The sparse index order must always be satisfied, but this
may give a choice in topsorts for several cases. We broke
ties in favor of any dense index order, since this gives
good locality. However, breaking ties in favor of pushing
unrelated indices into sparse iteration spaces gives better
asymptotic complexity. This revision improves the heuristic.
Note that in the long run, we are really interested in using
ML for ML to find the best loop ordering as a replacement for
such heuristics.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109100
Currently the builtin dialect is the default namespace used for parsing
and printing. As such module and func don't need to be prefixed.
In the case of some dialects that defines new regions for their own
purpose (like SpirV modules for example), it can be beneficial to
change the default dialect in order to improve readability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107236
Rationale:
Passing in a pointer to the memref data in order to implement the
dense to sparse conversion was a bit too low-level. This revision
improves upon that approach with a cleaner solution of generating
a loop nest in MLIR code itself that prepares the COO object before
passing it to our "swiss army knife" setup. This is much more
intuitive *and* now also allows for dynamic shapes.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108491
Folding in the MLIR uses the order of the type directly
but folding in the underlying implementation must take
the dim ordering into account. These tests clarify that
behavior and verify it is done right.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108474
Apply the "for loop peeling" pattern from SCF dialect transforms. This pattern splits scf.for loops into full and partial iterations. In the full iteration, all masked loads/stores are canonicalized to unmasked loads/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107733
This shares more code with existing utilities. Also, to be consistent,
we moved dimension permutation on the DimOp to the tensor lowering phase.
This way, both pre-existing DimOps on sparse tensors (not likely but
possible) as well as compiler generated DimOps are handled consistently.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108309
Implements lowering dense to sparse conversion, for static tensor types only.
First step towards general sparse_tensor.convert support.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107681
Introduces a conversion from one (sparse) tensor type to another
(sparse) tensor type. See the operation doc for details. Actual
codegen for all cases is still TBD.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107205
The order of testing in two sparse tensor ops was incorrect,
which could cause an invalid cast (crashing the compiler instead
of reporting the error). This revision fixes that bug.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106841
Arbitrary shifts have some complications, but shift by invariants
(viz. tensor index exp only at left hand side) can be easily
handled with the conjunctive rule.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106002
Adds zero-preserving unary operators from std. Also adds xor.
Performs minor refactoring to remove "zero" node, and pushed
the irregular logic for negi (not support in std) into one place.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105928
Integral AND and OR follow the simple conjunction and disjuction rules
for lattice building. This revision also completes some of the Merge
refactoring by moving the remainder parts that are merger specific from
sparsification into utils files.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105851
Right now, we only accept x/c with nonzero c, since this
conceptually can be treated as a x*(1/c) conjunction for both
FP and INT as far as lattice computations go. The codegen
keeps the division though to preserve precise semantics.
See discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/sparse-tensors-in-mlir/3389/28
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105731
This revision extends the sparse compiler support from fp/int addition and multiplication to fp/int negation and subtraction, thereby increasing the scope of sparse kernels that can be compiled.
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105306
* Split memref.dim into two operations: memref.dim and tensor.dim. Both ops have the same builder interface and op argument names, so that they can be used with templates in patterns that apply to both tensors and memrefs (e.g., some patterns in Linalg).
* Add constant materializer to TensorDialect (needed for folding in affine.apply etc.).
* Remove some MemRefDialect dependencies, make some explicit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105165
Slowly we are moving toward full support of sparse tensor *outputs*. First
step was support for all-dense annotated "sparse" tensors. This step adds
support for truly sparse tensors, but only for operations in which the values
of a tensor change, but not the nonzero structure (this was refered to as
"simply dynamic" in the [Bik96] thesis).
Some background text was posted on discourse:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/sparse-tensors-in-mlir/3389/25
Reviewed By: gussmith23
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104577
We have several ways of introducing a scalar invariant value into
linalg generic ops (should we limit this somewhat?). This revision
makes sure we handle all of them correctly in the sparse compiler.
Reviewed By: gysit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104335
This is a very careful start with alllowing sparse tensors at the
left-hand-side of tensor index expressions (viz. sparse output).
Note that there is a subtle difference between non-annotated tensors
(dense, remain n-dim, handled by classic bufferization) and all-dense
annotated "sparse" tensors (linearized to 1-dim without overhead
storage, bufferized by sparse compiler, backed by runtime support library).
This revision gently introduces some new IR to facilitate annotated outputs,
to be generalized to truly sparse tensors in the future.
Reviewed By: gussmith23, bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104074
Controlled by a compiler option, if 32-bit indices can be handled
with zero/sign-extention alike (viz. no worries on non-negative
indices), scatter/gather operations can use the more efficient
32-bit SIMD version.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103632
This revision completes the "dimension ordering" feature
of sparse tensor types that enables the programmer to
define a preferred order on dimension access (other than
the default left-to-right order). This enables e.g. selection
of column-major over row-major storage for sparse matrices,
but generalized to any rank, as in:
dimOrdering = affine_map<(i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p) -> (p,o,j,k,i,l,m,n)>
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102856
Skip the sparsification pass for Linalg ops without annotated tensors
(or cases that are not properly handled yet).
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102787
The experimental flag for "inplace" bufferization in the sparse
compiler can be replaced with the new inplace attribute. This gives
a uniform way of expressing the more efficient way of bufferization.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102538
We are moving from just dense/compressed to more general dim level
types, so we need more than just an "i1" array for annotations.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102520
A very elaborate, but also very fun revision because all
puzzle pieces are finally "falling in place".
1. replaces lingalg annotations + flags with proper sparse tensor types
2. add rigorous verification on sparse tensor type and sparse primitives
3. removes glue and clutter on opaque pointers in favor of sparse tensor types
4. migrates all tests to use sparse tensor types
NOTE: next CL will remove *all* obsoleted sparse code in Linalg
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102095
This revision migrates more code from Linalg into the new permanent home of
SparseTensor. It replaces the test passes with proper compiler passes.
NOTE: the actual removal of the last glue and clutter in Linalg will follow
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101811
(1) migrates the encoding from TensorDialect into the new SparseTensorDialect
(2) replaces dictionary-based storage and builders with struct-like data
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101669
This is the very first step toward removing the glue and clutter from linalg and
replace it with proper sparse tensor types. This revision migrates the LinalgSparseOps
into SparseTensorOps of a sparse tensor dialect. This also provides a new home for
sparse tensor related transformation.
NOTE: the actual replacement with sparse tensor types (and removal of linalg glue/clutter)
will follow but I am trying to keep the amount of changes per revision manageable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101573
This is the very first step toward removing the glue and clutter from linalg and
replace it with proper sparse tensor types. This revision migrates the LinalgSparseOps
into SparseTensorOps of a sparse tensor dialect. This also provides a new home for
sparse tensor related transformation.
NOTE: the actual replacement with sparse tensor types (and removal of linalg glue/clutter)
will follow but I am trying to keep the amount of changes per revision manageable.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101488
