Although we moved to Github Issues. The bug report message refers to
Bugzilla still. This patch tries to update these URLs.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, Quuxplusone, jhenderson, libunwind, libc++
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116351
This change adds an option AfterOverloadedOperator in SpaceBeforeParensOptions to add a space between overloaded operator and opening parentheses in clang-format.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116283
Along with the new language mode this commit contains misc
small updates for OpenCL 3 and GitHub issues for OpenCL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116271
This commit resolves GitHub issue #45895 (Bugzilla #46550), to
add or remove empty line between definition blocks including
namespaces, classes, structs, enums and functions.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116314
My team has a vendetta against lines ending with an open parenthesis, thought it might be useful for others too 😊
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116170
A 1% increase in the number of clang-formatted files.
An additional 235 files have been added to LLVM, and an additional
268 files are now clang-format clean. Raising the overall % to 52%
There are now 8407 files clean out of 15902 (ignoring lit tests)
This diff extends the -style=file option to allow a config file to be specified explicitly. This is useful (for instance) when adding IDE commands to reformat code to a personal style.
Usage: `clang-format -style=file:<path/to/config/file> ...`
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius, MyDeveloperDay, zwliew
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72326
Extends response file expansion to recognize `<CFGDIR>` and expand to the
current file's directory. This makes it much easier to author clang config
files rooted in portable, potentially not-installed SDK directories.
A typical use case may be something like the following:
```
# sample_sdk.cfg
--target=sample
-isystem <CFGDIR>/include
-L <CFGDIR>/lib
-T <CFGDIR>/ldscripts/link.ld
```
Reviewed By: sepavloff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115604
This patch adds a toolchain (TC) for SPIR-V along with the
following changes in Driver and base ToolChain and Tool.
This is required to provide a mechanism in clang to bypass
SPIR-V backend in LLVM for SPIR-V until it lands in LLVM and
matures.
The SPIR-V code is generated by the SPIRV-LLVM translator tool
named 'llvm-spirv' that is sought in 'PATH'.
The compilation phases/actions should be bound for SPIR-V in
the meantime as following:
compile -> tools::Clang
backend -> tools::SPIRV::Translator
assemble -> tools::SPIRV::Translator
However, Driver’s ToolSelector collapses compile-backend-assemble
and compile-backend sequences to tools::Clang. To prevent this,
added new {use,has}IntegratedBackend properties in ToolChain and
Tool to which the ToolSelector reacts on, and which SPIR-V TC
overrides.
Linking of multiple input files is currently not supported but
can be added separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112410
Co-authored-by: Henry Linjamäki <henry.linjamaki@parmance.com>
Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) replaces references to address-taken
functions with pointers to the CFI jump table. This is a problem
for low-level code, such as operating system kernels, which may
need the address of an actual function body without the jump table
indirection.
This change adds the __builtin_function_start() builtin, which
accepts an argument that can be constant-evaluated to a function,
and returns the address of the function body.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1353
Depends on D108478
Reviewed By: pcc, rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108479
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
This fixes the regex in ClangFormatStyleOptions for IncludeCategories
to match anything starting with < or starting with | AND followed by
(gtest|gmock|isl|json) then /.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115910
This error was found when analyzing MySQL with CTU enabled.
When there are space characters in the lookup name, the current
delimiter searching strategy will make the file path wrongly parsed.
And when two lookup names have the same prefix before their first space
characters, a 'multiple definitions' error will be wrongly reported.
e.g. The lookup names for the two lambda exprs in the test case are
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator int (*)(char)#1` and
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator bool (*)(char)#1` respectively. And their
prefixes are both `c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator` when using the first space
character as the delimiter.
Solving the problem by adding a length for the lookup name, making the
index items in the format of `USR-Length:USR File-Path`.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102669
After removing the range type, Linalg does not define any type. The revision thus consolidates the LinalgOps.h and LinalgTypes.h into a single Linalg.h header. Additionally, LinalgTypes.cpp is renamed to LinalgDialect.cpp to follow the convention adopted by other dialects such as the tensor dialect.
Depends On D115727
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115728
In 2015-05, GCC added the configure option `--enable-default-pie`. When enabled,
* in the absence of -fno-pic/-fpie/-fpic (and their upper-case variants), -fPIE is the default.
* in the absence of -no-pie/-pie/-shared/-static/-static-pie, -pie is the default.
This has been adopted by all(?) major distros.
I think default PIE is the majority in the Linux world, but
--disable-default-pie users is not that uncommon because GCC upstream hasn't
switched the default yet (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR103398).
This patch add CLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX which allows distros to use default PIE.
The option is justified as its adoption can be very high among Linux distros
to make Clang default match GCC, and is likely a future-new-default, at which
point we will remove CLANG_DEFAULT_PIE_ON_LINUX.
The lit feature `default-pie-on-linux` can be handy to exclude default PIE sensitive tests.
Reviewed By: foutrelis, sylvestre.ledru, thesamesam
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113372
This reverts commit 2b554920f1.
This change causes tsan test timeout on x86_64-linux-autoconf.
The timeout can be reproduced by:
git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg.git
BUILDBOT_CLOBBER= BUILDBOT_REVISION=eef8f3f85679c5b1ae725bade1c23ab7bb6b924f llvm-zorg/zorg/buildbot/builders/sanitizers/buildbot_standard.sh
I found that the coroutine intrinsic llvm.coro.param in documentation
(https://llvm.org/docs/Coroutines.html#id101) didn't get used actually
since there isn't lowering codes in LLVM. I also checked the
implementation of libstdc++ and libc++. Both of them didn't use
llvm.coro.param. So I am pretty sure that the llvm.coro.param intrinsic
is unused. I think it would be better t to remove it to avoid possible
misleading understandings.
