Reworked reordering algorithm. Originally, the compiler just tried to
detect the most common order in the reordarable nodes (loads, stores,
extractelements,extractvalues) and then fully rebuilding the graph in
the best order. This was not effecient, since it required an extra
memory and time for building/rebuilding tree, double the use of the
scheduling budget, which could lead to missing vectorization due to
exausted scheduling resources.
Patch provide 2-way approach for graph reodering problem. At first, all
reordering is done in-place, it doe not required tree
deleting/rebuilding, it just rotates the scalars/orders/reuses masks in
the graph node.
The first step (top-to bottom) rotates the whole graph, similarly to the previous
implementation. Compiler counts the number of the most used orders of
the graph nodes with the same vectorization factor and then rotates the
subgraph with the given vectorization factor to the most used order, if
it is not empty. Then repeats the same procedure for the subgraphs with
the smaller vectorization factor. We can do this because we still need
to reshuffle smaller subgraph when buildiong operands for the graph
nodes with lasrger vectorization factor, we can rotate just subgraph,
not the whole graph.
The second step (bottom-to-top) scans through the leaves and tries to
detect the users of the leaves which can be reordered. If the leaves can
be reorder in the best fashion, they are reordered and their user too.
It allows to remove double shuffles to the same ordering of the operands in
many cases and just reorder the user operations instead. Plus, it moves
the final shuffles closer to the top of the graph and in many cases
allows to remove extra shuffle because the same procedure is repeated
again and we can again merge some reordering masks and reorder user nodes
instead of the operands.
Also, patch improves cost model for gathering of loads, which improves
x264 benchmark in some cases.
Gives about +2% on AVX512 + LTO (more expected for AVX/AVX2) for {625,525}x264,
+3% for 508.namd, improves most of other benchmarks.
The compile and link time are almost the same, though in some cases it
should be better (we're not doing an extra instruction scheduling
anymore) + we may vectorize more code for the large basic blocks again
because of saving scheduling budget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105020
Reworked reordering algorithm. Originally, the compiler just tried to
detect the most common order in the reordarable nodes (loads, stores,
extractelements,extractvalues) and then fully rebuilding the graph in
the best order. This was not effecient, since it required an extra
memory and time for building/rebuilding tree, double the use of the
scheduling budget, which could lead to missing vectorization due to
exausted scheduling resources.
Patch provide 2-way approach for graph reodering problem. At first, all
reordering is done in-place, it doe not required tree
deleting/rebuilding, it just rotates the scalars/orders/reuses masks in
the graph node.
The first step (top-to bottom) rotates the whole graph, similarly to the previous
implementation. Compiler counts the number of the most used orders of
the graph nodes with the same vectorization factor and then rotates the
subgraph with the given vectorization factor to the most used order, if
it is not empty. Then repeats the same procedure for the subgraphs with
the smaller vectorization factor. We can do this because we still need
to reshuffle smaller subgraph when buildiong operands for the graph
nodes with lasrger vectorization factor, we can rotate just subgraph,
not the whole graph.
The second step (bottom-to-top) scans through the leaves and tries to
detect the users of the leaves which can be reordered. If the leaves can
be reorder in the best fashion, they are reordered and their user too.
It allows to remove double shuffles to the same ordering of the operands in
many cases and just reorder the user operations instead. Plus, it moves
the final shuffles closer to the top of the graph and in many cases
allows to remove extra shuffle because the same procedure is repeated
again and we can again merge some reordering masks and reorder user nodes
instead of the operands.
Also, patch improves cost model for gathering of loads, which improves
x264 benchmark in some cases.
Gives about +2% on AVX512 + LTO (more expected for AVX/AVX2) for {625,525}x264,
+3% for 508.namd, improves most of other benchmarks.
The compile and link time are almost the same, though in some cases it
should be better (we're not doing an extra instruction scheduling
anymore) + we may vectorize more code for the large basic blocks again
because of saving scheduling budget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105020
If the vectorized insertelements instructions form indentity subvector
(the subvector at the beginning of the long vector), it is just enough
to extend the vector itself, no need to generate inserting subvector
shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107494
If the vectorized insertelements instructions form indentity subvector
(the subvector at the beginning of the long vector), it is just enough
to extend the vector itself, no need to generate inserting subvector
shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107344
Replace insertelement instructions for splats with just single
insertelement + broadcast shuffle. Also, try to merge these instructions
if they come from the same/shuffled gather node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107104
For the nodes with reused scalars the user may be not only of the size
of the final shuffle but also of the size of the scalars themselves,
need to check for this. It is safe to just modify the check here, since
the order of the scalars themselves is preserved, only indeces of the
reused scalars are changed. So, the users with the same size as the
number of scalars in the node, will not be affected, they still will get
the operands in the required order.
