Commit Graph

964 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev
3f1f08f0ed Revert @llvm.isnan intrinsic patchset.
Please refer to
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/152440.html
(and that whole thread.)

TLDR: the original patch had no prior RFC, yet it had some changes that
really need a proper RFC discussion. It won't be productive to discuss
such an RFC, once it's actually posted, while said patch is already
committed, because that introduces bias towards already-committed stuff,
and the tree is potentially in broken state meanwhile.

While the end result of discussion may lead back to the current design,
it may also not lead to the current design.

Therefore i take it upon myself
to revert the tree back to last known good state.

This reverts commit 4c4093e6e3.
This reverts commit 0a2b1ba33a.
This reverts commit d9873711cb.
This reverts commit 791006fb8c.
This reverts commit c22b64ef66.
This reverts commit 72ebcd3198.
This reverts commit 5fa6039a5f.
This reverts commit 9efda541bf.
This reverts commit 94d3ff09cf.
2021-09-02 13:53:56 +03:00
Sanjay Patel
204038d52e [InstSimplify] fold or+shifted -1 to -1
These are similar to the rotate pattern added with:
dcf659e821
...but we don't have guard ops on the shift amount,
so we don't canonicalize to the intrinsic.

  declare void @llvm.assume(i1)

  define i32 @src(i32 %shamt, i32 %bitwidth) {
    ; subtract must be in range of bitwidth
    %lt = icmp ule i32 %bitwidth, 32
    call void @llvm.assume(i1 %lt)

    %r = lshr i32 -1, %shamt
    %s = sub i32 %bitwidth, %shamt
    %l = shl i32 -1, %s
    %o = or i32 %r, %l
    ret i32 %o
  }

  define i32 @tgt(i32 %shamt, i32 %bitwidth) {
    ret i32 -1
  }

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/aF7WHx
2021-08-24 15:38:38 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
ac7694596d [InstSimplify] add tests for or-of-shifted-one-bits; NFC 2021-08-24 15:38:38 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
dcf659e821 [InstSimplify] fold rotate of -1 to -1
This is part of solving more general rotate patterns seen in
bugs related to:
https://llvm.org/PR51575

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/GpkFCt
2021-08-22 09:15:48 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
d41e308f10 [InstSimplify] fold rotate of zero to zero
This is part of solving more general rotate patterns seen in
bugs related to:
https://llvm.org/PR51575

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/fjKwqv
2021-08-22 09:15:48 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
a0ebac4466 [InstSimplify] add tests for rotates of 0/-1; NFC 2021-08-22 09:15:48 -04:00
Usman Nadeem
a7c4e9b1f7 [InstSimplify] Eliminate vector reverse of a splat vector
experimental.vector.reverse(splat(X)) -> splat(X)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107793

Change-Id: Id29ba88fd669ff8686712e96b1bdc46dda5b853c
2021-08-11 11:27:58 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
e260e10c4a [InstSimplify] fold min/max with limit constant
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22

...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
2021-08-10 10:57:25 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
188832f419 Revert "[InstSimplify] fold min/max with limit constant; NFC"
This reverts commit f43859b437.
This is not NFC, so I'll try again without that mistake in the commit message.
2021-08-10 10:50:09 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
f43859b437 [InstSimplify] fold min/max with limit constant; NFC
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22

...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
2021-08-10 10:43:07 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
9b942a545c [InstSimplify] add tests for min/max idioms; NFC 2021-08-10 10:43:07 -04:00
David Sherwood
8439415333 [IR] Let ConstantVector::getSplat use poison instead of undef
This patch updates ConstantVector::getSplat to use poison instead
of undef when using insertelement/shufflevector to splat.

This follows on from D93793.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107751
2021-08-10 08:27:43 +01:00
Serge Pavlov
4c4093e6e3 Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:

    Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
    library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
    clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
    There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.

    * The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
      instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
      and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
      point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
      function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
      signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
      property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
      mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
      particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.

    * Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
      It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
      allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
      It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
      targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.

    * Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
      hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
      specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
      generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.

    Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
    efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:

    * The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
      target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
      some optimizations.

    * IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
      of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.

    Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
    use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
    specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
    optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
    'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
    returns 'false':

        std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())

    The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
    operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
    to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
    such function returns expected result instead of actually making
    checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
    often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
    by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
    assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
    and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
    operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
    which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
    '-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
    'tests'.

    To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
    function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
    and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
    does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
    selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
    vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
    resulting code satisfies requested semantics.

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
2021-08-06 14:32:27 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
0c28a7c990 Revert "Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan"
This reverts commit 16ff91ebcc.
Several errors were reported mainly test-suite execution time. Reverted
for investigation.
2021-08-04 17:18:15 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
16ff91ebcc Introduce intrinsic llvm.isnan
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.

* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
  instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
  and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
  point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
  function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
  signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
  property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
  mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
  particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.

* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
  It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
  allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
  It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
  targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.

* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
  hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
  specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
  generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.

Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:

* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
  target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
  some optimizations.

* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
  of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.

Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':

    std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())

The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.

To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
2021-08-04 15:27:49 +07:00
Sander de Smalen
84a4caeb84 [InstSimplify] Don't assume parent function when simplifying llvm.vscale.
D106850 introduced a simplification for llvm.vscale by looking at the
surrounding function's vscale_range attributes. The call that's being
simplified may not yet have been inserted into the IR. This happens for
example during function cloning.

This patch fixes the issue by checking if the instruction is in a
parent basic block.
2021-07-29 20:08:08 +01:00
Jun Ma
e2fe26e77b [NFC][InstSimplify] Use more intuitive variable names. 2021-07-29 13:55:47 +08:00
Jun Ma
ca0fe3447f [InstSimplify] Simplify llvm.vscale when vscale_range attribute exists
Reduce llvm.vscale to constant based on vscale_range attribute.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106850
2021-07-28 21:41:52 +08:00
Kevin P. Neal
2a7ee6b5c1 [FPEnv][InstSimplify] Enable more folds for constrained fadd
Precommit tests, try 2. My tree is up-to-date as of this morning so this
should go better than my first try.
2021-07-26 14:06:21 -04:00
Kevin P. Neal
aee8457b8d Revert "[FPEnv][InstSimplify] Enable more folds for constrained fadd"
Build bots have started failing.

This reverts commit 64c2b2c69d.
2021-07-23 15:09:05 -04:00
Kevin P. Neal
64c2b2c69d [FPEnv][InstSimplify] Enable more folds for constrained fadd
Precommit tests.
2021-07-23 14:59:38 -04:00
Serge Pavlov
1c64b5dc5e [ConstantFolding] Fold constrained arithmetic intrinsics
Constfold constrained variants of operations fadd, fsub, fmul, fdiv,
frem, fma and fmuladd.

The change also sets up some means to support for removal of unused
constrained intrinsics. They are declared as accessing memory to model
interaction with floating point environment, so they were not removed,
as they have side effect. Now constrained intrinsics that have
"fpexcept.ignore" as exception behavior are removed if they have no uses.
As for intrinsics that have exception behavior other than "fpexcept.ignore",
they can be removed if it is known that they do not raise floating point
exceptions. It happens when doing constant folding, attributes of such
intrinsic are changed so that the intrinsic is not claimed as accessing
memory.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102673
2021-07-23 14:39:51 +07:00
Sanjay Patel
13302c06cd [ConstantFolding] avoid crashing on a fake math library call
https://llvm.org/PR50960
2021-07-20 18:25:21 -04:00
Serge Pavlov
a0b4f424f5 Use update_test_checks.py to auto-generate check lines 2021-07-16 18:20:08 +07:00
Serge Pavlov
39a36999f9 Fix typo in test 2021-07-16 12:43:57 +07:00
Kevin P. Neal
52900486a1 [FPEnv][InstSimplify] Constrained FP support for NaN
Currently InstructionSimplify.cpp knows how to simplify floating point
instructions that have a NaN operand. It does not know how to handle the
matching constrained FP intrinsic.

