* set_symbol_name, get_symbol_name, set_visibility, get_visibility, replace_all_symbol_uses, walk_symbol_tables
* In integrations I've been doing, I've been reaching for all of these to do both general IR manipulation and module merging.
* I don't love the replace_all_symbol_uses underlying APIs since they necessitate SYMBOL_COUNT walks and have various sharp edges. I'm hoping that whatever emerges eventually for this can still retain this simple API as a one-shot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114687
NamedAttribute is currently represented as an std::pair, but this
creates an extremely clunky .first/.second API. This commit
converts it to a class, with better accessors (getName/getValue)
and also opens the door for more convenient API in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113956
The current implementation is quite clunky; OperationName stores either an Identifier
or an AbstractOperation that corresponds to an operation. This has several problems:
* OperationNames created before and after an operation are registered are different
* Accessing the identifier name/dialect/etc. from an OperationName are overly branchy
- they need to dyn_cast a PointerUnion to check the state
This commit refactors this such that we create a single information struct for every
operation name, even operations that aren't registered yet. When an OperationName is
created for an unregistered operation, we only populate the name field. When the
operation is registered, we populate the remaining fields. With this we now have two
new classes: OperationName and RegisteredOperationName. These both point to the
same underlying operation information struct, but only RegisteredOperationName can
assume that the operation is actually registered. This leads to a much cleaner API, and
we can also move some AbstractOperation functionality directly to OperationName.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114049
Per discussion on discord and various feature requests across bindings (Haskell and Rust bindings authors have asked me directly), we should be building a link-ready MLIR-C dylib which exports the C API and can be used without linking to anything else.
This patch:
* Adds a new MLIR-C aggregate shared library (libMLIR-C.so), which is similar in name and function to libLLVM-C.so.
* It is guarded by the new CMake option MLIR_BUILD_MLIR_C_DYLIB, which has a similar purpose/name to the LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_C_DYLIB option.
* On all platforms, this will work with both static, BUILD_SHARED_LIBS, and libMLIR builds, if supported:
* In static builds: libMLIR-C.so will export the CAPI symbols and statically link all dependencies into itself.
* In BUILD_SHARED_LIBS: libMLIR-C.so will export the CAPI symbols and have dynamic dependencies on implementation shared libraries.
* In libMLIR.so mode: same as static. libMLIR.so was not finished for actual linking use within the project. An eventual relayering so that libMLIR-C.so depends on libMLIR.so is possible but requires first re-engineering the latter to use the aggregate facility.
* On Linux, exported symbols are filtered to only the CAPI. On others (MacOS, Windows), all symbols are exported. A CMake status is printed unless if global visibility is hidden indicating that this has not yet been implemented. The library should still work, but it will be larger and more likely to conflict until fixed. Someone should look at lifting the corresponding support from libLLVM-C.so and adapting. Or, for special uses, just build with `-DCMAKE_CXX_VISIBILITY_PRESET=hidden -DCMAKE_C_VISIBILITY_PRESET=hidden`.
* Includes fixes to execution engine symbol export macros to enable default visibility. Without this, the advice to use hidden visibility would have resulted in test failures and unusable execution engine support libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113731
Identifier and StringAttr essentially serve the same purpose, i.e. to hold a string value. Keeping these seemingly identical pieces of functionality separate has caused problems in certain situations:
* Identifier has nice accessors that StringAttr doesn't
* Identifier can't be used as an Attribute, meaning strings are often duplicated between Identifier/StringAttr (e.g. in PDL)
The only thing that Identifier has that StringAttr doesn't is support for caching a dialect that is referenced by the string (e.g. dialect.foo). This functionality is added to StringAttr, as this is useful for StringAttr in generally the same ways it was useful for Identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113536
Enables using the same iterator interface to these even though underlying storage is different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113512
There are several aspects of the API that either aren't easy to use, or are
deceptively easy to do the wrong thing. The main change of this commit
is to remove all of the `getValue<T>`/`getFlatValue<T>` from ElementsAttr
and instead provide operator[] methods on the ranges returned by
`getValues<T>`. This provides a much more convenient API for the value
ranges. It also removes the easy-to-be-inefficient nature of
getValue/getFlatValue, which under the hood would construct a new range for
the type `T`. Constructing a range is not necessarily cheap in all cases, and
could lead to very poor performance if used within a loop; i.e. if you were to
naively write something like:
```
DenseElementsAttr attr = ...;
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
// We are internally rebuilding the APFloat value range on each iteration!!
