This patch considers the CU index entry
when reading the .debug_rnglists.dwo section.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107456
Fix D98289 so that it works even for 2nd..nth compilation unit
(.debug_rnglists).
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106466
This test is specifying the lldb log channel via `ll""db` which only really works
because the command parser ends up parsing that as `lldb`. Just putting the
channel name in quotes is enough to avoid the lldb command substitution and
doesn't rely on this weird parser behaviour.
Skeleton vs. DWO units mismatch has been fixed in D106270. As they both
have type DWARFUnit it is a bit difficult to debug. So it is better to
make it safe against future changes.
Reviewed By: kimanh, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107659
When going through the CU entries in the name index,
make sure to compare the name entry's CU
offset against the skeleton CU's offset.
Previously there would be a mismatch, since the
wrong offset was compared, and thus no suitable
entry was found.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106270
Summary:
In the spirit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846, we only return functions with
matching mangled name from Apple/DebugNamesDWARFIndex::GetFunction if
eFunctionNameTypeFull is requested.
This speeds up lookup in the presence of large amount of class methods of the
same name (a typical examples would be constructors of templates with many
instantiations or overloaded operators).
Reviewers: labath, teemperor
Reviewed By: labath, teemperor
Subscribers: aprantl, arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191
This patch fixes the lookup of locations in
.debug_loclists, if they are split in a .dwp file.
Mainly, we need to consider the cu index offsets.
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107161
In some environments this test could fail if start.S has its own DWARF
CompileUnit or similar are included before the DWARF CompileUnit for the
file.
This change makes the test independent of the index of the compile unit,
instead checking the filename.
Reviewed By: herhut, jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107300
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Testcases now require Linux as it is needed for -gsplit-dwarf.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
This change makes sure that DwarfUnit does not load a .dwo file until
necessary. I also take advantage of DWARF 5's guarantee that the first
support file is also the primary file to make it possible to create
a compile unit without loading the .dwo file.
Review By: jankratochvil, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100299
In D98289#inline-939112 @dblaikie said:
Perhaps this could be more informative about what makes the range list
index of 0 invalid? "index 0 out of range of range list table (with
range list base 0xXXX) with offset entry count of XX (valid indexes
0-(XX-1))" Maybe that's too verbose/not worth worrying about since
this'll only be relevant to DWARF producers trying to debug their
DWARFv5, maybe no one will ever see this message in practice. Just
a thought.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102851
DW_AT_ranges can use DW_FORM_sec_offset (instead of DW_FORM_rnglistx).
In such case DW_AT_rnglists_base does not need to be present.
DWARF-5 spec:
"If the offset_entry_count is zero, then DW_FORM_rnglistx cannot
be used to access a range list; DW_FORM_sec_offset must be used
instead. If the offset_entry_count is non-zero, then
DW_FORM_rnglistx may be used to access a range list;"
This fix is for TestTypeCompletion.py category `dwarf` using GCC with DWARF-5.
The fix just provides GetRnglist() lazy getter for `m_rnglist_table`.
The testcase is easier to review by:
diff -u lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_low_pc-addrx.s \
lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/DW_AT_range-DW_FORM_sec_offset.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98289
DWARF allows .dwo file paths to be relative rather than absolute. When
they are relative, DWARF uses DW_AT_comp_dir to find the .dwo
file. DW_AT_comp_dir can also be relative, making the entire search
patch for the .dwo file relative. In this case, LLDB currently
searches relative to its current working directory, i.e. the directory
from which the debugger was launched. This is not right, as the
compiler, which generated the relative paths, can have no idea where
the debugger will be launched. The correct thing is to search relative
to the location of the executable binary. That is what this patch
does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97786
DWARF allows .dwo file paths to be relative rather than absolute. When
they are relative, DWARF uses DW_AT_comp_dir to find the .dwo
file. DW_AT_comp_dir can also be relative, making the entire search
patch for the .dwo file relative. In this case, LLDB currently
searches relative to its current working directory, i.e. the directory
from which the debugger was launched. This is not right, as the
compiler, which generated the relative paths, can have no idea where
the debugger will be launched. The correct thing is to search relative
to the location of the executable binary. That is what this patch
does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97786
By moving them into a folder with a local lit config
requiring x86. All these tests use x86 target triples.
There are two tests that require target-x86_64 because
they run program files (instead of just needing the backend).
Those are moved to the x86 folder also but their REQUIRES are
unchanged.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100193
The file contained bogus input - the DIE list was not properly
terminated. This should not cause a crash, but it seems it was crashing
at least on linux arm and x86 windows.
SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContext is currently unaware that in DWARF5 the primary file is specified at file index 0. As a result it misses to correctly resolve the symbol context for the primary file when DWARF5 debug data is used and the primary file is only specified at index 0.
This change makes use of CompileUnit::ResolveSymbolContext to resolve the symbol context. The ResolveSymbolContext in CompileUnit has been previously already updated to reflect changes in DWARF5
and contains a more readable version. It can resolve more, but will also do a bit more work than
SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContext (getting the Module, and going through SymbolFileDWARF::ResolveSymbolContextForAddress), however, it's mostly directed by $resolve_scope
what will be resolved, and ensures that code is easier to maintain if there's only one path.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98619
Apply changes from https://reviews.llvm.org/D91014 to other places where DWARF entries are being processed.
Test case is provided by @jankratochvil.
The test is marked to run only on x64 and exclude Windows and Darwin, because the assembly is not OS-independent.
(First attempt https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778 broke the build bots)
Reviewed By: jankratochvil
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97765
In DWARF v4 compile units go in .debug_info and type units go in
.debug_types. However, in v5 both kinds of units are in .debug_info.
Therefore we can't decide whether to use the CU or TU index just by
looking at which section we're reading from. We have to wait until we
have read the unit type from the header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96194
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
Currently TypePrinter lumps anonymous classes and unnamed classes in one group "anonymous" this is not correct and can be confusing in some contexts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96807
Finishing out the support (to the best of my knowledge/based on current
testing running the whole check-lldb with a clang forcibly using
DW_AT_ranges on all DW_TAG_subprograms) for this feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94064
gcc already produces debug info with this form
-freorder-block-and-partition
clang produces this sort of thing with -fbasic-block-sections and with a
coming-soon tweak to use ranges in DWARFv5 where they can allow greater
reuse of debug_addr than the low/high_pc forms.
This fixes the case of breaking on a function name, but leaves broken
printing a variable - a follow-up commit will add that and improve the
test case to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94063
In split DWARF v5 files, the DWO id is no longer in the DW_AT_GNU_dwo_id
attribute. It's in the CU header instead. This change makes lldb look in
both places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93444
I found a few cases where entries in the debug_line for a specific line of code have invalid entries (the address is outside of a code section or no section at all) and also valid entries. When this happens lldb might not set the breakpoint because the first line entry it will find in the line table might be the invalid one and since it's range is "invalid" no location is resolved. To get around this I changed the way we parse the line sequences to ignore those starting at an address under the first code segment.
Greg suggested to implement it this way so we don't need to check all sections for every line sequence.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87172