This patch teaches it how to simplify so long as the exception handling
is not "fpexcept.strict".

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103169
2021-07-09 11:26:28 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
4ec7c02197 [InstSimplify] fix bug in poison propagation for FP ops
If any operand of a math op is poison, that takes
precedence over general undef/NaN.

This should not be visible with binary ops because
it requires 2 constant operands to trigger (and if
both operands of a binop are constant, that should
get handled first in ConstantFolding).
2021-07-06 14:06:50 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
35e8cc4979 [InstSimplify][test] add tests for poison propagation through FP calls; NFC 2021-07-06 14:06:50 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3d3c0ed932 [InstSimplify] fold extractelement of splat with variable extract index
We already have a fold for variable index with constant vector,
but if we can determine a scalar splat value, then it does not
matter whether that value is constant or not.

We overlooked this fold in D102404 and earlier patches,
but the fixed vector variant is shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50817

Alive2 agrees on that:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/HpijPC

The same logic applies to scalable vectors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104867
2021-07-05 08:19:40 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3ba090e5f6 [InstSimplify][test] add test for extract of splat; NFC
This is shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50817
2021-06-24 13:13:35 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
e13c62a103 [InstSimplify][test] move tests that don't require InstCombine; NFC
These are existing/missing simplifications, so the tests
don't need the full power of InstCombine.
2021-06-24 13:13:34 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
656001e7b2 [ValueTracking] look through bitcast of vector in computeKnownBits
This borrows as much as possible from the SDAG version of the code
(originally added with D27129 and since updated with big endian support).

In IR, we can test more easily for correctness than we did in the
original patch. I'm using the simplest cases that I could find for
InstSimplify: we computeKnownBits on variable shift amounts to see if
they are zero or in range. So shuffle constant elements into a vector,
cast it, and shift it.

The motivating x86 example from https://llvm.org/PR50123 is also here.
We computeKnownBits in the caller code, but we only check if the shift
amount is in range. That could be enhanced to catch the 2nd x86 test -
if the shift amount is known too big, the result is 0.

Alive2 understands the datalayout and agrees that the tests here are
correct - example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KZJFMZ

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104472
2021-06-23 11:46:46 -04:00
Juneyoung Lee
5af8bacc94 [InstSimplify] Add more poison folding optimizations
This adds more poison folding optimizations to InstSimplify.

Since all binary operators propagate poison, these are fine.

Also, the precondition of `select cond, undef, x` -> `x` is relaxed to allow the case when `x` is undef.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104661
2021-06-23 20:25:24 +09:00
Juneyoung Lee
09e8c0d5aa [InstSimplify] icmp poison, X -> poison
This adds a simple transformation from icmp with poison constant to poison.
Comparing poison with something else is poison, so this is okay.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/e8iReb
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/q4MurY
2021-06-20 15:39:07 +09:00
Sanjay Patel
61196f855c [InstSimplify] add tests for computeKnownBits of shift-with-bitcast op; NFC 2021-06-17 12:39:16 -04:00
Kevin P. Neal
60a8edf30d [FPEnv][InstSimplify] Precommit tests for D103169.
In D103169 I'm adding to InstSimplify support for NaN to constrained
intrinsics that have a regular FP IR instruction counterpart. Precommit
the tests for clarity when that ticket lands.
2021-06-17 10:34:39 -04:00
Bjorn Pettersson
4c7f820b2b Update @llvm.powi to handle different int sizes for the exponent
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.

The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.

One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
2021-06-17 09:38:28 +02:00
Sanjay Patel
ce95200b79 [InstSimplify] propagate poison through FP ops
We already have this fold:
  fadd float poison, 1.0 --> poison
...via ConstantFolding, so this makes the behavior consistent
if the other operand(s) are non-constant.

The fold for undef was added before poison existed as a
value/type in IR.