APFloat it = attr.getFlatValue<APFloat>(i);
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113229
- Provide the operator overloads for constructing (semi-)affine expressions in
Python by combining existing expressions with constants.
- Make AffineExpr, AffineMap and IntegerSet hashable in Python.
- Expose the AffineExpr composition functionality.
Reviewed By: gysit, aoyal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113010
Symbol tables are a largely useful top-level IR construct, for example, they
make it easy to access functions in a module by name instead of traversing the
list of module's operations to find the corresponding function.
Depends On D112886
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112821
Provide support for removing an operation from the block that contains it and
moving it back to detached state. This allows for the operation to be moved to
a different block, a common IR manipulation for, e.g., module merging.
Also fix a potential one-past-end iterator dereference in Operation::moveAfter
discovered in the process.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112700
The change is based on the proposal from the following discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-memreftype-affine-maps-list-vs-single-item/3968
* Introduce `MemRefLayoutAttr` interface to get `AffineMap` from an `Attribute`
(`AffineMapAttr` implements this interface).
* Store layout as a single generic `MemRefLayoutAttr`.
This change removes the affine map composition feature and related API.
Actually, while the `MemRefType` itself supported it, almost none of the upstream
can work with more than 1 affine map in `MemRefType`.
The introduced `MemRefLayoutAttr` allows to re-implement this feature
in a more stable way - via separate attribute class.
Also the interface allows to use different layout representations rather than affine maps.
For example, the described "stride + offset" form, which is currently supported in ASM parser only,
can now be expressed as separate attribute.
Reviewed By: ftynse, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111553
* This already half existed in terms of reading the raw buffer backing a DenseElementsAttr.
* Documented the precise expectations of the buffer layout.
* Extended the Python API to support construction from bitcasted buffers, allowing construction of all primitive element types (even those that lack a compatible representation in Python).
* Specifically, the Python API can now load all integer types at all bit widths and all floating point types (f16, f32, f64, bf16).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111284
Exposes mlir::TypeID to the C API as MlirTypeID along with various accessors
and helper functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110897
Currently DenseElementsAttr only exposes the ability to get the full range of values for a given type T, but there are many situations where we just want the beginning/end iterator. This revision adds proper value_begin/value_end methods for all of the supported T types, and also cleans up a bit of the interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104173
Add method to get NameLoc. Treat null child location as unknown to avoid
needing to create UnknownLoc in C API where child loc is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108678
* It is pretty clear that no one has tried this yet since it was both incomplete and broken.
* Fixes a symbol hiding issues keeping even the generic builder from constructing an operation with successors.
* Adds ODS support for successors.
* Adds CAPI `mlirBlockGetParentRegion`, `mlirRegionEqual` + tests (and missing test for `mlirBlockGetParentOperation`).
* Adds Python property: `Block.region`.
* Adds Python methods: `Block.create_before` and `Block.create_after`.
* Adds Python property: `InsertionPoint.block`.
* Adds new blocks.py test to verify a plausible CFG construction case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108898
SymbolRefAttr is fundamentally a base string plus a sequence
of nested references. Instead of storing the string data as
a copies StringRef, store it as an already-uniqued StringAttr.
This makes a lot of things simpler and more efficient because:
1) references to the symbol are already stored as StringAttr's:
there is no need to copy the string data into MLIRContext
multiple times.
