If an object file has an undefined foo@v1, we emit a dynamic symbol foo.
This is incorrect if at runtime a shared object provides the non-default version foo@v1
(the undefined foo may bind to foo@@v2, for example).
GNU ld issues an error for this case, even if foo@v1 is undefined weak
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3351). This behavior makes
sense because to represent an undefined foo@v1, we have to construct a Verneed
entry. However, without knowing the defining filename, we cannot construct a
Verneed entry (Verneed::vn_file is unavailable).
This patch implements the error.
Depends on D92258
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92260
With this change, `TargetInfo::adjustRelaxExpr` is only related to TLS
relaxations and a subsequent clean-up can delete the `data` parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92079
This partially reverts D85994.
In glibc, elf/dl-sym.c calls the raw `__tls_get_addr` by specifying the
tls_index parameter. Such a call does not have a pairing R_PPC64_TLSGD/R_PPC64_TLSLD.
This is legitimate. Since we cannot distinguish the benign case from cases due
to toolchain issues, we have to be permissive.
Acked by Stefan Pintilie
Add support to LLD for PC Relative Thread Local Storage for Local Dynamic.
This patch adds support for two relocations: R_PPC64_GOT_TLSLD_PCREL34 and
R_PPC64_DTPREL34.
The Local Dynamic code is:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsld@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSLD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsld) R_PPC64_TLSLD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
...
paddi r9, r3, x@dtprel R_PPC64_DTPREL34
```
After relaxation to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, 0x1000
nop
...
paddi r9, r3, x@dtprel R_PPC64_DTPREL34
```
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87504
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
`ELFFile<ELFT>` has many methods that take pointers,
though they assume that arguments are never null and
hence could take references instead.
This patch performs such clean-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87385
Prefer `errorOrWarn` to `fatal` for recoverable errors and graceful degradation
when --noinhibit-exec is specified.
Mention the destination symbol, otherwise the diagnostic is not really actionable.
Two errors are not tested but the patch does not intend to add the coverage.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87486
The function `__tls_get_addr` is used to get the address of an object that is Thread Local Storage.
It needs to have two relocations on it.
One relocation is for the function call itself and it is either R_PPC64_REL24 or R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC.
The other is R_PPC64_TLSGD or R_PPC64_TLSLD for the symbol that is having its address computed.
In the early days of the transition from the ELFv1 ABI that is used for big endian PowerPC Linux distributions to the ELFv2 ABI that is used for little endian PowerPC Linux distributions, there was some ambiguity in the specification of the relocations for TLS. The GNU linker has implemented support for correct handling of calls to __tls_get_addr with a missing relocation. Unfortunately, we didn't notice that the IBM XL compiler did not handle TLS according to the updated ABI until we tried linking XL compiled libraries with LLD. As a result, there is a lot of code out there in various libraries compiled with XL that have this problem.
This patch adds a new error check in LLD that makes sure calls to `__tls_get_addr` are not missing the TLSGD/TLSLD relocation.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85994
This patch implements the handling for the R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT relocation as well
as the GOT relocation for the associated R_PPC64_GOT_PCREL34 relocation.
On Power10 targets with PC-Relative addressing, the linker can relax
GOT-relative accesses to PC-Relative under some conditions. Since the sequence
consists of a prefixed load, followed by a non-prefixed access (load or store),
the linker needs to replace the first instruction (as the replacement
instruction will be prefixed). The compiler communicates to the linker that
this optimization is safe by placing the two aforementioned relocations on the
GOT load (of the address).
The linker then does two things:
- Convert the load from the got into a PC-Relative add to compute the address
relative to the PC
- Find the instruction referred to by the second relocation (R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT)
and replace the first with the PC-Relative version of it
It is important to synchronize the mapping from legacy memory instructions to
their PC-Relative form. Hence, this patch adds a file to be included by both
the compiler and the linker so they're always in agreement.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84360
In the absence of TLS relaxation (rewrite of code sequences),
there is still an applicable optimization:
[gd]: General Dynamic: resolve DTPMOD to 1 and/or resolve DTPOFF statically
All the other relaxations are only performed when transiting to
executable (`!config->shared`).