This came up in D102673 / D103169
because we're trying to sort out the more complicated handling
for constrained math ops.
We should have the handling for the regular instructions done
first, so we can build on that (or diverge as needed).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104383
2021-06-16 11:31:58 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks
9aa1428174 [InstSimplify] Treat invariant group insts as bitcasts for load operands
We can look through invariant group intrinsics for the purposes of
simplifying the result of a load.

Since intrinsics can't be constants, but we also don't want to
completely rewrite load constant folding, we convert the load operand to
a constant. For GEPs and bitcasts we just treat them as constants. For
invariant group intrinsics, we treat them as a bitcast.

Relanding with a check for self-referential values.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101103
2021-06-15 12:59:43 -07:00
Caroline Concatto
3c1f0e9ef8 [InstSimplify] Add constant fold for extractelement + splat for scalable vectors
This patch allows that scalable vector can fold extractelement and constant splat
only when the lane index is lower than the minimum number of elements of the vector.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103180
2021-06-10 12:41:40 +01:00
Serge Pavlov
8ff36aab69 [ConstantFolding] Enable folding of min/max/copysign for all floats
Previously such folding was enabled for half, float and double values
only. With this change it is allowed for other floating point values
also.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103956
2021-06-10 11:57:51 +07:00
Arthur Eubanks
222cce3828 Revert "[InstSimplify] Treat invariant group insts as bitcasts for load operands"
This reverts commit 26044c6a54.

Breaks on invalid IR (see D101103).
2021-06-09 11:46:10 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
8a4d05ddb3 [ConstantFolding] add copysign tests for more FP types; NFC
D102673 proposes to ease the current type check, but
there doesn't appear to be any test coverage for that.
2021-06-04 11:42:53 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks
26044c6a54 [InstSimplify] Treat invariant group insts as bitcasts for load operands
We can look through invariant group intrinsics for the purposes of
simplifying the result of a load.

Since intrinsics can't be constants, but we also don't want to
completely rewrite load constant folding, we convert the load operand to
a constant. For GEPs and bitcasts we just treat them as constants. For
invariant group intrinsics, we treat them as a bitcast.

Reviewed By: lebedev.ri

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101103
2021-06-01 16:33:06 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
3aa943070c [test] Precommit test for D101103 2021-06-01 16:31:02 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
8086f9d87e [ConstFold] Simplify a load's GEP operand through local aliases
MSVC-style RTTI produces loads through a GEP of a local alias which
itself is a GEP. Currently we aren't able to devirtualize any virtual
calls when MSVC RTTI is enabled.

This patch attempts to simplify a load's GEP operand by calling
SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP() with an option to look through local aliases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101100
2021-05-27 16:04:19 -07:00
Sanjay Patel
ca7eaa0a54 [InstSimplify] allow undef element match in vector select condition value
The semantics of select with undefined/poison condition
are not explicitly stated in the LangRef, but this matches
comments in the code and Alive2 appears to concur:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/KXytmd

We can find this pattern after demanded elements transforms.

As noted in D101191, fuzzers are finding infinite loops because
we may not account for this pattern in other passes.
2021-05-25 14:25:34 -04:00
David Goldblatt
8607a02357 [InstSimplify] Transform X * Y % Y --> 0
simplifyDiv already handles the case X * Y / Y --> X (barring overflow).
This adds the equivalent handling to simplifyRem.

Correctness:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/J2cUbS
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/us9NUM
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/AvaDGJ
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/kq9ige

Extending the situations in which we apply this transform would not be
correct:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Lf9V63
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/6RPQK3
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/p9UdxC
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/A2zlhE
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/vHTtLw
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/lvpH42

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102864
2021-05-25 10:16:04 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
a0e71f1832 [ConstProp] propagate poison from vector reduction element(s) to result
This follows from the underlying logic for binops and min/max.
Although it does not appear that we handle this for min/max
intrinsics currently.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Kq9Xnh
2021-05-24 10:34:40 -04:00
Sanjay Patel
3dd2063671 [ConstProp] add tests for vector reductions with poison elements; NFC 2021-05-24 10:34:40 -04:00