This add support for SjLj using Wasm exception handling instructions:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/master/proposals/exception-handling/Exceptions.md
This does not yet support the mixed use of EH and SjLj within a
function. It will be added in a follow-up CL.
This currently passes all SjLj Emscripten tests for wasm0/1/2/3/s,
except for the below:
- `test_longjmp_standalone`: Uses Node
- `test_dlfcn_longjmp`: Uses NodeRAWFS
- `test_longjmp_throw`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp1`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp2`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp3`: Mixes EH and SjLj
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108960
Please refer to
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/152440.html
(and that whole thread.)
TLDR: the original patch had no prior RFC, yet it had some changes that
really need a proper RFC discussion. It won't be productive to discuss
such an RFC, once it's actually posted, while said patch is already
committed, because that introduces bias towards already-committed stuff,
and the tree is potentially in broken state meanwhile.
While the end result of discussion may lead back to the current design,
it may also not lead to the current design.
Therefore i take it upon myself
to revert the tree back to last known good state.
This reverts commit 4c4093e6e3.
This reverts commit 0a2b1ba33a.
This reverts commit d9873711cb.
This reverts commit 791006fb8c.
This reverts commit c22b64ef66.
This reverts commit 72ebcd3198.
This reverts commit 5fa6039a5f.
This reverts commit 9efda541bf.
This reverts commit 94d3ff09cf.
This patch extends D107904's introduction of vector-predicated (VP)
operation legalization to include vector splitting.
When the result of a binary VP operation needs splitting, all of its
operands are split in kind. The two operands and the mask are split as
usual, and the vector-length parameter EVL is "split" such that the low
and high halves each execute the correct number of elements.
Tests have been added to the RISC-V target to show splitting several
scenarios for fixed- and scalable-vector types. Without support for
`umax` (e.g. in the `B` extension) the generated code starts to branch.
Ideally a cost model would prevent their insertion in the first place.
Through these tests many opportunities for better codegen can be seen:
combining known-undef VP operations and for constant-folding operations
on `ISD::VSCALE`, to name but a few.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107957
I believe, the profitability reasoning here is correct
"sub"reg is already located within the 0'th subreg of wider reg,
so if we have suvector insertion at index 0 into undef,
then it's always free do to.
After this, D109065 finally avoids the regression in D108382.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109074
Followup to D99355: SDAG support for vector-predicated load/store/gather/scatter.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105871
Instead of splitting off the fp16 to float conversion and generating
a libcall, we should split the operation into fp16 to float and float
to integer operations. This will allow the float to integer conversion
to go through any custom handling the target has. If the target doesn't
have custom handling then we should come back to ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_SINT/
ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_UINT automatically to create the libcall.
This avoids generating libcalls on 32-bit X86. These library functions may
not exist in 32-bit libgcc. At least for LLVM, we never generate them when
hardware floating point instructions are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108933
When expanding a SMULFIXSAT ISD node (usually originating from
a smul.fix.sat intrinsic) we've applied some optimizations for
the special case when the scale is zero. The idea has been that
it would be cheaper to use an SMULO instruction (if legal) to
perform the multiplication and at the same time detect any overflow.
And in case of overflow we could use some SELECT:s to replace the
result with the saturated min/max value. The only tricky part
is to know if we overflowed on the min or max value, i.e. if the
product is positive or negative. Unfortunately the implementation
has been incorrect as it has looked at the product returned by the
SMULO to determine the sign of the product. In case of overflow that
product is truncated and won't give us the correct sign bit.
This patch is adding an extra XOR of the multiplication operands,
which is used to determine the sign of the non truncated product.
This patch fixes PR51677.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108938
The check for whether a rotate is possible occurs before the
memory legality checks for the integer type. So it's possible we
decide we can use a rotate, but then fail the legality checks. If
that happens we should not fall back to a vector type. This triggers
an assertion in the rotate handling when it finds a vector type
instead of an integer type.
In theory we could use a shufflevector in place of the rotate, but
right now I'd just like to fix the crash.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108839
Without this change only the preferred fusion opcode is tested
when attempting to combine FMA operations.
If both FMA and FMAD are available then FMA ops formed prior to
legalization will not be merged post legalization as FMAD becomes
the preferred fusion opcode.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108619
We can halve the number of mask constants by masking before shl
and after srl.
This can reduce the number of mov immediate or constant
materializations. Or reduce the number of constant pool loads
for X86 vectors.
I think we might be able to do something similar for bswap. I'll
look at it next.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108738
This is another bug exposed by https://llvm.org/PR51612
(and the one that triggered the initial assertion) in the report.
That example was suppressed with:
985b48f183
...but these would still crash because we created nodes
like UADDO without the expected 2 output values.