Since [gd] is handled differently, we can fold `!config->shared` into canRelax
and simplify its use sites. Rename the variable to reflect to new semantics.
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83243
Follow-up to D82899. Note, we need to disable R_DTPREL relaxation
because ARM psABI does not define TLS relaxation.
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83138
The current implementation assumes that R_PPC64_TOC16_HA is always followed
by R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS. This can break with R_PPC64_TOC16_LO:
// Load the address of the TOC entry, instead of the value stored at that address
addis 3, 2, .LC0@tloc@ha # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
addi 3, 3, .LC0@tloc@l # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO
blr
which is used by boringssl's util/fipstools/delocate/delocate.go
https://github.com/google/boringssl/blob/master/crypto/fipsmodule/FIPS.md has some documentation.
In short, this tool converts an assembly file to avoid any potential relocations.
The distance to an input .toc is not a constant after linking, so it cannot use an `addis;ld` pair.
Instead, it jumps to a stub which loads the TOC entry address with `addis;addi`.
This patch checks the presence of R_PPC64_TOC16_LO and suppresses
toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation if R_PPC64_TOC16_LO is seen.
This approach is conservative and loses some relaxation opportunities but is easy to implement.
addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # no relaxation
addi 3, 3, .LC0@toc@l # no relaxation
li 9, 0
addis 4, 2, .LC0@toc@ha # can relax but suppressed
ld 4, .LC0@toc@l(4) # can relax but suppressed
Also note that interleaved R_PPC64_TOC16_HA and R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS is
possible and this patch accounts for that.
addis 3, 2, .LC1@toc@ha # can relax
addis 4, 2, .LC2@toc@ha # can relax
ld 3, .LC1@toc@l(3) # can relax
ld 4, .LC2@toc@l(4) # can relax
Reviewed By: #powerpc, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78431
A PC-relative relocation referencing a non-preemptible absolute symbol
(due to STT_TLS) is not representable in -pie/-shared mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77021
In most cases, LLD prints its multiline diagnostic messages starting
additional lines with ">>> ". That greatly helps external tools to parse
the output, simplifying combining several lines of the log back into one
message. The patch fixes the only message I found that does not follow
the common pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77132
As of a while ago, lld groups all undefined references to a single
symbol in a single diagnostic. Back then, I made it so that we
print up to 10 references to each undefined symbol.
Having used this for a while, I never wished there were more
references, but I sometimes found that this can print a lot of
output. lld prints up to 10 diagnostics by default, and if
each has 10 references (which I've seen in practice), and each
undefined symbol produces 2 (possibly very long) lines of output,
that's over 200 lines of error output.
Let's try it with just 3 references for a while and see how
that feels in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77017
Hexagon ABI specifies that call x@gdplt is transformed to call __tls_get_addr.
Example:
call x@gdplt
is changed to
call __tls_get_addr
When x is an external tls variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74443
Similar to D63182 [ELF][PPC64] Don't report "relocation refers to a discarded section" for .toc
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75419
For an out-of-range relocation referencing a non-local symbol, report the symbol name and the object file that defines the symbol. As an example:
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]
```
=>
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]; references func
>>> defined in t1.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73518
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
* Generalize the code added in D70637 and D70937. We should eventually remove the EM_MIPS special case.
* Handle R_PPC_LOCAL24PC the same way as R_PPC_REL24.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73424
-fno-pie produces a pair of non-GOT-non-PLT relocations R_PPC_ADDR16_{HA,LO} (R_ABS) referencing external
functions.
```
lis 3, func@ha
la 3, func@l(3)
```
In a -no-pie/-pie link, if func is not defined in the executable, a canonical PLT entry (st_value>0, st_shndx=0) will be needed.