Reported by @mstorsjo in D105020.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107080
If the instruction was previously deleted, it should not be treated as
an external user. This fixes cost estimation and removes dead
extractelement instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107106
Need to check that the minimum acceptable vector factor is at least 2,
not 0, to avoid compiler crash during gathered loads analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107058
Reworked reordering algorithm. Originally, the compiler just tried to
detect the most common order in the reordarable nodes (loads, stores,
extractelements,extractvalues) and then fully rebuilding the graph in
the best order. This was not effecient, since it required an extra
memory and time for building/rebuilding tree, double the use of the
scheduling budget, which could lead to missing vectorization due to
exausted scheduling resources.
Patch provide 2-way approach for graph reodering problem. At first, all
reordering is done in-place, it doe not required tree
deleting/rebuilding, it just rotates the scalars/orders/reuses masks in
the graph node.
The first step (top-to bottom) rotates the whole graph, similarly to the previous
implementation. Compiler counts the number of the most used orders of
the graph nodes with the same vectorization factor and then rotates the
subgraph with the given vectorization factor to the most used order, if
it is not empty. Then repeats the same procedure for the subgraphs with
the smaller vectorization factor. We can do this because we still need
to reshuffle smaller subgraph when buildiong operands for the graph
nodes with lasrger vectorization factor, we can rotate just subgraph,
not the whole graph.
The second step (bottom-to-top) scans through the leaves and tries to
detect the users of the leaves which can be reordered. If the leaves can
be reorder in the best fashion, they are reordered and their user too.
It allows to remove double shuffles to the same ordering of the operands in
many cases and just reorder the user operations instead. Plus, it moves
the final shuffles closer to the top of the graph and in many cases
allows to remove extra shuffle because the same procedure is repeated
again and we can again merge some reordering masks and reorder user nodes
instead of the operands.
Also, patch improves cost model for gathering of loads, which improves
x264 benchmark in some cases.
Gives about +2% on AVX512 + LTO (more expected for AVX/AVX2) for {625,525}x264,
+3% for 508.namd, improves most of other benchmarks.
The compile and link time are almost the same, though in some cases it
should be better (we're not doing an extra instruction scheduling
anymore) + we may vectorize more code for the large basic blocks again
because of saving scheduling budget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105020
This changes the cost to (LT.first-1) * cost(add) + 2, where the cost of
an add is assumed to be 1. This brings it inline with the other
reductions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106240
The cost of the InsertSubvector shuffle kind cost is not complete and
may end up with just extracts + inserts costs in many cases. Added
a workaround to represent it as a generic PermuteSingleSrc, which is
still pessimistic but better than InsertSubvector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105827
The cost of the InsertSubvector shuffle kind cost is not complete and
may end up with just extracts + inserts costs in many cases. Added
a workaround to represent it as a generic PermuteSingleSrc, which is
still pessimistic but better than InsertSubvector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105827
The function vectorizeChainsInBlock does not support scalable vector,
because function like canReuseExtract and isCommutative in the code
path assert with scalable vectors.
This patch avoids vectorizing blocks that have extract instructions with scalable
vector..
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104809
Loads of <4 x i8> vectors were modeled as extremely expensive. And while we
don't have a load instruction that supports this, it isn't that expensive to
create a vector of i8 elements. The codegen for this was fixed/optimised in
D105110. This now tweaks the cost model and enables SLP vectorisation of my
motivating case loadi8.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103629
The compiler should not ignore UndefValue when gathering the scalars,
otherwise the resulting code may be less defined than the original one.
Also, grouped scalars to insert them at first to reduce the analysis in
further passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105275
OR, XOR and AND entries are added to the cost table. An extra cost
is added when vector splitting occurs.
This is done to address the issue of a missed SLP vectorization
opportunity due to unreasonably high costs being attributed to the vector
Or reduction (see: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44593).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104538
1. Better sorting of scalars to be gathered. Trying to insert
constants/arguments/instructions-out-of-loop at first and only then
the instructions which are inside the loop. It improves hoisting of
invariant insertelements instructions.