Note: according to [class.copy.elision]/p1.3, this optimization is
allowed by the C++ language specification. Let's make it someday.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115222
Some users have a need to control attribute extension diagnostics
independent of other extension diagnostics. Consider something like use
of [[nodiscard]] within C++11:
```
[[nodiscard]]
int f();
```
If compiled with -Wc++17-extensions enabled, this will produce warning:
use of the 'nodiscard' attribute is a C++17 extension. This diagnostic
is correct -- using [[nodiscard]] in C++11 mode is a C++17 extension.
And the behavior of __has_cpp_attribute(nodiscard) is also correct --
we support [[nodiscard]] in C++11 mode as a conforming extension. But
this makes use of -Werror or -pedantic-errors` builds more onerous.
This patch adds diagnostic groups for attribute extensions so that
users can selectively disable attribute extension diagnostics. I
believe this is preferable to requiring users to specify additional
flags because it means -Wc++17-extensions continues to be the way we
enable all C++17-related extension diagnostics. It would be quite easy
for someone to use that flag thinking they're protected from some
portability issues without realizing it skipped attribute extensions if
we went the other way.
This addresses PR33518.
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
This documentation supports the dataflow analysis framework (see "[RFC]
A dataflow analysis framework for Clang AST" on cfe-dev).
Since the implementation of the framework has not been committed yet,
right now the doc describes dataflow analysis in general.
Since this is the first markdown document in clang/docs, I added support
for Markdown to clang/docs/conf.py in the same way as it is done in
llvm/docs.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114231
Updates the return types of these matchers' definitions to use
`internal::Matcher<LambdaCapture>` instead of `LambdaCaptureMatcher`. This
ensures that they are categorized as traversal matchers, instead of narrowing
matchers.
Reviewed By: ymandel, tdl-g, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114809
Responding to a Discord call to help {D113977} and heavily inspired by the unlanded {D34225} add some support to help coroutinues from not being formatted from
```for co_await(auto elt : seq)```
to
```
for
co_await(auto elt : seq)
```
Because of the dominance of clang-format in the C++ community, I don't think we should make it the blocker that prevents users from embracing the newer parts of the standard because we butcher the layout of some of the new constucts.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, Quuxplusone, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114859
Allow toggling of -fnew-infallible so last instance takes precedence
Testing:
ninja check-all
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113523
Checker alpha.security.taint.TaintPropagation now has user documentation for
taint analysis with an example showing external YAML configuration format.
The format of the taint configuration file is now documented under the user
documentation of Clang SA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113251
This doc lists ways of getting compilation databases out of some popular build systems for use with clangd and other tooling.
We built such a way for Bazel and just released it after a bunch of requests on GitHub. Thought I should propose that we add a link to help people find it and use clang tooling.
(This is my first revision submitted via LLVM Phabricator, so if I've messed something up, I'd really appreciate your help and patience. Asking for a review from Sam McCall, because I've had a great time working with him elsewhere on GitHub before and because I saw him in the Git history for this file.)
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114213
Whilst the % clang-formatted remains the same, the number
of files added to the LLVM project has risen by almost by 259.
- 190 of them have been added clang-format clean.
- 69 files have been added unformatted. (lit tests should be excluded from this number)
- 291 files have been added to the list of files that are clang-format clean
- 101 files have either become unclean or have been removed
As this updates the clang-formatted-files there are now
8139 files that are clean which we can be used as a regression test when making changes to clang-format.
```
clang-format -verbose -n -files ./clang/docs/tools/clang-formatted-files.txt
```
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52517
clang-format is butchering modules, this could easily become a barrier to entry for modules given clang-formats wide spread use.
Prevent the following from adding spaces around the `:` (cf was considering the ':' as an InheritanceColon)
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114151
From GCC's manpage:
-fplugin-arg-name-key=value
Define an argument called key with a value of value for the
plugin called name.
Since we don't have a key-value pair similar to gcc's plugin_argument
struct, simply accept key=value here anyway and pass it along as-is to
plugins.
This translates to the already existing '-plugin-arg-pluginname arg'
that clang cc1 accepts.
There is an ambiguity here because in clang, both the plugin name
as well as the option name can contain dashes, so when e.g. passing
-fplugin-arg-foo-bar-foo
it is not clear whether the plugin is foo-bar and the option is foo,
or the plugin is foo and the option is bar-foo. GCC solves this by
interpreting all dashes as part of the option name. So dashes can't be
part of the plugin name in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113250
Eachempati.
This patch adds clang (parsing, sema, serialization, codegen) support for the 'depend' clause on the 'taskwait' directive.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113540
Operations are emulated by software emulation and “float” instructions.
This patch is allowing the support of _Float16 type without the use of
-max512fp16 flag. The final goal being, perform _Float16 emulation for
all arithmetic expressions.
Let's describe accurately what the users can expect from the checker in
a direct way.
Also, add an example warning message.
Reviewed By: martong, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113401
There was some confusion during the discussion of a patch as to whether
`any` can be used to blast an attribute with no subject list onto
basically everything in a program by not specifying a subrule. This
patch adds documentation and tests to make it clear that this situation
is not supported and will be diagnosed.