References to func in shared objects will be resolved to this address.
-fno-pie -pie should fail with "can't create dynamic relocation ... against ...", so we just need to think about -no-pie.
On x86, the PLT entry passes the JMP_SLOT offset to the rtld PLT resolver.
On x86-64: the PLT entry passes the JUMP_SLOT index to the rtld PLT resolver.
On ARM/AArch64: the PLT entry passes &.got.plt[n]. The PLT header passes &.got.plt[fixed-index]. The rtld PLT resolver can compute the JUMP_SLOT index from the two addresses.
For these targets, the canonical PLT entry can just reuse the regular PLT entry (in PltSection).
On PPC32: PltSection (.glink) consists of `b PLTresolve` instructions and `PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r11 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
On PPC64 ELFv2: PltSection (.glink) consists of `__glink_PLTresolve` and `bl __glink_PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r12 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
We cannot reuse a `b PLTresolve`/`bl __glink_PLTresolve` in PltSection as a canonical PLT entry. PPC64 ELFv2 avoids the problem by using TOC for any external reference, even in non-pic code, so the canonical PLT entry scenario should not happen in the first place.
For PPC32, we have to create a PLT call stub as the canonical PLT entry. The code sequence sets up r11.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73399
This essentially reverts b841e119d7.
Such code construct can be used in the following way:
// glibc/stdlib/exit.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld => succeeded
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fpie -pie => relocation R_PLT_PC cannot refer to absolute symbol
__attribute__((weak, visibility("hidden"))) extern void __call_tls_dtors();
void __run_exit_handlers() {
if (__call_tls_dtors)
__call_tls_dtors();
}
Since we allow R_PLT_PC in -no-pie mode, it makes sense to allow it in
-pie mode as well.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72943
In D71281 a fix was put in to round up the size of a ThunkSection to the
nearest 4KiB when performing errata patching. This fixed a problem with a
very large instrumented program that had thunks and patches mutually
trigger each other. Unfortunately it triggers an assertion failure in an
AArch64 allyesconfig build of the kernel. There is a specific assertion
preventing an InputSectionDescription being larger than 4KiB. This will
always trigger if there is at least one Thunk needed in that
InputSectionDescription, which is possible for an allyesconfig build.
Abstractly the problem case is:
.text : {
*(.text) ;
...
. = ALIGN(SZ_4K);
__idmap_text_start = .;
*(.idmap.text)
__idmap_text_end = .;
...
}
The assertion checks that __idmap_text_end - __idmap_start is < 4 KiB.
Note that there is more than one InputSectionDescription in the
OutputSection so we can't just restrict the fix to OutputSections smaller
than 4 KiB.
The fix presented here limits the D71281 to InputSectionDescriptions that
meet the following conditions:
1.) The OutputSection is bigger than the thunkSectionSpacing so adding
thunks will affect the addresses of following code.
2.) The InputSectionDescription is larger than 4 KiB. This will prevent
any assertion failures that an InputSectionDescription is < 4 KiB
in size.
We do this at ThunkSection creation time as at this point we know that
the addresses are stable and up to date prior to adding the thunks as
assignAddresses() will have been called immediately prior to thunk
generation.
The fix reverts the two tests affected by D71281 to their original state
as they no longer need the 4KiB size roundup. I've added simpler tests to
check for D71281 when the OutputSection size is larger than the ThunkSection
spacing.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/812
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72344
R_HINT is ignored like R_NONE. There are no strong reasons to keep
R_HINT. The largest RelExpr member R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is 60 now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71822
Weak undefined symbols are preemptible after D71794.
if (sym.isPreemptible)
return false;
if (!config->isPic)
return true;
// isPic means includeInDynsym is true after D71794.
...
// We can delete this if because it can never be true.
if (sym.isUndefWeak)
return true;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71795
```
lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp:1622:56: warning: loop variable 'ts' of type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' (aka 'const pair<lld::elf::ThunkSection *, unsigned int>') creates a copy from type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t> ts : isd->thunkSections)
```
Drop const qualifier to fix -Wrange-loop-analysis.