2. Better detection of shuffle candidates in gathering function.
3. The cost of insertelement for constants is 0.
Part of D57059.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103458
No need to recalculate the cost of extractelements, just no need to
compensate the cost of all extractelements, need to check before if this
is actually going to be removed at the vectorization. Also, no need to
generate new extractelement instruction, we may just regenerate the
original one. It may improve the final vectorization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102933
tryToVectorizeList function allows to reorder only 2 scalars. Patch
allows to reorder >2 scalars. Also, to avoid possible regressions, it
allows extra vectorization of the remaining parts of the scalars
elements if possible.
Part of D57059.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103247
This is a patch that replaces shufflevector and insertelement's placeholder value with poison.
Underlying motivation is to fix the semantics of shufflevector with undef mask to return poison instead
(D93818)
The consensus has been made in the late 2020 via mailing list as well as the thread in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44185 .
This patch is a simple syntactic change to the existing code, hence directly pushed as a commit.
If we gather extract elements and they actually are just shuffles, it
might be profitable to vectorize them even if the tree is tiny.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101460
Add new type of tree node for `InsertElementInst` chain forming vector.
These instructions could be either removed, or replaced by shuffles during
vectorization and we can add this node to cost model, so naturally estimating
their cost, getting rid of `CompensateCost` tricks and reducing further work
for InstCombine. This fixes PR40522 and PR35732 in a natural way. Also this
patch is the first step towards revectorization of partially vectorization
(to fix PR42022 completely). After adding inserts to tree the next step is
to add vector instructions there (for instance, to merge `store <2 x float>`
and `store <2 x float>` to `store <4 x float>`).
Fixes PR40522 and PR35732.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98714
The test example from https://llvm.org/PR50256 (and reduced here)
shows that we can match a load combine candidate even when there
are no "or" instructions. We can avoid that by confirming that we
do see an "or". This doesn't apply when matching an or-reduction
because that match begins from the operands of the reduction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102074
Need to remove the old code for avoiding double counting of the gather
nodes with perfect diamond matches within the tree after we started
detecting perfect/shuffled matching in the previous patch D100495. We
may skip the cost for such nodes completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102023
1. No need to call `areAllUsersVectorized` as later the cost is
calculated only if the instruction has one use and gets vectorized.
2. Need to calculate the cost of the dead extractelement more precisely,
taking the vector type of the vector operand, not the resulting
vector type.
Part of D57059.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99980
SLP supports perfect diamond matching for the vectorized tree entries
but do not support it for gathered entries and does not support
non-perfect (shuffled) matching with 1 or 2 tree entries. Patch adds
support for this matching to improve cost of the vectorized tree.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100495
SLP supports perfect diamond matching for the vectorized tree entries
but do not support it for gathered entries and does not support
non-perfect (shuffled) matching with 1 or 2 tree entries. Patch adds
support for this matching to improve cost of the vectorized tree.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100495
SLP supports perfect diamond matching for the vectorized tree entries
but do not support it for gathered entries and does not support
non-perfect (shuffled) matching with 1 or 2 tree entries. Patch adds
support for this matching to improve cost of the vectorized tree.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100495
SLP supports perfect diamond matching for the vectorized tree entries
but do not support it for gathered entries and does not support
non-perfect (shuffled) matching with 1 or 2 tree entries. Patch adds
support for this matching to improve cost of the vectorized tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100495
After D98856 these tests will by default break (fatal_error) if any of
the wrong interfaces are used, so there's no longer a need to have a
RUN line that checks for a warning message emitted by the compiler.
The motivation for this patch is to better estimate the cost of
extracelement instructions in cases were they are going to be free,
because the source vector can be used directly.
A simple example is
%v1.lane.0 = extractelement <2 x double> %v.1, i32 0
%v1.lane.1 = extractelement <2 x double> %v.1, i32 1
%a.lane.0 = fmul double %v1.lane.0, %x
%a.lane.1 = fmul double %v1.lane.1, %y
Currently we only consider the extracts free, if there are no other
users.
In this particular case, on AArch64 which can fit <2 x double> in a
vector register, the extracts should be free, independently of other
users, because the source vector of the extracts will be in a vector
register directly, so it should be free to use the vector directly.
The SLP vectorized version of noop_extracts_9_lanes is 30%-50% faster on
certain AArch64 CPUs.
It looks like this does not impact any code in
SPEC2000/SPEC2006/MultiSource both on X86 and AArch64 with -O3 -flto.
This originally regressed after D80773, so if there's a better
alternative to explore, I'd be more than happy to do that.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99719
1. Need to cleanup InstrElementSize map for each new tree, otherwise might
use sizes from the previous run of the vectorization attempt.
2. No need to include into analysis the instructions from the different basic
blocks to save compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99677
