d35bf17e8a
Implicit bindings will cause very confusing crashes in the backend at present, so this is intended at least partially as a stop gap until we get them implemented (see #110722). However, I do think that this is useful in the longer term as well as an off-by-default warning, as it is quite easy to miss a binding or two when using explicit bindings and the results of that can be surprisingly hard to debug. I've filed #135907 to track turning this into an off-by-default warning or removing it eventually as we see fit.
21 lines
1.0 KiB
HLSL
21 lines
1.0 KiB
HLSL
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -o - %s -verify
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+1{{'is_rov' attribute cannot be applied to a declaration}}
|
|
[[hlsl::is_rov]] __hlsl_resource_t res0;
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+1{{HLSL resource needs to have [[hlsl::resource_class()]] attribute}}
|
|
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::is_rov]] res1;
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+1{{'is_rov' attribute takes no arguments}}
|
|
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]] [[hlsl::is_rov(3)]] res2;
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'gibberish'}}
|
|
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]] [[hlsl::is_rov(gibberish)]] res3;
|
|
|
|
// expected-warning@+1{{attribute 'is_rov' is already applied}}
|
|
__hlsl_resource_t [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]] [[hlsl::is_rov]] [[hlsl::is_rov]] res4;
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+2{{attribute 'resource_class' can be used only on HLSL intangible type '__hlsl_resource_t'}}
|
|
// expected-error@+1{{attribute 'is_rov' can be used only on HLSL intangible type '__hlsl_resource_t'}}
|
|
float [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]] [[hlsl::is_rov]] res5;
|