2) This allows pointer comparisons instead of string
comparisons (or redundant uniquing) within SymbolTable.cpp.
3) This allows SymbolTable to hold a DenseMap instead of a
StringMap (which again copies the string data and slows
lookup).
This is a moderately invasive patch, so I kept a lot of
compatibility APIs around. It would be nice to explore changing
getName() to return a StringAttr for example (right now you have
to use getNameAttr()), and eliminate things like the StringRef
version of getSymbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108899
Extend the OpDSL with index attributes. After tensors and scalars, index attributes are the third operand type. An index attribute represents a compile-time constant that is limited to index expressions. A use cases are the strides and dilations defined by convolution and pooling operations.
The patch only updates the OpDSL. The C++ yaml codegen is updated by a followup patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104711
This is both more efficient and more ergonomic than going
through an std::string, e.g. when using llvm::utostr and
in string concat cases.
Unfortunately we can't just overload ::get(). This causes an
ambiguity because both twine and stringref implicitly convert
from std::string.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103754
Also, fix a small typo where the "unsigned" splat variants were not
being created with an unsigned type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102797
At the moment `MlirModule`s can be converted to `MlirOperation`s, but not
the other way around (at least not without going around the C API). This
makes it impossible to e.g. run passes over a `ModuleOp` created through
`mlirOperationCreate`.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102497
This adds `mlirOperationSetOperand` to the IR C API, similar to the
function to get an operand.
In the Python API, this adds `operands[index] = value` syntax, similar
to the syntax to get an operand with `operands[index]`.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101398
Expose the debug flag as a readable and assignable property of a
dedicated class instead of a write-only function. Actually test the fact
of setting the flag. Move test to a dedicated file, it has zero relation
to context_managers.py where it was added.
Arguably, it should be promoted from mlir.ir to mlir module, but we are
not re-exporting the latter and this functionality is purposefully
hidden so can stay in IR for now. Drop unnecessary export code.
Refactor C API and put Debug into a separate library, fix it to actually
set the flag to the given value.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100757
This CL introduces a generic attribute (called "encoding") on tensors.
The attribute currently does not carry any concrete information, but the type
system already correctly determines that tensor<8xi1,123> != tensor<8xi1,321>.
The attribute will be given meaning through an interface in subsequent CLs.
See ongoing discussion on discourse:
[RFC] Introduce a sparse tensor type to core MLIR
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-introduce-a-sparse-tensor-type-to-core-mlir/2944
A sparse tensor will look something like this:
```
// named alias with all properties we hold dear:
#CSR = {
// individual named attributes
}
// actual sparse tensor type:
tensor<?x?xf64, #CSR>
```
I see the following rough 5 step plan going forward:
(1) introduce this format attribute in this CL, currently still empty
(2) introduce attribute interface that gives it "meaning", focused on sparse in first phase
(3) rewrite sparse compiler to use new type, remove linalg interface and "glue"
(4) teach passes to deal with new attribute, by rejecting/asserting on non-empty attribute as simplest solution, or doing meaningful rewrite in the longer run
(5) add FE support, document, test, publicize new features, extend "format" meaning to other domains if useful
Reviewed By: stellaraccident, bondhugula
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99548
This revision tightens up the handling of attributes for both named
and generic linalg ops.
To demonstrate the IR validity, a working e2e Linalg example is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99430
Based on the following discussion:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-memref-memory-shape-as-attribute/2229
The goal of the change is to make memory space property to have more
expressive representation, rather then "magic" integer values.
It will allow to have more clean ASM form:
```
gpu.func @test(%arg0: memref<100xf32, "workgroup">)
// instead of
gpu.func @test(%arg0: memref<100xf32, 3>)
```
Explanation for `Attribute` choice instead of plain `string`:
* `Attribute` classes allow to use more type safe API based on RTTI.
* `Attribute` classes provides faster comparison operator based on
pointer comparison in contrast to generic string comparison.