We can make -Wrange-loop-analysis warnings (DiagnoseForRangeConstVariableCopies) on `const A` more
permissive on more types (e.g. POD -> trivially copyable), unfortunately it will not make std::pair
good, because `constexpr pair& operator=(const pair& p);` is unfortunately user-defined.
Reviewed By: Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72211
For undef-not-suggest.test, we currently make redundant alternative
spelling suggestions:
```
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .text.foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x0)
>>> did you mean:
>>> defined in: a.o
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a symbol in a discarded section: foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x8)
>>> did you mean: for
>>> defined in: a.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71735
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
Fixes PPC64 part of PR40438
// clang -target ppc64le -c a.cc
// .text.unlikely may be placed in a separate output section (via -z keep-text-section-prefix)
// The distance between bar in .text.unlikely and foo in .text may be larger than 32MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.unlikely"))) static int bar() { foo(); return 0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for PPC64.
AArch64: .text -> `__AArch64ADRPThunk_ (adrp x16, ...; add x16, x16, ...; br x16)` -> target
PPC64: .text -> `__long_branch_ (addis 12, 2, ...; ld 12, ...(12); mtctr 12; bctr)` -> target
AArch64 can leverage ADRP to jump to the target directly, but PPC64
needs to load an address from .branch_lt . Before Power ISA v3.0, the
PC-relative ADDPCIS was not available. .branch_lt was invented to work
around the limitation.
Symbol::ppc64BranchltIndex is replaced by
PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::entry_index which take addends into
consideration.
The tests are rewritten: ppc64-long-branch.s tests -no-pie and
ppc64-long-branch-pi.s tests -pie and -shared.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70937
replaceWithDefined is used by canonical PLT and copy relocations, which
imply that the symbol is preemptable. ppc64BranchltIndex is only used by
non-preemptable cases, and it can only be the default value in
replaceWithDefined.
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
ThunkCreator::getThunk and ThunkCreator::normalizeExistingThunk
currently assume that the implicit addends are -8 for ARM and -4 for
Thumb. In D70637, ThunkCreator::getThunk will need to take care of the
relocation addend explicitly.
Add the utility function getPCBias() as a prerequisite so that the getThunk change in D70637
can be more general.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70690
D62381 introduced forEachSymbol(). It seems that many call sites cannot
be parallelized because the body shared some states. Replace
forEachSymbol with iterator_range<filter_iterator<...>> symbols() to
simplify code and improve debuggability (std::function calls take some
frames).
It also allows us to use early return to simplify code added in D69650.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70505
The definition may be mangled while an undefined reference is not.
This may come up when (1) the reference is from a C file or (2) the definition
misses an extern "C".
(2) is more common. Suggest an arbitrary mangled name that matches the
undefined reference, if such a definition exists.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: foo
>>> referenced by a.o:(.text+0x1)
>>> did you mean to declare foo(int) as extern "C"?
>>> defined in: a1.o
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69650
When missing an extern "C" declaration, an undefined reference may be
mangled while the definition is not. Suggest the missing
extern "C" and the base name.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69592
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
Fixes PR38748
mergeSections() calls getOutputSectionName() to get output section
names. Two MergeInputSections may be merged even if they are made
different by SECTIONS commands.
This patch moves mergeSections() after processSectionCommands() and
addOrphanSections() to fix the issue. The new pass is renamed to
OutputSection::finalizeInputSections().
processSectionCommands() and addorphanSections() are changed to add
sections to InputSectionDescription::sectionBases.
finalizeInputSections() merges MergeInputSections and migrates
`sectionBases` to `sections`.
For the -r case, we drop an optimization that tries keeping sh_entsize
non-zero. This is for the simplicity of addOrphanSections(). The
updated merge-entsize2.s reflects the change.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67504
llvm-svn: 372734