There are 2 bugs here:
1. We were not checking uses of operand 2 (the false value of the select).
2. We were not checking for multiple uses of nodes that produce >1 result.
Correcting those is enough to avoid the crash in the reduced test based on:
https://llvm.org/PR51612
The additional use check on operand 0 (the condition value of the select)
should not strictly be necessary because we are only replacing one use
with another (whether it makes performance sense to do the transform with
that pattern is not clear). But as noted in the TODO, changing that
uncovers another bug.
Note: there's at least one more bug here - we aren't propagating EVTs
correctly, but I plan to fix that in another patch.
Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of functions whom should not be called.
They are frequently used to provide compile time diagnostics similar to
_Static_assert, but which may rely on non-ICE conditions (ie. relying on
compiler optimizations). This is also similar to diagnose_if function
attribute, but can diagnose after optimizations have been run.
While users may instead simply call undefined functions in such cases to
get a linkage failure from the linker, these provide a much more
ergonomic and actionable diagnostic to users and do so at compile time
rather than at link time. Users instead may be able use inline asm .err
directives.
These are used throughout the Linux kernel in its implementation of
BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON macros. These macros generally cannot be
converted to use _Static_assert because many of the parameters are not
ICEs. The Linux kernel still needs to be modified to make use of these
when building with Clang; I have a patch that does so I will send once
this feature is landed.
To do so, we create a new IR level Function attribute, "dontcall" (both
error and warning boil down to one IR Fn Attr). Then, similar to calls
to inline asm, we attach a !srcloc Metadata node to call sites of such
attributed callees.
The backend diagnoses these during instruction selection, while we still
know that a call is a call (vs say a JMP that's a tail call) in an arch
agnostic manner.
The frontend then reconstructs the SourceLocation from that Metadata,
and determines whether to emit an error or warning based on the callee's
attribute.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1173
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030
InstrRefBasedLDV is marginally slower than VarlocBasedLDV when analysing
optimised code -- however, it's much slower when analysing code compiled
-O0.
To avoid this: don't use instruction referencing for -O0 functions. In the
"pure" case of unoptimised code, this won't really harm the debugging
experience because most variables won't have been promoted off the stack,
so can't go missing. It becomes more complicated when optimised code is
inlined into functions marked optnone; however these are rare, and as -O0
doesn't run many optimisations there should be little damage to the debug
experience as a result.
I've taken the opportunity to refactor testing for instruction-referencing
into a MachineFunction method, which seems the most appropriate place to
put it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108585
For ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, its second operand must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107795
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines (in this case for fp->int load/store copies) to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108318
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines (in this case for ISD::BUILD_PAIR) to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
This helps in particular for 32-bit X86 cases loading 64-bit size data, reducing codegen diffs vs x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108307
This changes the lowering of saddsat and ssubsat so that instead of
using:
r,o = saddo x, y
c = setcc r < 0
s = c ? INTMAX : INTMIN
ret o ? s : r
into using asr and xor to materialize the INTMAX/INTMIN constants:
r,o = saddo x, y
s = ashr r, BW-1
x = xor s, INTMIN
ret o ? x : r
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/TYufgD
This seems to reduce the instruction count in most testcases across most
architectures. X86 has some custom lowering added to compensate for
cases where it can increase instruction count.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105853
Previously we pre-calculated this and cached it for every
instruction in the function. Most of the calculated results will
never be used. So instead calculate it only on the first use, and
then cache it.
The cache was originally added to fix a compile time issue which
caused r216066 to be reverted.
This change exposed that we weren't pre-computing the Value for
Arguments. I've explicitly disabled that for now as it seemed to
regress some tests on AArch64 which has sext built into its compare
instructions.
Spotted while investigating how to improve heuristics to work better
with RISCV preferring sign extend for unsigned compares for i32 on RV64.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107976
This patch adds the beginnings of more thorough support in the
legalizers for vector-predicated (VP) operations.
The first step is the ability to widen illegal vectors. The more
complicated scenario in which the result/operands need widening but the
mask doesn't has not been handled here. That would require a lot of code
without an in-tree target on which to test it.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107904
This patch adds vector-predicated ("VP") reduction intrinsics corresponding to
each of the existing unpredicated `llvm.vector.reduce.*` versions. Unlike the
unpredicated reductions, all VP reductions have a start value. This start value
is returned when the no vector element is active.
Support for expansion on targets without native vector-predication support is
included.
This patch is based on the ["reduction
slice"](https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504#1732277) of the LLVM-VP reference patch
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D57504).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104308
Follow-up to D107068, attempt to fold nested concat_vectors/undefs, as long as both the vector and inner subvector types are legal.