* `Attribute` allows to store more complex things, like structs or dictionaries.
It will allows to have more complex memory space hierarchy.
This commit preserve old integer-based API and implements it on top
of the new one.
Depends on D97476
Reviewed By: rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96145
Just a pure method renaming.
It is a preparation step for replacing "memory space as raw integer"
with more generic "memory space as attribute", which will be done in
separate commit.
The `MemRefType::getMemorySpace` method will return `Attribute` and
become the main API, while `getMemorySpaceAsInt` will be declared as
deprecated and will be replaced in all in-tree dialects (also in separate
commits).
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97476
This also exposed a bug in Dialect loading where it was not correctly identifying identifiers that had the dialect namespace as a prefix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97431
`verifyConstructionInvariants` is intended to allow for verifying the invariants of an attribute/type on construction, and `getChecked` is intended to enable more graceful error handling aside from an assert. There are a few problems with the current implementation of these methods:
* `verifyConstructionInvariants` requires an mlir::Location for emitting errors, which is prohibitively costly in the situations that would most likely use them, e.g. the parser.
This creates an unfortunate code duplication between the verifier code and the parser code, given that the parser operates on llvm::SMLoc and it is an undesirable overhead to pre-emptively convert from that to an mlir::Location.
* `getChecked` effectively requires duplicating the definition of the `get` method, creating a quite clunky workflow due to the subtle different in its signature.
This revision aims to talk the above problems by refactoring the implementation to use a callback for error emission. Using a callback allows for deferring the costly part of error emission until it is actually necessary.
Due to the necessary signature change in each instance of these methods, this revision also takes this opportunity to cleanup the definition of these methods by:
* restructuring the signature of `getChecked` such that it can be generated from the same code block as the `get` method.
* renaming `verifyConstructionInvariants` to `verify` to match the naming scheme of the rest of the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97100
These properties were useful for a few things before traits had a better integration story, but don't really carry their weight well these days. Most of these properties are already checked via traits in most of the code. It is better to align the system around traits, and improve the performance/cost of traits in general.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96088
Replace MlirDialectRegistrationHooks with MlirDialectHandle, which under-the-hood is an opaque pointer to MlirDialectRegistrationHooks. Then we expose the functionality previously directly on MlirDialectRegistrationHooks, as functions which take the opaque MlirDialectHandle struct. This makes the actual structure of the registration hooks an implementation detail, and happens to avoid this issue: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/strange-swift-issues-with-dialect-registration-hooks/2759/3
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96229
This reverts commit 511dd4f438 along with
a couple fixes.
Original message:
Now the context is the first, rather than the last input.
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure and makes
it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96111
Now the context is the first, rather than the last input.
This better matches the rest of the infrastructure and makes
it easier to move these types to being declaratively specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96111
* Adds a flag to MlirOperationState to enable result type inference using the InferTypeOpInterface.
* I chose this level of implementation for a couple of reasons:
a) In the creation flow is naturally where generated and custom builder code will be invoking such a thing
b) it is a bit more efficient to share the data structure and unpacking vs having a standalone entry-point
c) we can always decide to expose more of these interfaces with first-class APIs, but that doesn't preclude that we will always want to use this one in this way (and less API surface area for common things is better for API stability and evolution).
* I struggled to find an appropriate way to test it since we don't link the test dialect into anything CAPI accessible at present. I opted instead for one of the simplest ops I found in a regular dialect which implements the interface.
* This does not do any trait-based type selection. That will be left to generated tablegen wrappers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95283
This wasn't possible before because there was no support for affine expressions
as maps. Now that this support is available, provide the mechanism for
constructing maps with a layout and inspecting it.
Rework the `get` method on MemRefType in Python to avoid needing an explicit
memory space or layout map. Remove the `get_num_maps`, it is too low-level,
using the length of the now-avaiable pseudo-list of layout maps is more
pythonic.
Depends On D94297
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94302
