non-bootstrapped
compiler is 175, but the bot uses GNU ld and ld.gold at different
points, which could be affecting behaviour.
Change this threshold to LLVM_VP_MAX_NUM_VALS_PER_SITE=130 in order to
try and get it below the failure point, at least for the foreseeable
future.
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/37/builds/2744
`__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` are used by runtime but not
referenced via relocation in the translation unit.
With `-z start-stop-gc` (LLD 13 (D96914); GNU ld 2.37 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27451),
the linker does not let `__start_/__stop_` references retain their sections.
Place `__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` in `llvm.used` to make
them retained by the linker.
This patch changes most existing `UsedVars` cases to `CompilerUsedVars`
to reflect the ideal state - if the binary format properly supports
section based GC (dead stripping), `llvm.compiler.used` should be sufficient.
`__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` are switched to `UsedVars`
since we want them to be unconditionally retained by both compiler and linker.
Behaviors on COFF/Mach-O are not affected.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97649
`__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` are used by runtime but not
referenced via relocation in the translation unit.
With `-z start-stop-gc` (D96914 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27451),
the linker no longer lets `__start_/__stop_` references retain them.
Place `__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` in `llvm.used` to make
them retained by the linker.
This patch changes most existing `UsedVars` cases to `CompilerUsedVars`
to reflect the ideal state - if the binary format properly supports
section based GC (dead stripping), `llvm.compiler.used` should be sufficient.
`__llvm_prf_vnodes` and `__llvm_prf_names` are switched to `UsedVars`
since we want them to be unconditionally retained by both compiler and linker.
Behaviors on other COFF/Mach-O are not affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97649
llvm-cov -path-equivalence=/tmp,... is used by some checked-in coverage mapping
files where the original filename is under /tmp. If the test itself produces the
coverage mapping file, there is no need for /tmp.
For coverage_emptylines.cpp: the source filename is under the build directory.
If the build directory is under /tmp, the path mapping will make
llvm-cov fail to find the file.
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
Similarly as for pointers, even for integers a == b is usually false.
GCC also uses this heuristic.
Reviewed By: ebrevnov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85781
These lit configuration files are really Python source code. Using the
.py file extension helps editors and tools use the correct language
mode. LLVM and Clang already use this convention for lit configuration,
this change simply applies it to all of compiler-rt.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63658
llvm-svn: 364591
Summary:
The changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44847 cause load time failure
due to lprofMergeValueProfData in Android libs enabled with profile generation:
"dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "lprofMergeValueProfData" referenced by..."
Marking lprofMergeValueProfData as hidden so the correct in-module definition
is picked by the linker.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: efriedma, xur, davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55893
llvm-svn: 354064
The test expects to see the pattern "load add store" twice
in a row.
However the test contains actually several instances of this pattern.
Currently the first pattern appears in the output twice.
But after LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691 some addtional
modification is done and one of another pattern has been hoisted in
function entry block.
As a result we have another order of meeting this pattern.
The test is updated to meet this change.
llvm-svn: 324571
Summary:
As discussed in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/933,
it would be really awesome to be able to use ThinLTO for fuzzing.
However, as @kcc has pointed out, it is currently undefined (untested)
whether the sanitizers actually function properly with LLD and/or LTO.
This patch is inspired by the cfi test, which already do test with LTO
(and/or LLD), since LTO is required for CFI to function.
I started with UBSan, because it's cmakelists / lit.* files appeared
to be the cleanest. This patch adds the infrastructure to easily add
LLD and/or LTO sub-variants of the existing lit test configurations.
Also, this patch adds the LLD flavor, that explicitly does use LLD to link.
The check-ubsan does pass on my machine. And to minimize the [initial]
potential buildbot breakage i have put some restrictions on this flavour.
Please review carefully, i have not worked with lit/sanitizer tests before.
The original attempt, r319525 was reverted in r319526 due
to the failures in compiler-rt standalone builds.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: #sanitizers, pcc, kubamracek, mgorny, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini, inglorion, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39508
llvm-svn: 319575