This exposed the same issue in ARM's MVE LowerCONCAT_VECTORS_i1 (raised as PR51365) and AArch64's performConcatVectorsCombine which both assumed concat_vectors only took 2 subvector operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107597
visitEXTRACT_SUBVECTOR can sometimes create illegal BITCASTs when
removing "redundant" INSERT_SUBVECTOR operations. This patch adds
an extra check to ensure such combines only occur after operation
legalisation if any resulting BITBAST is itself legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108086
AttributeList::hasAttribute() is confusing, use clearer methods like
hasParamAttr()/hasRetAttr().
Add hasRetAttr() since it was missing from AttributeList.
We were calling find and then using operator[]. Instead keep the
iterator from find and use it to get the value.
Just happened to notice while investigating how we decide what extends
to use between basic blocks.
This patch refactors / simplifies salvageDebugInfoImpl(). The goal
here is to simplify the implementation of coro::salvageDebugInfo() in
a followup patch.
1. Change the return value to I.getOperand(0). Currently users of
salvageDebugInfoImpl() assume that the first operand is
I.getOperand(0). This patch makes this information explicit. A
nice side-effect of this change is that it allows us to salvage
expressions such as add i8 1, %a in the future.
2. Factor out the creation of a DIExpression and return an array of
DIExpression operations instead. This change allows users that
call salvageDebugInfoImpl() in a loop to avoid the costly
creation of temporary DIExpressions and to defer the creation of
a DIExpression until the end.
This patch does not change any functionality.
rdar://80227769
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107383
This commit adds the isnan intrinsic and provides a default expansion
for it in the SDAG. However, it makes the assumption that types
it operates on are IEEE-compliant types. This is not always the case.
An example of that is PPC "double double" which has a representation
that
- Does not need to conform to IEEE requirements for isnan as it is
not an IEEE-compliant type
- Does not have a representation that allows for straightforward
reinterpreting as an integer and use of integer operations
The result was that this commit broke __builtin_isnan for ppc_fp128
making many valid numeric values report a NaN.
This patch simply changes the expansion to always expand to unordered
comparison (regardless of whether FP exceptions are tracked). This
is inline with previous semantics.
This isn't optimal, but prevents crashing when the libcall isn't
available. It just calculates the full product and makes sure the high bits
match the sign of the low half. Each of the pieces should go through their own
type legalization.
This can make D107420 unnecessary.
Needs tests, but I wanted to start discussion about D107420.
Reviewed By: FreddyYe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107581
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
We don't have real demanded bits support for MULHU, but we can
still use the known bits based constant folding support at the end
of SimplifyDemandedBits to simplify a MULHU. This helps with cases
where we know the LHS and RHS have enough leading zeros so that
the high multiply result is always 0.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106471
IR typically creates INSERT_SUBVECTOR patterns as a widening of the subvector with undefs to pad to the destination size, followed by a shuffle for the actual insertion - SelectionDAGBuilder has to do something similar for shuffles when source/destination vectors are different sizes.
This combine attempts to recognize these patterns by looking for a shuffle of a subvector (from a CONCAT_VECTORS) that starts at a modulo of its size into an otherwise identity shuffle of the base vector.
This uncovered a couple of target-specific issues as we haven't often created INSERT_SUBVECTOR nodes in generic code - aarch64 could only handle insertions into the bottom of undefs (i.e. a vector widening), and x86-avx512 vXi1 insertion wasn't keeping track of undef elements in the base vector.
Fixes PR50053
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107068
It's entirely possible (because it actually happened) for a bool
variable to end up with a 256-bit DW_AT_const_value. This came about
when a local bool variable was initialized from a bitfield in a
32-byte struct of bitfields, and after inlining and constant
propagation, the variable did have a constant value. The sequence of
optimizations had it carrying "i256" values around, but once the
constant made it into the llvm.dbg.value, no further IR changes could
affect it.
Technically the llvm.dbg.value did have a DIExpression to reduce it
back down to 8 bits, but the compiler is in no way ready to emit an
oversized constant *and* a DWARF expression to manipulate it.
Depending on the circumstances, we had either just the very fat bool
value, or an expression with no starting value.
The sequence of optimizations that led to this state did seem pretty
reasonable, so the solution I came up with was to invent a DWARF
constant expression folder. Currently it only does convert ops, but
there's no reason it couldn't do other ops if that became useful.
This broke three tests that depended on having convert ops survive
into the DWARF, so I added an operator that would abort the folder to
each of those tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106915
The LegalizeAction for this node should follow the logic for
`VECREDUCE_SEQ_FADD` and be determined using the vector operand's type.
here isn't an in-tree target that makes use of this, but I think it's safe to
say this is how it should behave, should a target want to customize the action
for this node.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107478
